On 07/20/2010 01:39 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> On 7/19/2010 4:31 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
>> [...]
>> How come a Red Hat employee becomes so ignorant when it comes to
>> understanding patent issues?
>>
>> Buzz off with your stupidities about copyright and patents. It doesn't
>> help you make a p
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/20/2010 05:09 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
>>
>> I think the subject line should be changed to "Who's murdering this
>> forum?" as that seems to be your only intent.
>>
>
> If anyone is concerned about the behaviour of anyone in this list,
> feel free to drop a mail to
Tom H wrote:
> To be fair, the difference between grub1/2 and lilo remains that
> grub1/2 don't update the mbr for every config change but only when
> they are set up.
>
> grub2's update is the equivalent of grubby on Fedora and grub1's
> update-grub on Debian/Ubuntu.
What is the supposed advant
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:02:12 +0100
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> What is the supposed advantage of grub2 over grub?
As near as I can tell grub2 is a classic example of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-system_effect
It is supposed to be easier to add support for
different filesystems with loadable
On 07/19/2010 04:41 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:53:51 -0700,
>>Michael Miles wrote:
>>
>>> I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to
>>> be the wrong one published by RPMfusion.
>>>
>> Fedora
On 07/20/2010 05:53 AM, Michael Miles wrote:
> I am finding it hard to deal with as RPMFusion and Fedora are two
> seperate thing but when it blocks a update then yes I do think it is a
> Fedora issue.
>
Among the mainstream distributions, Fedora is unique in that, it
doesn't have a off
Hi,
I'm running 32-bit Fedora 12 on a recently built core2 duo system.
The dvd burner is a month-old Samsung drive.
I use imgburn 2.5.0.0 under Wine to create iso's and burn them to disk.
( Imgburn works better than K3B; e.g. if iso is near the disk
capacity, K3B says it won't fit. Also,
On 07/19/2010 05:27 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/20/2010 05:53 AM, Michael Miles wrote:
>
>> I am finding it hard to deal with as RPMFusion and Fedora are two
>> seperate thing but when it blocks a update then yes I do think it is a
>> Fedora issue.
>>
>>
> Among the mainstream
On 07/20/2010 06:09 AM, Michael Miles wrote:
> Oh well, considering the two main Video companies is Nvidia and Ati it
> would be good to have a Fedora based driver that works 100%.
> I am not knocking Nouveau but it still has a way to go before it can be
> called a driver replacement.
>
> Thanks
> From: Harald Hoyer
> Subject: Re: Fedora 13 installation, does not boot
> On 07/18/2010 04:24 PM, Vincent Onelli wrote:
> >> From: "Darr"
> >> On Saturday, 17 July, 2010 @23:56 zulu, Vincent Onelli scribed:
> >>
> >>> I used the rescue disk typed: chroot /mnt/sysimage
> >>> then dracut -f /bo
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>>
>> To be fair, the difference between grub1/2 and lilo remains that
>> grub1/2 don't update the mbr for every config change but only when
>> they are set up.
>>
>> grub2's update is the equivalent of grubby on Fedora and grub
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:02:12 +0100
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>> What is the supposed advantage of grub2 over grub?
>
> As near as I can tell grub2 is a classic example of
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-system_effect
>
> It is supposed to
> From: "Darr"
> Subject: Re: Fedora 13 installation, does not boot
> On Sunday, 18 July, 2010 @14:24 zulu, Vincent Onelli scribed:
>
> > By runing depmod -a I got the following:
> > WARNING: Couldn't open directory /lib/modules/2.6.33.3-85.fc13.i686:
> > no such file or directory.
> > FATAL: c
On 7/19/2010 7:41 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:53:51 -0700,
>> Michael Miles wrote:
>>> I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to
>>> be the wrong one published by RPMfusion.
>>
>> Fedora doesn't produce the kmod.
On 07/20/2010 06:29 AM, Tom H wrote:
>
> The official manual is (fairly recent, AFAIK)
> http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/
> (which is the url of the now MIA grub1 manual).
>
grub1 is called grub legacy now and doc for that is at
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/legacy
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/20/2010 06:29 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> The official manual is (fairly recent, AFAIK)
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/
>> (which is the url of the now MIA grub1 manual).
>>
>
> grub1 is called grub legacy now and doc
On 07/19/2010 05:51 PM, David wrote:
> On 7/19/2010 7:41 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>
>> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:53:51 -0700,
>>>Michael Miles wrote:
>>>
I have been waiting to see if a kmod comes available and there seems to
be the wr
Hi;
Does anybody have an idea when we might see an update for gnash. I keep
watching the threads, upgrades etc. to see if one is on the way. I am
trying to avoid going back to adobe flash, but I am losing too many
services because of it and/or Mozilla.
