On 4/13/21 5:02 AM, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 14:37 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
What doesn't change, though, are user settings. Any program that
stores its settings in your homespace is unaffected by RPM updates.
Your configurations carry over. However, some applications chang
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 14:37 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> What doesn't change, though, are user settings. Any program that
> stores its settings in your homespace is unaffected by RPM updates.
> Your configurations carry over. However, some applications change
> their configuration format over t
On 4/8/21 1:51 PM, home user wrote:
(f33; gnome)
I just finished upgrading from f32 to f33.
When I click the gnome "Activities", I no longer see "caja". When I use
the gnome activities search thing, it does not find "caja". But dnf
shows it installed and up-to-date. Before today's update, c
On 4/11/21 3:46 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
2021-04-11 23:02 UTC+02:00, home user :
2021-04-11 6:38 UTC+02:00, home user
I don't fully understand. Of what use is a link to nowhere?
Let me show you an example.
$ rpm -qV hunspell
$ symlinks /usr/share/doc/hunspell/
dangling: /usr/share/doc/hunsp
On 4/11/21 11:07 PM, Tim via users wrote:
On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 20:46 +, home user wrote:
Do you mean that all the other software is the same as the newest?
If I do a weekly patch (dnf upgrade), and that patch includes patches
to vim or firefox, and then the next day I boot into one of the o
On 12/04/2021 12:59, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 05:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
It is most likely they want it this way.
I have to wonder how they expected you to browse the file system if
they hide the file browser.
They expect you to use the file browser of the desktop you
On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 20:46 +, home user wrote:
> Do you mean that all the other software is the same as the newest?
> If I do a weekly patch (dnf upgrade), and that patch includes patches
> to vim or firefox, and then the next day I boot into one of the older
> entries in the grub menu, I sho
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 05:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> It is most likely they want it this way.
I have to wonder how they expected you to browse the file system if
they hide the file browser.
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 18:28:22 UTC 2021 x86_64
Boilerp
On 4/11/21 3:03 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/04/2021 04:54, home user wrote:
I wonder if it's supposed to be undisplayed and only in MATE, or was
that a goof. The original poster might try filing a bug report and see
what the response is.
Ed's suggestion to edit /usr/share/applications/caja.desk
On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 20:46 +, home user wrote:
> > It doesn't actually work like that. Only the kernel is kept, not
> > everything. When you pick a different entry, you're only selecting
> > a
> > different kernel. All the other software is the same.
>
> Do you mean that all the other so
2021-04-11 23:02 UTC+02:00, home user :
>> 2021-04-11 6:38 UTC+02:00, home user >
>> [...]
>>
>>
>> This isn't necessarily a good idea, because those dangling symlinks
>> may belong to their respective packages. If so, removing them will
>> compromise the integrity of the package they belong to.
>
On 12/04/2021 04:54, home user wrote:
I wonder if it's supposed to be undisplayed and only in MATE, or was
that a goof. The original poster might try filing a bug report and see
what the response is.
Ed's suggestion to edit /usr/share/applications/caja.desktop worked. Should I
still file a bu
> 2021-04-11 6:38 UTC+02:00, home user
> [...]
>
>
> This isn't necessarily a good idea, because those dangling symlinks
> may belong to their respective packages. If so, removing them will
> compromise the integrity of the package they belong to.
I don't fully understand. Of what use is a li
> I wonder if it's supposed to be undisplayed and only in MATE, or was
> that a goof. The original poster might try filing a bug report and see
> what the response is.
Ed's suggestion to edit /usr/share/applications/caja.desktop worked. Should I
still file a bug?
___
> To make it not system-wide, copy the file to
> ~/.local/share/applications/ and edit it there.
I want this fix to be system-wide. But thank-you.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists
> The "other" way to fix it is to edit the file...
>
> /usr/share/applications/caja.desktop
>
> and comment out as shown
>
> #NoDisplay=true
> #OnlyShowIn=MATE;
>
> Caveat: This file is a "system-wide" file and may get overwritten on
> updates.
> This file affects all users
> The previous "m
> But, I can tell you how to "fix" it.
>
> Install "menulibre". This will allow you to add a "launcher". It
> will then be visible when you search
> in the search bar in "Activities". And you can add it to your
> "Favorites" if you wish.
I'm opting for the more general fix in your later post.
> It doesn't actually work like that. Only the kernel is kept, not
> everything. When you pick a different entry, you're only selecting a
> different kernel. All the other software is the same.
Do you mean that all the other software is the same as the newest? If I do a
weekly patch (dnf up
2021-04-11 6:38 UTC+02:00, home user :
[...]
> * symlinks -r -d /usr
This isn't necessarily a good idea, because those dangling symlinks
may belong to their respective packages. If so, removing them will
compromise the integrity of the package they belong to.
On 2021-04-11 12:47 a.m., Ed Greshko wrote:
The "other" way to fix it is to edit the file...
/usr/share/applications/caja.desktop
and comment out as shown
#NoDisplay=true
#OnlyShowIn=MATE;
Caveat: This file is a "system-wide" file and may get overwritten on
updates. This file affects all u
On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 15:47 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> The "other" way to fix it is to edit the file...
>
>
>
> /usr/share/applications/caja.desktop
>
>
>
> and comment out as shown
>
>
>
> #NoDisplay=true
>
> #OnlyShowIn=MATE;
>
>
>
> Caveat: This file is a "system-wide" file and may
On 11/04/2021 13:36, Tim via users wrote:
On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 13:51 -0600, home user wrote:
When I click the gnome "Activities", I no longer see "caja". When I
use the gnome activities search thing, it does not find "caja". But
dnf shows it installed and up-to-date.
My first guess would be t
On 11/04/2021 12:38, home user wrote:
Those are all the clues and evidence I can think of at the moment.
OK I'm going to "dismiss" what you've said for the reason that I don't
know why it was working for
you in the first place. I went back to installing F31 and the same results.
Not th
On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 13:51 -0600, home user wrote:
> When I click the gnome "Activities", I no longer see "caja". When I
> use the gnome activities search thing, it does not find "caja". But
> dnf shows it installed and up-to-date.
My first guess would be to locate caja.desktop file(s), and chec
On 4/10/21 9:38 PM, home user wrote:
Since the upgrade (and patching) keeps the most recent 2 patches, I
tried to boot up in each of those last 2 (f32), log in, and check for
caja. The application has become "invisible" to gnome in those patches
also.
It doesn't actually work like that. Onl
On 4/10/21 9:38 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 11/04/2021 10:56, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 4/10/21 7:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Of course it was installed from updates.
Why should that matter?
Because I don't know the habits of the OP in installing updates.
So, not being in the habit of making assumpti
On 11/04/2021 10:56, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 4/10/21 7:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Of course it was installed from updates.
Why should that matter?
Because I don't know the habits of the OP in installing updates.
So, not being in the habit of making assumptions and my not knowing how the
Activitie
On 4/10/21 7:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Of course it was installed from updates.
Why should that matter?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 09/04/2021 03:51, home user wrote:
I just finished upgrading from f32 to f33.
When I click the gnome "Activities", I no longer see "caja". When I use the gnome
activities search thing, it does not find "caja". But dnf shows it installed and up-to-date.
Before today's update, caja was easi
29 matches
Mail list logo
