Tim:
>> Usually I'd say the worse browser was MSIE (pronounce "misery").
ToddAndMargo:
> The "ActiveX" that went with misery was responsible for a lot of
> virus infections.
I'm not in the least surprised. The concept of "don't trust random
things" just isn't in their head (the programmers and t
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 09:21:10 +1100
"Stephen Morris" wrote:
> >
> >
> I tried the second site with Chrome and it seems to work fine in that browse
> too, although I did find with Chrome I had to attempt the translation twice
> because the first time failed to translate.
>
> regards,
> Steve
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 09:16:46 +1100
"Stephen Morris" wrote:
> >
> At what point does the second site fail for you? I didn't activate the
> translation and I can click on links in the page without any issues. I'm also
> not compiling firefox, I've downloaded the pre-built version of firefox
>
On 12/13/24 16:16, Tim via users wrote:
Usually I'd say the worse browser was MSIE (pronounce "misery").
The "ActiveX" that went with misery was responsible
for a lot of virus infections.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 02:58 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> The worst browser I have come across is Midori
With noscript running, all I see of their own website was a white page
with a spinning wait while we load graphic... Once I allowed
scripting, I saw a basic pretty useless website. H
On 14/12/24 09:16, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 13/12/24 09:40, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 22:22:43 +
Bob Marčan via users wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 08:38:30 +1100
"Stephen Morris" wrote:
On 13/12/24 07:18, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 11:40:44 -0800
On 13/12/24 09:40, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 22:22:43 +
Bob Marčan via users wrote:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 08:38:30 +1100
"Stephen Morris" wrote:
On 13/12/24 07:18, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 11:40:44 -0800
"ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
On 11/25
On 12/13/24 01:07, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:02:33 -0800
"ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
oh ya. 1+ on the crap web sites.
oh ya. 2+ on the crap web sites AND browsers.
The worst browser I have come across is Midori
--
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:02:33 -0800
"ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
>
> oh ya. 1+ on the crap web sites.
oh ya. 2+ on the crap web sites AND browsers.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le
On 12/12/24 16:03, Tim wrote:
Tim:
I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox
ToddAndMargo:
It is medical sites were patients look up their medical
records and Recreational Vehicles campgrounds. And a few
government sites.
I'm sure there are sites that fail in some browsers, I've
Tim:
> > I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox
ToddAndMargo:
> It is medical sites were patients look up their medical
> records and Recreational Vehicles campgrounds. And a few
> government sites.
I'm sure there are sites that fail in some browsers, I've seen plenty
that do in va
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 22:22:43 +
Bob Marčan via users wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 08:38:30 +1100
> "Stephen Morris" wrote:
>
> > On 13/12/24 07:18, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 11:40:44 -0800
> > > "ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
> > >
> > > On 11/25/24 16:59, Tim v
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 08:38:30 +1100
"Stephen Morris" wrote:
> On 13/12/24 07:18, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 11:40:44 -0800
> > "ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
> >
> > On 11/25/24 16:59, Tim via users wrote:
> >> I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox
> >>>
>
On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 08:38 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 13/12/24 07:18, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 11:40:44 -0800
> > "ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/25/24 16:59, Tim via users wrote:
> > > > I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox
> > --
On 13/12/24 07:18, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 11:40:44 -0800
"ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
On 11/25/24 16:59, Tim via users wrote:
I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox
---
https://mail.proton.me/u/0/all-mail/o4da3Tlhne-ORwaJYsVRoxzBZj3Qm8rbjFjY124klbUrx1
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 11:40:44 -0800
"ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
> On 11/25/24 16:59, Tim via users wrote:
> > I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox
>
---
https://mail.proton.me/u/0/all-mail/o4da3Tlhne-ORwaJYsVRoxzBZj3Qm8rbjFjY124klbUrx1BQyLu3kIBJKhL6_97rVobQc2a7keiXy3hb5LfJG
On 11/25/24 16:59, Tim via users wrote:
I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox
It is medical sites were patients look up their medical
records and Recreational Vehicles campgrounds. And a few
government sites.
--
___
users mailing list
On Mon, 2024-11-25 at 08:21 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> If you have not tried Brave Browser, you
> should. It uses the "Blink" rendering engine
> (same as Chrome), has automatic ad blocking,
> does not spy on you, has a private windows
> with TOR, and is considered grandparent safe.
