On 29 September 2011 23:46, linux guy wrote:
>
> Is there an easy was to know if a disk is mounted and act accordingly or
> prevent data from being written to a mountpoint ?
Here is how I prevent data accidentally being written to a unmounted
mountpoint. You must first ensure that "/example/mount
On 09/29/2011 10:45 AM, Joe Wulf wrote:
> Interesting thread. :)
>
> I would like to know a bit more about your process for booting knoppix (which
> version/edition, too) and rsync'ing between the two
> partitions. Thanks.
>
>
> ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2011 08:14 PM, Kernel Guardian wrote:
> SELinux rules. Look into /var/log/messages and
> /var/log/audit/audit.log. at least in my case. chrome works well on
> F15.
>
>
> On 29 September 2011 19:05, jackson byers
> wrote:
>> $ uname -r 2.6.
I am trying to get both trackpoint and touchpad of the Lenovo
T520 UltraNav working, preferably at the same time as under Windows 7.
cat /proc/bus/input/devices shows:
- SynPS/2 Synaptics Touchpad
- TPPS/2 IBM Trackpoint
After install of F15 the trackpoint works but not the touchpad.
The scroll f
Hi folks,
I have compiled kernel 3.1 rc7 under Fedora 15.
Compiling the kernel drive me into a several question.
I tought that if I remove support for hardware that I wont use it would improve
performance (at least boot time ).
But booting from my new kernel (instead of the 'old' fedora ker
Hi Jo�o,
Please don't send HTML mail to the list - you can find the posting
guidelines here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
On 09/30/2011 01:55 PM, Jo�o Daniel Neves wrote:
> So I discovered that my initramfs file was to large. About 112 MB.
> Fedora intramfs is about 15Mb
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 20:15 -0700, jdow wrote:
> 1) Respect
>
> Writing software is not the slam dunk simple thing most people seem to
> think it to be based on their whining and carping. Please respect the
> effort. Dive in and try something simple yourself. A most interesting
> language is 2 yea
Speaking of which, what is a good way to compare the files in two
directories (recursively, of course) to ensure that they are exactly the
same ?
Something like diff for files ?
Thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admi
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 09:18:12 -0600,
linux guy wrote:
> Speaking of which, what is a good way to compare the files in two
> directories (recursively, of course) to ensure that they are exactly the
> same ?
>
> Something like diff for files ?
diff -rq
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedor
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 19:33, linux guy wrote:
> It turns out that the whole process can be done from within gparted, if you
> know what you are doing.
This exemplifies the problem with FOSS software and the "here's the
recipe on how to fix it" culture, . Don't get me wrong, I'm not
throwing bla
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:18 AM, linux guy wrote:
> Speaking of which, what is a good way to compare the files in two
> directories (recursively, of course) to ensure that they are exactly the
> same ?
>
> Something like diff for files ?
As opposed to diff for non files? :) I think you mean non
On 30 September 2011 16:32, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 19:33, linux guy wrote:
>> It turns out that the whole process can be done from within gparted, if you
>> know what you are doing.
>
> This exemplifies the problem with FOSS software and the "here's the
> recipe on how t
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 10:57 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
> As the title says, I'd like to reinstall fedora 15 with the netinstall
> image because it's about 100mb (kernel and initrd) instead of the
> install dvds. My problem is that those files located in
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/l
On 09/30/2011 08:32 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> a. A BUG REPORT ON FDISK is entered, so that:
> * It works correctly on drives bigger than 2TB, or
> * (interim solution) it displays a user-friendly message telling the user
> that for big drives as (the current drive size) gparted is
JB wrote:
> Frantisek Hanzlik hanzlici.cz> writes:
>
>> ...
>
> Just a wild guess if you want to try.
>
> Turn off ICMP redirect:
> # echo "0' > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/accept_redirects
> # echo "0" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/send_redirects
>
> Flush arp cache:
> # ip neigh flush all
>
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 14:25, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
> And, there'd be more progress if people filed bug reports instead of
> just ranting that somebody else shou
I was just making an observation, trying to influence people who DO
experience problems to actually FILE BUGS rather than just coming up
w
Lets be clear here. There isn't really a bug in fdisk. It just doesn't
handle any partition table types other than MSDOS. And MSDOS type partition
tables have the 2 TB limitation, not fdisk.
I don't blame developers for not updating fdisk. I think its an inferior
tool to parted (and gparted).
I file my fair share of bugs. Generally I like to post issues to discussion
groups (mailing lists) to be sure there is indeed an issue and that I am not
overlooking something.
Lets see where this discussion goes and then I/we can determine if it
warrants a bugzilla entry.
