On 13.03.2015 17:21, Bob Goodwin wrote:
...
> If I botch this I can still re-install and start from scratch again but
> would prefer not.
Consider these two applications:
Graphical disk usage statistics - Qt/KDE
- https://userbase.kde.org/Filelight
Filelight allows you to quickly understand e
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:21:15 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I am still trying to fix this, just in over my head ...
Run "du -h /" on your sda3 and skim over the output. Watch out for
directory trees that contain many GB. Is that usage expected?
Especially examine /var. Try to find any runtime files
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I've never used gparted before but so far have managed to shrink the largest
> partition 20+ GB. However that is an extended partition and I need to add
> space to / [/var/cache/yum/x86_64/21/fedora is what wants more room] and I
> don't unde
On 03/13/15 10:04, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Plus, Bob has shown a rather empty Yum cache in the original post.
I am still trying to fix this, just in over my head ...
I've never used gparted before but so far have managed to shrink the
largest partition 20+ GB. However that is an extended par
Oops, thank you Michael!
On Mar 13, 2015 11:04 AM, "Michael Schwendt" wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:29:57 -0300, Martin Cigorraga wrote:
>
> > Hey Bob,
> >
> > Try cleaning the yum cache for unused packages...
>
> By default, Yum does not keep installed packages in the cache. It would be
> nece
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:29:57 -0300, Martin Cigorraga wrote:
> Hey Bob,
>
> Try cleaning the yum cache for unused packages...
By default, Yum does not keep installed packages in the cache. It would be
necessary to edit yum.conf to enable that feature as explained in the
manual.
Plus, Bob has sho
Hey Bob,
Try cleaning the yum cache for unused packages...
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Paul Cartwright
wrote:
> On 03/13/2015 06:04 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> >
> > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> > /dev/sda350G 49G 0 100% /
> >
> > Ok, there is the problem.
On 03/13/2015 06:04 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda350G 49G 0 100% /
>
> Ok, there is the problem. Not sure what's going on or what has filled
> that?
>
> I need more coffee ...
>
> Thank you,
mine looks like
[root@pauls-server b
On 03/13/15 05:51, Frederic Muller wrote:
On 03/13/2015 04:44 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I can't think of the command to show free space?
df -h
-
[root@bobgASRockServer bobg]# df -h /var/cache/yum/x86_64/21/fedora
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda350G 49G 0
On 03/13/15 05:51, Frederic Muller wrote:
On 03/13/2015 04:44 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I can't think of the command to show free space?
df -h
-
[root@bobgASRockServer bobg]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda350G 49G 0 100% /
devtmpf
On 03/13/2015 04:44 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I can't think of the command to show free space?
df -h
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraprojec
On 03/13/15 05:28, Michael Schwendt wrote:
You forgot to show how much free space there_is_.
I can't think of the command to show free space?
Then, after you've done that, run "yum clean metadata" and retry.
Also check the directory access permission bits -- just in case.
-
I did that first
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 05:24:13 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> I tried to yum update this computer and got the following error:
>
> One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora 21 - x86_64),
> and yum doesn't have enough cached data to continue. At this point the
> only
> safe thing yum can
I tried to yum update this computer and got the following error:
One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora 21 - x86_64),
and yum doesn't have enough cached data to continue. At this point the
only
safe thing yum can do is fail. There are a few ways to work "fix" this:
.
I
On 12/15/13 17:16, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> This is an error message I have not had before:
>
> [root@box10 bobg]# yum update
> Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
> adobe-linux-x86_64 | 951 B 00:00:00
> fedora/20/x86_64/metalink | 18 kB 00:00:00
> fedora | 3.8 kB 00:00:00
> rpmfusion-fr
On 15/12/13 09:16, Bob Goodwin wrote:
This is an error message I have not had before:
[root@box10 bobg]# yum update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
adobe-linux-x86_64 | 951 B 00:00:00
fedora/20/x86_64/metalink | 18 kB 00:00:00
fedora | 3.8 kB 00:00:00
rpmfusion-free-rawhide |
On 15/12/13 05:01, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 15/12/13 04:26, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 04:16:23 -0500
There was a fix for that in F20, F19 & F20 use the same yum.
Grab the latest yum(f20) from koji, and install:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=484549
Ok, I did t
On 15/12/13 04:26, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 04:16:23 -0500
There was a fix for that in F20, F19 & F20 use the same yum.
Grab the latest yum(f20) from koji, and install:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=484549
Ok, I did that and it appears to have stumbled thr
On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 04:16:23 -0500
There was a fix for that in F20, F19 & F20 use the same yum.
Grab the latest yum(f20) from koji, and install:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=484549
--
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
This is an error message I have not had before:
[root@box10 bobg]# yum update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit
adobe-linux-x86_64 | 951 B 00:00:00
fedora/20/x86_64/metalink | 18 kB 00:00:00
fedora | 3.8 kB 00:00:00
rpmfusion-free-rawhide | 3.3 kB 00:00:00
rpmfusion-nonfree-rawh
I was able to update by issuing the following command.
yum --skip-broken --exclude mesa-dri-drivers
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/M
I cannot run 'yum update' due to dependency problems with F16 packages.
