I'm running a connection to a remote server via x2go. The remote desktop
is xfce.
When I leave this unattended for some time, I come back to find that
pulseaudio is sucking 64GB of VM. Needless to say, I don't really need PA
running on it, but I haven't seen how to disable it.
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 21:19:02 +0100 Barry Scott wrote:
>
>
> > On 1 Jun 2023, at 19:28, Frank Elsner via users
> > wrote:
> >
> > I simply want to use pulseaudio.
>
> In case you are not aware.
>
> There are design problems in pulseaudio that pipe
> On 1 Jun 2023, at 19:28, Frank Elsner via users
> wrote:
>
> I simply want to use pulseaudio.
In case you are not aware.
There are design problems in pulseaudio that pipewire fixes.
Also there is no new work going into pulseaudio all the effort
is going into pipe
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 11:57:57 -0500 Roger Heflin wrote:
> I am not sure what you are attempting to do by trying to replace
> pipewire with pulse, but you only removed the pipewire to pulseaudio
> module, you did not erase any of the actual pipewire rpms, just the
> module that provide
> On 1 Jun 2023, at 17:46, Frank Elsner via users
> wrote:
>
> # pactl stat
> Connection failure: Connection refused
> pa_context_connect() failed: Connection refused
I have pipewire and its pulse adapter installed (the default I think)
and pactl stat works without that error.
I assume that
I am not sure what you are attempting to do by trying to replace
pipewire with pulse, but you only removed the pipewire to pulseaudio
module, you did not erase any of the actual pipewire rpms, just the
module that provides pulseaudio compatibility.
What exactly did the dnf swap command say it did
Hello all,
I've done
sudo dnf swap --allowerasing pipewire-pulseaudio pulseaudio
But even after login pipewire seems still to be active:
# ps -ef | grep -E "pulse|pipe"
frank 19848 19503 3 18:19 ?00:00:47 /usr/bin/pipewire
frank 19850 19503 4 18
On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 12:38:03AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
$ systemctl --user status wireplumber.service
# wireplumber.service - Multimedia Service Session Manager
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/user/wireplumber.service: enabled;
preset: enabled)
Active: inactive (dead)
T
@updates
pipewire-pulseaudio.x86_64 0.3.66-1.fc37
@updates
pulseaudio-libs.x86_64 16.1-4.fc37
@updates
pulseaudio-utils.x86_6416.1-4.fc37
@updates
python3-a
#
This is a user unit. Use thus: systemctl --user cat pulseaudio.service
Interesting. How would a global configuration change be implemented, since any
edit made for a user who runs it goes into a user settings directory?
You seem to have pulseaudio installed, but as far as I now, pipewi
Felix Miata wrote:
> francis.montag...@inria.fr composed on 2023-03-06 08:01 (UTC+0100):
>> This is a user unit. Use thus: systemctl --user cat pulseaudio.service
>
> Interesting. How would a global configuration change be implemented, since any
> edit made for a user who runs it goes into a user
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 3:34 AM Felix Miata wrote:
> [...] [How to switch between pulseaudio and pipewire]
> I'm not against change, but this is a result of several years of
> system-upgrades,
> and I've never seen anything explaining how to make a switch:
https://discussi
at pulseaudio.service
Interesting. How would a global configuration change be implemented, since any
edit made for a user who runs it goes into a user settings directory?
> You seem to have pulseaudio installed, but as far as I now, pipewire should
> replace it nowadays.
I'm not
> No files found for pulseaudio.service.
> # systemctl cat pulseaudio.socket
> No files found for pulseaudio.socket.
> #
This is a user unit. Use thus: systemctl --user cat pulseaudio.service
You seem to have pulseaudio installed, but as far as I now, pipewire should
Can anyone reconcile the following?
# journalctl -b --no-hostname | grep pulse
Mar 06 01:38:45 systemd[577]: pulseaudio.socket - Sound System was skipped
because of a failed condition check (ConditionUser=!root).
Mar 06 01:38:45 systemd[577]: pulseaudio.service - Sound Service was skipped
because
On 05.11.21 19:39, Neal Becker wrote:
My audio seems to be working fine, but I do see both
pipewire
pipewire-pulse
are running. Should they be?
I think yes. pipewire-pulse is a translation service for classic
pulseaudio applications.
