I’m especially interested in the data transfer speeds and how it handles
high-resolution images and 4K/8K video footage. According to the specs, it
should take full advantage of the high speeds offered by CFexpress cards, but I
haven’t had a chance to try it out yet.
--
Hey everyone,
I recently came across the M.2 M-Key CFexpress Memory Card Reader from Micro
SATA Cables and wanted to open a discussion about it.
I’m especially interested in the data transfer speeds and how it handles
high-resolution images and 4K/8K video footage. According to the specs, it
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 6/26/23 20:48, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I've got a Fedora 38 install (upgrade from F37). The install happened
>> with Anaconda. Anaconda created the compressed memory swap file. I
>> resized the disk and added
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 5:20 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-06-26 at 23:48 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > I've got a Fedora 38 install (upgrade from F37). The install happened
> > with Anaconda. Anaconda created the compressed memory swap file. I
> &g
On Mon, 2023-06-26 at 23:48 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> I've got a Fedora 38 install (upgrade from F37). The install happened
> with Anaconda. Anaconda created the compressed memory swap file. I
> resized the disk and added a proper swap partition. Now I need to
> modify /etc/
stall happened
with Anaconda. Anaconda created the compressed memory swap file. I
resized the disk and added a proper swap partition. Now I need to
modify /etc/fstab and disable the compressed memory swap file. In the
screen text below, /dev/nvme0n1p4 is the new partition.
My Google-fu really sucks tod
install (upgrade from F37). The install happened
> >>> with Anaconda. Anaconda created the compressed memory swap file. I
> >>> resized the disk and added a proper swap partition. Now I need to
> >>> modify /etc/fstab and disable the compressed memory swap file. In th
On 6/26/23 23:20, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 2:14 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 6/26/23 20:48, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
I've got a Fedora 38 install (upgrade from F37). The install happened
with Anaconda. Anaconda created the compressed memory swap file. I
resized the dis
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 2:14 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 6/26/23 20:48, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> >
> > I've got a Fedora 38 install (upgrade from F37). The install happened
> > with Anaconda. Anaconda created the compressed memory swap file. I
> > resiz
On 6/26/23 20:48, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've got a Fedora 38 install (upgrade from F37). The install happened
with Anaconda. Anaconda created the compressed memory swap file. I
resized the disk and added a proper swap partition. Now I need to
modify /etc/fstab and disabl
Hi Everyone,
I've got a Fedora 38 install (upgrade from F37). The install happened
with Anaconda. Anaconda created the compressed memory swap file. I
resized the disk and added a proper swap partition. Now I need to
modify /etc/fstab and disable the compressed memory swap file. In the
screen
On Tue Feb28'23 08:09:24PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> From: Jeffrey Walton
> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 20:09:24 -0500
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: noloa...@gmail.com, Community support for Fedora users
>
> Subject: Re: recommended partition for
ne, which utilizes swap on zram. So
> > basically it won't use any swap unless needed. You can adjust the amount of
> > memory allowed to be used for swap.
>
> Right, thanks. So, I let the installer pick this up. I usually do a custom
> partitioning, does that mean that I do not de
On Tue Feb28'23 03:23:37PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> From: Richard Shaw
> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 15:23:37 -0600
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: recommended partition for swap with 0.5 TB memory
>
>
ty is if we are swapping then something/someone screwed up (too
many process, process leak, memory leak, machine sized wrong).
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 2:48 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> On Tue Feb28'23 01:56:08PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > From: Richard Shaw
> > Date: Tue, 28 Fe
lt;
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > Subject: Re: recommended partition for swap with 0.5 TB memory
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 1:43 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am trying to install Fedora on to a new mac
On Tue Feb28'23 01:56:08PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> From: Richard Shaw
> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:56:08 -0600
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: recommended partition for swap with 0.5 TB memory
>
> On
On Tue Feb28'23 01:56:08PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> From: Richard Shaw
> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:56:08 -0600
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: recommended partition for swap with 0.5 TB memory
>
> On
talling Fedora 36 or 37,
I would just leave the defaults alone, which utilizes swap on zram. So
basically it won't use any swap unless needed. You can adjust the amount of
memory allowed to be used for swap.
