It would have to be some sort of package problem. Unless something specifically deleted that so.9 link (which seems unlikely).
Clearly dnf thinks it needs so.9 but you only have so.10 I just upgraded my fc38 machine and have so.9 and this rpm version. What fedora version do you have and what rpm do you have? rpm -qa --filesbypkg | grep -i librpm.so rpm-libs /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 rpm-libs /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9.4.0 rpm -qa | grep -i rpm-libs rpm-libs-4.18.1-3.fc38.x86_64 On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 9:07 PM ToddAndMargo via users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On 11/14/23 18:47, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 6:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users > >> <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 11/14/23 16:37, Joe Zeff wrote: > >>>> On 11/14/2023 05:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> How do I fix this? > >>>> > >>>> You might try just removing tigervnc and letting it remove the > >>>> no-longer > >>>> needed dependencies. > >>> > >>> dnf is giving me the same output for any command I give it. > > > > On 11/14/23 17:19, Roger Heflin wrote: > > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9 -> > > > librpm.so.9.4.0 > > > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 551368 Apr 24 2023 /usr/lib64/librpm.so.9.4.0 > > > > > > so > > > cd /usr/lib64 > > > ln -s librpm.so.9.4.0 librpm.so.9 > > > > > > Assuming the librpm.so.9.4.0 is still there. But if that link is > > > missing there is a decent chance that other links and/or files are > > > also gone. > > > > > > > # ls -al librpm.so* > > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 Sep 18 17:00 librpm.so.10 -> > > librpm.so.10.0.0 > > -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 563032 Sep 18 17:00 librpm.so.10.0.0 > > > > > > Hmmmmmmm ... > > > > Okay, > > I got dnf to work again with the following: > > /usr/lib64# ln -s librpmio.so.10.0.0 librpmio.so.9 > /usr/lib64# ln -s librpm.so.10.0.0 librpm.so.9 > > Now how do I fix it right? > > Just posted: > dnf looking for outdated librpmio and librpm > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2249732 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
