On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 09:25:33PM +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-10-31 at 21:39 -0700, Thomas Dineen wrote:
> > So when do you plan to actually STOP POSTING?
>
> WHEN I DAMN WELL FEEL LIKE IT!
>
> When do you plan to take your head out of your ass?
>
> --
>
> uname -rsvp
> Linux
When a top post quotes boilerplate,
one case be certain that it's a case of
don't care or TH;DDI.
--
Michael henne...@mail.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"SCSI is NOT magic. There are *fundamental technical
reasons* why it is necessary to sacrifice a young
goat to your SCSI chain now and then." -- John
On Thu, 2024-10-31 at 21:39 -0700, Thomas Dineen wrote:
> So when do you plan to actually STOP POSTING?
WHEN I DAMN WELL FEEL LIKE IT!
When do you plan to take your head out of your ass?
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.119.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 4 14:43:51 UTC 2024 x86_64
Boilerplate
So when do you plan to actually STOP POSTING?
On 10/31/2024 9:20 PM, Tim via users wrote:
On Fri, 2024-11-01 at 09:00 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
I understand the list guidelines specify to not top post, which I
follow, I was just curious as to why.
I hadn't looked at the guidelines for ages,
On Fri, 2024-11-01 at 09:00 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I understand the list guidelines specify to not top post, which I
> follow, I was just curious as to why.
I hadn't looked at the guidelines for ages, but it *does* help *some*
people actually pay attention to following them when it gives s
On 31/10/24 09:25, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 10/30/2024 03:46 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
although having said that I also get annoyed if I have to read
through multiple mail threads to get the full context of what the
reply is addressing, and in my view it is bad mail etiquette to not
include that con
On 10/30/24 3:16 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 31/10/24 09:04, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
The only sensible answer. It spoils the logical sequence.
No problems, thankyou, I was just curious because the other thing I
forgot to mention is those organisations also had the "standard" that if
your
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 6:17 PM Stephen Morris
wrote:
... snip ...
No problems, thankyou, I was just curious because the other thing I forgot
> to mention is those organisations also had the "standard" that if your
> reply was not top posted your reply would not be read.
>
I'll add that
a) most
On 10/30/2024 03:46 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
although having said that I also get annoyed if I have to read through
multiple mail threads to get the full context of what the reply is
addressing, and in my view it is bad mail etiquette to not include that context
Yes, you include enough text t
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:54:47 -0400
"Felix Miata" wrote:
> Stephen Morris composed on 2024-10-31 08:46 (UTC+1100):
>
> > Just on the etiquette front, every organisation I have worked in
> > consider it bad email etiquette to not top post replies, so what are the
> > reasons for this mail list to
On 31/10/24 09:04, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:54:47 -0400
"Felix Miata" wrote:
Stephen Morris composed on 2024-10-31 08:46 (UTC+1100):
Just on the etiquette front, every organisation I have worked in
consider it bad email etiquette to not top post replies, so what are
Stephen Morris composed on 2024-10-31 08:46 (UTC+1100):
> Just on the etiquette front, every organisation I have worked in
> consider it bad email etiquette to not top post replies, so what are the
> reasons for this mail list to be averse to that methodology (just curious).
A: Top-posters who
On 30/10/24 21:06, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 17:26 -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
On 10/29/24 15:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
All I had to do in Evolution in replying to this was mark the text
above before hitting Reply to List. No editing required.
Nice tip! Also works in
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 17:26 -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
> On 10/29/24 15:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > All I had to do in Evolution in replying to this was mark the text
> > above before hitting Reply to List. No editing required.
>
> Nice tip! Also works in Thunderbird.
It also used to work
On 10/29/24 15:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
All I had to do in Evolution in replying to this was mark the text
above before hitting Reply to List. No editing required.
Nice tip! Also works in Thunderbird.
:m
--
___
users mailing list -- users@list
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 14:57 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> > It makes it damn near impossible to read the message. And clearly,
> > from the lack of attention being paid to what's said in a couple of
> > recent threads, you're not reading it all, anyway.
>
> What annoys me is having the scan th
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024, Tim via users wrote:
When you post to this group crop out all the quotes of quotes of quotes
of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes
of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes quotes of quotes of
It makes it damn near impossible to re
On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 23:19 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> When you post to this group crop out all the quotes of quotes of quotes
> of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes
[...]
> It makes it damn near impossible to read the message. And clearly,
> from the lack of
When you post to this group crop out all the quotes of quotes of quotes
of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes
of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes
of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes of quotes
of quotes of quot
19 matches
Mail list logo
