Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> > AFAICT, when running dnf5 as ordinary user (e.g. dnf repoquery), it uses
> ~/cache/libdnf5, when running as root (e.g. for real updates) it uses
> /var/cache/libdnf5
> Ralf
seems to be the case
Thanks
--
___
users mailing
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
...
> > Yeah, the machine I checked that on was dnf-system-upgraded. I guess
> it uses the old database in that case. (I did verify the records were
> current, so I know it is being used with F41).
here it's an upgraded box too.
yesterday I run "dnf hi
Am 21.01.25 um 4:29 PM schrieb Jeffrey Walton:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:25 AM old sixpack13 wrote:
but another question:
why does dnf5 (it seems only sometimes !) stores repos data under
~/cache/libdnf5 and /var/cache/libdnf5 ?
I don't know.
AFAICT, when running dnf5 as ordinary user
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 10:25 AM old sixpack13 wrote:
>
> Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> ...
> > > Related, DNF5 stores its database at /var/lib/dnf/history.sqlite. If
>
> /var/lib/dnf/history.sqlite is absent here or you meant DNF4
> under /var/lib/dnf/ I have repos/
>
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
...
> > Related, DNF5 stores its database at /var/lib/dnf/history.sqlite. If
/var/lib/dnf/history.sqlite is absent here or you meant DNF4
under /var/lib/dnf/ I have repos/
history seems to be stored under /usr/lib/sysimage/libdnf5/ in
transaction_history.sqlite
=
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 12:58 PM old sixpack13 wrote:
>
> with dnf4 the dnf history was stored somewhere under /var/cache or /var/lib
> and was clearable by removing store files therein
>
> how does one nowerdays with dnf5 clear the dnf history ?
Related, DNF5 stores its datab
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 1:48 PM old sixpack13 wrote:
>
> with dnf4 the dnf history was stored somewhere under /var/cache or /var/lib
> and was clearable by removing store files therein
>
> how does one nowerdays with dnf5 clear the dnf history ?
/var/log/dnf5.log*
--
Geor
got it: /usr/lib/sysimage/libdnf5
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List G
with dnf4 the dnf history was stored somewhere under /var/cache or /var/lib and
was clearable by removing store files therein
how does one nowerdays with dnf5 clear the dnf history ?
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Tue, 2024-06-04 at 16:26 +, Joe Wulf wrote:
It truly depends on how the default management of bash history is set
up in the virgin environment.
Variables like HISTCONTROL, HISTIGNORE can play a part. The setting
for 'shopt -s histappend' also matters.
The BASH man page briefl
If you have 2 separate sessions open for the given user last save/exit
wins and overwrites the history file. This may be an
oversimplification but 2 sessions both saving out do seem to make a
mess.
And if there is no -TERM and/or clean exit then nothing gets written out.
I have trained people
It truly depends on how the default management of bash history is set up in
the virgin environment.Variables like HISTCONTROL, HISTIGNORE can play a part.
The setting for 'shopt -s histappend' also matters.The BASH man page briefly
explains them.
R,-Joe
On Tuesday, June 4, 202
This is on fedora 40, a fresh 'everything' network install.
I always update/upgrade manually using 'sudo dnf --refresh upgrade'.
To save typing I would scroll through the command history using the
arrow keys.
But 'sudo dnf --refresh upgrade' is no longer listed!
All o
On Apr 14, 2022, at 20:49, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>
> Anyway, storing passwords is a terrible idea, even worse a history of old
> passwords. At best you store hashes.
Now that I have said that, if you are using OpenLDAP as an authentication
source (and not just binding to it), t
On Apr 11, 2022, at 14:16, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
>
> Is there a way to retrieve the OpenLDAP password history list using openldap
> utilities?
> For example to get the history of passwords which a user has used and the
> timestamp associated with it when the password ha
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 11:45 PM Kaushal Shriyan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to retrieve the OpenLDAP password history list
> using openldap utilities?
> For example to get the history of passwords which a user has used and the
> timestamp associated with it when the
Hi,
Is there a way to retrieve the OpenLDAP password history list
using openldap utilities?
For example to get the history of passwords which a user has used and the
timestamp associated with it when the password has been resetted.
