On 7/23/2010 10:13 AM, TNWestTex wrote:
>
>
> Stephen Gallagher-2 wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07/22/2010 08:37 AM, David Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> I prefer to boot in non-graphical mode then load the Xwindow system, or
>>> not, as desired. To this
Fennix gmail.com> writes:
>
> I think that you must have turned off notifications.Fennix
>
Well,
I have set preferences to hourly as usually (System-Preferences-Software
Updates).
I checked that the gpk-update-icon is checked-off in System-Preferences-Startup
Applications.
But the software up
On 07/23/2010 05:00 PM, JB wrote:
> Fennix gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>>I think that you must have turned off notifications.Fennix
>>
>>
> Well,
> I have set preferences to hourly as usually (System-Preferences-Software
> Updates).
> I checked that the gpk-update-icon is checked-off in
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:58:35 -0400
David Liguori wrote:
> Maybe the solution is to buy a bigger monitor.
Nah, I use a 46 inch HDTV as a monitor and the fonts are
too small for me there as well. The problem is they
are pixel sized fonts, and none of the pixel sizes
are very big. You need a crappy
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 14:23 -0600, Phil Meyer wrote:
> On 07/23/2010 12:59 AM, JD wrote:
> >
> > Can you describe the hardware of the private cloud
> > and the hardware of the non-cloud machine in the
> > location where you were involved in the installation
> > or configuration?
> > I would like to
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Friday, July 23, 2010 16:44:56 Christofer C. Bell wrote:
>> In all honesty, for normal desktop use, the only "hoop" Parshwa should
>> need to jump through is to setup RPM Fusion on the system[1].
>
> And install flash plugin in firefox.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
> Really, in order to provide equivalent functionality of a typical Windows
> desktop, Fedora requires more than one hoop to jump through. A novice user is
> maybe better off installing Omega instead, if he doesn't want to bother with
> th
On 7/23/2010 6:20 PM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>>
>> Really, in order to provide equivalent functionality of a typical Windows
>> desktop, Fedora requires more than one hoop to jump through. A novice user is
>> maybe better off installing
On 07/23/2010 03:20 PM, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
>
>> Really, in order to provide equivalent functionality of a typical Windows
>> desktop, Fedora requires more than one hoop to jump through. A novice user is
>> maybe better off insta
Thank you for proving my point.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_
Can I just point out quickly here that Fedora is probably not a proper
distribution for home use? It's meant to be a test bed for the latest
in Linux and open source software; it has a very short version cycle
time, it's always on the cutting edge, it isn't documented well, etc. I
love it, p
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Friday 23 July 2010 09:29 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>> Have you uninstalled Totem? It can cause conflicts with other installed
>> media players.
>>
>
> Its not totem that conflicts, its the browser plugin for totem he should
> be removing.
>
> # yum remove totem-mozplugin
On Friday 23 July 2010 04:36 PM, Hugh Caley wrote:
> RHEL (not free), CentOS (free) or Ubuntu (free), all of which are meant
> to be more stable and better documented than Fedora.
Why do you say that?
I find the official Fedora documentation @ docs.fedoraproject.org much
more reliable than searc
> Fedora releases every 6 months, and supports a release for 1 month
> past the release of n+1[1]. This means that Fedora 13, which was
> released May 25 will be supported until, roughly, June of 2011(*).
> This is 13 months and a far cry short of 36 months. Fedora 11 is
> already unsupported[2]
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 12:41 AM, g wrote:
> i am just now back from joining pogo.com and attempting to play chess.
>
> was hoping that i could configure to play, but it kept throwing up
> a window about popup blocker, even after enabling popups for site.
>
> i do need to run out for a few. shoul
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Christofer C. Bell
wrote:
> All things he'd have to do in Windows. And Firefox will direct you to
> the Flash installation download and instructions page at Adobe the
> first time you encounter some Flash. And by "do in Windows" I mean
> "go to the website the
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Christofer C. Bell
wrote:
> You know, this thread is pointless. It's Parshwa saying "I don't know
> anything!" over and over, g making things scarier than they are, and
> folks like Marko here basically implying Fedora's a big PITA.
Yes, If you are suddenly pu
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 3:56 AM, David wrote:
> The BS here is overwhelming. Poor Parshwa asks for help and guidence and
> the wolves circle with the 'we be more smarter than you' crap.
So if you really don't need help, why did you join this listing? It
means you are also poor. If not, you must
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Michael Miles wrote:
> I have to differ.
Its your wish.
> The best thing that ever happened to my computer was Fedora.
> It's double the speed of Windows 7, no registry is a big plus, no
> defrag, no virus.
This is correct.
> What more can you ask for.
M
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Roger wrote:
> Not long ago someone wrote to me:
> " If you have a working system and are happy with it then why change it"
> For this reason I will stay with Fedora 11 until I have unavoidable
> reason to upgrade.
That's what I did and am doing.