I have exactly the same problem as Bob Mckay in this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820351
Running 'yum --skip-broken distro-sync' does not fix it.
How do I resolve this issue ?
Thanks
--
users mailing l
After upgrading from f16 to f17 a couple of weeks ago using preupgrade
and then doing an initial 'yum update', everything worked fine - the
yum update worked.
This weekend tried to do a yum update on either my lagtop or server
and I get the same error condition:
--> Processing Dependency: libxapi
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:29:30 -0500, Gregory wrote:
> [r...@re01 pluginconf.d]# yum check-update
> Loaded plugins: presto, priorities, refresh-packagekit
> 3487 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Just remove plugins you either don't use or are not familiar with.
rpm --eras
Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
>
> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 17:59 +, JB wrote:
> > Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
> >
> > > ...
> > > /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo:priority=1
> > > ...
> > > /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates.repo:priority=2
> > >
> > Hi,
> > please give me an uncut o
Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
>
> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 17:59 +, JB wrote:
> > Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
> >
> > > ...
> > > /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo:priority=1
> > > ...
> > > /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates.repo:priority=2
> > >
> > Hi,
> > please give me an uncut o
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 17:59 +, JB wrote:
> Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
>
> > ...
> > /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo:priority=1
> > ...
> > /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates.repo:priority=2
> >
> Hi,
> please give me an uncut output of:
>
> # cat /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo
> and
> #
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 17:48 +, JB wrote:
> Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
>
> > >
> > You were correct to cause me to look at the downloadonly plugin... it
> > was enabled. I originally did in upgrade from f12 to f13 instead of a
> > new install, and then installed yum-cron. I do not
Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
> ...
> /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo:priority=1
> ...
> /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates.repo:priority=2
>
Hi,
please give me an uncut output of:
# cat /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo
and
# cat /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates.repo
Looks like we are getting clos
Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
> >
> You were correct to cause me to look at the downloadonly plugin... it
> was enabled. I originally did in upgrade from f12 to f13 instead of a
> new install, and then installed yum-cron. I do not remember installing
> the downloadonly plugin, or enablin
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 16:45 +, JB wrote:
> Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
>
> > ...
> > [root Re01 pluginconf.d]# yum check-update
> > Loaded plugins: presto, priorities, refresh-packagekit
> > 3487 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
> >
> Hi,
>
> you have a plu
Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
> ...
> [root Re01 pluginconf.d]# yum check-update
> Loaded plugins: presto, priorities, refresh-packagekit
> 3487 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
>
Hi,
you have a plugin called priorities, which is fine.
I assume it is enabled, whic
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestion!!!
>
> I thought perhaps it was a bad mirror as well. To test this I removed
> the comment marker from baseurl and then commented out the mirrorlist.
> After doing a yum clean all, this change did not result in
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 15:50 +, JB wrote:
> Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
>
> >
> Gregory,
> you have a plugin called downloadonly - the package is:
>
> $ yum list *downloadonly*
> yum-plugin-downloadonly.noarch 1.1.27-2.fc13
> @updates
>
> The description
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 15:35 +, JB wrote:
> Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
>
> > ...
> Hi,
> I must apologize first for mistyped entry request ('yum list all") - this is
> not
> what I wanted.
> I meant to ask for output of:
> yum repolist all
> Also, get output of:
> yum check
> JB
Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
>
Gregory,
you have a plugin called downloadonly - the package is:
$ yum list *downloadonly*
yum-plugin-downloadonly.noarch 1.1.27-2.fc13 @updates
The description of it is:
$ yum info yum-plugin-downloadonly.noarch
...
Description:
Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
> ...
Hi,
I must apologize first for mistyped entry request ('yum list all") - this is not
what I wanted.
I meant to ask for output of:
yum repolist all
Also, get output of:
yum check
JB
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 09:36 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 06:30 +, JB wrote:
> > Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
> >
> > >
> > > When I try to update an rpm yum is not pulling the recent rpm's from the
> > > repository.
> > >
> > Hi,
> > I assume it is Fedora
On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 06:59 +0100, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > Dear List,
> >
> > I noticed a problem with an update of evolution on my laptop with
> > 2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE. I thought the problem was with evolution
> > and made an en
Gregory P. Ennis PoMec.Net> writes:
>
> When I try to update an rpm yum is not pulling the recent rpm's from the
> repository.
>
Hi,
I assume it is Fedora 13.
We have to do it methodically, jumping all over places does not do it.
Please post full output (uncut):
yum list all
yum clean all
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I noticed a problem with an update of evolution on my laptop with
> 2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE. I thought the problem was with evolution
> and made an entry on this list. Kevin Fenzi aptly pointed me in the
> right direc
Dear List,
I noticed a problem with an update of evolution on my laptop with
2.6.33.4-95.fc13.i686.PAE. I thought the problem was with evolution
and made an entry on this list. Kevin Fenzi aptly pointed me in the
right direction.
I have done the following :
yum clean all
rm /var/lib/rpm/__d
42 matches
Mail list logo