Please guide me. Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Kaushal
On 11/12/21 04:40, Tom R (Milwaukee WI) wrote:
On Thu 11/11/21 23:37 -0800 Community support (Sam) for Fedora users wrote:
On 11/11/21 15:13, Tom R (Milwaukee WI) wrote:
Is it safe to run
$ dnf history rollback 148
There's no way that will work.
Wow, thanks!
Rollback gene
edora34
>> (i.e. go from fedora32 to fedora34). I'm happy to upgrade to fedora34.
>
>My understanding of the previous history is that it that the upgrade was
>successful, but for some reason it was having trouble booting.
Yes/agreed, thanks for correcting me.
>You booted
f the previous history is that it that the upgrade was
successful, but for some reason it was having trouble booting. You
booted the F32 kernel, which worked, but you are still running F33.
Here's what my vps provider suggested I do:
# boot into fedora32, as root:
This is not
). Should I be doing some cleanup first: http://sprunge.us/Cyhmq4
Is it safe to run
$ dnf history rollback 148
?
--
thanks!
On Mon 11/8/21 9:01 -0600 Tom R wrote:
>My notes: https://zq3q.org/fp/fed32-33ug-boothang.htm
>
>--
>thanks,
>Tom | Milwaukee WI
>
>Snip
On 10/28/20 4:38 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> This is with default Fedora 33 Workstation x86_64.
>
> Firefox > History > Clear Recent History > Time range to clear
>
> The combobox can be clicked to show the drop-down list, but none of the
> shown items can be selecte
This is with default Fedora 33 Workstation x86_64.
Firefox > History > Clear Recent History > Time range to clear
The combobox can be clicked to show the drop-down list, but none of the
shown items can be selected with a mouse-click. Using cursor keys is the
workaround.
Can anyone
Il giorno mar, 20/11/2018 alle 18.37 +0100, Dario Lesca ha scritto:
> Yes, thanks, also this can be a workaround.
>
> But i can think also for other people, if in case this annoying
> problem also affects other people.
>
> Then, if this is the only solution, it's bette I fill a bug in order
> to
Il giorno mar, 20/11/2018 alle 10.11 -0700, Joe Zeff ha scritto:
> Try adding this line to ~/.bashrc:
> alias reboot='exec reboot'
Yes, thanks, also this can be a workaround.
But i can think also for other people, if in case this annoying problem
also affects other people.
Then, if this is the
On 11/20/2018 10:03 AM, Dario Lesca wrote:
Ok, thank, this can be a possible solution
but it will be difficult to avoid the habit of writing only "reboot" ...
to lose last history is very annoyng
Try adding this line to ~/.bashrc:
alias reboot=&#
"reboot"
... to lose last history is very annoyng
Why this kind of problem occur only some time?
Has anyone had this kind of problem?
I must fill a bug?
IMHO:
Seem this problem occur only on Fedora Server
On Centos 7 this kind of problem has never happened (to me).
Thanks
--
Dario
On 11/20/18 4:50 AM, Dario Lesca wrote:
How to I get rid on this (my?) issue ?
Use "exec reboot" instead of "reboot". Close all of your other active
shells before you do.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
hell pid and nothing happen.
I have try to kill $PPID (my parent process id "sshd: root@pts/0") and
logout + history saved is happen
then, systemd send SIGTERM to all process, and when sshd get it, close
the shell ... how to close it if SIGTERM is ignored from it?
when the system goes down, H
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:00 PM stan wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:11:32 +0100 Dario Lesca wrote:
> > Fedora server 29 minimal fresh install.
> >
> > If I restart server with "reboot" the last history of working shell is
> > not saved.
> > Is someth
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:11:32 +0100
Dario Lesca wrote:
> Fedora server 29 minimal fresh install.
>
> If I restart server with "reboot" the last history of working shell is
> not saved.
> Is something missing that I should install?
That would seem to be a systemd e
Fedora server 29 minimal fresh install.
If I restart server with "reboot" the last history of working shell is
not saved.
I must remember to do "history -a" to store last commands history
If I do logout the history is correctly stored.