>
>
On 2024-11-25 11:21, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 11/25/24 07:18, Frank Bures wrote:
I do not use Firefox as my default browser
I have eight browser installed. Firefox
is "currently" the default, but is varies.
I use them all for various things.
If you have not tried Brave Browser, you
s
On 11/25/24 07:18, Frank Bures wrote:
I do not use Firefox as my default browser
I have eight browser installed. Firefox
is "currently" the default, but is varies.
I use them all for various things.
If you have not tried Brave Browser, you
should. It uses the "Blink" rendering engine
(same as
that same program without asking you to pick
something to do the job. At least that happened here (on older
software versions).
I do not use Firefox as my default browser. I was just trying to reproduce
the OP's problem.
I found the default setting and it pointed to Chrome. However, when I
On Sun, 2024-11-24 at 17:04 -0500, Frank Bures wrote:
> The above sequence is:
>
> --> Firefox -> File -> eMail link
>
> Cheers
> Frank
Aha! You're not clicking on an email mailto: address in a page, like I
thought you were doing. You're emailing someone a link to the page
you're browsing (som
On Mon, 2024-11-25 at 17:38 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> Tim:
> > > Yes. I have had to force it to quit sometimes. It doesn't always
> > > handle things gracefully if it can't access one of the mail servers.
>
> Patrick O'Callaghan:
> > Try taking it offline and on again (connection icon in the
Tim:
> > Yes. I have had to force it to quit sometimes. It doesn't always
> > handle things gracefully if it can't access one of the mail servers.
Patrick O'Callaghan:
> Try taking it offline and on again (connection icon in the lower left
> corner).
Tried that, too. But when it gets in a bad
thunderbird-128.4.3-1.fc41.x86_64
firefox-132.0.1-2.fc41.x86_64
Since upgrading from Fedora 39 to Fedora 41,
when I go into
--> Firefox -> File -> eMail link
I get told that Thunderbird is already running,
which it is.
The exact steps on how to reproduce it are missing. Simply i
On 2024-11-24 16:32, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 25/11/24 02:34, Frank Bures wrote:
On 2024-11-23 17:50, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 24/11/24 05:35, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:43:08 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 41
thunderbird-128.4.3-1.fc41.x86_64
On 25/11/24 02:34, Frank Bures wrote:
On 2024-11-23 17:50, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 24/11/24 05:35, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:43:08 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 41
thunderbird-128.4.3-1.fc41.x86_64
firefox-132.0.1-2.fc41.x86_64
Since upgrading
On 2024-11-23 17:50, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 24/11/24 05:35, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:43:08 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 41
thunderbird-128.4.3-1.fc41.x86_64
firefox-132.0.1-2.fc41.x86_64
Since upgrading from Fedora 39 to Fedora 41,
when I go
On Sun, 2024-11-24 at 23:42 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-11-24 at 10:55 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > FWIW: Evolution has multiple parts (try 'pgrep evolution' to see them).
> > Simply quitting the GUI will not shut it down. I'm sure you know this,
> > but if you really want t
On Sun, 2024-11-24 at 10:55 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> FWIW: Evolution has multiple parts (try 'pgrep evolution' to see them).
> Simply quitting the GUI will not shut it down. I'm sure you know this,
> but if you really want to to stop it you should use 'evolution --force-
> shutdown' from
On Sun, 2024-11-24 at 14:46 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-11-23 at 19:35 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > The exact steps on how to reproduce it are missing. Simply installing
> > thunderbird, then configuring GNOME Shell default apps to let thunderbird
> >
On Sat, 2024-11-23 at 19:35 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The exact steps on how to reproduce it are missing. Simply installing
> thunderbird, then configuring GNOME Shell default apps to let thunderbird
> handle email doesn't suffice. The firefox menu opens a thunderbird
> co
On 11/23/24 10:35, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:43:08 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 41
thunderbird-128.4.3-1.fc41.x86_64
firefox-132.0.1-2.fc41.x86_64
Since upgrading from Fedora 39 to Fedora 41,
when I go into
--> Firefox -> File -> eMai
On 11/23/24 14:50, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 24/11/24 05:35, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:43:08 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 41
thunderbird-128.4.3-1.fc41.x86_64
firefox-132.0.1-2.fc41.x86_64
Since upgrading from Fedora 39 to Fedora 41,
when I go into
On 24/11/24 05:35, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:43:08 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 41
thunderbird-128.4.3-1.fc41.x86_64
firefox-132.0.1-2.fc41.x86_64
Since upgrading from Fedora 39 to Fedora 41,
when I go into
--> Firefox -> File -> eMai
On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:43:08 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Fedora 41
> thunderbird-128.4.3-1.fc41.x86_64
> firefox-132.0.1-2.fc41.x86_64
>
> Since upgrading from Fedora 39 to Fedora 41,
> when I go into
>
>--> Firefox -> File
Hi All,
Fedora 41
thunderbird-128.4.3-1.fc41.x86_64
firefox-132.0.1-2.fc41.x86_64
Since upgrading from Fedora 39 to Fedora 41,
when I go into
--> Firefox -> File -> eMail link
I get told that Thunderbird is already running,
which it is. This is a regression bug that I reporte
iltering) where I can examine
it and then quickly hide it (mark as read).
