On 21.07.2014, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> what is it I am symlinking?? the actual kernel??
If you need to: the root directory of the kernel source.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/
On 22.07.2014, Joe Zeff wrote:
> If you really need to put it on a spare partition, you can always move
> everything there from /usr/src and then mount that partition at /usr/src and
> go from there.
And don't forget to take a look into /lib/modules and update the
(now) incorrect symlinks to the
Hi Amila,
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:42:23PM +0530, Amila Perera wrote:
> man()
> {
> env LESS_TERMCAP_mb=$'\E[01;31m' \
> LESS_TERMCAP_md=$'\E[01;34m' \
> LESS_TERMCAP_me=$'\E[0m' \
> LESS_TERMCAP_se=$'\E[0m' \
> LESS_TERMCAP_so=$'\E[01;33;40m' \
> LESS_TERMCAP_ue=$'\E[0m' \
> LESS_TERMCAP_us=$'\
On 07/22/2014 09:10 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi Amila,
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:42:23PM +0530, Amila Perera wrote:
>> man()
>> {
>> env LESS_TERMCAP_mb=$'\E[01;31m' \
>> LESS_TERMCAP_md=$'\E[01;34m' \
>> LESS_TERMCAP_me=$'\E[0m' \
>> LESS_TERMCAP_se=$'\E[0m' \
>> LESS_TERMCAP_so=$'\E[01;33;40
Thank you for your feedback.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Suvayu Ali
wrote:
> I tried with bash, it seems to work ... somewhat. I see a yellow status
> at the bottom, but otherwise I see a regular man page. When I `type
> man' after defining your function, I get a few colours among the v
On Jul 22 13:37, Amila Perera wrote:
> Thank you for your feedback.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Suvayu Ali
> wrote:
>
> > I tried with bash, it seems to work ... somewhat. I see a yellow status
> > at the bottom, but otherwise I see a regular man page. When I `type
> > man' after
Thanks a lot Corinna.
The following setting did the trick for me.
Now the output on Ubuntu & Fedora looks the same.
Thank you once again.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Try this additionally to setting the LESS_TERMCAP_xx vars:
>
> export GROFF_NO_SGR=yes
>
--
On 22/07/14 02:39, Peter Skensved wrote:
I've been using NFSv4 extensively for several years and I've not had an issue
that you
describe where everything is fine and then suddenly performance goes to hell in
a hand basket.
It sounds as if you only have 2 systems to work with? No, tiebreaker
On Jul 22 14:43, Amila Perera wrote:
> Thanks a lot Corinna.
>
> The following setting did the trick for me.
> Now the output on Ubuntu & Fedora looks the same.
>
> Thank you once again.
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > Try this additionally to setting the LES
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> $ man -Hlynx less
It's the first time I ever used such thing.
It looks quite good, especially the hyperlinks etc.
Thank you for the information
--
*Amila Perera.*
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
On 21/07/14 21:27, Ed Greshko wrote:
For all intents and purpose it looks like its working as it should, it's just
painfully slow.
Any NFS gurus out there, that can tell me what I'm doing wrong?
I've been using NFSv4 extensively for several years and I've not had an issue
that you describe
On 21/07/14 20:14, Tom Horsley wrote:
Any NFS gurus out there, that can tell me what I'm doing wrong?
Not a useful answer, I'm afraid:
In my experience, the fundamental problem is caused by using NFS.
With all the folks re-writing things that don't need to be replaced,
I really wonder why no
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Paul Cartwright
wrote:
> is there some command I don't know about that will let you swap to the
> latest kernel without rebooting?
>
What problems one could face if I were to not reboot my system for a while
and let it update a few kernel versions?
--
Regards,
Why doesn't system respect FSH? What is its benefit?
Cite man 7 hier
..
/usr/lib
Object libraries, including dynamic libraries, plus some
executables which usually are not invoked directly. More complicated
pro‐
grams may have whole subdirectories there.
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:56:00 +0530
Sudhir Khanger wrote:
>
> What problems one could face if I were to not reboot my system for a
> while and let it update a few kernel versions?
Well, for example, a kernel update might be due to some new severe
security exploit, and the old kernel might be vuln
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:26:57 +0100
Balint Szigeti wrote:
> Why doesn't system respect FSH? What is its benefit?
[snip]
> I think, the config files should store in /etc instead of everywhere
> else. The chroot applications are exceptions. It cause we MUST
> mount /usr in / (root) partion.
The _Ne
On 07/22/2014 02:42 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Whether this is FSH-compliant or not, I don't know. Some people say it
is, some people say it is not, most of the people don't really care. :-)
The difference is:
Files outside of /etc are not supposed to modified by users or admins.
I.e. shippin
Hello,
Is it normal that /usr/bin/python -Es /usr/sbin/setroublehootd -f (2 shells)
consumes 8 GO of RAM (i.e. 49% and 46% of the total)?
Thank.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
> A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
> files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr is
> broken by design.
pls don't start it.
