Robert McBroom via users composed on 2022-11-01 17:37 (UTC-0400):
>> Robert McBroom via users composed on 2022-10-31 17:17 (UTC-0400):
>>> ~]# grub2-install /dev/sdc
>>> grub2-install: error: this utility cannot be used for EFI platforms
...
> No mention of MBR as the drive is GPT.
MBR is impli
On 11/1/22 14:37, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
No mention of MBR as the drive is GPT. Totally UEFI system, four drives
three OS. I was suspecting a problem with the boot sector, but on
removal of all drives but the one, it boots. Adding the drives one by
one to see the point of digression.
On 10/31/22 17:26, Felix Miata wrote:
Robert McBroom via users composed on 2022-10-31 17:17 (UTC-0400):
Running Fedora 35 and trying to fix installed boot files on a third drive.
~]# grub2-install /dev/sdc
grub2-install: error: this utility cannot be used for EFI platforms
because it does not s
On 1/11/22 08:26, Felix Miata wrote:
Robert McBroom via users composed on 2022-10-31 17:17 (UTC-0400):
Running Fedora 35 and trying to fix installed boot files on a third drive.
~]# grub2-install /dev/sdc
grub2-install: error: this utility cannot be used for EFI platforms
because it does not su
Robert McBroom via users composed on 2022-10-31 17:17 (UTC-0400):
> Running Fedora 35 and trying to fix installed boot files on a third drive.
> ~]# grub2-install /dev/sdc
> grub2-install: error: this utility cannot be used for EFI platforms
> because it does not support UEFI Secure Boot.
> Sec
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 17:17:35 -0400
Robert McBroom via users wrote:
> ~]# grub2-install /dev/sdc
> grub2-install: error: this utility cannot be used for EFI platforms
> because it does not support UEFI Secure Boot.
An efi install of grub2 needs more info than just a disk drive. Here
is my note fr
On 10/31/22 14:17, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
Running Fedora 35 and trying to fix installed boot files on a third drive.
~]# grub2-install /dev/sdc
grub2-install: error: this utility cannot be used for EFI platforms
because it does not support UEFI Secure Boot.
Secure Boot is turned off
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/20/2010 06:29 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> The official manual is (fairly recent, AFAIK)
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/
>> (which is the url of the now MIA grub1 manual).
>>
>
> grub1 is called grub legacy now and doc
On 07/20/2010 06:29 AM, Tom H wrote:
>
> The official manual is (fairly recent, AFAIK)
> http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/html_node/
> (which is the url of the now MIA grub1 manual).
>
grub1 is called grub legacy now and doc for that is at
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/legacy
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:02:12 +0100
> Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
>> What is the supposed advantage of grub2 over grub?
>
> As near as I can tell grub2 is a classic example of
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-system_effect
>
> It is supposed to
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>>
>> To be fair, the difference between grub1/2 and lilo remains that
>> grub1/2 don't update the mbr for every config change but only when
>> they are set up.
>>
>> grub2's update is the equivalent of grubby on Fedora and grub
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:02:12 +0100
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> What is the supposed advantage of grub2 over grub?
As near as I can tell grub2 is a classic example of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-system_effect
It is supposed to be easier to add support for
different filesystems with loadable
Tom H wrote:
> To be fair, the difference between grub1/2 and lilo remains that
> grub1/2 don't update the mbr for every config change but only when
> they are set up.
>
> grub2's update is the equivalent of grubby on Fedora and grub1's
> update-grub on Debian/Ubuntu.
What is the supposed advant
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:53:03 -0400
> Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>> It isn't quite that bad Tom, I have composed new stanza's for it several
>> times now.
>
> It isn't horrible, but it is a lot more inconvenient that the current
> grub, but at least
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:53:03 -0400
Gene Heskett wrote:
> It isn't quite that bad Tom, I have composed new stanza's for it several
> times now.
It isn't horrible, but it is a lot more inconvenient that the current
grub, but at least on ubuntu, if you modify the grub.cfg file directly
you are gonn
On Monday, July 19, 2010 09:52:16 am Tom Horsley did opine:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:44:37 -0400
>
> Tom H wrote:
> > I wonder what the status of grub2 is in Fedora.
>
> Hopefully, the status is "we'll stick with grub forever".
> The newest ubuntu releases default to grub2 and I find
> it incred
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:44:37 -0400
> Tom H wrote:
>
>> I wonder what the status of grub2 is in Fedora.
>
> Hopefully, the status is "we'll stick with grub forever".
> The newest ubuntu releases default to grub2 and I find
> it incredibly inconv
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:44:37 -0400
Tom H wrote:
> I wonder what the status of grub2 is in Fedora.
Hopefully, the status is "we'll stick with grub forever".
The newest ubuntu releases default to grub2 and I find
it incredibly inconvenient. I could swear the main
driving force behind grub over lilo
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:54 PM, JD wrote:
> On 07/18/2010 12:13 PM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> I have just installed grub2 in an f13 vbox (built through an f13 live
>> cd install) and it looks to me like that:
>> (1) grub1 is still in control and the mbr is untouched
>> (2) you can just uninstall grub2
On 07/18/2010 12:13 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:41 PM, JD wrote:
>> Has anyone installed grub2 on F13?
>> If yes, did it work OK?
>> did you have to manually modify any files
>> in /boot/grub?
>>
>> If it did not work, was it easy to get back to legacy grub?
> I have just ins
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Doron Bar Zeev wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 22:13, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> For the record:
>>
>> Installing grub2 added an entry to the grub1 menu pointing to grub2's
>> stage 1 img in /boot/grub2.
>>
>> The grub boot menu remains grub1's and still defaults to
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/19/2010 12:43 AM, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> Installing gettext allows you to run "grub2-mkconfig -o
>> /boot/grub2/grub.cfg" to create a grub.cfg and be able to chainload
>> grub2 from grub1 (I hope that Fedora will eventually add an
>> "upda
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 22:13, Tom H wrote:
>
> For the record:
>
> Installing grub2 added an entry to the grub1 menu pointing to grub2's
> stage 1 img in /boot/grub2.
>
> The grub boot menu remains grub1's and still defaults to the grub1
> entry to boot the most recent kernel.
>
>
I think you ha
On 07/19/2010 12:43 AM, Tom H wrote:
>
> Installing gettext allows you to run "grub2-mkconfig -o
> /boot/grub2/grub.cfg" to create a grub.cfg and be able to chainload
> grub2 from grub1 (I hope that Fedora will eventually add an
> "update-grub"/"update-grub2" shell script to run "grub2-mkconfig -o
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 2:41 PM, JD wrote:
> Has anyone installed grub2 on F13?
> If yes, did it work OK?
> did you have to manually modify any files
> in /boot/grub?
>
> If it did not work, was it easy to get back to legacy grub?
I have just installed grub2 in an f13 vbox (built through an f13
25 matches
Mail list logo