The latest google (GNU and others) informat
--- On Mon, 7/19/10, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > --- On Tue, 7/13/10, Peter Diercks
> wrote:
> >
> >> I am running a server under F11. It is a remote
> machine
> >> which I have no
> >> physical access to. It has a network connection. I
> wanted
> >> to upgrade to
> >> F12
On 07/20/2010 06:52 AM, William Case wrote:
> Hi;
>
> Does anybody have an idea when we might see an update for gnash. I keep
> watching the threads, upgrades etc. to see if one is on the way. I am
> trying to avoid going back to adobe flash, but I am losing too many
> services because of it and/o
Yes, unfortunately im having the same issue, now using the final version of
fedora 13... the error is:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/share/system-config-display/xconf.py", line 378, in
dialog = xConfigDialog.XConfigDialog(hardware_state, xconfig,
videocard.VideoCardInfo())
On 07/19/2010 03:38 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> john wendel wrote:
>> I installed the latest Firefox Beta on a 32-bit F11 box, and I'm really
>> impressed. So, I decided to install it on my 64-bit F13 box.
>>
>> The problem - the F13 box is 64-bit only and the Firefox beta seems to
>> be 32-bit, so
On 7/19/2010 9:17 PM, Michael Miles wrote:
> On 07/19/2010 05:51 PM, David wrote:
>> On 7/19/2010 7:41 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>
>>
>> Obviously the previous kernel worked correct? Why not use that one?
>>
>>
>>
> I am using the previous kernel.
>
> I just like to keep up and it is a upd
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 20:37 -0500, David A. Paredes Rios wrote:
> Yes, unfortunately im having the same issue, now using the final
> version of fedora 13... the error is:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/share/system-config-display/xconf.py", line 378, in
>
> dialog = xCo
On 7/19/10, JD wrote:
>
> I had noscript installed but it broke several websites, including youtube.
> Several links in youtube would cease to work. I could no longer play
> youtube vids.
> Perhaps I misconfigured it???
It's likely you just neglected to trust the relevant websites. For YouTube
Tim:
>> I will judge that [1] link, then. I can see quite a few things that
>> I wouldn't suggest someone does unless they know why they're doing
>> it.
1. http://digitizor.com/2009/01/31/fedora-speed-tweaks-make-fedora-faster/
Parshwa Murdia:
> So removing the following line from the sysctl.co
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20100719
Regards,
Antonio
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
On Tuesday, 20 July, 2010 @01:00 zulu, Vincent Onelli scribed:
> I couldn't not remove any thing. Grub.conf apparently is a non
> editable file
we were not advising to edit the grub.conf file.
If the kernel arguments from the boot menu are edited, they
return to 'normal' at next boot.
Another w
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
take a look at this lively
> topic.
>
> See more and other topics of interest at Distrowatch Weekly
>
> http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20100719
>
> Regards,
>
> Antonio
>
>
>
What are he implicit and explicit impacts on the Fedora distribution?
--
us
On Monday 19 July 2010 01:46 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> What seemed to work, was (since the source tarball isn't configured for
> FEdora as the way they have it setup) to make a link
> from /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins to /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins and that let
> the firefox-4 work with plugins.
>
Tha
On Monday 19 July 2010 10:27 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> The cloud computing is a topic that I believe should have more input and
> while I am opposed to it, I like for others to take a look at this lively
> topic.
I'm curious, what do you mean by you are opposed to it? I find it quite
prod
Well, I'm no less confused, but ...
Despite the fact that the first iso compared w/o error to the
originating directory after being mounted, i went ahead and
recreated the iso and burned another dvd+r from that.
The new dvd now compares w/ no errors to the original directory.
I hate apparent no
On 07/19/2010 11:15 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Monday 19 July 2010 10:27 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>>The cloud computing is a topic that I believe should have more input and
>> while I am opposed to it, I like for others to take a look at this lively
>> topic.
> I'm curious, what do you m
On 07/19/2010 11:20 PM, D Wyatt wrote:
> Well, I'm no less confused, but ...
>
> Despite the fact that the first iso compared w/o error to the
> originating directory after being mounted, i went ahead and
> recreated the iso and burned another dvd+r from that.
>
> The new dvd now compares w/ no e
101 - 135 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