My filter setup is the same and I have adaptive junk control active as
well in both global Junk Settings and Account level settings. When
previewing an email in the preview window I used to see a lot of
messages about Thunder
tive as well in
both global Junk Settings and Account level settings. When previewing an email
in the preview window I used to see a lot of messages about Thunderbird
thinking the email was spam (usually when the email source was an IP Address
rather than a DNS name), but that seems to have disappea
On 16/11/24 10:32 am, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 15/11/24 10:06, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
I'm using the daily version of Thunderbird with two email addresses and local folders,
and the "Message Filters" interface provides the ability to input rules for
both mailboxes and th
On 15/11/24 10:06, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
I'm using the daily version of Thunderbird with two email addresses
and local folders, and the "Message Filters" interface provides the
ability to input rules for both mailboxes and the local folders.
I see it now. I use only on
later, when the folder is opened.
Are the options for filter messages in *all* folders? As opposed to
just the inbox.
I do not think that there are folder specific rules in tb.
I'm using the daily version of Thunderbird with two email addresses and local folders,
and the "Messa
options for filter messages in *all* folders? As opposed to
just the inbox.
I do not think that there are folder specific rules in tb.
I'm using the daily version of Thunderbird with two email addresses and
local folders, and the "Message Filters" interface provides the ability
s which was check in all folders. Unchecked,
it just did the inbox.
It is possible that you seeing a delayed filtering affect (when you
changed folders the message was there, but then disappeared before your
eyes) might be the time it took Thunderbird to get around to filtering
that message, or
opposed to
just the inbox.
I do not think that there are folder specific rules in tb.
NB: I don't *use* Thunderbird, I occasionally look at it and had it
installed on some PCs.
I switch off junk mail filtering on my mail clients, it's a pain. Too
many false positives and negatives
don't *use* Thunderbird, I occasionally look at it and had it
installed on some PCs.
I switch off junk mail filtering on my mail clients, it's a pain. Too
many false positives and negatives. I don't want to lose real mail, I
don't want to check a spam folder (if I'm ch
I didn't see a bug filed for the broken "Release notes" link so I just filed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2323688 .
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject
> The following may be unrelated but is unusual.
> I then checked the "About" version (for this report) and see
> 128.3.2esr (64-bit)
> [BTW: clicking the "Release notes" link gives "There's Nothing Here"...]
> which surprised me, I do not recall installing the esr package, or is it the
>
, when the folder is opened.
This is the case for a few folders and I do not see any parallels. Yet it does
not happen always.
I restarted thunderbird, in case it got into a "funny" state.
The following may be unrelated but is unusual.
I then checked the "About" version (for
On 6/26/24 2:45 PM, richard emberson wrote:
With fedora 6.8.8-300.fc40.x86_64 thunderbird packaged contained
/bin/thunderbird-wayland.
With fedora 6.9.5-200.fc40.x86_64 the thunderbird package 115.12.1 does
not contain /bin/thunderbird-wayland
dnf search thunderbird
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 6:45 PM richard emberson
wrote:
> With fedora 6.8.8-300.fc40.x86_64 thunderbird packaged contained
> /bin/thunderbird-wayland.
