On 6/26/17 11:47 PM, Tim wrote:
Tim:
* In this case the ISP "doesn't support" IPv6 meaning that it's not
there, rather than they simply won't give any help with it.
Stephen Morris:
Yeah, my ISP has told me I should disable any attempts to use IPv6 on
my system as they do not support it. I'm in
Tim:
>> * In this case the ISP "doesn't support" IPv6 meaning that it's not
>> there, rather than they simply won't give any help with it.
Stephen Morris:
> Yeah, my ISP has told me I should disable any attempts to use IPv6 on
> my system as they do not support it. I'm in Australia and my ISP is
>
On 4/10/17 3:39 PM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 10 April 2017, Stephen Morris sent:
am I correct in understanding that you are saying that even
though I have IPv6 set to link-local, that IPv6 is still being
attempted across the internet gateway, and in my case because my ISP
doesn't suppor
On 4/10/17 9:01 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/10/17 06:39, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/10/17 05:33, Stephen Morris wrote:
Thanks Rick, am I correct in understanding that you are saying that
even though I have IPv6 set to link-local, that IPv6 is still being
attempted across the internet gateway, and
Tim [mailto:ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au]
Sent: maandag 10 april 2017 7:39
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Is there a way to stop ipv6 leakage without turning off ipv6?
Allegedly, on or about 10 April 2017, Stephen Morris sent:
> am I correct in understanding that you are saying that even thou
Allegedly, on or about 10 April 2017, Stephen Morris sent:
> am I correct in understanding that you are saying that even
> though I have IPv6 set to link-local, that IPv6 is still being
> attempted across the internet gateway, and in my case because my ISP
> doesn't support IPv6, I am assuming tho
On 04/10/17 06:39, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/10/17 05:33, Stephen Morris wrote:
>> Thanks Rick, am I correct in understanding that you are saying that
>> even though I have IPv6 set to link-local, that IPv6 is still being
>> attempted across the internet gateway, and in my case because my ISP
>> do
On 04/10/17 05:27, Stephen Morris wrote:
> If I use your suggestion to disable IPv6, that was in the thread for
> the person that is having trouble accessing sites with Firefox, will
> that cause the IPv6 not ready messages to start appearing in the boot
> log again?
No. If you disable IPv6 sup
On 04/10/17 05:33, Stephen Morris wrote:
> Thanks Rick, am I correct in understanding that you are saying that
> even though I have IPv6 set to link-local, that IPv6 is still being
> attempted across the internet gateway, and in my case because my ISP
> doesn't support IPv6, I am assuming those pac
On 4/7/17 10:17 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 04/06/2017 02:45 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 4/6/17 9:20 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/06/17 06:57, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi Ed, just as a side issue to this, because my ISP (I don't know
about my VPN provider) IPv6 at all for anything, I was setting I
On 4/7/17 10:29 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/07/17 08:17, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 04/06/2017 02:45 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 4/6/17 9:20 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/06/17 06:57, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi Ed, just as a side issue to this, because my ISP (I don't know
about my VPN provider) IPv
On 04/07/17 08:17, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 04/06/2017 02:45 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
>> On 4/6/17 9:20 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 04/06/17 06:57, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi Ed, just as a side issue to this, because my ISP (I don't know
about my VPN provider) IPv6 at all for anything, I
On 04/06/2017 02:45 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 4/6/17 9:20 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 04/06/17 06:57, Stephen Morris wrote:
>>> Hi Ed, just as a side issue to this, because my ISP (I don't know
>>> about my VPN provider) IPv6 at all for anything, I was setting IPv6 to
>>> 'ignore' via Networkm
On 4/6/17 9:20 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/06/17 06:57, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi Ed, just as a side issue to this, because my ISP (I don't know
about my VPN provider) IPv6 at all for anything, I was setting IPv6 to
'ignore' via Networkmanager in KDE (Gnome doesn't seem to have the
same options)
-Original Message-
From: Ed Greshko [mailto:ed.gres...@greshko.com]
Sent: donderdag 6 april 2017 11:47
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: Is there a way to stop ipv6 leakage without turning off ipv6?
On 04/06/17 15:53, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
> Remember that V6
On 04/06/17 15:53, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
> Remember that V6 is some option you do NOT have the option to ignore. And
> that strange quirks could be solved by "net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1"
> Some countries make haste implementing it, while others don't.