When I was working on t
As for the automount gpt issue, as far as I can tell, kernel support for gpt
is fairly new. I'm sure this issue will be address shortly, if it hasn't
been already.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On 09/30/2011 10:54 AM, linux guy wrote:
> Now... could fdisk (and gparted) be improved ? Absolutely.Here is how:
As we're discussing in a different thread, if you want this done, file a
feature request in Bugzilla.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or chang
On 09/30/2011 10:57 AM, linux guy wrote:
> I file my fair share of bugs. Generally I like to post issues to
> discussion groups (mailing lists) to be sure there is indeed an issue
> and that I am not overlooking something.
>
> Lets see where this discussion goes and then I/we can determine if it
>
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 14:54, linux guy wrote:
> Lets be clear here. There isn't really a bug in fdisk.
If it doesn't want the user about this, I consider it a bug. lack of
documentation and human-readable feedback is a bug. :)
Like you say, firing fdisk on a >2TB disk should give users SOME
On Sep 30, 2011, at 2:00 PM, linux guy wrote:
As for the automount gpt issue, as far as I can tell, kernel support
for gpt is fairly new. I'm sure this issue will be address shortly,
if it hasn't been already.
I've been using a GPT disk in my laptop for quite a while, F12 at
least, dual
Kernel Guardian wrote:
> On 29 September 2011 09:56, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
>
> How are you create rules? (maybe there is a problem?)
> what do you want to achieve with wifi* adsl table, load balancing or
> splitting access?
I tried create rules with Fedora convention - via appropriate files i
I don't know when this happened but unetbootin-linux-555 is now
available. This allows dozens of live Linux distributions to be
downloaded onto a USB stick. The new version includes Fedora 15. The yum
available unetbootin does not allow this.
You can download it from:
http://www.unetbootin.sou
I have a fedora 14 server here who's ethernet interface seems to take
just a bit too long to establish a link.
Whenever it starts it is inaccessible over the network, which is a real
pain for a server. I have to go over with the monitor and keyboard,
crawl under the desk...
When I try to restart
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Alexander Volovics
wrote:
> I am trying to get both trackpoint and touchpad of the Lenovo
> T520 UltraNav working, preferably at the same time as under Windows 7.
>
> cat /proc/bus/input/devices shows:
> - SynPS/2 Synaptics Touchpad
> - TPPS/2 IBM Trackpoint
>
> Af
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:32:59 -0500 Aaron Konstam
wrote:
> I don't know when this happened but unetbootin-linux-555 is now
> available. This allows dozens of live Linux distributions to be
> downloaded onto a USB stick. The new version includes Fedora 15. The yum
> available unetbootin does not
Frantisek Hanzlik hanzlici.cz> writes:
> ...
Suggestions:
1. use -R option to see routing (like ping plus traceroute in one)
Perhaps it will give you some clue about how it travels.
# ping -R -n -c 2 -I source_ip target_ip
# ping -R -n -c 2 -I source_if target_ip
You may try with
2011/9/30, Ranjan Maitra :
> It does not? Mine does. However, what it does not (and from the
> screenshots on the referred-to page still may not) provide is
> downloading other spins from Fedora such as LXDE, XFCE and the like.
What prevents you from downloading them yourself? Does unetbootin onl
Daniel J Walsh replied
>This is definitely something in SELinux. The current upstream google
>chrome is a little strange from an SELinux point of view. Have you
>tried chromium?
>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Chromium
well, no. Advice on this llist over last year or so is that
google-chro
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:32:59 -0500
Aaron Konstam wrote:
>>> snip
> This allowed me to download the latest Ubuntu version. I admit the
> interface as at leas as weird as Gnome 3.
If you like weird, take a look at Mandriva's KDE desktop. Their motto:
"You want stinkin' icons? We'll give you sti
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 13:51 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:32:59 -0500 Aaron Konstam
> wrote:
>
> > I don't know when this happened but unetbootin-linux-555 is now
> > available. This allows dozens of live Linux distributions to be
> > downloaded onto a USB stick. The new
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:25:18 -0500 Andras Simon
wrote:
> 2011/9/30, Ranjan Maitra :
>
> > It does not? Mine does. However, what it does not (and from the
> > screenshots on the referred-to page still may not) provide is
> > downloading other spins from Fedora such as LXDE, XFCE and the like.
>
On 09/30/2011 11:37 AM, Kevin H. Hobbs wrote:
> I have a fedora 14 server here who's ethernet interface seems to take
> just a bit too long to establish a link.