With Centos7 minimal fresh install
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 18:46 Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 18:01 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> [egreshko@meimei ~]$ rpm -qa pulse*
>>> pulseaudio-11.1-18.fc28.1.x86_64
>>> pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-11.1-18.fc28.1.x86_64
>>> pulseaudio-module-x11-11.1-
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018, 18:46 Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 18:01 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 06/15/18 13:44, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > > Tim via users wrote:
> > > > Allegedly, on or about 14 June 2018, Todd Zullinger sent:
> > > > > To be fair, I don't think the rpm man p
On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 18:01 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/15/18 13:44, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > Tim via users wrote:
> > > Allegedly, on or about 14 June 2018, Todd Zullinger sent:
> > > > To be fair, I don't think the rpm man page documents its
> > > > wildcard support. If it does, I'm lookin
On 06/15/18 13:44, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Tim via users wrote:
>> Allegedly, on or about 14 June 2018, Todd Zullinger sent:
>>> To be fair, I don't think the rpm man page documents its
>>> wildcard support. If it does, I'm looking past it.
>> I've always successfully done things like this:
>>
>>
On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 01:44 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Tim via users wrote:
> > Allegedly, on or about 14 June 2018, Todd Zullinger sent:
> > > To be fair, I don't think the rpm man page documents its
> > > wildcard support. If it does, I'm looking past it.
> >
> > I've always successfully do
Tim via users wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 14 June 2018, Todd Zullinger sent:
>> To be fair, I don't think the rpm man page documents its
>> wildcard support. If it does, I'm looking past it.
>
> I've always successfully done things like this:
>
> rpm -qa \*pulse\*
>
> More through force of
Allegedly, on or about 14 June 2018, Todd Zullinger sent:
> To be fair, I don't think the rpm man page documents its
> wildcard support. If it does, I'm looking past it.
I've always successfully done things like this:
rpm -qa \*pulse\*
More through force of habit, than any hard knowledge.
--
te:
>> > On 14 June 2018 at 14:27, Robert Moskowitz > <mailto:r...@htt-consult.com>> wrote:
>> >> I want to get history for all the pulseaudio components (to
>> update my
>> >> audacity bug report at rpmfusion).
>> >>
&g
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Ah, I left off the 'list' portion of your command
>
> # dnf history list pulseaudio*
> ID | Command line | Date and time| Action(s) |
> Altered
> -
t to grep...
>>
>> # rpm -qa | grep pulseaudio
>
> But that does not give me the update history. Going to have to pipe this
> output into something else
>
> # rpm -qa | grep pulseaudio
> pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-11.1-18.fc28.1.x86_64
> pulseaudio-module-x1
.
which has nothing to do with "history".
If, as the OP suggests, he wishes to know the history of when packages named
pulseaudio* were updated he may run into a problem if he wasn't consistent in
the
apps used to perform updates. First of all, rpm doesn't keep a history of
On 06/14/2018 09:57 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:55 AM Robert Moskowitz <mailto:r...@htt-consult.com>> wrote:
On 06/14/2018 09:08 AM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
> On 14 June 2018 at 14:27, Robert Moskowitz mailto:r...@htt-consult.com>> wrote:
>&g
On 06/14/18 22:23, Tony Nelson wrote:
> That is not what he means. Would one of you please look at the RPM
> man page?
Sure
--last Orders the package listing by install time such that the latest
packages are at the top.
which has nothing to do with "his
Tony Nelson wrote:
> That is not what he means. Would one of you please look
> at the RPM man page?
To be fair, I don't think the rpm man page documents its
wildcard support. If it does, I'm looking past it.
--
Todd
~~
From th
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:55 AM Robert Moskowitz
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 06/14/2018 09:08 AM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
>>> FWIW, to match using a wildcard you'd have to use `rpm -qa pulseaudio*`.
>>
>> Don't think so:
>>
>> # `rpm -qa pulseaudio*`
>> bash: pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-
On 18-06-14 09:57:33, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:55 AM Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
>
> On 06/14/2018 09:08 AM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
> > On 14 June 2018 at 14:27, Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
> >> I want to get history for all the pulseaudio components (to
upd
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:55 AM Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
>
> On 06/14/2018 09:08 AM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
> > On 14 June 2018 at 14:27, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >> I want to get history for all the pulseaudio components (to update my
> >> audacity bug report at
On 06/14/2018 09:08 AM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 14 June 2018 at 14:27, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I want to get history for all the pulseaudio components (to update my
audacity bug report at rpmfusion).
#rpm -q pulseaudio --last
produces
pulseaudio-11.1-18.fc28.1.x86_64 Thu 24 May
On 14 June 2018 at 14:27, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I want to get history for all the pulseaudio components (to update my
> audacity bug report at rpmfusion).