> With fedora 6.9.5-200.fc40.x86_64 the thunderbird package 115.12.1 does
> not contain /bin/thunderbird-wayland
>
> dnf
With fedora 6.8.8-300.fc40.x86_64 thunderbird packaged contained
/bin/thunderbird-wayland.
With fedora 6.9.5-200.fc40.x86_64 the thunderbird package 115.12.1 does not
contain /bin/thunderbird-wayland
dnf search thunderbird
=== Name & Summary Matched: thu
On 18/6/24 04:58, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024, Stephen Morris wrote:
I'm not sure this is helpful, but it may be an attempt to emulate
windows. I have a similar issue under Windows 10 where all apps, not
relative to the screen saver, when minimised and subsequently
maximised d
On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 08:13 +1000, Stephen Morris wrote:
> I'm not sure this is helpful, but it may be an attempt to emulate
> windows. I have a similar issue under Windows 10 where all apps, not
> relative to the screen saver, when minimised and subsequently
> maximised display on the monitor conf
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024, Stephen Morris wrote:
I'm not sure this is helpful, but it may be an attempt to emulate windows. I
have a similar issue under Windows 10 where all apps, not relative to the
screen saver, when minimised and subsequently maximised display on the
monitor configured as the pri
On 14/6/24 23:24, lejeczek via users wrote:
Hi guys.
I think it came with an update a few releases ago - Thunderbird no
longer stays on the monitor it was on, prior to screen-saver.
After screen-saver was invoked, Thunderbird goes onto the main monitor
always - for those of us who have two
Hi guys.
I think it came with an update a few releases ago -
Thunderbird no longer stays on the monitor it was on, prior
to screen-saver.
After screen-saver was invoked, Thunderbird goes onto the
main monitor always - for those of us who have two-monitor
setup, needless to say.
I wonder if
Tim:
>> A program ought to be able to detect a stale lock file
>> still remaining and handle it itself.
Joe Zeff:
> And how do you suggest that it detects it?
Other programs manage it, dunno what's so magic about it. It's not a
problem that *I* need to solve.
After a reboot, cron &/or fetchmai
ime > lock file time, lock file is stale.
Another way is to run thunderbird from a script with a name such as
tbird to avoid confusion. That script can check to see if there's a
copy of thunderbird running, and if not, delete the lock file. If there
is, of cou
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:46 PM Joe Zeff wrote:
>
> On 02/27/2024 10:39 AM, Tim via users wrote:
> > A program ought to be able to detect a stale lock file
> > still remaining and handle it itself.
>
> And how do you suggest that it detects it?
An in-memory semaphore. No lock file required.
Jef
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:45 PM Joe Zeff wrote:
>
> On 02/27/2024 10:39 AM, Tim via users wrote:
> > A program ought to be able to detect a stale lock file
> > still remaining and handle it itself.
>
> And how do you suggest that it detects it?
I can think of 2 ways off the top of my head
1)
On 02/27/2024 10:39 AM, Tim via users wrote:
A program ought to be able to detect a stale lock file
still remaining and handle it itself.
And how do you suggest that it detects it?
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 11:19 -0500, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
> Power failure is what left Thunderbird in a state. The lock was in the
> ".thunderbird" tree as a link to a nonexistent file
> "192.168.1.218:+7103". Deleting the entry enabled Thunderbird to sta
On 2/27/24 10:12, Thomas Cameron wrote:
On 2/27/24 09:08, Tim via users wrote:
Is Thunderbird one of those apps that always runs once started, and
never quits when you close the window?
There have been times in the past where this is the case, but they're
few and far between these days
On 2/27/24 09:08, Tim via users wrote:
Is Thunderbird one of those apps that always runs once started, and
never quits when you close the window?
There have been times in the past where this is the case, but they're
few and far between these days. Not saying it doesn't happen, but
On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 08:54 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> Every once in a while, Thunderbird just loses its mind. No idea why. But
> I will generally just rename my ~/.thunderbird directory to something
> like ~/.thunderbird.old and launch Thunderbird again.