Best regards
ulf
My audio seems to be working fine, but I do see both
pipewire
pipewire-pulse
are running. Should they be?
Thanks,
Neal
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 10:43 AM Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> On 11/3/21 11:57, Ulf Volmer wrote:
> > sudo dnf install --allowerasing pipewire-pulseaudio
> >
>
On 11/3/21 11:57, Ulf Volmer wrote:
sudo dnf install --allowerasing pipewire-pulseaudio
should deo the job.
It did indeed. Thank you!
(I also had to 'dnf swap pipewire-media-session wireplumber' to undo
that in
pipewire-media-session
That installed pipewire-media-session (wireplumber wasn't installed),
but after rebooting pulseaudio is still running.
If I look at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DefaultPipeWire
sudo dnf install --allowerasing pipewire-pulseaudio
should deo the job.
pipewire-media-session (wireplumber wasn't installed),
but after rebooting pulseaudio is still running.
--
In Soviet Russia, Google searche
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 3:48 PM Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> Are there instructions anywhere for switching to pipewire?
See the following, Ian:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WirePlumber
and run
dnf swap wireplumber pipewire-media-session
Paul
___
Are there instructions anywhere for switching to pipewire?
--
In Soviet Russia, Google searches you!
_
I'm looking to upgrade from Fedora 32 to Fedora 34
Does pipewire support the Apple Airplay protocol featured in pulseaudio?
Specifically, the pulseaudio module-raop-sink ?
My setup is: Rhythmbox --> pulseaudio (module-raop-sink) --> RaspberryPi
(Shairport Sync AirPlay audio pla
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:43:28 +0200
Cisco Tissera wrote:
> Another question, if you don't mind, actually two: say I wanted to
> completely remove Pipewire from the system, could I?
Only by removing all its dependencies that have been set to pipewire
only (they won't work with pul
f there is a way to install pulseaudio 15 and it's
deps, instead of 14.2-3, which fedora provides, even in it's testing
repositories.
Thanks again for any answer.
Best regards.
Francisco.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 11:16 AM Grumpey wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 4:22 AM Cisco
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 4:22 AM Cisco Tissera
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I was wondering if there was a way, or a step by step guide, to migrate
> from Pipewire to Pulseaudio in Fedora 34.
> I really like Pipewire, however the audio server does not yet support some
>
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if there was a way, or a step by step guide, to migrate
from Pipewire to Pulseaudio in Fedora 34.
I really like Pipewire, however the audio server does not yet support some
of the assistive technologies that I'd like to use, while pulseaudio does.
I can'
appen when you go
through the pulseaudio settings (e.g. you open the thing so you can
adjust the sound level of one thing - such as the file playing in a web
browser, separately from the system ding alert sounds). Or, some
application causing the system to ding out loud, starts this fault
occurring.
On 26/05/2021 16:15, Frank Elsner via users wrote:
Hi,
I'm a podcaster and therefore I need a functional audio environment.
Currently I use pulseaudio on a Fedora 33 system. Works for me.
Will this also work if I upgrade to Fedora 34?
Is there an equivalent to pavucontrol? I need it to a
On 29/05/2021 15:31, George N. White III wrote:
On Sat, 29 May 2021 at 11:00, Steve Underwood <mailto:coppic...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> [...]
When I upgraded from F32 to F33 pulseaudio changed from something
with a
few quirks, to something very troublesome. The main
On Sat, 29 May 2021 at 11:00, Steve Underwood wrote:
> > [...]
> When I upgraded from F32 to F33 pulseaudio changed from something with a
> few quirks, to something very troublesome. The main issue was I had to
> restart pulseaudio several times after logging in before it would
On 26/05/2021 09:15, Frank Elsner via users wrote:
Hi,
I'm a podcaster and therefore I need a functional audio environment.
Currently I use pulseaudio on a Fedora 33 system. Works for me.
Will this also work if I upgrade to Fedora 34?
Is there an equivalent to pavucontrol? I need it to a
to, 2021-05-27 kello 23:43 +0300, Matti Pulkkinen kirjoitti:
> The improved:
> I would also sometimes get this weird problem where the
> output was selected correctly, and the meter was moving when audio
> was
> being output, but nothing could be heard through the headphones. I've
> experienced non
On Wed, 26 May 2021 10:15:39 +0200 Frank Elsner via users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a podcaster and therefore I need a functional audio environment.