>
> #rpm -q pulseaudio --last
>
> produces
>
> pulseaudio-11.1-18.fc28.1.x86_64 Thu 24 May 2018 0
On 06/14/18 20:32, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 7:28 AM Robert Moskowitz <mailto:r...@htt-consult.com>> wrote:
>
> I want to get history for all the pulseaudio components (to update my
> audacity bug report at rpmfusion).
>
> #rpm -q pulseau
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 7:28 AM Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
> I want to get history for all the pulseaudio components (to update my
> audacity bug report at rpmfusion).
>
> #rpm -q pulseaudio --last
>
> produces
>
> pulseaudio-11.1-18.fc28.1.x86_64 Thu 24 Ma
I want to get history for all the pulseaudio components (to update my
audacity bug report at rpmfusion).
#rpm -q pulseaudio --last
produces
pulseaudio-11.1-18.fc28.1.x86_64 Thu 24 May 2018 09:59:34
PM EDT
but
# rpm -q pulseaudio* --last
results in:
package
2016-06-01 1:18 GMT-06:00 Maurizio Marini :
> Hello
> by some days (2 weeks or something like that)
> the notify popup that warn me that some updates are ready to be applied, does
> show me a very long history of updates needed by my system, many lines are
> replicated, I have a 15&
> The most obvious response is: Install the updates waiting to be
> installed.
yes, of course I do, but that popup is a finger in my eye!
> But do you mean that you're getting notifications about updates that
> have already been installed?
Yes, I get a very large popup, with all the notifications
On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 09:18 +0200, Maurizio Marini wrote:
> by some days (2 weeks or something like that) the notify popup that
> warn me that some updates are ready to be applied, does show me a very
> long history of updates needed by my system, many lines are
> replicated, I have
Hello
by some days (2 weeks or something like that)
the notify popup that warn me that some updates are ready to be applied, does
show me a very long history of updates needed by my system, many lines are
replicated, I have a 15" screen and now it fills up all screen vertically
It is boring
> From: "Michael Schwendt"
>
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 23:44:53 +0200, Antonio M wrote:
>
> > when I try to revert to a previous history I get an error...what does it
> > mean??
> >
> > # dnf history undo 125
>
> > @updates
> >
On 10/24/2015 08:20 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 20:05:52 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> The only time "undo" seems relevant is if you're working with
>> updates-testing repo.
> It cannot be generalised like that. Installing from _any_ repo, such
> as updates-testing, may lead
On Sat, 24 Oct 2015 20:05:52 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> The only time "undo" seems relevant is if you're working with
> updates-testing repo.
It cannot be generalised like that. Installing from _any_ repo, such
as updates-testing, may lead to upgrading something that cannot be
downgraded again af
On 10/24/2015 08:02 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:30:55 +1030, Tim wrote:
>
>> Tim:
Makes a nonsense of having any downgrade/undo options then...
> Even the very latest install transaction cannot be undone, because it
> included an update, too:
>
> Undoing transaction
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:30:55 +1030, Tim wrote:
> Tim:
> >> Makes a nonsense of having any downgrade/undo options then...
Even the very latest install transaction cannot be undone, because it
included an update, too:
Undoing transaction 49, from Sat Oct 24 13:56:18 2015
Install alsa-lib-deve
files would change in
a non-compatible way.
There were a few bookmarks that I wanted to retrieve, at the very least,
now I've got to do it the hard way. What's probably going to more
difficult is that I wanted to look through the history to find something
I'd looked at a few days ago
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:02:07 +1030, Tim wrote:
> > You can only downgrade to packages, which are still available in
> > the repos. Unfortunately, when an update is released, it replaces
> > the previous update in the repo.
>
> Makes a nonsense of having any downgrade/undo options then...
True.
Allegedly, on or about 22 October 2015, Michael Schwendt sent:
> You can only downgrade to packages, which are still available in
> the repos. Unfortunately, when an update is released, it replaces
> the previous update in the repo.
Makes a nonsense of having any downgrade/undo options then...
I
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 01:05:20 +0200
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 23:44:53 +0200, Antonio M wrote:
>
> > when I try to revert to a previous history I get an error...what
> > does it mean??