Thanks,
Richard
___
users mailing lis
Hi,
I am trying to install Fedora on to a new machine that has 0.5 TB RAM. Hard
drives are 256 GB for / and friends, and 2 TB for /home partition. In the past,
it used to be suggested that swap be twice that of RAM: this later changed to
the same amount, and now it is very unclear (to me) becau
Hi all;
I just did a new install of Fedora 34 on my laptop. I put my XQD card in
a usb card reader and nothing happens (mo popup in the system tray).
A dmesg command shows me this:
[41307.726478] usb 4-2: new SuperSpeed Plus Gen 2x1 USB device number 69
using xhci_hcd
[41307.742352] usb 4-
On 1/14/22 08:50, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
First, I have ordered 16Gb of memory for my x140e. One of the Lenovo
forum experts has run this way in the past with no noticeable
problems, though he no longer uses the 140. The mem cards should come
next week. I will first test them out in my ole
First, I have ordered 16Gb of memory for my x140e. One of the Lenovo
forum experts has run this way in the past with no noticeable problems,
though he no longer uses the 140. The mem cards should come next week.
I will first test them out in my ole F32 system and make sure they don't
On 1/14/22 03:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 1/13/22 16:00, Tim via users wrote:
My experience with Firefox's restore last session feature was only with
multiple tabs, not multiple windows. I know I can't manually kill
multiple windows and than restart and get them all back, I only get
back the la
On 1/13/22 16:00, Tim via users wrote:
My experience with Firefox's restore last session feature was only with
multiple tabs, not multiple windows. I know I can't manually kill
multiple windows and than restart and get them all back, I only get
back the last closed window. I've discovered that
restart of firefox is faster than waiting for it to
respond.
We can all hope that the browsers get fixed and don't eat ram, but
firefox(on both windows and linux), IE(on windows) have had this
problem off and on since they were first created, so if the current
memory leaks get fixed some less
it detects you're close to running out of memory the
behaviour is to try and kill off the process heavily consuming memory.
It won't actually stop the application from using too much resources
but let it keep on running.
i.e. Firefox will be quit, or it will crash.
The idea is that t
s to use and they have
> stuff running on them.
Anything other than flat static HTML is a major candidate for chewing
through your memory, CPU load, and network bandwidth. Pages that load
adverts may continually load new ones, perhaps multimedia ones. Some
pages may time-out on you.
Pages th
On 1/13/22 00:35, Tim via users wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan
You might consider the Tab Session Manager extension. It
periodically (or on demand) saves your current tabs and windows and
can restore them again on startup, but optionally not actually load
each page until you decide to visit it.
A
Patrick O'Callaghan
>> You might consider the Tab Session Manager extension. It
>> periodically (or on demand) saves your current tabs and windows and
>> can restore them again on startup, but optionally not actually load
>> each page until you decide to visit it.
Andras Simon:
> I believe that th
2022-01-12 13:21 UTC+01:00, Patrick O'Callaghan :
> On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 12:46 +0100, Andras Simon wrote:
>> 2022-01-12 12:09 UTC+01:00, Patrick O'Callaghan
>> :
>>
>> > You might consider the Tab Session Manager extension. It
>> > periodically
>> > (or on demand) saves your current tabs and windo
On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 08:40 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
> On 1/12/22 06:09, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 20:25 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 16:58 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> > > > what is
On 1/12/22 06:09, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 20:25 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 16:58 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
what is 'earlyoom'?
OOM is an out-of-memory condition, earlyoom is something that's
supposed to jump in and m
On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 12:46 +0100, Andras Simon wrote:
> 2022-01-12 12:09 UTC+01:00, Patrick O'Callaghan
> :
>
> > You might consider the Tab Session Manager extension. It
> > periodically
> > (or on demand) saves your current tabs and windows and can restore
> > them
> > again on startup, but opt
2022-01-12 12:09 UTC+01:00, Patrick O'Callaghan :
> You might consider the Tab Session Manager extension. It periodically
> (or on demand) saves your current tabs and windows and can restore them
> again on startup, but optionally not actually load each page until you
> decide to visit it.
I beli
On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 20:25 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 16:58 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> > what is 'earlyoom'?
>
> OOM is an out-of-memory condition, earlyoom is something that's
> supposed to jump in and manage the memory use (someho
On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 14:58 -0700, linux guy wrote:
> I have 75 Windows with 550 tabs. Across 5 desktops and 4
> activities. My machine has 64GB of RAM. It is always responsive.
Okay, we're all coming around to your place to use your computer, then.