> Currently I use pulseaudio on a Fedora 33 system. Works for me.
>
> Will this also work if I upgrade to Fedora 34?
>
&
On Thu, 2021-05-27 at 10:08 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I don't do any exotic audio usage, but the only difference
> I've seen is that it no longer takes audio a second or two
> to start working again if I pause a youtube video for a while
> then come back later and start it up again. I used to alw
ke, 2021-05-26 kello 10:15 +0200, Frank Elsner via users kirjoitti:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a podcaster and therefore I need a functional audio environment.
> Currently I use pulseaudio on a Fedora 33 system. Works for me.
>
> Will this also work if I upgrade to Fedora 34?
>
&
Yes, either pulseaudio or pipewire can be installed, from my history:
1137 | install pulseaudio-module-bluetooth --allowerasing
| 2021-05-19 14:33 | E, I |2
1136 | install pulseaudio --allowerasing
| 2021-05-19 14:32 | E, I |3 EE
On Thu, May 27
On Thu, 27 May 2021 16:21:24 +0300 Kseniya Blashchuk wrote:
> I use pulseaudio at the moment with fedora 34, tried pipewire but had much
> headache with bluetooth headphones. However I should admit that HSP/HFP
> profile started working with pipewire (did not work with pulseaudio at
>
On Thu, 27 May 2021 14:04:28 +0100
Tethys wrote:
> I'd also say that they've significantly heavier weight than pulseaudio
> was. Between then, pipewire and pipewire-pulse are consistently using
> 10% of my available CPU time between them, which is insane.
I just tried play
I use pulseaudio at the moment with fedora 34, tried pipewire but had much
headache with bluetooth headphones. However I should admit that HSP/HFP
profile started working with pipewire (did not work with pulseaudio at
all). Still it is quite unstable, so I had to switch back to pulseaudio and
use
o pipewire has not been a pleasant experience for
> > me.
>
> I'd also say that they've significantly heavier weight than pulseaudio
> was. Between then, pipewire and pipewire-pulse are consistently using
> 10% of my available CPU time between them, which is insane.
T
x27;d also say that they've significantly heavier weight than pulseaudio
was. Between then, pipewire and pipewire-pulse are consistently using
10% of my available CPU time between them, which is insane.
Tet
--
I saw cout being shifted "Hello world" times to the lef
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 9:16 AM Frank Elsner via users
wrote:
> Is there an equivalent to pavucontrol? I need it to adjust
> the level of my external audio interface?
>
> I'm heavy interested in any experience - especially pitfalls - before
> I start the upgrade.
I've had mixed success. pavucont
On 26/05/2021 16:15, Frank Elsner via users wrote:
Hi,
I'm a podcaster and therefore I need a functional audio environment.
Currently I use pulseaudio on a Fedora 33 system. Works for me.
Will this also work if I upgrade to Fedora 34?
Is there an equivalent to pavucontrol? I need it to a
Hi,
I'm a podcaster and therefore I need a functional audio environment.
Currently I use pulseaudio on a Fedora 33 system. Works for me.
Will this also work if I upgrade to Fedora 34?
Is there an equivalent to pavucontrol? I need it to adjust
the level of my external audio interface?
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 5:57 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> >> You may want to ask on the "test" list as well as adding a comment to
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906086
> >>
> > Slight correction: please don't comment on that bug. It would be
> > better to file a new bug that blocks
On 11/02/2021 22:54, Ben Cotton wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 8:59 AM Ed Greshko wrote:
You may want to ask on the "test" list as well as adding a comment to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906086
Slight correction: please don't comment on that bug. It would be
better to file a
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 8:59 AM Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> You may want to ask on the "test" list as well as adding a comment to
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906086
>
Slight correction: please don't comment on that bug. It would be
better to file a new bug that blocks 1906086.
--
Be
On 11/02/2021 21:36, Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All,
I have installed pipewire-pulseaudio with:
dnf --allowerasing install pipewire-pulseaudio
And now, the microphone is not detected. Any ideas? Is pipewire
already at an usable stage of development?