> >
> > # dnf history undo 125
>
> > @updates
&
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 23:44:53 +0200, Antonio M wrote:
> when I try to revert to a previous history I get an error...what does it
> mean??
>
> # dnf history undo 125
> @updates
> Nessun pacchetto sssd-ipa-0:1.13.0-4.fc22.x86_64 disponibile.
> Errore: An operation cannot be
when I try to revert to a previous history I get an error...what does it
mean??
# dnf history undo 125
Last metadata expiration check performed 2:10:34 ago on Wed Oct 21 21:26:09
2015.
Undoing transaction 125, from Tue Oct 20 22:59:17 2015
Aggiornato clutter-gst3-3.0.12-1.fc22.x86_64
@updates
On 07/11/2015 06:59 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 07/10/2015 07:52 PM, jd1008 wrote:
I mean first release according a wicki, was dubbed by RH as 0.8
not 8.0 back in 1993???
As far as I know, there's no remaining archive of the original beta
releases of Red Hat Linux.
Sigh!! :(
I enjoy runn
On 07/10/2015 07:52 PM, jd1008 wrote:
I mean first release according a wicki, was dubbed by RH as 0.8
not 8.0 back in 1993???
As far as I know, there's no remaining archive of the original beta
releases of Red Hat Linux.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or c
On 07/11/2015 11:00 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:52:31 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
Guys! No.
I mean first release according a wicki, was dubbed by RH as 0.8
not 8.0 back in 1993???
Which wiki?
I don't recall ever hearing about 0.8/0.9 versions...
kevin
https://fedoraproject.org/w
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:52:31 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
> Guys! No.
> I mean first release according a wicki, was dubbed by RH as 0.8
> not 8.0 back in 1993???
Which wiki?
I don't recall ever hearing about 0.8/0.9 versions...
kevin
pgp5IuK1l03hh.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users
That was Halloween. I believe that FC1 came out after RH9 and RHEL 3 was
based on it.
On Jul 10, 2015 10:52 PM, "jd1008" wrote:
>
>
> On 07/10/2015 07:14 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:01:31PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 07/10/2015 01:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>>
>>
On 07/10/2015 07:14 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:01:31PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
On 07/10/2015 01:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:45:57 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
On 07/10/2015 01:32 PM, Fulko Hew wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:26 PM, jd1008 wrote:
What RH
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:01:31PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 07/10/2015 01:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:45:57 -0600
> >jd1008 wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>On 07/10/2015 01:32 PM, Fulko Hew wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:26 PM, jd1008 wrote:
> What RH release was FC1
On 07/10/2015 01:57 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:45:57 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
On 07/10/2015 01:32 PM, Fulko Hew wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:26 PM, jd1008 wrote:
What RH release was FC1 based on?
Try this entry in Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Fedor
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:45:57 -0600
jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 07/10/2015 01:32 PM, Fulko Hew wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:26 PM, jd1008 wrote:
> >> What RH release was FC1 based on?
> > Try this entry in Wikipedia:
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Fedora_releases#Fedora_Core_1
On 07/10/2015 01:32 PM, Fulko Hew wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:26 PM, jd1008 wrote:
What RH release was FC1 based on?
Try this entry in Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Fedora_releases#Fedora_Core_1.E2.80.934
Thanx!
For personal collection, I tried to find the RHL 0.8 d
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:26 PM, jd1008 wrote:
> What RH release was FC1 based on?
Try this entry in Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Fedora_releases#Fedora_Core_1.E2.80.934
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https:
What RH release was FC1 based on?
Thanx!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/
there. The charging splash screen took over the screen at some point and I
>>> cannot switch to any other tty. So I waited until I believe the
>>> transcaction is done and did a forced shutdown.
>>>
>>> I rebooted and everything seems fine except
>> transcaction is done and did a forced shutdown.
>>
>> I rebooted and everything seems fine except that the output of yum
>> history info X (X is the update transcaction) is a bit strange:
>>
>> ..
>> Scriptlet output:
>> 1 warning: /etc/cups/cup
ction is
> done and did a forced shutdown.
>
> I rebooted and everything seems fine except that the output of yum
> history info X (X is the update transcaction) is a bit strange:
>
> ..
> Scriptlet output:
> 1 warning: /etc/cups/cups-browsed.conf created as
> /etc/cu
seems fine except that the output of yum history
info X (X is the update transcaction) is a bit strange:
..