;-)
--
uname -rsvp
Linux 3.10.0-1160.4
On Tue, 2022-01-11 at 16:58 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> what is 'earlyoom'?
OOM is an out-of-memory condition, earlyoom is something that's
supposed to jump in and manage the memory use (somehow) before you run
out of free memory.
I'm not surprised at Firefox b
G 6G 100
So, memory is being used as swap making it much faster. And, as you can see,
no disk swap is being used.
--
Did 황준호 die?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.
On 1/11/22 17:00, linux guy wrote:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 2:56 PM Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
In a couple days, I will see the swap usage grow. Until I Quit
firefox,
then restart with all the old windows opening.
But I really never exit Firefox unless forced to.
TabSessio
ntil I Quit firefox,
> > then restart with all the old windows opening.
> >
> > But I really never exit Firefox unless forced to.
> >
> > On 1/11/22 16:33, John Mellor wrote:
> > > What on earth are you doing in Firefox and Thunderbird to use that
> > &g
ox unless forced to.
>
> On 1/11/22 16:33, John Mellor wrote:
> > What on earth are you doing in Firefox and Thunderbird to use that
> > swap? I have multiple 8GB machines running the same Fedora, Firefox
> > and Thunderbird, and virtually never get into swap at all. Two t
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 2:56 PM Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
> In a couple days, I will see the swap usage grow. Until I Quit firefox,
> then restart with all the old windows opening.
>
> But I really never exit Firefox unless forced to.
>
TabSessionManager is your friend. Look for it in AddOns.
W
se hogging all that memory. Do a top and sort by RSS and see
what the real problem app is.
--
John Mellor
On 2022-01-11 12:30 p.m., Robert Moskowitz wrote:
The specs for my Lenovo x140e is 8GB, which I have and it seems to be
not enough.
$ free
totalusedfree
I have 75 Windows with 550 tabs. Across 5 desktops and 4 activities. My
machine has 64GB of RAM. It is always responsive.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedo
ning the same Fedora, Firefox and
> > Thunderbird, and virtually never get into swap at all. Two the these
> > machines are also Lenovo. This makes no sense, so there must be
> > something else hogging all that memory. Do a top and sort by RSS and see
> > what the real prob
et into swap at all. Two the
these machines are also Lenovo. This makes no sense, so there must be
something else hogging all that memory. Do a top and sort by RSS and
see what the real problem app is.
--
John Mellor
On 2022-01-11 12:30 p.m., Robert Moskowitz wrote:
The specs for my Leno
Firefox uses a lot of RAM if you have a lot of windows/tabs open.
Another way to see how much memory FF is using is to do an
about:performance in the URL field.
A bare minimum hardware spec for me these days is 16GB of RAM. I purchased
a laptop this summer and bumped that to 32 GB. My desktop
nning the same Fedora, Firefox and
> Thunderbird, and virtually never get into swap at all. Two the these
> machines are also Lenovo. This makes no sense, so there must be
> something else hogging all that memory. Do a top and sort by RSS and see
> what the real problem app is.
>
>
hogging all that memory. Do a top and sort by RSS and see
what the real problem app is.
--
John Mellor
On 2022-01-11 12:30 p.m., Robert Moskowitz wrote:
The specs for my Lenovo x140e is 8GB, which I have and it seems to be
not enough.
$ free
total used free
Looks like more memory is "well" supported:
https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/ThinkPad-X-Series-Laptops/X140e-Review-and-Upgrade-Information-WLAN-WWAN-Memory-HDD/m-p/1931897
So 16GB for ~$90. Going to have to figure out the best good deal on
2x*GB memory.
And look at 32GB options.
But
21734220
but really the bottom line is I need more memory for the tasks at hand.
Firefox has all these weird processes running eating up lots of memory
and swapping like crazy. Probably bad for my SSD drive.
So how to get to 16GB memory?
What follows the x140e in the 12" format? I
proc/meminfo documentation:
Shmem
Total memory used by shared memory (shmem) and tmpfs
ShmemHugePages
Memory used by shared memory (shmem) and tmpfs allocated with huge pages
I have been reading the meminfo documentation trying to try to account
for all of the memory usage
uld be happening here? Does writing a file to
> > tmpfs and then deleting it cause the tmpfs to retain that allocated
> > memory until reboot?
> >
> > My system is running Fedora 34. I have ensured nothing is mounted over
> > top of /tmp and hiding files.
