Hi On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> Rahul, thanks to Your recommendation. But for wider angle, this isn't > as so significant. I want a stable system on which I can rely on - > and it now block systemd piece. And as I see for last 4 years of its > evolving, it is still totally buggy thing. I want alternative, as I > said before You are side stepping your own contention that systemd documentation is incomplete. If it wasn't significant, it is not clear, why you brought it up in the first place. If you want to package up an alternative and make sure it works well in Fedora, you are free to do that. It is far from trivial but it is possible https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers So far, absolutely noone who wants alternatives has stepped up to do any of the work involved. Rahul
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