I could find anything else. The only reason I've found systemd because I
worked with it nowadays.
--
users
On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 13:25 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> In theory, for each kernel update you could look at the changelog to
> see what was actually updated and why, and then decide if you need to
> run the updated kernel or not. But most people typically don't want to
> invest the time and eff
On 07/22/2014 12:16 AM, Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 12:34 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have considerable routing and addressing knowledge. Besides being
one of the authors of rfc 1918, and worked on CIDR, here at IETF I
contribute to ipv6ops and ipv6man.
Sorry, didn't mean to impune
On 07/22/2014 12:35 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/21/14 22:55, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a headless system that I cannot connect to. So I was thinking to put a
direct connection to it and my notebook. Both ethernets would use the zeroconf
(169.254.0.0/16) addresses. I could then use fpi
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is a mess now
> with scripts for each wifi connection and I can't find any for my ethernet
> adapter.
Well, "ip link" will/should give a list of links.
I use network-manager, as I have no
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is a mess now
with scripts for each wifi connection and I can't find any for my ethernet
adapter.
Well, "ip link" will/should give a list of link
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is a mess now
>>> with scripts for each wifi connection and I can't find any for my ethernet
>>>
On 07/22/14 00:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Crossover cable. Is that enough of a 'same network'?
FWIW, I've not seen the need to use crossover cables in years. Even when
connected peer-to-peer the HW is now capable to detect this situation and auto
configure itself using standard cables.
--
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is a mess now
with scripts for each wifi connection and I ca
On Jul 22 22:19, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/22/14 00:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> > Crossover cable. Is that enough of a 'same network'?
>
> FWIW, I've not seen the need to use crossover cables in years. Even
> when connected peer-to-peer the HW is now capable to detect this
> situation and aut
On 07/22/14 22:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 22 22:19, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 07/22/14 00:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> Crossover cable. Is that enough of a 'same network'?
>> FWIW, I've not seen the need to use crossover cables in years. Even
>> when connected peer-to-peer the HW is n
On 07/22/2014 10:19 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 00:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Crossover cable. Is that enough of a 'same network'?
FWIW, I've not seen the need to use crossover cables in years. Even when
connected peer-to-peer the HW is now capable to detect this situation and auto
On 07/22/14 22:43, poma wrote:
> file /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf
> /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf: symbolic link to
> `/etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/keyfile-plugin.conf'
>
> # cat /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/keyfile-plugin.conf
> [main]
> plugins=keyfile
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ fi
On 07/22/14 22:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
>> Do you have access to the system to use the GUI tools of network manager?
>> (I'm assuming you are using nm).
>>
>>
> I cannot see anyplace to specify use zeroconf if no dhcp.
>
> This is gnome3 on F20...
>
>
>
I don't regularly use gnome. KDE
On 07/22/2014 10:27 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 22 22:19, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 00:34, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Crossover cable. Is that enough of a 'same network'?
FWIW, I've not seen the need to use crossover cables in years. Even
when connected peer-to-peer the HW is now ca
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is a mess now
On 07/22/2014 10:40 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 22:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Do you have access to the system to use the GUI tools of network manager?
(I'm assuming you are using nm).
I cannot see anyplace to specify use zeroconf if no dhcp.
This is gnome3 on F20...
I don't
On 07/22/2014 10:43 AM, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now? /etc/sysco
On 07/22/14 22:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I don't want a permanent change. If no DHCP, I want zeroconf. If DHCP use
> it. This option does not seem to be available.
Oh, I've never seen a case where you could have a "fall back" position.
--
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladl
On 22.07.2014 16:43, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But what file is this in now? /etc/sysconf
On 22.07.2014 16:57, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 10:43 AM, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz w
On 07/22/2014 10:49 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 22:43, poma wrote:
file /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf
/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf: symbolic link to
`/etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/keyfile-plugin.conf'
# cat /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/keyfile-plugin.conf
[main]
plugins=
On 07/22/2014 10:54 AM, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:43, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:22, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But wh
On 07/22/2014 10:55 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 22:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't want a permanent change. If no DHCP, I want zeroconf. If DHCP use it.
This option does not seem to be available.
Oh, I've never seen a case where you could have a "fall back" position.
This is wha
On 22.07.2014 17:27, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 10:54 AM, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:43, poma wrote:
On 22.07.2014 16:24, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 21:49, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 09:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On
OK. New day, new testing. I can get IPv4 setup quickly and routing
right. Yeah me (with a little help from my friends I got by)!
So I go to start vncserver where I was up to yesterday where I got the
display wrong and get:
# systemctl start vncserver@:3.service
Job for vncserver@:3.service
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:03:39 +0200
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
> files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr
> is broken by design.
Agreed, but I don't seem to fully understand your point here. Are you
sug
On 07/22/14 23:32, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 07/22/2014 10:55 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 07/22/14 22:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> I don't want a permanent change. If no DHCP, I want zeroconf. If DHCP use
>>> it. This option does not seem to be available.
