On 2/25/24 05:17, Roger Heflin wrote:
x11vnc works at least with x11 (not sure about wayland) and can be run
on a running session to create a vnc connection to that live session.
I used it to remotely view/control my active laptop screen.
For some reason, he wants a second separate session, no
On 2/25/24 06:35, Jonathan Billings wrote:
What this means is there’s no TCP port listening for Xvnc, just a UNIX
socket file. So two people or a local and remote session can’t have
sessions interfering with each other. I played with using systemd socket
activation too but that’s too complicate
hing Xvnc by specifying `−rfbunixpath path` in the
parameters to Xvnc. I think this is only available in somewhat recent TigerVNC,
so it doesn’t work in Centos 7.
What this means is there’s no TCP port listening for Xvnc, just a UNIX socket
file. So two people or a local and remote session can’t have s
ra switched to the current tigervnc systemd-based
> configuration, but:
>
> I've been using tigervnc to log in to an Ubuntu box, and it was simple to
> set up tigervnc on Ubuntu for remote access. I just tried the same on Fedora
> and was informed that launching vncserver was &quo
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 11:11 AM Sam Varshavchik
wrote:
> I'm not sure when Fedora switched to the current tigervnc systemd-based
> configuration, but:
>
> I've been using tigervnc to log in to an Ubuntu box, and it was simple to
> set up tigervnc on Ubuntu for remote
On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 09:11:34 +0100 francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
>> So it's only the combination. I did run a strace, but it's not
>> clear what's going on. It almost seems like it's something to do with
>> the ssh agent, but I wasn't motivated enough to really follow it.
I tried to no av
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 23:23:28 -0800 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 2/24/24 23:17, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
>>> It does have something to do with running from systemd, but I have no
>>> idea what it is.
>> Not sure at all of that. It seems to be instead an compatibility between
>> vncsession and
On 2/24/24 23:17, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
It does have something to do with running from systemd, but I have no
idea what it is.
Not sure at all of that. It seems to be instead an compatibility between
vncsession and startxfce4.
It's directly related to running from systemd while th
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:11:20 -0800 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 2/24/24 08:52, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>> ... and that was because even xfce is not going to work. The reason was
>> dumped into ~/.vnc/*log:
>> /usr/bin/startxfce4: X server already running on display :1
>> MESA: error: ZINK: failed to c
On 2/24/24 08:52, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
... and that was because even xfce is not going to work. The reason was
dumped into ~/.vnc/*log:
/usr/bin/startxfce4: X server already running on display :1
MESA: error: ZINK: failed to choose pdev
glx: failed to create drisw screen
failed to load driver
Samuel Sieb writes:
On 2/24/24 08:52, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Sam Varshavchik writes:
But something is still broken. I went through the motions, set session=xfce,
but then something is still broken with systemd. systemctl start vncserver@:
1 results in:
Feb 24 11:30:33 monster.email-scan.co
Samuel Sieb writes:
On 2/24/24 07:10, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I'm not sure when Fedora switched to the current tigervnc systemd-based
configuration, but:
I've been using tigervnc to log in to an Ubuntu box, and it was simple to
set up tigervnc on Ubuntu for remote access. I just
On 2/24/24 08:52, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Sam Varshavchik writes:
But something is still broken. I went through the motions, set
session=xfce, but then something is still broken with systemd.
systemctl start vncserver@:1 results in:
Feb 24 11:30:33 monster.email-scan.com systemd[1]: Starting
On 2/24/24 07:10, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I'm not sure when Fedora switched to the current tigervnc systemd-based
configuration, but:
I've been using tigervnc to log in to an Ubuntu box, and it was simple
to set up tigervnc on Ubuntu for remote access. I just tried the same on
Fedo
On 24 Feb 2024 at 16:55, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
From: Sam Varshavchik
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject:Re: tigervnc server configuration limitation
Date sent: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 16:55:05 -0500
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
Michael D. Setzer II via users writes:
As I stated. I've found Turbo VNC seems to work very well.
At my home, I've got a notebook, and use it to vnc into 6 other
Fedora 39 machines, and two windows machines in house.
