>
> On 6/17/25 12:51 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> >> If you've set B and C to static addresses in the 10.40.0.0 subnet, then
> >> obviously you have to change one or the other. The bridge doesn't have
> >> a gateway or DNS, that's a setting for the clients.
> >
> > The bizarre thing is th
On 6/17/25 12:51 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
If you've set B and C to static addresses in the 10.40.0.0 subnet, then
obviously you have to change one or the other. The bridge doesn't have
a gateway or DNS, that's a setting for the clients.
The bizarre thing is that I cannot switch the b
> On 6/17/25 12:27 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 6/16/25 2:38 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> >
> > On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> >> OK,
> >>
> >> Now it is working with
> >> Kernel IP routing table
> >> Destinati
Hi.
Just a note on using "netstat -rn" versus "ip route":
From man netstat (re-formatted):
NOTES
This program is mostly obsolete.
Replacement for netstat is ss.
Replacement for netstat -r is ip route.
Replacement for netstat -i is ip -s link.
Replacement for n
On 6/17/25 12:27 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
On 6/16/25 2:38 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
OK,
Now it is working with
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
0.0.
>
>
> > On 6/16/25 2:38 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > >>> OK,
> > >>>
> > >>> Now it is working with
> > >>> Kernel IP routing table
> > >>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window
> > >>> irtt
On 6/16/25 11:44 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
I don't understand what you mean about the ports. Whatever those are,
they shouldn't be configured.
Maybe, but I dod not configure any thing on that side.
It is done automatically by fedora
The only option that I se is to disable the interfac
> On 6/16/25 2:38 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> >>> OK,
> >>>
> >>> Now it is working with
> >>> Kernel IP routing table
> >>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
> >>> Iface
> >>> 0.0.0.0
On 6/16/25 7:37 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Although the network manager is "suppose" to do this
(or something similar), I discovered the following
corrected the problem:
"#" means as "root"
# systemctl restart NetworkManager.service
If you run it as a user, systemctl will promp
On 6/16/25 3:24 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 6/16/25 2:38 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
OK,
Now it is working with
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window
irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 192.1
On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
OK,
Now it is working with
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0
enp0s20f0u11
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1
On 6/16/25 2:38 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
OK,
Now it is working with
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0
>
> On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > OK,
> >
> > Now it is working with
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
> > Iface
> > 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0
> > enp0s2
OK,
Now it is working with
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0
enp0s20f0u11
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0 bridge0
On 6/16/25 12:25 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
On 6/14/25 11:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Hello,
I tried to fix a small issue that I have.
PC A is connected to internet through a USB port.
This PC A has 2 RJ45 cards, connected to 2 PC: B and C.
Both interface are in shared to o
>
> On 6/14/25 11:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried to fix a small issue that I have.
> > PC A is connected to internet through a USB port.
> > This PC A has 2 RJ45 cards, connected to 2 PC: B and C.
> > Both interface are in shared to other computers
> >
> > The p
On 6/14/25 11:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Hello,
I tried to fix a small issue that I have.
PC A is connected to internet through a USB port.
This PC A has 2 RJ45 cards, connected to 2 PC: B and C.
Both interface are in shared to other computers
The problem is this one.
I use /etc/host
On 6/15/25 4:27 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
1) I cannot configure properly manually my interfaces on PC A, ie. enp1s0 and
enp2s0
I do not know why.
I tried 10.42.0.1 and 10.42.0.2
They can't be in the same subnet unless they are bridged somewhere. And
you won't have the forwarding and
This is what I have done.
1) I cannot configure properly manually my interfaces on PC A, ie. enp1s0 and
enp2s0
I do not know why.
I tried 10.42.0.1 and 10.42.0.2
Thenk I played with Gateway and DNS.
Hence, I switched to shared to other computer.
it turned to 10.42.0.1 and 10.42.1.1
Then, I can m
On 6/15/25 12:32 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 6/15/25 1:42 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
PC A is connected to internet and it is fine. device enp0s20f0u11
It is in automatic setting.
This PC has 2 ethernet cards
By default
enp1s0 (connected to PC B) and enp2s0 (connected to PC C)
If I unders
On 6/15/25 1:42 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
PC A is connected to internet and it is fine. device enp0s20f0u11
It is in automatic setting.
This PC has 2 ethernet cards
By default
enp1s0 (connected to PC B) and enp2s0 (connected to PC C)
If I understand PC A run as a router.
By default (sh
I tried to set up manually which only one PC, using the network manager.
nm-connection-editor
offers very similar options to my understanding.
I configured manually the interface on PC A and on PB C.
I works, except the DNS does not work.
I did not find the right setting.
>
> On Sun, 2025-06-15 a
On Sun, 2025-06-15 at 01:37 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> The internet is connected through the USB interface. Then there are two
> RJ45 ports, one for each of B and C.
Yes, I know. I think *you* have failed to comprehend my responses,
initial and subsequent. Read through them again, carefully.
AM
> From: "Samuel Sieb"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: local network
>
> On 6/14/25 10:04 PM, Tim via users wrote:
> > USB device
> > 10.42.0.254
> > |
On 6/15/25 1:11 AM, Tim via users wrote:
On 6/14/25 10:04 PM, Tim via users wrote:
USB device
10.42.0.254
| <-- Top half in same IP range
| as themselves (first three
10.42.0.1
On 6/14/25 10:04 PM, Tim via users wrote:
> > USB device
> > 10.42.0.254
> > | <-- Top half in same IP range
> > | as themselves (first three
> > 10.42.0.1 quads match each oth
On 6/14/25 10:04 PM, Tim via users wrote:
USB device
10.42.0.254
| <-- Top half in same IP range
| as themselves (first three
10.42.0.1 quads match each other).
On Sat, 2025-06-14 at 20:28 +0200, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> I tried to fix a small issue that I have.
> PC A is connected to internet through a USB port.
> This PC A has 2 RJ45 cards, connected to 2 PC: B and C.
> Both interface are in shared to other computers
>
> The problem is this one.
On 6/14/25 11:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
How can I solve this issue?
On PC A: Do I need to switch from shared to other computers to Manual?
If Yes how should I configure ?
10.42.1.0 255.255.255.0 Gateway? DNS ?
Use "nm-connection-editor" to set the IP address range for each
interf
> On 14 Jun 2025, at 19:28, Patrick Dupre via users
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried to fix a small issue that I have.
> PC A is connected to internet through a USB port.
> This PC A has 2 RJ45 cards, connected to 2 PC: B and C.
> Both interface are in shared to other computers
>
> The probl
30 matches
Mail list logo