>
> Whenever it starts it is inaccessible over the network, which is a real
> pain for a server. I have to go over with the monitor and k
2011/9/30 David Lehman :
> On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 10:57 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
>> As the title says, I'd like to reinstall fedora 15 with the netinstall
>> image because it's about 100mb (kernel and initrd) instead of the
>> install dvds. My problem is that those files located in
>> http://download
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> On Sep 30, 2011, at 2:00 PM, linux guy wrote:
>
> As for the automount gpt issue, as far as I can tell, kernel support for
>> gpt is fairly new. I'm sure this issue will be address shortly, if it
>> hasn't been already.
>>
>
> I've been us
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:56 PM, linux guy wrote:
>
> Great tip ! Thanks for sharing that.
>
>
I forgot to say, FOSS ROCKS ! It ain't perfect, but its very, very good
and for the most part it gets better with every release.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:30:08 -0500 Aaron Konstam
wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 13:51 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:32:59 -0500 Aaron Konstam
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I don't know when this happened but unetbootin-linux-555 is now
> > > available. This allows dozens of li
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 8:40 PM, jackson byers wrote:
> Daniel J Walsh replied
>
>
>>This is definitely something in SELinux. The current upstream google
>>chrome is a little strange from an SELinux point of view. Have you
>>tried chromium?
>
>>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Chromium
>
>
> well,
On 09/30/2011 01:30 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> There seems to be a misunderstanding. I am talking about being able to
> download distributions. You are interested in DEs. If you want let us
> say LXDE under F15 you install F15 with its default DE and then install
> LXDE using yum.
Or, you can inst
F15
I installed frostwire and executed same and got error, can someone tell
what this error message means.
$ frostwire
HOSTNAME IS BigOne
Starting FrostWire...
Java exec found in PATH. Verifying...
Suitable java version found [java = 1.6.0_27]
Configuring environment...
Loading FrostWire:
ls:
So guys,
I need to install snort on a machine. It seems that snort need a library
called daq and libpcap version > 1.0
[root@localhost daq-0.6.1]# find / -name *libpcap*
/usr/local/lib/libpcap.a
/usr/local/lib/libpcap.so.1.1.1
/usr/local/lib/libpcap.so
/usr/local/lib/libpcap.so.1
/lib/lib/libpca
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Joao Daniel
wrote:
>
> ERROR! Libpcap library version >= 1.0.0 not found.
> Get it from http://www.tcpdump.org
I think you need libpcap-devel to build against libpcap. Try yum
installing that and giving your configure another go.
-Rohan
--
users mailing
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 15:12 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 14:54, linux guy wrote:
> > Lets be clear here. There isn't really a bug in fdisk.
>
> If it doesn't want the user about this, I consider it a bug. lack of
> documentation and human-readable feedback is a bug. :
JB wrote:
> Frantisek Hanzlik hanzlici.cz> writes:
>
>> ...
>
> Suggestions:
>
> 1. use -R option to see routing (like ping plus traceroute in one)
>Perhaps it will give you some clue about how it travels.
># ping -R -n -c 2 -I source_ip target_ip
># ping -R -n -c 2 -I source_if ta
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 08:56 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> I wish I had any evidence that developers listen to the suggestions you
> want to send them. I have seen no such evidence. I would assume most of
> the people on this list are well aware of the difficulty of programming
> secure and "foolpr
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 21:57, Craig White wrote:
> I don't think this exemplifies the problem with FOSS software except for
> maybe indicating that sometimes the information is there for all to see
> but some people don't actually look and rely upon misinformed web pages,
> people, etc.
I used t
My IP and OS are a vandalism target of mindless childish hellbound kooks
hellbent on causing me grief to appease their delusions that I'm in any
ways like them, and that I might somehow want to help them solve their
useless bullyish lives.. is why I find it best to "DBAN" compromised
OS's, to make
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 23:31 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 21:57, Craig White wrote:
> > I don't think this exemplifies the problem with FOSS software except for
> > maybe indicating that sometimes the information is there for all to see
> > but some people don't actually
I find FireFox is Fedora's biggest security flaw.. FF is way too easy
to hack and crack
by demon-bullies to get into to mess-up the browser...
Please tell: What be the most secure browser for Linux Fedora?.. Is
there such a thing as a "secure browser"..?
Have you got any ideas when Mozilla mig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/30/2011 11:53 PM, Linda McLeod wrote:
>
> I find FireFox is Fedora's biggest security flaw.. FF is way too easy
> to hack and crack
> by demon-bullies to get into to mess-up the browser...
>
> Please tell: What be the most secure browser for
Are you looking for some kind of support? We might be able to help...
On Sep 30, 2011 10:04 PM, "Linda McLeod" wrote:
> My IP and OS are a vandalism target of mindless childish hellbound kooks
> hellbent on causing me grief to appease their delusions that I'm in any
> ways like them, and that I mi
53 matches
Mail list logo