Scriptlet output:
1 warning: /etc/cups/cups-browsed.conf created as
/etc/cups/cups-browsed.conf.rpmnew
2
3 1k
4 2k
5 3k
6 4k
7 5k
8 6k
..
93 91k
94 92k
95 93k
96 94k
97 95k
98 96k
Hi,
I've just installed f20 and can't figure out why the gnome-terminal
scroll history doesn't work. I've enabled both "scroll on output" and
"scroll on keystroke" in the Scrolling tab, but there is still no
scroll history.
What am I missing?
T
Am 31.08.2013 16:51, schrieb John Pilkington:
> Installed yesterday from fedora-updates-testing. Is it just me? Is it
> recoverable? Should this go to Bugzilla?
unconfirmed here, installed it at koji-build-day
Aug 20 18:54:01 Updated: firefox-23.0.1-1.fc18.x86_64
signature.asc
Description
On 09/02/2013 05:50 AM, John Pilkington wrote:
On 02/09/13 10:38, g wrote:
<<<>>>
if you open about:config and enter 'history' or 'shutdown' in "Find:" bar,
you will/should see that 'default' is 'true'.
privacy.clearO
here, installed it at koji-build-day
Aug 20 18:54:01 Updated: firefox-23.0.1-1.fc18.x86_64
OK, thanks Harald, 'Edit > Preferences > Privacy > History > custom
settings > Clear history when FF closes' was ticked. No idea how.
if you open about:config and enter 'h
-build-day
Aug 20 18:54:01 Updated: firefox-23.0.1-1.fc18.x86_64
OK, thanks Harald, 'Edit > Preferences > Privacy > History > custom
settings > Clear history when FF closes' was ticked. No idea how.
if you open about:config and enter 'history' or 'shutd
.fc18.x86_64
OK, thanks Harald, 'Edit > Preferences > Privacy > History > custom
settings > Clear history when FF closes' was ticked. No idea how.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.
Installed yesterday from fedora-updates-testing. Is it just me? Is it
recoverable? Should this go to Bugzilla?
John P
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduc
cause I am involved in mankind; and
therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee."
-Original Message-
From: Alan Cox
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:50:13
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: how to disable "unset HISTORY"
> You can turn on "BSD Process Accoun
On 16/10/12 11:03, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
On 10/16/2012 07:52 AM, Tiziana Manfroni wrote:
Hi, I have some users that delete .history file (in tcsh shell), so I
can't see their commands.
Can I disable the command "unset history"?
If it is not possible, what can I do?
You can
On 10/17/2012 12:06 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 10/16/2012 02:52 AM, Tiziana Manfroni wrote:
>> Hi, I have some users that delete .history file (in tcsh shell), so I
>> can't see their commands.
>> Can I disable the command "unset history"?
>> If it is
On 10/15/2012 11:52 PM, Tiziana Manfroni wrote:
If it is not possible, what can I do?
Enable the auditing system. Everything else can be trivially disabled
or evaded.
SuSE actually has some fair documentation for this:
http://doc.opensuse.org/products/draft/SLES/SLES-security_sd_draft/cha.a
On 10/16/2012 05:06 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 10/16/2012 02:52 AM, Tiziana Manfroni wrote:
Hi, I have some users that delete .history file (in tcsh shell), so I
can't see their commands.
Can I disable the command "unset history"?
If it is not possible, what can I do?
Th
On 10/16/2012 05:52 PM, JD wrote:
On 10/16/2012 05:06 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 10/16/2012 02:52 AM, Tiziana Manfroni wrote:
Hi, I have some users that delete .history file (in tcsh shell), so I
can't see their commands.
Can I disable the command "unset history"?
If it
On 10/16/2012 05:06 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 10/16/2012 02:52 AM, Tiziana Manfroni wrote:
Hi, I have some users that delete .history file (in tcsh shell), so I
can't see their commands.
Can I disable the command "unset history"?
If it is not possible, what can I do?
Th
On 10/16/2012 02:52 AM, Tiziana Manfroni wrote:
Hi, I have some users that delete .history file (in tcsh shell), so I
can't see their commands.
Can I disable the command "unset history"?
If it is not possible, what can I do?
Thanks in advance
Tiziana
If you are creative wit
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
