> Am 02.05.2015 um 21:01 schrieb Thomas Cameron
> :
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I am trying to help a buddy set up a simple web site for a small
> landscaping business. I'm going to run it on a Fedora 21 VM on Digital
> Ocean (I love them, by the way).
>
> I will se
On 03/05/15 19:24, Peter Boy wrote:
Am 02.05.2015 um 21:01 schrieb Thomas Cameron :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am trying to help a buddy set up a simple web site for a small
landscaping business. I'm going to run it on a Fedora 21 VM on Digital
Ocean (I love them, by the wa
Hi all,
Sorry for reviving a thread from the past, but I have a very similar
problem: my Current_Pending_Sector value is 2, and I get notifications
about it. I'm wondering whether I should replace the drive. What is
strange, though, is that when I run a long self-test (smartctl -t long
/dev/sdc),
On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 14:01 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> I'd like to make sure it's dead-bang easy for him to upload pictures
> and the like when his company finishes a new project.
If they're only going to upload graphics (photos, product shots with
prices superimposed, pictures saying "sale on
I just tried upgrade my F19/i686 PC to F21/i686, but I'm frustrated:
- (bigger harm) Why hasn't Fedora alternative (upstart/openrc) init?
In F14- times all things worked for me flawlessly, was not problem
for me create init script for new (Fedora unsupported) services, was
not problem for me creat
On 05/03/2015 05:40 AM, MegaBrutal wrote:
Sorry for reviving a thread from the past, but I have a very similar
problem: my Current_Pending_Sector value is 2, and I get notifications
about it. I'm wondering whether I should replace the drive. What is
strange, though, is that when I run a long self
On Sun, 3 May 2015 12:40:48 +0200
MegaBrutal wrote:
> I'm wondering whether I should replace the drive. What is
> strange, though, is that when I run a long self-test (smartctl -t long
> /dev/sdc), it reports „Completed without error”.
I tried to make this go away on my drive by spending ages
wri
On Sun, 03 May 2015 14:04:37 +0200
Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> - (smaller harm) Why hasn't systemd option to run without journald?
See "Tip 3" in:
http://home.comcast.net/~tomhorsley/game/systemd.html
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription optio
Hello,
After I run
grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
grub2-install /dev/sda
I was unable to boot:
dracut
failed to create symbolic link
/dev/resume: file exists
This is thepart of the grub.cfg fails
menuentry 'Fedora, with Linux 3.19.5-100.fc20.x86_64' --class fedora --clas
From what I recall from the discussion on this thread,
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2013-December/443871.html
you are supposed to edit /etc/sysconfig/grub. Did you do that?
Ranjan
On Sun, 3 May 2015 15:59:00 +0200 Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After I run
> gru
On Sun, 03 May 2015 14:04:37 +0200
Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>
> - (bigger harm) Why hasn't Fedora alternative (upstart/openrc) init?
Umm, because everyone is happy with systemd? :-)
If you want Fedora to have an alternative init, roll up your sleeves
and dig in, make it happen! ;-)
:-)
Marko
On Sun, 3 May 2015 15:45:36 +0100
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Umm, because everyone is happy with systemd? :-)
Not the slightest possibility that is true. I have a more
likely reason for the universal adoption of systemd:
http://home.comcast.net/~tomhorsley/game/selection.html
--
users mailing lis
Am 03.05.2015 um 15:59 schrieb Patrick Dupre:
Hello,
After I run
grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
grub2-install /dev/sda
First thought: Shouldn't these two commands be interchanged?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription o
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Sun, 03 May 2015 14:04:37 +0200
> Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>>
>> - (bigger harm) Why hasn't Fedora alternative (upstart/openrc) init?
>
> Umm, because everyone is happy with systemd? :-)
>
> If you want Fedora to have an alternative init, roll up your sleeves
> and di
Hi
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 2015 15:45:36 +0100
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> > Umm, because everyone is happy with systemd? :-)
>
> Not the slightest possibility that is true. I have a more
> likely reason for the universal adoption of systemd:
>
> http:
On Sun, 3 May 2015 10:57:55 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 2015 15:45:36 +0100
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> > Umm, because everyone is happy with systemd? :-)
>
> Not the slightest possibility that is true. I have a more
> likely reason for the universal adoption of systemd:
>
> http
On Sun, 03 May 2015 17:33:53 +0200
Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > On Sun, 03 May 2015 14:04:37 +0200
> > Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> >>
> >> - (bigger harm) Why hasn't Fedora alternative (upstart/openrc)
> >> init?
> >
> > Umm, because everyone is happy with systemd? :-)
>
I got this from the freebsd mailing list to which I am subscribed.
Has anyone else seen this: Unnoticed for years, malware turned Linux and
BSD servers into spamming machines
http://www.net-security.org/malware_new
On 05/03/2015 11:02 AM, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
> Am 03.05.2015 um 15:59 schrieb Patrick Dupre:
>> Hello,
>>
>> After I run
>> grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
>> grub2-install /dev/sda
> First thought: Shouldn't these two commands be interchanged?
no, you run the mkconfig FIRST, t
> Hello,
>
> After I run
> grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
> grub2-install /dev/sda
>
> I was unable to boot:
> dracut
> failed to create symbolic link
> /dev/resume: file exists
when that happens to me, I have a boot repair CD that I use to remake
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 2015 15:45:36 +0100
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
>> Umm, because everyone is happy with systemd? :-)
>
> Not the slightest possibility that is true. I have a more
> likely reason for the universal adoption of systemd:
>
> http://home.comcast.net/~tomhorsley/game/
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 May 2015 15:45:36 +0100
> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> > Umm, because everyone is happy with systemd? :-)
>
> Not the slightest possibility that is true. I have a more
> likely rea
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Sun, 03 May 2015 17:33:53 +0200
> Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>
>> Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>>> On Sun, 03 May 2015 14:04:37 +0200
>>> Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
- (bigger harm) Why hasn't Fedora alternative (upstart/openrc)
init?