Is Thunderbird one of t
On 2/26/24 19:44, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
On one of my f39 systems Thundebird fails to start claiming that it is
already running. "ksyguard" from root doesn't show anything I can
recognize as having to do with Thunderbird. Rebooting does not get it to
work. Looked at th
On 02/26/2024 06:44 PM, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
On one of my f39 systems Thundebird fails to start claiming that it is
already running. "ksyguard" from root doesn't show anything I can
recognize as having to do with Thunderbird. Rebooting does not get it to
work
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 8:45 PM Robert McBroom via users
wrote:
>
> On one of my f39 systems Thundebird fails to start claiming that it is
> already running. "ksyguard" from root doesn't show anything I can
> recognize as having to do with Thunderbird. Rebooting does n
On one of my f39 systems Thundebird fails to start claiming that it is
already running. "ksyguard" from root doesn't show anything I can
recognize as having to do with Thunderbird. Rebooting does not get it to
work. Looked at the ".thunderbird" file in the user directo
For years, if I hovered the mouse over a folder, it would show me the
subject of the most recent message.
Now it is showing how many messages unread. I can SEE that always
displayed with the folder name...
So what changed and how do I change things back?
thanks
--
_
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:45 PM home user wrote:
> (Fedora 38; home workstation; Thunderbird 115.5.0)
>
> In early October, I upgraded from Fedora-37 to Fedora-38. Since then,
> I've been consistently experiencing two types of misbehavior in Thunderbird.
>
> 1. When I sw
On 12/5/23 8:59 PM, home user wrote:
On 12/5/23 7:39 PM, John Mellor wrote:
On 2023-12-05 8:45 p.m., home user wrote:
(Fedora 38; home workstation; Thunderbird 115.5.0)
In early October, I upgraded from Fedora-37 to Fedora-38. Since then, I've
been consistently experiencing two typ
On 12/06/2023 06:57 AM, John Mellor wrote:
X is no longer maintained properly, and by F38 is no longer fully
functional. More functionality removal has happened in F39, and I
believe that it is on the feature list of F40 for full removal.
And what's going to happen to those of us using a DE t
On Wed, 2023-12-06 at 08:57 -0500, John Mellor wrote:
> On 2023-12-05 22:59, home user wrote:
> > . . .
> > I almost always use Gnome with X, not wayland. Even the test I
> > reported in my previous post (in response to Richard) was KDE with
> > X,
> > not way
On 2023-12-05 22:59, home user wrote:
. . .
I almost always use Gnome with X, not wayland. Even the test I
reported in my previous post (in response to Richard) was KDE with X,
not wayland. Should thunderbird-wayland be installed and used by us X
users?
X is no longer maintained properly
On 12/5/23 7:39 PM, John Mellor wrote:
On 2023-12-05 8:45 p.m., home user wrote:
(Fedora 38; home workstation; Thunderbird 115.5.0)
In early October, I upgraded from Fedora-37 to Fedora-38. Since then, I've
been consistently experiencing two types of misbehavior in Thunderbird.
1. W
On 12/5/23 6:55 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 12/5/23 20:45, home user wrote:
(Fedora 38; home workstation; Thunderbird 115.5.0)
In early October, I upgraded from Fedora-37 to Fedora-38. Since then, I've
been consistently experiencing two types of misbehavior in Thunderbird.
1. W
On 2023-12-05 8:45 p.m., home user wrote:
(Fedora 38; home workstation; Thunderbird 115.5.0)
In early October, I upgraded from Fedora-37 to Fedora-38. Since then,
I've been consistently experiencing two types of misbehavior in
Thunderbird.
1. When I switch e-mail accounts or folders w
(Fedora 38; home workstation; Thunderbird 115.5.0)
In early October, I upgraded from Fedora-37 to Fedora-38. Since then, I've
been consistently experiencing two types of misbehavior in Thunderbird.
1. When I switch e-mail accounts or folders within an e-mail account, the list
of mes
On 16/11/23 21:55, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
fc38
tb 115.4.1
I sort my mail into many folders, using message filters.
When I select a folder, the list of messages is focused somewhere in the
past, nowhere near the last item I opened (normally the latest).
I have to scroll down to bring the
fc38
tb 115.4.1
I sort my mail into many folders, using message filters.
When I select a folder, the list of messages is focused somewhere in the past,
nowhere near the last item I opened (normally the latest).
I have to scroll down to bring the message into view, and it is usually
highlighted
On 11/7/23 01:46, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
Though I do have imap available on my mail server if I ever want to use it.
That's your answer, bud. POP is ancient and crufty, and as others have
said, different mail servers do different, often weird, things to the
messages.
