Hi,
Thanks again! The spec file compiles fine but also does without libtool. Why do
we need it?
What more info would you like? I don't know what a desktop file does exactly,
and I don't know why there is a file such as that in /etc/wbar.d, sorry.
Many thanks and best wishes,
Ranjan
On Tue, 25
Ranjan Maitra writes:
RPM build errors:
Macro expanded in comment on line 11: %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Am2P0X (%build)
I wonder: what is causing these errors? Line 11 of the file seems to be
something else.
Line 11 has nothing to do with t
I played around a bit and built it in mock and found several dependencies
you didn't have in the spec file. You didn't provide the desktop file so I
commented it out but I noticed it puts one in /etc/wbar.d so I'm not sure
what it's for...
I can fix it up a bit more if you can provide more info.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:47 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 07:52:46 -0500 Richard Shaw
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:07 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have not done this for a while, and I was trying to build a small rpm
> > > using a previously
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 07:52:46 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:07 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have not done this for a while, and I was trying to build a small rpm
> > using a previously written .spec file which I had created some time ago and
> > which comp
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:07 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have not done this for a while, and I was trying to build a small rpm
> using a previously written .spec file which I had created some time ago and
> which compiled without incident till F27.
Over time gcc gets more pedantic abou
Hi,
I have not done this for a while, and I was trying to build a small rpm using a
previously written .spec file which I had created some time ago and which
compiled without incident till F27.
The spec file is at:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/UyRdT3LJxQ5cW21SjBeR9w
The source is ava
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:56:52 -0500
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:35:39 +0200 Michael Schwendt
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:44:59 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >
> > > > Revisit the build output and look for a real error message from
> > > > the compiler, not these th
On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 23:35:39 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:44:59 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > > Revisit the build output and look for a real error message from the
> > > compiler, not these that Make prints.
> >
> > Where is this build output? I get the following
On Sun, 2016-06-26 at 18:09 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> So, how should I fix this? Is this something that has to be taken
> care of, upstream?
The normal procedure, as a package maintainer, would be for you to fix
it by writing a patch, applying the patch to your spec file, and submit
the pat
Michael,
Thanks!
> Here:
>
> > ../src/core/Main.cc:84:35: error: invalid suffix on literal; C++11 requires
> > a space between literal and string macro [-Werror=literal-suffix]
> > command = PACKAGE_NAME" "DEFAULT_ARGV;
>
> And the line above that is the full invocation of the com
On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:44:59 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Revisit the build output and look for a real error message from the
> > compiler, not these that Make prints.
>
> Where is this build output? I get the following complete output when I use:
Here:
> ../src/core/Main.cc:84:35: error:
Michael,
Thanks!
On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 16:44:39 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 09:26:29 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a local rpm that I have created using wbar. The spec file is here:
> >
> > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/384973/14669508
> >
> >
On Sun, 26 Jun 2016 09:26:29 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a local rpm that I have created using wbar. The spec file is here:
>
> https://paste.fedoraproject.org/384973/14669508
>
> I have successfully created this rpm up to Fedora 23. But have been unable to
> do so this time a
Hi,
I have a local rpm that I have created using wbar. The spec file is here:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/384973/14669508
I have successfully created this rpm up to Fedora 23. But have been unable to
do so this time around in F24.
I get the following errors:
cc1plus: all warnings bei
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:54:10 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> I did read the README which says that all that is needed to be done is:
>
> make
And once you've compiled the executable, you are free do put in anywhere
you like. Such as somewhere below /usr/local or into your user's local
dir that's w
On 11/30/2015 11:54 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
luksipc.src: W: non-standard-group Applications/Security
...
What is the correct group to put it into? I made up Applications/Security but
clearly that guess is not right:-)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RPMGroups
cryptsetup is in Applications/Sys
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 20:29:01 +0100 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:14:15 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > Besides, I have always had the feeling that rpmbuild is too complicated,
> > perhaps needlessly.
>
> Not really. You just approach the "problem" from the wrong side.
>
>
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:14:15 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Besides, I have always had the feeling that rpmbuild is too complicated,
> perhaps needlessly.
Not really. You just approach the "problem" from the wrong side.
If you wanted to compile and install the same software from source
*without*
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:37:39 +0100 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 07:07:33 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > I am sorry I do not quite understand what to do here. Is there an example
> > spec file I can look at for this?
> >
> > I tried Gordon's suggestion and added:
> >
> >
>
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 07:07:33 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> I am sorry I do not quite understand what to do here. Is there an example
> spec file I can look at for this?
>
> I tried Gordon's suggestion and added:
>
>
> %install
> install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}
> install -m 755 luskipc $R
On 11/30/2015 05:07 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Thanks again (to Gordon also)!
I am sorry I do not quite understand what to do here. Is there an example spec
file I can look at for this?
Start here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package
but get:
+ cd luksipc-0.04
+ install
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:03:06 +0100 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:32:58 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am trying to build a RPM for luksipc to allow for in-place LUKS
> > encryption of existing HDDs from a LiveUSB without erasing their data but I
> > am r
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:32:58 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to build a RPM for luksipc to allow for in-place LUKS encryption
> of existing HDDs from a LiveUSB without erasing their data but I am running
> into some errors. The trouble is that the file does not come with a
Hello,
I am trying to build a RPM for luksipc to allow for in-place LUKS encryption of
existing HDDs from a LiveUSB without erasing their data but I am running into
some errors. The trouble is that the file does not come with a make install in
the Makefile: thus the executable is not moved to t
On 11/04/2015 03:20 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
How does one create debuginfo packages (is there an easy/automated way?)
They normally are being generated automatically as by-product of
building rpms.
However, you
a) must not to use "%global debug_package %{nil}"
(this disables building debugi
Michael,
> > Processing files: aNu-debuginfo-0.1-1.fc23.x86_64
> > error: Empty %files file /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILD/aNu-0.1/debugfiles.list
> >
> > RPM build errors:
> > Empty %files file /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILD/aNu-0.1/debugfiles.list
>
> That's an indication that you build with "wr
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 22:13:08 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been having an error on F23 with rpmbuild while building my personal
> rpms.
>
> Here is the error I have been having. (aNu is a terminal emulator program
> that I have modified from an existing source file, ie evilvte.)
Hi,
I have been having an error on F23 with rpmbuild while building my personal
rpms.
Here is the error I have been having. (aNu is a terminal emulator program that
I have modified from an existing source file, ie evilvte.)
Processing files: aNu-debuginfo-0.1-1.fc23.x86_64
error: Empty %file
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:15:23 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> %{python3_sitelib}
> rpmbuild -bb pyFilter.spec
>
> + exit 0
>
>
> RPM build errors:
> File not found:
> /home/etc/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/pyFltk-1.3.3.1-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages
>
> ---
Hi,
I have been trying to build pyFltk. Here is my spec file:
# spec file for package pyFltk
#
Name: pyFltk
Version:1.3.3.1
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Python wrapper for the Fast Light Tool Kit
License:GPL
URL:http://pyfltk.sourceforge.net/
Michael,
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GSettings_Schema
>
> ?
Reading this was a great help and I have been able to create a rpm (which
works). Here is the rpm
if someone is interested.
https://streaming.stat.iastate.edu/~stat580/fedora/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.f
> Are you aware of
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GSettings_Schema
>
> ?
Thanks, no. I will take a look.
>
> > I guess trying to package this was not a very smart idea: issues here are
> > getting to be beyond me.
> >
>
> Have you ever before installed this
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:41:18 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> However, there appears to be some errors in the actual application. Upon
> installing, I get:
>
>
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon_lib/Builder.py:81: Warning: The
> property GtkWindow:has-resize-grip is deprecated and shouldn
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:01:25 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:59:39 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > So, now with this modified spec file, I am in this predicament now (files
> > not packaged but installed) -- how do I get rid of this problem?
> >
>
> > error: Installed
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:59:39 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> So, now with this modified spec file, I am in this predicament now (files not
> packaged but installed) -- how do I get rid of this problem?
>
> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
Well, obviously you need to edit the %fil
Hi,
Thanks (to Richard also)!
> Do some trouble-shooting. As a first step, forget rpmbuild. Run the
> same commands you run in %build and %install in your terminal. If
> the commands fail, you need to fix the source code and cannot blame
> rpmbuild or the spec file.
I was not familiar with setup
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Ranjan Maitra <
maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to make a rpm out of the following application:
>
> https://github.com/apandada1/typhoon
>
> but my spec file, created from looking at the batti.spec file looks for a
> desktop file, rat
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:27:53 -0500, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > > I guess it might be helpful to know the difference between a desktop
> > > and a desktop.in file. Could someone please tell me about this
> > > difference?
A *.in file is an input/include file, i.e. a template file that is
taken by a
Thanks again!
> > So, from what I understood from your suggestions, I should look at:
> >
> > /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon-0.8.94-py2.7.egg-info
> >
> > So, that is what I did but I can not see what the files are that it
>
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:35:24 -0500
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> So, from what I understood from your suggestions, I should look at:
>
> /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/typhoon-0.8.9.4-1.fc22.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typhoon-0.8.94-py2.7.egg-info
>
> So, that is what I did but I can not
Hi,
Thank you for your response!
> > I am trying to make a rpm out of the following application:
> >
> > https://github.com/apandada1/typhoon
> >
> > but my spec file, created from looking at the batti.spec file looks
> > for a desktop file, rather than a desktop.in file. What I don't
> > unde
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:25:13 -0500
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to make a rpm out of the following application:
>
> https://github.com/apandada1/typhoon
>
> but my spec file, created from looking at the batti.spec file looks
> for a desktop file, rather than a desktop.in file.
Hello,
I am trying to make a rpm out of the following application:
https://github.com/apandada1/typhoon
but my spec file, created from looking at the batti.spec file looks for a
desktop file, rather than a desktop.in file. What I don't understand is where
it figures out how to look for a deskt
Hi,
I was trying to build a Fedora 22 rpm for typhoon:
https://sites.google.com/site/typhoonweatherapp/home
modifying a python-based spec file of mine, but I have run into problems.
Here is the spec file:
$ fpaste typhoon.spec
Uploading (1.1KiB)...
http://ur1.ca/n3vhs -> http://paste.fedorapr
45 matches
Mail list logo