I hear you. I'm not married to tigervnc, just not sure i
As I stated. I've found Turbo VNC seems to work very well.
At my home, I've got a notebook, and use it to vnc into 6 other
Fedora 39 machines, and two windows machines in house. Also,
vnc into remote machines in mom's house in Nevada. Windows
machines all with the tigervnc sinc
X server lost
It works by setting in ~/.vnc/config:
session=xfce4
not session=xfce.
Seems that /usr/sbin/vncsession calls then xfce4-session.
I don't have an xfce-session command on my machine.
This is at odds with the HOWTO in the tiger
Hi.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 11:52:40 -0500 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> But something is still broken. I went through the motions, set session=xfce,
> ... and that was because even xfce is not going to work. The reason was
> dumped into ~/.vnc/*log:
> /usr/bin/startxfce4: X server already running o
Sam Varshavchik writes:
Michael D. Setzer II via users writes:
On 24 Feb 2024 at 10:10, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> That's a no-go for me. My Fedora system is configured to automatically log
> into a graphical desktop. This won't work for me, then.
Not sure on the latest versio
Michael D. Setzer II via users writes:
On 24 Feb 2024 at 10:10, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> That's a no-go for me. My Fedora system is configured to automatically log
> into a graphical desktop. This won't work for me, then.
Not sure on the latest version of tigervnc on Fedora, f
On 24 Feb 2024 at 10:10, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
From: Sam Varshavchik
To: Fedora Users List
Subject:tigervnc server configuration limitation
Date sent: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 10:10:42 -0500
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
> I'm not sure when Fedora swi
I'm not sure when Fedora switched to the current tigervnc systemd-based
configuration, but:
I've been using tigervnc to log in to an Ubuntu box, and it was simple to
set up tigervnc on Ubuntu for remote access. I just tried the same on Fedora
and was informed that launching vnc
On 11/15/23 09:03, Barry Scott wrote:
What do you get when you do the following commands:
rpm -ql rpm-libs
dnf list installed rpm-libs
I am on FC39 now and I forced updated dnf to
the fc39 version
$ rpm -ql rpm-libs
/usr/lib/.build-id
/usr/lib/.build-id/a8
/usr/lib/.build-id/a8/ad83daa16d
On 11/15/23 10:28, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
`dnf repolist enabled` may be helpful:
$ dnf repolist enabled
repo idrepo name
fedora Fedora 39 - x86_64
fedora-cisco-openh264 Fedora 39 OpenH264 (from Cisco) - x86_64
updates
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 12:04 PM Barry Scott wrote:
>
> On 15 Nov 2023, at 16:18, ToddAndMargo via users
> wrote:
>
> I had the same as you until today when I did a `dnf upgrade`.
> Then all hell broke loose and librpmio and librpm got upgraded
> to 10.
>
> On my f38 system there is no .10
>
> #
> On 15 Nov 2023, at 16:18, ToddAndMargo via users
> wrote:
>
> I had the same as you until today when I did a `dnf upgrade`.
> Then all hell broke loose and librpmio and librpm got upgraded
> to 10.
On my f38 system there is no .10
# dnf install /usr/lib64/librpm.so.10
Last metadata expirat
?
You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the
no-longer
needed dependencies.
dnf is giving me the same output for any command I give it.
On 11/14/23 17:19, Roger Heflin wrote:
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 ->
> librpm
go via users wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How do I fix this?
> >>>>
> >>>> You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the
> >>>> no-longer
> >>>> needed dependencies.
> >>>
> >&g
just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the
no-longer
needed dependencies.
dnf is giving me the same output for any command I give it.
On 11/14/23 17:19, Roger Heflin wrote:
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 ->
> librpm.so.9.4.0
> -rwxr-
On 11/14/23 18:47, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 6:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
On 11/14/23 16:37, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 11/14/2023 05:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
How do I fix this?
You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 6:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
On 11/14/23 16:37, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 11/14/2023 05:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
How do I fix this?
You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the no-longer
needed dependencies.
dnf is giving me
s a decent chance that other links and/or files are
also gone.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 6:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
>
> On 11/14/23 16:37, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > On 11/14/2023 05:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> >>
> >> How do I fix this?