> Fedora 11 i
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Hugh Caley wrote:
> Can I just point out quickly here that Fedora is probably not a proper
> distribution for home use? It's meant to be a test bed for the latest in
> Linux and open source software; it has a very short version cycle time, it's
> always on the cu
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> I find the official Fedora documentation @ docs.fedoraproject.org much
> more reliable than searching for solutions in Ubuntu forums. I also find
> the documentation included with packages more complete in Fedora.
Fedora is good overall.
Reg
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 15:58 -0600, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> > Look at the Cloud Harmony benchmarks for your favorite cloud provider here:
> >
> > http://blog.cloudharmony.com/2010/06/cloud-server-benchmarking-part-4-memory.html
> >
> > Consider that you can get (on paper) more throughput
*snip*
> I don't pretend to know what's coming, but I do know that
> when stuff is outside my house it can be priced annually, it can be
> arbitrarily withheld, it can be surveiled, it can be compromised by
> those who have direct physical access, and it is not something I really
> want or need. J
has anyone been able to get .jsp files/java applets to work in Fedora?
i'm currently using openjdk and the openjdk browser plugin, and visiting
http://www.java.com/en/download/help/testvm.xml says that java is
working fine, and indeed it seems to be, but the applet at
http://www.gokgs.com/apple
> http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2366841,00.asp
It was nice to see Windows being totally crushed in some benchmarks
(apples vs oranges). Overall, very positive publicity for Linux.
Regards,
John
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscrip
--
Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Ariful Hossain wrote:
> I am running fedora 13 with KDE desktop. When i change my display
> settings it works but i have to change it again when i relogin my
> desktop returns to its previous settings.
> Fre
On 07/23/2010 11:41 PM, Nathan W wrote:
> has anyone been able to get .jsp files/java applets to work in Fedora?
> ...
> http://www.gokgs.com/applet.jsp seems to be just a grey box :(
>
Works fine using google-chrome + sun java 6.0.21 - perhaps someone else
can confirm if sun java works if in f
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Nathan W wrote:
> has anyone been able to get .jsp files/java applets to work in Fedora?
> i'm currently using openjdk and the openjdk browser plugin, and visiting
> http://www.java.com/en/download/help/testvm.xml says that java is
> working fine, and indeed it s
Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> I uninstalled the NoScript, which doesn't work with User Agent
> Switcher in my PC, but still IE7 (via default user agent) is not
> working and i am not able to play chess.
'user agent' and 'noscript' should not have any inner action to block other.
at least it does not w
Ed Greshko wrote:
> Thank you for proving my point.
not really, as i was *not recommending* down grading.
but, if you think so, that is fine with me.
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a frien
Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> but how i use that user agent switcher? i restarted the pc and now in
> Firefox -> Tools -> Default User Agent is coming but switiching to IE
> and then playing is also not working?
as mentioned in post dated just before this one, i do not believe you
need to use 'agent s
On 07/24/2010 12:19 PM, g wrote:
> Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Thank you for proving my point.
> not really, as i was *not recommending* down grading.
I did not suggest that was your recommendation. You've again proved my
point.
--
I just heard the SEVENTIES were over!! And I was just getting in to
Parshwa Murdia wrote:
>> And after all, where did windows come from..Linux
>
>
> This is also correct.
if you are meaning 'windows', as in 'ms windows', bill gates stoled
concept from 'apple computers'. plus there was a big stink about bg&c
using exact same 'trash can' icon.
linux was
Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> Don't mind but it is always not good to suddenly switch to some other
> OS if problems come.
agreed.
> If suppose after switching to Ubuntu, again some
> problem comes, would it mean to again switch to CentOS?
centos or scientific linux are rewrites of rhel, currently
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/24/2010 12:19 PM, g wrote:
>> Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> Thank you for proving my point.
>> not really, as i was *not recommending* down grading.
> I did not suggest that was your recommendation. You've again proved my
> point.
lol.
then just what was *point* you were tryi
On 07/23/2010 09:16 PM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Nathan W wrote:
>
>
>> has anyone been able to get .jsp files/java applets to work in Fedora?
>>
>
>> i'm currently using openjdk and the openjdk browser plugin, and visiting
>> http://www.java.com/en/do
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:17:49 -0700, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> On 07/23/2010 09:16 PM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Nathan W
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> has anyone been able to get .jsp files/java applets to work in Fedora?
>>>
>>>
>>> i'm currently using openjdk and
On 07/24/2010 01:32 PM, Nathan W wrote:
> *snip*
>
>> I don't pretend to know what's coming, but I do know that
>> when stuff is outside my house it can be priced annually, it can be
>> arbitrarily withheld, it can be surveiled, it can be compromised by
>> those who have direct physical acces
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:51:50 +0530
Parshwa Murdia wrote:
>
> thanks a lot for the suggestions and the simple purpose why did i ask
> is that fedora is not as common as was windows but is slowly now
> replacing it. i would have to see one book for this.
Hi, Parshwa;
I've been following this t
101 - 140 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