>> Oh, I've never seen a case w
On 07/22/2014 01:25 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 23:32, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/22/2014 10:55 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/22/14 22:52, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't want a permanent change. If no DHCP, I want zeroconf. If DHCP use it.
This option does not seem to be available
Ralf Corsepius writes:
> A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
> files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr
> is broken by design.
Both python and perl come with mechanisms to add their respective
native packages under /usr/lib/... Do you c
Hi, thanks for help,
>> I installed a color profile for my LCD monitor.
>
> Where did it come from?
I measured it with a colorimeter using argyllcms.
> What do you get for?
> colormgr get-devices
...
Object Path:
/org/freedesktop/ColorManager/devices/xrandr_Chi_Mei_Optoelectronics_corp__fred
Hi
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Anders Wegge Kelle wrote:
> Ralf Corsepius writes:
>
> > A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
> > files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr
> > is broken by design.
>
> Both python and perl come with me
On 07/22/2014 12:26 PM, Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
Ralf Corsepius writes:
A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr
is broken by design.
Both python and perl come with mechanisms to add their resp
Hello,
I have 2 machines running fedora 20, one from 2007 with a dual processor
and 3 Go, and a recent one (2013) with a quad processor an 8 Go.
But it is a lot more convenient to use the old machine!!!
The recent one is always busy, 4 processors running
53.1 55.9 /usr/bin/python -Es /usr/sbin/set
On 07/23/14 01:41, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> If I go back far enough with my linux testing, I remember zeroconf working.
> Or at least I think so; am going back quite a while. Probably before adding
> avahi.
Now that you mention it, you are most probably right. I recall there always
being a
Joe Zeff writes:
> On 07/22/2014 12:26 PM, Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
> > Ralf Corsepius writes:
> >
> >> A package, which does not provide a means to override configuration
> >> files from below /etc, or requires users to modify files below /usr
> >> is broken by design.
> >
> > Both python a
On 07/23/14 01:02, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> OK. New day, new testing. I can get IPv4 setup quickly and routing right.
> Yeah me (with a little help from my friends I got by)!
>
> So I go to start vncserver where I was up to yesterday where I got the
> display wrong and get:
>
> # systemctl st
> I don't know, and don't want to know what Flock is and I don't want to
> register for it. Please UNSUBSCRIBE me!
Who wouldn't want to go to Flock?
--
Steven Rosenberg
http://stevenrosenberg.net/blog
http://blogs.dailynews.com/click
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
On 22 Jul 2014 at 13:02, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Date sent: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:02:02 -0400
From: Robert Moskowitz
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject:vncserver not starting today
Send reply to: Community sup
On 07/22/2014 01:23 PM, Patrick Dupre issued this missive:
Hello,
I have 2 machines running fedora 20, one from 2007 with a dual processor
and 3 Go, and a recent one (2013) with a quad processor an 8 Go.
But it is a lot more convenient to use the old machine!!!
The recent one is always busy, 4 p
Couple of things seem to have gone awry.
I think Ubuntu update to 14.04 has messed around with Fedora 20 grub
boot because booting now takes for ever and defaults to Ctrl D to
Continue or root password for maintenance, then takes 30-50 seconds to boot.
2nd, With the latest updates and kern
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Roger wrote:
> Couple of things seem to have gone awry.
>
> I think Ubuntu update to 14.04 has messed around with Fedora 20 grub boot
> because booting now takes for ever and defaults to Ctrl D to Continue or
> root password for maintenance, then takes 30-50 sec
On 07/22/14 04:55, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 22 13:37, Amila Perera wrote:
>> Thank you for your feedback.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Suvayu Ali
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I tried with bash, it seems to work ... somewhat. I see a yellow status
>>> at the bottom, but otherwise I see a
On Tuesday 22 July 2014 12:14 PM, Amila Perera wrote:
Thank you Jatin.
I knew 'most' would work.
It is able to display colours as well.
But I am used to 'less' and its key bindings.
I am quite puzzled as why the termcap settings for less don't work in
Fedora20.
Do you have any explanations?
On 07/22/2014 06:55 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014 at 13:02, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Date sent: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:02:02 -0400
From: Robert Moskowitz
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject:vncserver no
OK. I believe I figured out what is wrongish.
I normally run gnome, so in my ~/.vnc/xstartup I have:
exec gnome-session &
as the last line. But this fedora 20 arm system is running Xfce! So
after a quick google search, I changed that to:
exec xfce4-session &
But still I get vnc having a b
On 23 Jul 2014 at 1:47, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 01:47:37 -0400
From: Robert Moskowitz
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject:vnc not into gnome but Xfce but still not working
Send reply to:
On 07/23/14 13:47, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> OK. I believe I figured out what is wrongish.
>
> I normally run gnome, so in my ~/.vnc/xstartup I have:
>
> exec gnome-session &
>
> as the last line. But this fedora 20 arm system is running Xfce! So after a
> quick google search, I changed that to:
66 matches
Mail list logo