> >
>
On 11/14/23 16:39, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 11/14/23 16:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
How do I fix this?
Many thanks,
-T
# rpm -qa tiger\*
tigervnc-license-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch
tigervnc-icons-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch
tigervnc-1.13.1-6.fc38.x86_64
# dnf remove tigervnc
On 11/14/23 16:37, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 11/14/2023 05:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
How do I fix this?
You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the no-longer
needed dependencies.
dnf is giving me the same output for any command I give it
On 11/14/23 16:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
How do I fix this?
Many thanks,
-T
# rpm -qa tiger\*
tigervnc-license-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch
tigervnc-icons-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch
tigervnc-1.13.1-6.fc38.x86_64
# dnf remove tigervnc-1.13.1-6.fc38.x86_64
tigervnc-icons-1.13.1-6.fc38
On 11/14/2023 05:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
How do I fix this?
You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the no-longer
needed dependencies.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Hi All,
How do I fix this?
Many thanks,
-T
# rpm -qa tiger\*
tigervnc-license-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch
tigervnc-icons-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch
tigervnc-1.13.1-6.fc38.x86_64
# dnf remove tigervnc-1.13.1-6.fc38.x86_64
tigervnc-icons-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch tigervnc-license-1.13.1-6.fc38.noarch
On 1/13/23 18:58, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Jan 13, 2023, at 21:45, Alex wrote:
vncserver[5803]: Could not start Xvnc.
vncserver[5803]: _XSERVTransSocketUNIXCreateListener: ...SocketCreateListener()
failed
vncserver[5803]: _XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: server already running
vncser
On Jan 13, 2023, at 21:45, Alex wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> I have a fedora37 desktop install with tigervnc-server and can't get it to
> start. I'd like it to start on system boot.
>
> I've followed the HOWTO.md as well as numerous examples online, and can't
Hi,
I have a fedora37 desktop install with tigervnc-server and can't get it to
start. I'd like it to start on system boot.
I've followed the HOWTO.md as well as numerous examples online, and can't
figure out what's wrong. I've set the vncpasswd for the user li
On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 19:49:08 +0100 Frank Elsner via users wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've problems to connect to an vnc server. Tigervnc dies with the message
>
> Attempted to configure an invalid screen layout
The UltraVNC on the server was replaced by an updated v
On Sun, 2019-05-19 at 14:23 -0400, Alex wrote:
> The reason the hostname is displayed as "localhost.localdomain" is
> because it's on a private IP range (192.168.9.110) without DNS, and
> I'm using port forwarding from the cable modem to this host for port
> 5900 through 6000.
I'm not sure if VNC
On 5/19/19 11:23 AM, Alex wrote:
Here is the command I run on the local machine to start the vncserver
as the regular user (gary):
$ vncserver :1 -geometry 800x600 -depth 24
Try running "export DISPLAY=:1" before that.
___
users mailing list -- users
Hi, I've installed tigervnc according to the instructions here for a
new fedora30 install:
https://www.server-world.info/en/note?os=Fedora_28&p=desktop&f=6
mate-desktop doesn't seem to work properly, so I've just stuck with
the default xinitrc, which produces the default f
On 06/27/2017 03:59 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
What I believe is that the vncviewer is doing is requesting 1024x768 and that
is what
you'll get. Now, the "interesting" or bad thing is that once you connect at a
lower
resolution than what you want Xvnc will stick with it no matter what you do
from
On 06/28/17 01:46, Walter H. wrote:
> On 27.06.2017 19:23, Walter H. wrote:
>> xrandr only shows
>>
>> Screen 0: minimum 32 x 32, current 1024 x 768, maximum 32768 x 32768
>> VNC-0 connected primary 1024x768+0+0 0mm x 0mm
>>1600x1200 60.00 +
>>1920x1200 60.00
>>1920x1080 60.