My understanding is that the target release
Dear All,
I have installed pipewire-pulseaudio with:
dnf --allowerasing install pipewire-pulseaudio
And now, the microphone is not detected. Any ideas? Is pipewire
already at an usable stage of development?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
___
users mailing
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:37:57 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 8/26/20 4:10 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > I generally like PA, but it has a quirk with Zoom (likely the latter is to
> > blame). Starts Zoom at around 50% of the audio. I miss quite a bit
> > before I realize that I am the one who can fi
On 8/26/20 4:10 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I generally like PA, but it has a quirk with Zoom (likely the latter is to
blame). Starts Zoom at around 50% of the audio. I miss quite a bit
before I realize that I am the one who can fix my faint sound issue. FWIW, I
use the official Zoom client for Fe
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 4:10 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> > That's a strange question. Who wouldn't be using it? It's the default
> > sound system. You would have to go to great lengths to not be using it.
>
not entirely true, i chased sound related expertise for a bit, thenn dove
in and flew
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 15:41:03 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 8/26/20 3:37 PM, Jack Craig wrote:
> > now i got it working, i wonder if anyone else out there is using PA ??
> >
> > anyone??
>
> That's a strange question. Who wouldn't be using it? It's the default
> sound system. You would have to
On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 15:37:15 -0700
Jack Craig wrote:
> now i got it working, i wonder if anyone else out there is using PA ??
I've never known there was a way to avoid it. That's why I'm using it.
Every once in a while, for no apparent reason, it will decide my
default audio shouldn't be HDMI any
On 2020-08-27 06:37, Jack Craig wrote:
> now i got it working, i wonder if anyone else out there is using PA ??
>
> anyone??
>
Sure, it is the default. I can't recall when it became the default, but it has
been for some time now.
--
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.
__
On 8/26/20 3:37 PM, Jack Craig wrote:
now i got it working, i wonder if anyone else out there is using PA ??
anyone??
That's a strange question. Who wouldn't be using it? It's the default
sound system. You would have to go to great lengths to not be using it.
_
now i got it working, i wonder if anyone else out there is using PA ??
anyone??
tia, jackc...
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://do
On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 17:15 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I didn't want to get specific as it's not a use case for many others
> outside of ham radio. Digital communications with ham radio is done
> with a sound card and the audio is sent to the radio and transmitted
> over the air where it is then
rce=rtpout.monitor loop=0
load-module module-null-sink sink_name=rtpin format=s16be channels=2
rate=44100 sink_properties="device.description='RTP Multicast In'
device.bus='network' device.icon_name='network-server'"
load-module module-rtp-recv sink=rtpin
lo
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 5:09 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 7/7/20 2:53 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I plan on doing a demonstration for an Emergency Management meeting and
> > I need to have two computers cross connected via audio.
> >
> > Ideally this would be between two sound cards but laptops with
On 7/7/20 2:53 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
I plan on doing a demonstration for an Emergency Management meeting and
I need to have two computers cross connected via audio.
Ideally this would be between two sound cards but laptops with a single
3.5mm audio jack seem to be problematic. I've ordered a
I plan on doing a demonstration for an Emergency Management meeting and I
need to have two computers cross connected via audio.
Ideally this would be between two sound cards but laptops with a single
3.5mm audio jack seem to be problematic. I've ordered another USB->Audio
adapter but it won't get
On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 13:13:22 -0500
SternData wrote:
> I just did a clean install of F30 on this system and am trying to get
> things back to work.
>
> I've got pulseeffects installed because the install of
> pulseaudio-equalizer fails
>
> $ sudo dnf install pu
On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 13:13:22 -0500, SternData wrote:
> I just did a clean install of F30 on this system and am trying to get
> things back to work.
>
> I've got pulseeffects installed because the install of
> pulseaudio-equalizer fails
>
> $ sudo dnf install pu
I just did a clean install of F30 on this system and am trying to get
things back to work.
I've got pulseeffects installed because the install of
pulseaudio-equalizer fails
$ sudo dnf install pulseaudio-equalizer
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides ladspa-swh-pl
hi everybody
I'm hoping it is possible to have audio in apps when you run
them like:
$ sudo -u aUser yourApp
$ xhost +; sudo su aUser
And I've followed this:
https://fhackts.wordpress.com/2017/07/01/running-pulseaudio-system-wide-with-pacmd-on-arch/
but failed to have that Firefox
gest a fix or help me
> > > identify the problem?