>
> I was expecting that it woul
See below
-Original Message-
From: Ed Greshko [mailto:ed.gres...@greshko.com]
Sent: donderdag 6 april 2017 1:20
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: Is there a way to stop ipv6 leakage without turning off ipv6?
On 04/06/17 06:57, Stephen Morris wrote:
> Hi Ed, just a
On 04/06/17 06:57, Stephen Morris wrote:
> Hi Ed, just as a side issue to this, because my ISP (I don't know
> about my VPN provider) IPv6 at all for anything, I was setting IPv6 to
> 'ignore' via Networkmanager in KDE (Gnome doesn't seem to have the
> same options) but that was causing messages in
On 4/2/17 8:22 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/01/17 21:42, William Oliver wrote:
I'm using Fedora 25 on an HP laptop with KDE. I commonly use a VPN
service, but it leaks ipv6 addresses. This seems to be a common
problem with VPN and ipv6, from what I've read on the internet.
So, I've turned off
On 04/03/17 08:29, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> You really need to configure your VPN to also tunnel IPv6. Get into
> the habit. IPv6 is actually being effectively deployed. The more you
> delay, the more issues you will have.
I guess this comment was meant for me. Well, I would configure my VP
On 04/01/2017 06:22 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/01/17 21:42, William Oliver wrote:
I'm using Fedora 25 on an HP laptop with KDE. I commonly use a VPN
service, but it leaks ipv6 addresses. This seems to be a common
problem with VPN and ipv6, from what I've read on the internet.
So, I've turn
Yes, use your firewall to drop all
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone
> Op 2 apr. 2017 om 00:25 heeft Ed Greshko het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>> On 04/01/17 21:42, William Oliver wrote:
>> I'm using Fedora 25 on an HP laptop with KDE. I commonly use a VPN
>> service, but it leaks ipv6 addresses. Thi
On 04/01/17 21:42, William Oliver wrote:
> I'm using Fedora 25 on an HP laptop with KDE. I commonly use a VPN
> service, but it leaks ipv6 addresses. This seems to be a common
> problem with VPN and ipv6, from what I've read on the internet.
>
> So, I've turned off ipv6 for my wireless interface,
I'm using Fedora 25 on an HP laptop with KDE. I commonly use a VPN
service, but it leaks ipv6 addresses. This seems to be a common
problem with VPN and ipv6, from what I've read on the internet.
So, I've turned off ipv6 for my wireless interface, and that seems to
solve the problem. However, I
Andrew Parker wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Paul Allen Newell
> wrote:
>
>> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>
>>> I prefer changing something in /etc/sysctl.conf because it's clearly
>>> where this kind of configuration change belongs. Changing ifcfg-eth0 may
>>> or may not work
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 17:31 +1000, Dan Irwin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
>
> > No doubt IP6 will eventually arrive because it will become necessary,
> > but the chances of a significant number of end-users "demanding" it are
> > close to zero
>
> And w
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 21:45 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 14:10 +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
[...]
> But it seems that there should be a "Fedora-approved" way to not deal
> with ipv6 rather than all of us having "best solutions". If anyone
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> I prefer changing something in /etc/sysctl.conf because it's clearly
>> where this kind of configuration change belongs. Changing ifcfg-eth0 may
>> or may not work at the moment -- I'm guessing it probably d
> "Dan" == Dan Irwin writes:
Dan> Clearly it provides a benefit.
Clearly?
it's not clear to me.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
G
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> No doubt IP6 will eventually arrive because it will become necessary,
> but the chances of a significant number of end-users "demanding" it are
> close to zero
And while none of the users who have a need ask (eg: yourself) the
ISPs w
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 14:10 +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>
>>
To disable ipv6 on F12 on the next reboot just add the line
net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1
to your /etc/sysctl.conf file.
To dis
>> To disable ipv6 on F12 on the next reboot just add the line
>> net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1
>> to your /etc/sysctl.conf file.
>> To disable it right away issue the command
>> sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1
>> To disable ipv6 on just one interface (for example eth0) issue the
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 14:10 +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> >> To disable ipv6 on F12 on the next reboot just add the line
> >>
> >> net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1
> >>
> >> to your /etc/sysctl.conf file.
