Re: internal network

2025-03-10 Thread Tim via users
On Sun, 2025-03-09 at 16:51 -0400, Robert McBroom via users wrote: > The Spectrum modem only has oneport. It would only connect to their > proprietary router with an extra monthly charge not my Reyee. If a PC can connect to it, so can a router. They may require you to connect something to it so

Re: internal network

2025-03-09 Thread Robert McBroom via users
On 3/2/25 8:10 AM, Barry Scott wrote: On 2 Mar 2025, at 12:25, Will McDonald wrote: Your life would be made a lot simpler if you had a small switch or router, as Tim suggested. You can even get USB-powered devices. All the ISP modems I have ever seen have a 3 or 4 port switch built in.

Re: internal network

2025-03-06 Thread Tim via users
On Thu, 2025-03-06 at 19:42 -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote: > What is daisy-chaining? Named after making a necklace from intertwining daisies together, it's one thing connected to another, to another through another, to another through another, etc. Internet <--> PC <--> PC <--> PC -- uname -r

Re: internal network

2025-03-06 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 3/6/25 5:42 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: What is daisy-chaining? Forwarding (each device has two distinct connections)? This. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject

Re: internal network

2025-03-06 Thread Michael Hennebry
What is daisy-chaining? Multi-drop bus (each device connected to a common wire)? Forwarding (each device has two distinct connections)? Something else? Discovering the topology was easy. Details, not so much. -- Michael henne...@mail.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "SCSI is NOT magic. There are *fundamental

Re: internal network

2025-03-03 Thread Tim via users
On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 17:21 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > Following your suggestion, I set the following > > On PC A, the interface for PC C with IP 10.42.1.1 with a gateway to 10.42.0.2 > and on PC C > IP 10.42.1.2 with a gateway to 10.42.1.1 I am thoroughly confused by that descriptio

Re: internal network

2025-03-03 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 3/3/25 3:30 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: Connection between A and B work fine. The only think that I cannot build is the connection with PC C (I manually set up the ip address, etc..) What do you mean by You could configure the two ethernet ports on PC A as a bridge or you could again

Re: internal network

2025-03-03 Thread Patrick Dupre via users
> > On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 12:30 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > > Is bridge synonymy of "shared to other computers"? > > No, it's more of a straight through (or over, hence the name). Or, you > might think of it as a pass-through. > > > If yes, every time that I do that, it generates an a

Re: internal network

2025-03-03 Thread Tim via users
On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 12:30 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > Is bridge synonymy of "shared to other computers"? No, it's more of a straight through (or over, hence the name). Or, you might think of it as a pass-through. > If yes, every time that I do that, it generates an address in 10.40

Re: internal network

2025-03-03 Thread Patrick Dupre via users
Connection between A and B work fine. The only think that I cannot build is the connection with PC C (I manually set up the ip address, etc..) What do you mean by > You could > configure the two ethernet ports on PC A as a bridge or you could again > configure the second ethernet port as shared.

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Tim via users
On Sun, 2025-03-02 at 20:38 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > Trying to add a nameserver. > > On PC B, I have > Global > Protocols: LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported > resolv.conf mode: stub > > Link 2 (enp3s0) > Current Scopes: LLMNR/IPv4 LLMNR/IPv6 >

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 3/1/25 7:03 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: I have 2 PC A and B. Before A what connected to the world wireless and PC B was connected through an internet cable (wired). PC A lost its wireless connection. Now PC B is connected to the world through a telephone and I want to have PC A connecte

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Patrick Dupre via users
Trying to add a nameserver. On PC B, I have Global Protocols: LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported resolv.conf mode: stub Link 2 (enp3s0) Current Scopes: LLMNR/IPv4 LLMNR/IPv6 Protocols: -DefaultRoute LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Tim via users
On Sun, 2025-03-02 at 09:58 -0500, bruce wrote: > hey Tim. > > saw your post. could u let us know who the offending is is so we can > avoid if possible!! Hi Bruce, My fired FTTP ISP was Telstra (Australia's service from hell), that thinks it's a premium service provider despite having outsour

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread bruce
hey Tim. saw your post. could u let us know who the offending is is so we can avoid if possible!! On Sun, Mar 2, 2025, 9:50 AM Tim via users wrote: > Patrick Dupre: > > > Yes the schamatics is correct. > > I set the gateway and now it works. > > > > Now > > 1) I wish to use internet from PC A

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Tim via users
Patrick Dupre: > Yes the schamatics is correct. > I set the gateway and now it works. > > Now > 1) I wish to use internet from PC A. > I guess that I need to set a name server > But not possible manually Presuming that you just mean for using the internet... If internet sharing is working, the

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Patrick Dupre via users
Thank for the feedback.   It is just a temporally solution. I must get a new doogle at the end of next week. Before I had PC A with the 2 internet interfaces connected to PC B and PC C. The setup was easy, and new had problem.   Now From PC B nmcli connection show NAME                  

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Barry Scott
> On 2 Mar 2025, at 12:25, Will McDonald wrote: > > Your life would be made a lot simpler if you had a small switch or router, as > Tim suggested. You can even get USB-powered devices. All the ISP modems I have ever seen have a 3 or 4 port switch built in. Doesn't yours? Barry --

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Will McDonald
On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 at 09:12, Patrick Dupre wrote: > I set the gateway and now it works. > > Now > 1) I wish to use internet from PC A. > I guess that I need to set a name server > But not possible manually > nmcli connection modify ipv4.dns (From: https://idroot.us/fedora-41-network-configurati

Re: internal network

2025-03-02 Thread Patrick Dupre via users
Thank for the feedback.   Yes the schamatics is correct. I set the gateway and now it works.   Now 1) I wish to use internet from PC A. I guess that I need to set a name server But not possible manually   2) How do I need to set for PC 3 From PC A From PC C I tried several things

Re: internal network

2025-03-01 Thread Tim via users
On Sat, 2025-03-01 at 23:22 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > I had a configuration with was working, but my usb WiFi doogle does > not work anymore. Replacing it isn't an option? As for the best way forward... It might be worth letting us know if you were using a mix of cabled ethernet an

Re: internal network

2025-03-01 Thread Tim via users
On Sat, 2025-03-01 at 16:03 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > I have 2 PC A and B. > Before A what connected to the world wireless > and PC B was connected through an internet cable (wired). > PC A lost its wireless connection. > Now PC B is connected to the world through a telephone and I wa

Re: internal network

2025-03-01 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 3/1/25 4:18 PM, Will McDonald wrote: On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 at 22:22, Patrick Dupre via users mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: I am lost. I had a configuration with was working, but my usb WiFi doogle does not work anymore. The configuration which was working

Re: internal network

2025-03-01 Thread Will McDonald
On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 at 22:22, Patrick Dupre via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I am lost. > > I had a configuration with was working, but my usb WiFi doogle does not > work anymore. > The configuration which was working > > Doogle on PC A with 2 ethernet cards. > One connected to P

Re: internal network

2025-03-01 Thread Patrick Dupre via users
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: internal network > > On 3/1/25 7:03 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > > I have 2 PC A and B. > > Before A what connected to the world wireless > > and PC B was connected through an internet cable (wired). > > P

Re: internal network

2025-03-01 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 3/1/25 7:03 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: I have 2 PC A and B. Before A what connected to the world wireless and PC B was connected through an internet cable (wired). PC A lost its wireless connection. Now PC B is connected to the world through a telephone and I want to have PC A connecte