On 27.06.2017 19:23, Walter H. wrote:
xrandr only shows
Screen 0: minimum 32 x 32, current 1024 x 768, maximum 32768 x 32768
VNC-0 connected primary 1024x768+0+0 0mm x 0mm
1600x1200 60.00 +
1920x1200 60.00
1920x1080 60.00
1680x1050 60.00
1400x1050 60.00
1360
On 26.06.2017 05:10, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/26/17 01:19, Walter H. wrote:
Hello,
I did nearly the same as here
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/25/html/System_Administrators_Guide/ch-TigerVNC.html#s3-configuring-vnc-server
by the way this
ExecStart=/sbin/runuser -l USER -c "/usr/b
On 06/26/17 01:19, Walter H. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I did nearly the same as here
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/25/html/System_Administrators_Guide/ch-TigerVNC.html#s3-configuring-vnc-server
>
>
> by the way this
> ExecStart=/sbin/runuser -l USER -c "/usr/bin/vncserver %i -geometry 128
Hello,
I did nearly the same as here
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/25/html/System_Administrators_Guide/ch-TigerVNC.html#s3-configuring-vnc-server
by the way this
ExecStart=/sbin/runuser -l USER -c "/usr/bin/vncserver %i -geometry
1280x1024"
must be
ExecStart=/usr/bin/vncserver %
Hello,
When using tigervnc 1.5.0 server on fedora 23 workstation with tigervnc
1.5.0 viewer on windows 7 (both 64bit) I can see the desktop. But it
quickly flickers between the following view fragments in undeterministic
order:
* full login screen
* Background image
* black screen
* just
On 11/30/2013 12:50 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
What's up with TigerVnc? It seems to be missing
the Ctrl-Alt-Del icon and other icons for Windoes?
If there is another VncClient that has it, what would
it be?
Ahh... memory lapse! I forgot about 'F8' key!
Sorry for the noise!
-
What's up with TigerVnc? It seems to be missing
the Ctrl-Alt-Del icon and other icons for Windoes?
If there is another VncClient that has it, what would
it be?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraprojec
)
I ended up installing gconf-editor, and then just turning off that unlock
pop-up, and the background screen, and also desktop animations.
No sense in having to enter my password twice, anyway.
Tigervnc is fast enough if I use the ultravnc client.
Thanks!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedorap
2011/1/29, compdoc :
> I have tigervnc server installed on a fedora 14 box, and when I use the
> Windows tigervnc client it is terribly slow.
>
> Normally, I use the ultravnc windows client which is very fast, however when
> I use it to connect to the tigervnc server, there is a lo
I have tigervnc server installed on a fedora 14 box, and when I use the
Windows tigervnc client it is terribly slow.
Normally, I use the ultravnc windows client which is very fast, however when
I use it to connect to the tigervnc server, there is a long pause with a
black screen before the unlock
On 9/4/2010 10:56 AM, Tim wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 07:33 -0400, Claude Jones wrote:
>> > I didn't know anaconda was no longer necessary
> As far as I were aware, it never was. It's the installer, it's not used
> post-installation.
I guess I never fully understood what it did - I somehow ha
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 07:33 -0400, Claude Jones wrote:
> I didn't know anaconda was no longer necessary
As far as I were aware, it never was. It's the installer, it's not used
post-installation.
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address,
and just assumed I should try
to reinstall it when it was removed during my removal of TigerVNC-server...
--
Claude Jones
Brunswick, MD, USA
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi
2010/9/3 Claude Jones :
> I removed tigervnc-server the other day to install RealVNC enterprise. I
> noticed while removing tigervnc that it also uninstalled Anaconda which
> seemed very strange. I just tried to reinstall Anaconda and it wants to
> reinstall Tigervnc-server for depen
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 09:46:41PM -0400, Claude Jones wrote:
> I removed tigervnc-server the other day to install RealVNC
> enterprise. I noticed while removing tigervnc that it also
> uninstalled Anaconda which seemed very strange. I just tried to
> reinstall Anaconda and
I removed tigervnc-server the other day to install RealVNC
enterprise. I noticed while removing tigervnc that it also
uninstalled Anaconda which seemed very strange. I just tried to
reinstall Anaconda and it wants to reinstall Tigervnc-server for
dependencies, but, if I try to do that, it
63 matches
Mail list logo