> >>
> >> To disable it right away issue the command
> >
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> To disable ipv6 on F12 on the next reboot just add the line
>>
>> net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1
>>
>> to your /etc/sysctl.conf file.
>>
>> To disable it right away issue the command
>>
>> sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1
> Thank you. That looks lik
ssages is
> > overflowing with complaints from named (I run the basic caching
> > nameserver configuration).
> >
> > There's lots of variegated advice around on turning off ipv6, much of it
> > out of date. What's the canonical way of doing this in Fedora
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 22:24 -0800, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> inode0 wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Tom H wrote:
> >
> >> Blacklisting ipv6 may not be enough to disable it completely; ipv6 can
> >> still be loaded with insmod/modprobe.
> >>
> >> If you add
> >> install ipv6 /bin/tr
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 18:31 +1000, Dan Irwin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> > I know ipv6 is going to be in all our futures, but for the moment it's
> > just a PITA. My ISP doesn't support it
>
> If you're ISP doesn't support it, you should connect to a t
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> I know ipv6 is going to be in all our futures, but for the moment it's
> just a PITA. My ISP doesn't support it
If you're ISP doesn't support it, you should connect to a tunnel
broker. Fedora is most capable of doing that, though there
sic caching
> nameserver configuration).
>
> There's lots of variegated advice around on turning off ipv6, much of it
> out of date. What's the canonical way of doing this in Fedora (12), or
> at least getting named to shut up about it?
>
> poc
>
To disable
inode0 wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Tom H wrote:
>
>> Blacklisting ipv6 may not be enough to disable it completely; ipv6 can
>> still be loaded with insmod/modprobe.
>>
>> If you add
>> install ipv6 /bin/true
>> to the blacklist entry, it will not load at all.
>>
>
> I think i
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Tom H wrote:
> Blacklisting ipv6 may not be enough to disable it completely; ipv6 can
> still be loaded with insmod/modprobe.
>
> If you add
> install ipv6 /bin/true
> to the blacklist entry, it will not load at all.
I think insmod will still load it even in that
>> ipv6 is now compiled into the kernel so all the previous advice about
>> modprobe.conf, modprobe.d, and sysctl.conf no longer works.
>> You now have to
>> (1) add
>> ipv6.disable=1
>> to the kernel (grub1) or linux (grub2) line
>> or
>> (2) recompile the kernel without ipv6 or with ipv6 as a mo
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 11:53 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I'll try that, but since it just affects the logging, does this mean
> > that named is still trying to do ipv6 lookups all the time?
>
> Only if you are visiting a IPv6-capable site, but such lookups ret
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I'll try that, but since it just affects the logging, does this mean
> that named is still trying to do ipv6 lookups all the time?
Only if you are visiting a IPv6-capable site, but such lookups return
immediately since you have no IPv6 route. There will not be any
in
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 09:00 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I know ipv6 is going to be in all our futures, but for the moment it's
> > just a PITA. My ISP doesn't support it and my /var/log/messages is
> > overflowing with complaints from named (I run the basic ca
On 02/08/2010 10:16 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> There's lots of variegated advice around on turning off ipv6, much of it
>> out of date. What's the canonical way of doing this in Fedora (12), or
>> at least getting named to shut up about it?
>>
> ipv6 is no
> There's lots of variegated advice around on turning off ipv6, much of it
> out of date. What's the canonical way of doing this in Fedora (12), or
> at least getting named to shut up about it?
ipv6 is now compiled into the kernel so all the previous advice about
modprobe.co
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I know ipv6 is going to be in all our futures, but for the moment it's
> just a PITA. My ISP doesn't support it and my /var/log/messages is
> overflowing with complaints from named (I run the basic caching
> nameserver configuration).
Are you seeing messages like this?
I know ipv6 is going to be in all our futures, but for the moment it's
just a PITA. My ISP doesn't support it and my /var/log/messages is
overflowing with complaints from named (I run the basic caching
nameserver configuration).
There's lots of variegated advice around on turning
On 01/12/2010 05:23 PM, Jim wrote:
> On 01/12/2010 07:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> On 01/12/2010 01:00 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>> Robert Moskowitz on 01/12/2010 02:36 PM wrote:
And before I left home I was on my wireless network that DOES have
IPv6
and a RA server.
