Re: Minor update question

2011-09-26 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.09.2011 19:32, schrieb Joe Zeff: > On 09/21/2011 11:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> please try "yum update" and post output, witout exactly outputs >> everybody must guess waht you mean, anyways "ntfsprogs" gets >> some "replaces" updates the last time what yum would show in >> a clean way >

Re: Minor update question

2011-09-26 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.09.2011 16:55, schrieb JB: > Reindl Harald thelounge.net> writes: > >> ... >> P.S.: the peopole who decided to moderate my mails to the list >> should consider revert this or push them a little faster instead >> of days and weeks later or silently drop them >> >> normally a moderated lis

Re: Minor update question

2011-09-23 Thread Joe Zeff
On 09/21/2011 11:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > please try "yum update" and post output, witout exactly outputs > everybody must guess waht you mean, anyways "ntfsprogs" gets > some "replaces" updates the last time what yum would show in > a clean way Whatever makes you think this would do any good

Re: Minor update question

2011-09-23 Thread JB
Reindl Harald thelounge.net> writes: > ... > P.S.: the peopole who decided to moderate my mails to the list > should consider revert this or push them a little faster instead > of days and weeks later or silently drop them > > normally a moderated list anserwers instantly that it is moderated >

Re: Minor update question

2011-09-23 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 21.09.2011 20:31, schrieb Joe Zeff: > I just started an update of Fedora 14 by yumex, and it listed ntfsprogs > 2011.4.12-5.fc14 twice. Both are from updates and are the same size. > I'm sure this is harmless, but does anybody know what's going on? please try "yum update" and post output,

Re: Minor update question

2011-09-21 Thread Christina Salls
64bit and 32bit versions perhaps? On 9/21/11 2:31 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > I just started an update of Fedora 14 by yumex, and it listed ntfsprogs > 2011.4.12-5.fc14 twice. Both are from updates and are the same size. > I'm sure this is harmless, but does anybody know what's going on? -- Christin

Re: Minor update question

2011-09-21 Thread Richard Shaw
I didn't have quite the same issue but it seems strange that ntfsrpogs was getting replaced rather than updated (see below) Richard # yum update Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, downloadonly, langpacks, presto, refresh- : packagekit Adding en_US to language list Setting up Upd

Re: Minor update question

2011-09-21 Thread Joe Zeff
On 09/21/2011 12:00 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > Are you running an x86_64 system and, if so, could it perhaps be .686 and > .x86_64 packages? No. I suspect that if I were, one of them would have specified x86_64, making the versions slightly different and giving me no reason to ask. -- users ma

Re: Minor update question

2011-09-21 Thread Kevin Martin
On 09/21/2011 01:31 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: > I just started an update of Fedora 14 by yumex, and it listed ntfsprogs > 2011.4.12-5.fc14 twice. Both are from updates and are the same size. > I'm sure this is harmless, but does anybody know what's going on? Are you running an x86_64 system and, if

Minor update question

2011-09-21 Thread Joe Zeff
I just started an update of Fedora 14 by yumex, and it listed ntfsprogs 2011.4.12-5.fc14 twice. Both are from updates and are the same size. I'm sure this is harmless, but does anybody know what's going on? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscriptio