Re: patch listed as missing

2016-02-22 12:07 GMT+01:00 thibaut noah : > Failing at step 7 : > http://fpaste.org/327222/39094145/ > Error seems to be related to ssl, maybe a certificate creation for the > kernel that fails? > > ps : Fixed the HUNK failed by adding the line directly into the quirks.c > file > Error was mine,

Re: patch listed as missing

2016-02-21 17:32 GMT+01:00 Heinz Diehl : > 1. Grab recent -stable from kernel.org and unpack it into /usr/src > 2. Take a look into /boot and grab the config of your recent Fedora > kernel. Example: config-4.2.5-300.fc23.x86_64 > 3. Rename this file to ".config" and copy it into the root directory

Re: patch listed as missing

2016-02-21 9:38 GMT+01:00 Heinz Diehl : > Here's the same patch ported to 4.4.2, avoiding the level 2 fuzz. > It applies cleanly: > > [root@chiara linux-4.4.2]# cat quirk.diff | patch -p2 > patching file drivers/pci/quirks.c > > > diff -urN a/linux-4.4.2/drivers/pci/quirks.c > b/linux-4.4.2/driver

Re: patch listed as missing

2016-02-21 17:32 GMT+01:00 Heinz Diehl : > How to build a recent "Fedora kernel for the unexperienced": > > 1. Grab recent -stable from kernel.org and unpack it into /usr/src > 2. Take a look into /boot and grab the config of your recent Fedora > kernel. Example: config-4.2.5-300.fc23.x86_64 > 3.

Re: patch listed as missing

On 21.02.2016, Heinz Diehl wrote: [] Daah, today's not my day. Should have used a spelling & grammar correction, sorry for the broken English :-( -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listi

Re: patch listed as missing

On 21.02.2016, thibaut noah wrote: > So i have no way to use this patch on 4.4.2 since i have no way to run it, > i'm already lost with patching my kernel i can't build my own package. How to build a recent "Fedora kernel for the unexperienced": 1. Grab recent -stable from kernel.org and unpack

Re: patch listed as missing

2016-02-21 9:38 GMT+01:00 Heinz Diehl : > Here's the same patch ported to 4.4.2, avoiding the level 2 fuzz. > It applies cleanly > Current kernel is 4.3.5 through dnf update. There is still no easy way to get a 4.4.1 kernel on fedora since it seems one has to build his own package atm. So i have

Re: patch listed as missing

On 20/02/16 22:27, Ntlworld wrote: > Because my friend not many of us in this day & age have time to > spend cutting & pasting bits of an email chain! You're thinking about this the wrong way. Not many of us in "this day and age" have enough time to read email. For every email you write there m

Re: patch listed as missing

On 20.02.2016, thibaut noah wrote: > I got the patch from here : > https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/73697/acs-override-patch-on-fedora-22/ > A modify version which is the most recent version of this patch i could > find. Here's the same patch ported to 4.4.2, avoiding the level 2 fuzz

Re: patch listed as missing

On 2016-02-20 15:00, thibaut noah wrote: First of all i'm not a kid, i'm 28 years old thank you. Barely an adult. Probably doesn't pee in his pants anymore. Possible alleges to a college graduation. {^_-} From my vantage point his a really callow child little more than 1/3 my age. -- user

Re: patch listed as missing

On 02/20/2016 02:23 PM, thibaut noah wrote: if you want people to follow certain guidelines, they should be advertise somewhere imo (like stackoverflow does) In the footer that's included in every post including this one, there's a link to the Mailing List Guidelines. Go to http://fedorapro

Re: patch listed as missing

On 02/20/2016 03:00 PM, thibaut noah wrote: First of all i'm not a kid, i'm 28 years old thank you. Second, i'm not your friend or your kid or whathever, stop talking to me like i am, know your place and stick with it. ...and I'm 66, so to me, you're still a kid. I know my place, and I don't

Re: patch listed as missing

2016-02-20 23:51 GMT+01:00 Joe Zeff : > Gmail sets up the reply for top posting, but there's nothing in the world > stopping you from moving the cursor down to the bottom where it belongs, or > from trimming extraneous text from what you quote. (Again, I commend you > for knowing how to keep your

Re: patch listed as missing

On 02/20/2016 03:54 PM, thibaut noah wrote: 2016-02-20 23:27 GMT+01:00 jd1008 >: You cannot set the number of the patch in the spec file to match some other spec file. If you do, then you need to re-number all the other patch files in mentioned in

Re: patch listed as missing

2016-02-20 23:27 GMT+01:00 jd1008 : > You cannot set the number of the patch in the spec file to match some > other spec > file. If you do, then you need to re-number all the other patch files in > mentioned > in the spec file. Setting the number for the patch you want, you will mess > up the > se

Re: patch listed as missing

On 02/20/2016 02:27 PM, Ntlworld wrote: I presume you use facebook & linked-in - they are good examples of why these mailing lists are sailing against a head-wind. You presume wrong. I've never used the tome of farces, I'm not linked in and I've never visited Twitter. I have no use for them

Re: patch listed as missing

On 02/20/2016 02:23 PM, thibaut noah wrote: I personnaly NEVER quoted anyone in a mail before, and i'm using mails since 2005. I wouldn't be bragging about that if I were you. I was doing telephone tech support for an ISP back in '96, and nobody, including the suits was top posting back then

Re: patch listed as missing

On 02/20/2016 03:21 PM, Ntlworld wrote: Don't let it get you down noah - these mailing lists are antiquated - people get very religious about top-posting vs bottom-posting On 20 Feb 2016, at 22:08, thibaut noah > wrote: 2016-02-20 22:52 GMT+01:00 Joe Zef

Re: patch listed as missing

> On 20 Feb 2016, at 22:14, Joe Zeff wrote: > >> On 02/20/2016 02:08 PM, thibaut noah wrote: >> >> Okay, i googled what top posting is. >> I did not to post, i just never quote what i'm replying too since text >> is not quoted when one press the answer button on gmail. >> What's the point of q

Re: patch listed as missing

On 02/20/2016 02:46 PM, thibaut noah wrote: I am just using the respond feature of gmail, i don't know what you're talking about :/ Patch is say to work on 4.1.3 The thing is there is actually no patch that i know about for current kernel, i expect it to work because i checked it with upstre

Re: patch listed as missing

2016-02-20 23:14 GMT+01:00 Joe Zeff : > When I reply to something from gmail, the entire message is quoted, but I > trim it to what's relevant. Sometimes, I cut the quoted text into sections > with replies in between to make it clear just what I'm responding to. It's > not exactly rocket surgery

Re: patch listed as missing

Don't let it get you down noah - these mailing lists are antiquated - people get very religious about top-posting vs bottom-posting > On 20 Feb 2016, at 22:08, thibaut noah wrote: > > > 2016-02-20 22:52 GMT+01:00 Joe Zeff : >>> On 02/20/2016 01:46 PM, thibaut noah wrote: >>> I am just usin

Re: patch listed as missing

On 02/20/2016 02:08 PM, thibaut noah wrote: Okay, i googled what top posting is. I did not to post, i just never quote what i'm replying too since text is not quoted when one press the answer button on gmail. What's the point of quoting everything when you just have to read the previous message

Re: patch listed as missing

2016-02-20 22:52 GMT+01:00 Joe Zeff : > On 02/20/2016 01:46 PM, thibaut noah wrote: > >> I am just using the respond feature of gmail, i don't know what you're >> talking about :/ >> > > I have a gmail account, although I'm not using it for this list. Gmail is > set to assume top posting, but som

Re: patch listed as missing

On 02/20/2016 01:46 PM, thibaut noah wrote: I am just using the respond feature of gmail, i don't know what you're talking about :/ I have a gmail account, although I'm not using it for this list. Gmail is set to assume top posting, but somehow, none of my replies go out top posted. Think o

Re: patch listed as missing

I am just using the respond feature of gmail, i don't know what you're talking about :/ Patch is say to work on 4.1.3 The thing is there is actually no patch that i know about for current kernel, i expect it to work because i checked it with upstream source earlier and it was working. Methods have

Re: patch listed as missing

On 02/20/2016 02:20 PM, thibaut noah wrote: yumdownloader --source kernel-4.2.3-300.fc23.x86_64 I use fedora 23 and the kernel 4.2.3-300 I got the patch from here : https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/73697/acs-override-patch-on-fedora-22/ A modify version which is the most recent versi

Re: patch listed as missing

yumdownloader --source kernel-4.2.3-300.fc23.x86_64 I use fedora 23 and the kernel 4.2.3-300 I got the patch from here : https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/73697/acs-override-patch-on-fedora-22/ A modify version which is the most recent version of this patch i could find. I just want to ap

Re: patch listed as missing

On 02/20/2016 02:04 PM, thibaut noah wrote: Following my kernel compilation issue i used another method to get the source. I added : # custom patch for acs override support Patch: override_for_missing_acs_capabilities.patch in my kernel.spec The patch is in rpmbuild/SOURCES but when i run

patch listed as missing

Following my kernel compilation issue i used another method to get the source. I added : # custom patch for acs override support Patch: override_for_missing_acs_capabilities.patch in my kernel.spec The patch is in rpmbuild/SOURCES but when i run the build it says the file is missing. Also to n