On Sun, 2025-03-09 at 16:51 -0400, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
> The Spectrum modem only has oneport. It would only connect to their
> proprietary router with an extra monthly charge not my Reyee.
If a PC can connect to it, so can a router.
They may require you to connect something to it so
On 3/2/25 8:10 AM, Barry Scott wrote:
On 2 Mar 2025, at 12:25, Will McDonald wrote:
Your life would be made a lot simpler if you had a small switch or
router, as Tim suggested. You can even get USB-powered devices.
All the ISP modems I have ever seen have a 3 or 4 port switch built in.
On Thu, 2025-03-06 at 19:42 -0600, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> What is daisy-chaining?
Named after making a necklace from intertwining daisies together, it's
one thing connected to another, to another through another, to another
through another, etc.
Internet <--> PC <--> PC <--> PC
--
uname -r
On 3/6/25 5:42 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
What is daisy-chaining?
Forwarding (each device has two distinct connections)?
This.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject
What is daisy-chaining?
Multi-drop bus (each device connected to a common wire)?
Forwarding (each device has two distinct connections)?
Something else?
Discovering the topology was easy.
Details, not so much.
--
Michael henne...@mail.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"SCSI is NOT magic. There are *fundamental
On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 17:21 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> Following your suggestion, I set the following
>
> On PC A, the interface for PC C with IP 10.42.1.1 with a gateway to 10.42.0.2
> and on PC C
> IP 10.42.1.2 with a gateway to 10.42.1.1
I am thoroughly confused by that descriptio
On 3/3/25 3:30 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Connection between A and B work fine.
The only think that I cannot build is the connection with PC C
(I manually set up the ip address, etc..)
What do you mean by
You could
configure the two ethernet ports on PC A as a bridge or you could again
>
> On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 12:30 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > Is bridge synonymy of "shared to other computers"?
>
> No, it's more of a straight through (or over, hence the name). Or, you
> might think of it as a pass-through.
>
> > If yes, every time that I do that, it generates an a
On Mon, 2025-03-03 at 12:30 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> Is bridge synonymy of "shared to other computers"?
No, it's more of a straight through (or over, hence the name). Or, you
might think of it as a pass-through.
> If yes, every time that I do that, it generates an address in 10.40
Connection between A and B work fine.
The only think that I cannot build is the connection with PC C
(I manually set up the ip address, etc..)
What do you mean by
> You could
> configure the two ethernet ports on PC A as a bridge or you could again
> configure the second ethernet port as shared.
On Sun, 2025-03-02 at 20:38 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> Trying to add a nameserver.
>
> On PC B, I have
> Global
> Protocols: LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
> resolv.conf mode: stub
>
> Link 2 (enp3s0)
> Current Scopes: LLMNR/IPv4 LLMNR/IPv6
>
On 3/1/25 7:03 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
I have 2 PC A and B.
Before A what connected to the world wireless
and PC B was connected through an internet cable (wired).
PC A lost its wireless connection.
Now PC B is connected to the world through a telephone and I want to
have PC A connecte
Trying to add a nameserver.
On PC B, I have
Global
Protocols: LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS DNSSEC=no/unsupported
resolv.conf mode: stub
Link 2 (enp3s0)
Current Scopes: LLMNR/IPv4 LLMNR/IPv6
Protocols: -DefaultRoute LLMNR=resolve -mDNS -DNSOverTLS
DNSSEC=no/unsupported
On Sun, 2025-03-02 at 09:58 -0500, bruce wrote:
> hey Tim.
>
> saw your post. could u let us know who the offending is is so we can
> avoid if possible!!
Hi Bruce,
My fired FTTP ISP was Telstra (Australia's service from hell), that
thinks it's a premium service provider despite having outsour
hey Tim.
saw your post. could u let us know who the offending is is so we can avoid
if possible!!
On Sun, Mar 2, 2025, 9:50 AM Tim via users
wrote:
> Patrick Dupre:
>
> > Yes the schamatics is correct.
> > I set the gateway and now it works.
> >
> > Now
> > 1) I wish to use internet from PC A
Patrick Dupre:
> Yes the schamatics is correct.
> I set the gateway and now it works.
>
> Now
> 1) I wish to use internet from PC A.
> I guess that I need to set a name server
> But not possible manually
Presuming that you just mean for using the internet... If internet
sharing is working, the
Thank for the feedback.
It is just a temporally solution. I must get a new doogle at the end of next week.
Before I had PC A with the 2 internet interfaces connected to PC B and PC C.
The setup was easy, and new had problem.
Now
From PC B
nmcli connection show
NAME
> On 2 Mar 2025, at 12:25, Will McDonald wrote:
>
> Your life would be made a lot simpler if you had a small switch or router, as
> Tim suggested. You can even get USB-powered devices.
All the ISP modems I have ever seen have a 3 or 4 port switch built in.
Doesn't yours?
Barry
--
On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 at 09:12, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> I set the gateway and now it works.
>
> Now
> 1) I wish to use internet from PC A.
> I guess that I need to set a name server
> But not possible manually
>
nmcli connection modify ipv4.dns
(From: https://idroot.us/fedora-41-network-configurati
Thank for the feedback.
Yes the schamatics is correct.
I set the gateway and now it works.
Now
1) I wish to use internet from PC A.
I guess that I need to set a name server
But not possible manually
2) How do I need to set for PC 3
From PC A
From PC C
I tried several things
On Sat, 2025-03-01 at 23:22 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> I had a configuration with was working, but my usb WiFi doogle does
> not work anymore.
Replacing it isn't an option?
As for the best way forward... It might be worth letting us know if
you were using a mix of cabled ethernet an
On Sat, 2025-03-01 at 16:03 +0100, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> I have 2 PC A and B.
> Before A what connected to the world wireless
> and PC B was connected through an internet cable (wired).
> PC A lost its wireless connection.
> Now PC B is connected to the world through a telephone and I wa
On 3/1/25 4:18 PM, Will McDonald wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 at 22:22, Patrick Dupre via users
mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
wrote:
I am lost.
I had a configuration with was working, but my usb WiFi doogle does
not work anymore.
The configuration which was working
On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 at 22:22, Patrick Dupre via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I am lost.
>
> I had a configuration with was working, but my usb WiFi doogle does not
> work anymore.
> The configuration which was working
>
> Doogle on PC A with 2 ethernet cards.
> One connected to P
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: internal network
>
> On 3/1/25 7:03 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > I have 2 PC A and B.
> > Before A what connected to the world wireless
> > and PC B was connected through an internet cable (wired).
> > P
On 3/1/25 7:03 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
I have 2 PC A and B.
Before A what connected to the world wireless
and PC B was connected through an internet cable (wired).
PC A lost its wireless connection.
Now PC B is connected to the world through a telephone and I want to
have PC A connecte
26 matches
Mail list logo