Switch to IMAP, i
On 07/11/2023 20.01, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/7/23 00:16, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
On 07/11/2023 18.52, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/6/23 23:48, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
What would be nice is to have the "Gem Messages" icon go inactive while a
download is in progress.
It will both indicat
On 11/7/23 00:16, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
On 07/11/2023 18.52, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/6/23 23:48, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
What would be nice is to have the "Gem Messages" icon go inactive
while a download is in progress.
It will both indicate that the click took, and avoid a double
, and try it out without messing up your normal mail.
> What would be nice is to have the "Gem Messages" icon go inactive
> while a download is in progress.
> It will both indicate that the click took, and avoid a double
> download.
I presume that's "get" messa
On 07/11/2023 18.52, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/6/23 23:48, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
What would be nice is to have the "Gem Messages" icon go inactive while a
download is in progress.
It will both indicate that the click took, and avoid a double download.
Are you saying that while it's down
On 11/6/23 23:48, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
What would be nice is to have the "Gem Messages" icon go inactive while
a download is in progress.
It will both indicate that the click took, and avoid a double download.
Are you saying that while it's downloading, you click the button again,
and
On 07/11/2023 16.34, Tim via users wrote:
On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 10:17 +1100, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
The server is configured as pop3 with the option to leave the
messages on the server.
After clicking "Get Messages" I often get no reaction for a while,
and click again in a few seconds.
In
On 07/11/2023 16.34, Tim via users wrote:
On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 10:17 +1100, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
The server is configured as pop3 with the option to leave the
messages on the server.
After clicking "Get Messages" I often get no reaction for a while,
and click again in a few seconds.
In
On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 10:17 +1100, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
> The server is configured as pop3 with the option to leave the
> messages on the server.
>
> After clicking "Get Messages" I often get no reaction for a while,
> and click again in a few seconds.
> In this case, after the new message
On 11/6/23 15:17, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote:
tb 115.3.2
My upgrade to 115 did not go smoothly. Swear words
have not bee invented to properly express
You should see the tears being shed over on
alt.comp.software.thunderbird
What were they thinking!
11.5.4 is in the repo now. Try
[resend from correct email]
F38, tb 115.3.2 (64-bit)
The server is configured as pop3 with the option to leave the messages on the
server.
After clicking "Get Messages" I often get no reaction for a while, and click
again in a few seconds.
In this case, after the new messages are downloaded,
On 4/10/23 09:05, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/3/23 15:00, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 4/10/23 03:33, Lester Petrie wrote:
On 10/2/2023 8:01 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/2/23 16:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/2/23 14:13, Lester Petrie wrote:
In my thunderbird, in settings/general the last group of
On 4/10/23 09:05, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/3/23 15:00, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 4/10/23 03:33, Lester Petrie wrote:
On 10/2/2023 8:01 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/2/23 16:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/2/23 14:13, Lester Petrie wrote:
In my thunderbird, in settings/general the last group of
what
I saw between this reply and my signature. It starts off with an
error
message, and the message has character encoding (and/or decoding)
problems (I see a few =20 sequences in my reader).
Same here. Also using Evolution.
In Thunderbird V120, I see the same thing a Tim does from Adam's
ature. It starts off with an
error
message, and the message has character encoding (and/or decoding)
problems (I see a few =20 sequences in my reader).
Same here. Also using Evolution.
In Thunderbird V120, I see the same thing a Tim does from Adam's emails
except that Thunderbird doesn&#x
On 10/3/23 15:00, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 4/10/23 03:33, Lester Petrie wrote:
On 10/2/2023 8:01 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/2/23 16:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/2/23 14:13, Lester Petrie wrote:
In my thunderbird, in settings/general the last group of entries is
Indexing.
The second entry
On 4/10/23 03:33, Lester Petrie wrote:
On 10/2/2023 8:01 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/2/23 16:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/2/23 14:13, Lester Petrie wrote:
In my thunderbird, in settings/general the last group of entries is
Indexing.
The second entry is Message Store Type for new accounts
the list address. Is there a fix?
Thunderbird keeps continually telling me it wants to compact the mails
storage for what is a trivial amount of space, Is there a way to make
it use a reasonable size to do the prompt?
In Edit->Settings->General->Disk Space there is a check box to s
1 - 100 of 1740 matches
Mail list logo