>>>
> I disabled IPv6 in Firefox and the time delays went away.
> The fe80 prefix is local link. This is for accessing any IPv6 device on
> your subnet.
I had reminded you of the Firefox ipv6 setting and forgot to add that
you could also disable ipv6 (and not get a link-local ipv6 address)
while you
On 01/12/2010 06:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> We think it is a "misconfigure" notebook on the network here. I
> succeeded in deleting the gw route, and 2 minutes later it was back.
> And the network guys confirmed it is not coming from them. Then I
> remembered I did not have this problem
On 01/12/2010 07:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/12/2010 01:00 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Robert Moskowitz on 01/12/2010 02:36 PM wrote:
And before I left home I was on my wireless network that DOES have IPv6
and a RA server.
It's possible you've hit a bug with Netwo
On 01/12/2010 01:00 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz on 01/12/2010 02:36 PM wrote:
>> And before I left home I was on my wireless network that DOES have IPv6
>> and a RA server.
>
> It's possible you've hit a bug with NetworkManager. It may be carrying
> over the default gateway f
On 01/12/2010 01:00 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz on 01/12/2010 02:36 PM wrote:
>> And before I left home I was on my wireless network that DOES have IPv6
>> and a RA server.
>
> It's possible you've hit a bug with NetworkManager. It may be carrying
> over the default gateway f
Robert Moskowitz on 01/12/2010 02:36 PM wrote:
> And before I left home I was on my wireless network that DOES have IPv6
> and a RA server.
It's possible you've hit a bug with NetworkManager. It may be carrying
over the default gateway for IPv6 if you go from a IPv6 network to
IPv4-only network.
On 01/12/2010 12:10 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz on 01/12/2010 02:02 PM wrote:
> > ::/0
> fe80::2149:9a62:1185:fd1c UGDA 1024 399 0 wlan0
>
> This should not be there. NetworkManager does not add it - it would
> ha
On 01/12/2010 12:10 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz on 01/12/2010 02:02 PM wrote:
> > ::/0
> fe80::2149:9a62:1185:fd1c UGDA 1024 399 0 wlan0
>
> This should not be there. NetworkManager does not add it - it would
> ha
Robert Moskowitz on 01/12/2010 02:02 PM wrote:
> ::/0fe80::2149:9a62:1185:fd1c
UGDA 1024 399 0 wlan0
This should not be there. NetworkManager does not add it - it would have
to be added by the user. Remove this route and your timeo
On 01/12/2010 11:35 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz on 01/12/2010 12:29 PM wrote:
>> inet6 addr: fe80::21b:77ff:fe43:978/64 Scope:Link
>
> Your issue with "timeouts" have nothing at all to do with IPv6.
>
> Please note two things in your IPv6 address.
> 1) fe80 prefix - This is lo
Robert Moskowitz on 01/12/2010 12:29 PM wrote:
> inet6 addr: fe80::21b:77ff:fe43:978/64 Scope:Link
Your issue with "timeouts" have nothing at all to do with IPv6.
Please note two things in your IPv6 address.
1) fe80 prefix - This is local only - think 127.0.0.1 for IPv4.
2) Scope: Link - Same as
On 01/12/2010 10:21 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Robert Moskowitz
> wrote:
>
>> I am at the IEEE 802 Emergency Services Study Group meeting and IPv6 is
>> configured on their wireless and not working, so to sites like IETF and
>> my home, I am getting long time out
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I am at the IEEE 802 Emergency Services Study Group meeting and IPv6 is
> configured on their wireless and not working, so to sites like IETF and
> my home, I am getting long time outs until Firefox and Thunderbird give
> up and then try
> I am at the IEEE 802 Emergency Services Study Group meeting and IPv6 is
> configured on their wireless and not working, so to sites like IETF and
> my home, I am getting long time outs until Firefox and Thunderbird give
> up and then try IPv4.
> How do I change things that for this week, I skip t
I am at the IEEE 802 Emergency Services Study Group meeting and IPv6 is
configured on their wireless and not working, so to sites like IETF and
my home, I am getting long time outs until Firefox and Thunderbird give
up and then try IPv4.
How do I change things that for this week, I skip the IPv
65 matches
Mail list logo