> >
> > I guess nobody else has seen these problems. :)
>
> This sounds like a bug, but could be a misconfiguration.
>
> As you say, I don't have the problem. If you switch to a console
> (Ctrl-Alt-[F2-F6])
On Sun, 9 Dec 2018 01:07:28 -0500
Christopher wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 1:53 AM Christopher
> wrote:
> > 1. In gdm, the volume indicator always indicates the output device
> > is Headphones, even when headphones aren't plugged in. gdm doesn't
> > make a lot of noise to debug before loggin
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 1:53 AM Christopher wrote:
>
> Okay, so this has been bugging me for a while now, but I'm not sure
> how to fix it, or to troubleshoot it further. Maybe somebody here can
> help.
>
> There are two issues, and they may or may not be related. I'm
> currently on F29, but it hap
Okay, so this has been bugging me for a while now, but I'm not sure
how to fix it, or to troubleshoot it further. Maybe somebody here can
help.
There are two issues, and they may or may not be related. I'm
currently on F29, but it happened before I upgraded, too.
1. In gdm, the volume indicator a
o systems at the same time: to
> > internal speakers on the computer and to external ones like, e.g.,
> > those in a TV, via HDMI. And all this on Fedora 26 system
>
> I found this writeup extremely helpful. It doesn't touch alsa at all
> but uses other higher lev
found this writeup extremely helpful. It doesn't touch alsa at all
but uses other higher level tools to accomplish what you're looking for,
specifically: pavucontrol (pulseaudio volume control) and paprefs
(pulseaudio preferences).
https://community.linuxmint.com/tutorial/view/12
gt; those in a TV, via HDMI. And all this on Fedora 26 system
>
>
> Try the google search "pulseaudio multiple outputs".
>
> Seems to be plenty of information available.
>
Well, obviously: you're right. Shame on me, and thanks for helping some
at-leas
a TV, via HDMI. And all this on Fedora 26 system
Try the google search "pulseaudio multiple outputs".
Seems to be plenty of information available.
--
Fedora Users List - The place to go to speculate endlessly
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
n Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:49:17 -0500
Doug wrote:
[ ... ]
Perhaps I should elaborate: On my system, I have a MB with a sound
output. I also have an NVidia video card that also contains a sound
decoder with an HDMI output jack. With this combination, AND
PulseAudio, I can get simultaneous sound (nea
wrote:
[ ... ]
> Perhaps I should elaborate: On my system, I have a MB with a sound
> output. I also have an NVidia video card that also contains a sound
> decoder with an HDMI output jack. With this combination, AND
> PulseAudio, I can get simultaneous sound (near the computer with
> the MO
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 09:09:07 -0500
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:49:17 -0500
> Doug wrote:
>
> > It may take some serious fiddling
> > around with the possibilities in PA
>
> My most annoying PA experience was it doing something
> a bit like that all by itself. All I did was app
and distract the pulseaudio developers
before they could think of inventing this solution
for a problem that doesn't exist.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 11/23/2017 07:04 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On 11/23/17, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/23/2017 01:59 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
I ended up removing pulseaudio but couldn't get alsa to work either,
so I now have a sound-less system just like in my AMD 386 running OS/2
back in 1993 befor
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 18:59:15 -0300
Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Where do I sign?. Unfortunately I have a LinuxMINT system w AMD APU
> and where audio over HDMI never actually worked.
>
> I purchased three cheap USB Sound adapters in the hope of getting
> audio out that way, but I don't get sound fro
rb repeat $REP 2> /dev/null
>
> Try it. It ought to work in any of the above situations.
> But it won't if pulseaudio is in the picture.
Pulseaudio will never work in that situation; that was a design
decision. They felt that that was insecure, since a user's soundstream
ow to use it).
It is in the pulseaudio-utils rpm along with some other
command line utilities for doing other things.
About 5 years after pulse was released, it did mostly
start to work for me, but it still seems to be solving
a problem no one has :-).
___
On 11/23/17, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 11/23/2017 01:59 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>> I ended up removing pulseaudio but couldn't get alsa to work either,
>> so I now have a sound-less system just like in my AMD 386 running OS/2
>> back in 1993 before the SoundBlaster 16
Wolfgang,
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:07:08 +0100
From: Wolfgang Pfeiffer
Subject: Re: pulseaudio MUST DIE!