>>>
>>> Umm, because everyone
HI
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> Rahul, I'm not sure what you're talking about, sorry for my narrow
> english knowledge.
> Despite of that, although I know that systemd fans talk how is its
> documentations exhaustive (best/ideal/...), it isn't truth
I disagree wi
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> HI
>
> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>
> Rahul, I'm not sure what you're talking about, sorry for my narrow
> english knowledge.
> Despite of that, although I know that systemd fans talk how is its
> documentations exhaustive (be
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 04/16/2015 07:19 AM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>> I'm looking for Fedora 20 dkim-milter package (which was in F19 and
>> lower), but it seems as it isn't available - probably not even in
>> the F21). Know anyone?
>
> It was retired. You should switch to opendkim.
>
On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 15:59 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After I run
> grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
> grub2-install /dev/sda
Why not just try...
1 - grub2-mkconfig
2 - grub2-install /dev/sda
Unless your using specific config files and such, it will do the work
On 05/03/2015 02:37 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
1 - grub2-mkconfig
2 - grub2-install /dev/sda
Doing that would just output the new config to the screen. If you want
the new config to be saved, you must use -o $FULLYQUALIFIEDFILENAME to
store it in the right place.
--
users mailing list
users@l
On 05/03/2015 05:04 AM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
- (bigger harm) Why hasn't Fedora alternative (upstart/openrc) init?
...
When systemd presents itself as compatible with sysvinit, then IMO
having alternative init in Fedora should not be too big problem.
Systemd is backward-compatible with SysV
First of all, supporting multiple init systems is not something a distro wants
to do.
It would involve forcing package maintainers to support them when getting
enough package maintainers is a problem already.
The alternative is to create a respin with another init system and its own
builds of
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 05/03/2015 05:04 AM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>> - (bigger harm) Why hasn't Fedora alternative (upstart/openrc) init?
>> ...
>> When systemd presents itself as compatible with sysvinit, then IMO
>> having alternative init in Fedora should not be too big problem.
>
> Syst
As unprivileged user, I run locate
and get
$ locate file_3.mp3
locate: can not open `/var/lib/mlocate/mlocate.db': Permission denied
I always end up running sudo to change the perms so unpriv'ed
users can run locate.
What command should I run so the mlocate.db file is readable
by unpriv'ed user
On 05/04/15 07:14, jd1008 wrote:
> As unprivileged user, I run locate
> and get
> $ locate file_3.mp3
> locate: can not open `/var/lib/mlocate/mlocate.db': Permission denied
>
> I always end up running sudo to change the perms so unpriv'ed
> users can run locate.
>
> What command should I run so t
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 05/04/15 07:14, jd1008 wrote:
>> As unprivileged user, I run locate
>> and get
>> $ locate file_3.mp3
>> locate: can not open `/var/lib/mlocate/mlocate.db': Permission denied
>>
>> I always end up running sudo to change the perms so unpriv'ed
>> users can run locate.
>>
>> W
On 05/03/2015 05:25 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/04/15 07:14, jd1008 wrote:
As unprivileged user, I run locate
and get
$ locate file_3.mp3
locate: can not open `/var/lib/mlocate/mlocate.db': Permission denied
I always end up running sudo to change the perms so unpriv'ed
users can run locate.
birger wrote:
> First of all, supporting multiple init systems is not something a distro
> wants to do.
>
> It would involve forcing package maintainers to support them when getting
> enough package maintainers is a problem already.
>
> The alternative is to create a respin with another init syst
jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 05/03/2015 05:25 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 05/04/15 07:14, jd1008 wrote:
>>> As unprivileged user, I run locate
>>> and get
>>> $ locate file_3.mp3
>>> locate: can not open `/var/lib/mlocate/mlocate.db': Permission denied
>>>
>>> I always end up running sudo to change th
On 05/04/15 07:47, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 05/03/2015 05:25 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 05/04/15 07:14, jd1008 wrote:
>>> As unprivileged user, I run locate
>>> and get
>>> $ locate file_3.mp3
>>> locate: can not open `/var/lib/mlocate/mlocate.db': Permission denied
>>>
>>> I always end up running
Hi
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> Rahul, thanks to Your recommendation. But for wider angle, this isn't
> as so significant. I want a stable system on which I can rely on -
> and it now block systemd piece. And as I see for last 4 years of its
> evolving, it is still
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 01:48:57 +0200,
Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
Hmm, I guess You want advice me, to bought some strictly limited (maybe
commercial) OS - and then shut up and be satisfied with I have. But this
fortunately is not Linux case...
However it is very unlikely that Fedora will supp
On May 3, 2015 6:04 AM, "Frantisek Hanzlik" wrote:
>
> - (problem for me create init script for another network daemon
> instance running on different port etc.
> TIA, Franta Hanzlik
>
> --
>
I cut out the parts that didn't seem relevant to accomplishing what it
seems like you are trying to do.
Pete Travis wrote:
> I cut out the parts that didn't seem relevant to accomplishing what it
> seems like you are trying to do.
>
> Can you elaborate on what service, specifically, you want to listen on a
> different port, how you attempted to change it, and what happened when you
> did so?
Hi, it
I was checking on systemctl status and found some that were listed as
failed?
One was caused since the vboxdrv modules for 3.19.5 kernel were not being
installed by yum for some reason. They didn't show up in the list, but was
able to locate and manually install it to correct that error.
The ot
43 matches
Mail list logo