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Message-ID: <20171123210708.26f09cb4@aw17>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 20:02:47 +0100
Wolfgang Pfeiffer
On 11/23/2017 01:59 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
I ended up removing pulseaudio but couldn't get alsa to work either,
so I now have a sound-less system just like in my AMD 386 running OS/2
back in 1993 before the SoundBlaster 16 arrived.
If ALSA isn't working, then PulseAudio won'
On 11/22/17, David A. De Graaf wrote:
> Sound now works perfectly - just the way it should.
> I cannot discern any important loss of function from the deleted 34
> packages so far. aplay, vlc, xmms, mythfrontend and even
> skypeforlinux all work fine with alsa.
>
> pulseau
On 11/23/2017 08:14 AM, David A. De Graaf wrote:
By fine, I mean, for example, that scripts that generate sound can be
invoked by any user, in any environment: In /etc/rc.d/rc.local during
boot by root, in a plain text terminal, in an X window by any user,
including root, in a crontab job run
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 20:02:47 +0100
Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 20:10:19 -0500
> Doug wrote:
>
> > On 11/22/2017 05:36 PM, David A. De Graaf wrote:
> > > [ ... ]
> > >
> > > Today I held an exorcism and have slain the dam
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 20:10:19 -0500
Doug wrote:
> On 11/22/2017 05:36 PM, David A. De Graaf wrote:
> > pulseaudio became unusable on F26 with the upgrade to vers 11.1.2 a
> > few weeks ago. It rapidly filled the log files with trash - and
> > produced no sound.
> &g
On 11/22/17 21:59, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 22 November 2017, David A. De Graaf sent:
I've fought with this miserable pulseaudio creation for several
years, trying to get sound to work *properly*, but this is the
last straw.
I can't say I've had any real problems with
On 11/22/17 19:38, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
David A. De Graaf writes:
Today I held an exorcism and have slain the damned thing:
dnf remove pulseaudio
which, amazingly, took out 34 packages.
Sound now works perfectly - just the way it should.
I cannot discern any important loss of function
Allegedly, on or about 22 November 2017, David A. De Graaf sent:
> I've fought with this miserable pulseaudio creation for several
> years, trying to get sound to work *properly*, but this is the
> last straw.
I can't say I've had any real problems with it. I used to ha
On 11/22/2017 05:36 PM, David A. De Graaf wrote:
pulseaudio became unusable on F26 with the upgrade to vers 11.1.2 a few
weeks ago. It rapidly filled the log files with trash - and produced
no sound.
By using dnf downgrade "*pulseaudio*"I was able to restore sanity.
Yesterday
David A. De Graaf writes:
Today I held an exorcism and have slain the damned thing:
dnf remove pulseaudio
which, amazingly, took out 34 packages.
Sound now works perfectly - just the way it should.
I cannot discern any important loss of function from the deleted 34
packages so far. aplay
On 11/23/17 06:36, David A. De Graaf wrote:
> pulseaudio became unusable on F26 with the upgrade to vers 11.1.2 a few
> weeks ago. It rapidly filled the log files with trash - and produced
> no sound.
> By using dnf downgrade "*pulseaudio*" I was able to restore s
pulseaudio became unusable on F26 with the upgrade to vers 11.1.2 a few
weeks ago. It rapidly filled the log files with trash - and produced
no sound.
By using dnf downgrade "*pulseaudio*" I was able to restore sanity.
Yesterday I freshly installed Fedora 27 Live Xfce on an A
Allegedly, on or about 8 November 2017, stan sent:
> Whether HRTF sounds better may be dependent on the source audio and a
> matter of personal taste, but it is definitely worth trying out.
I would question the fidelity of it, too. But it can be interesting to
listen to some of these spatiality t
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 15:07:01 -0700
stan wrote:
mplayer has builtin hrtf available, with limitations. You would have
to stream to mplayer from the url in order to do this with netflix, I
think. Here's the blurb from the mplayer docs.
3.9.6. Surround emulation in headphones
MPlayer includes an H
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 14:15:32 -0700
stan wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 19:15:05 +1100
> Stephen Morris wrote:
>
> > Hi stan, Ed replied in another thread that he found some info that
> > says that Logitech software is required to get the functionality
> > which is not available for Linux, so it loo
1 - 100 of 377 matches
Mail list logo