>
&g
p
>
> However, `du` does not show 3.5GB of files inside:
>
> jmetzmeier@localhost:/tmp $ sudo du -sh ./
> 32K ./
>
> Does anyone know what could be happening here? Does writing a file to
> tmpfs and then deleting it cause the tmpfs to retain that allocated
> memor
On 10/26/21 12:23 PM, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
Does anyone know what could be happening here? Does writing a file to
tmpfs and then deleting it cause the tmpfs to retain that allocated
memory until reboot?
Wikipedia tells us that shared memory is used to communicate between
programs and
I am trying to determine if a problem I am experiencing is a bug or if
there is something I am missing. Last week I found that 15GB of my
32GB RAM was used by shared memory, causing my system to fill swap.
After about 1hr of trying to discover the reason for this, the only
thing I could find was
> On 22 Jul 2021, at 20:01, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>
> I have a Kiosk I'm trying out using Chromium, unfortunately it seems to have
> a memory leak and crashes in less than 24 hours of usage.
It likely that the problem is not a bug in chromium but rather the javascript
On 23/07/2021 04:22, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 2:41 PM Ed Greshko mailto:ed.gres...@greshko.com>> wrote:
On 23/07/2021 03:00, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I have a Kiosk I'm trying out using Chromium, unfortunately it seems to
have a memory leak and crashes i
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 2:41 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 23/07/2021 03:00, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I have a Kiosk I'm trying out using Chromium, unfortunately it seems to
> have a memory leak and crashes in less than 24 hours of usage.
> >
> > I see systemD has an o
On 23/07/2021 03:00, Richard Shaw wrote:
I have a Kiosk I'm trying out using Chromium, unfortunately it seems to have a
memory leak and crashes in less than 24 hours of usage.
I see systemD has an option for "MemoryMax" but was wondering if anyone has
actually used it?
Is
I have a Kiosk I'm trying out using Chromium, unfortunately it seems to
have a memory leak and crashes in less than 24 hours of usage.
I see systemD has an option for "MemoryMax" but was wondering if anyone has
actually used it?
Is it as simple as
MemoryMax=512M
OnFailure=Restar
On 5/3/21 1:24 PM, Earl Ramirez wrote:
What do you mean by "in memory"? And how much memory?
Currently the LiveOS can run off a USB/DVD what I am asking is if the
OS can be loaded into RAM so that the removable media is no longer
needed.
I expect you could and I think I've
>
> What do you mean by "in memory"? And how much memory?
Currently the LiveOS can run off a USB/DVD what I am asking is if the
OS can be loaded into RAM so that the removable media is no longer
needed.
At a minimum of 2GB.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sig
On 5/3/21 12:20 PM, Earl Ramirez wrote:
Has anyone used Fedora in memory? I saw that there are couple OSes that
are capable of doing this and wonder if this is possible to achieve
this with Fedora.
What do you mean by "in memory"? And how m
Dear All,
Has anyone used Fedora in memory? I saw that there are couple OSes that
are capable of doing this and wonder if this is possible to achieve
this with Fedora.
Thanks
--
Kind Regards,
Earl A. Ramirez
2021-05-03T21:14:59 (CEST +0200)
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 10:19 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote:
> Il 31/01/20 03:13, Roger Heflin ha scritto:
> > Google reports this answer:
> > *** CUT ***
>
> I know, but I need to contact someone that has a running system,
> because
> I want to see the output of some specific commands before I proc
Il 31/01/20 03:13, Roger Heflin ha scritto:
> Google reports this answer:
> *** CUT ***
I know, but I need to contact someone that has a running system, because
I want to see the output of some specific commands before I proceed to
buy the hardware
___
u
Google reports this answer:
AMD confirms that Ryzen support ECC memory
In simple terms, this means that AMD's Ryzen CPUs have full support
for ECC memory, but AMD does not want to officially provide any QA or
official support for ECC on their consumer platforms.Mar 2, 2017
A couple of answe
Can anybody with a Ryzen CPU + ECC memory show me the output of
following command?
# dmesg | grep ECC
I am buying a Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI in order to be able to
use ECC capabilities, by the way Gigabyte documentation states: " ECC is
only supported with AMD Ryzen and Athlon o
On 8/6/19 3:29 AM, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 14:53 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have to think if I want to facilitate hibernate when battery runs
out, like on a long flight with no working AC. Or when I am just not
paying attention to my power situation.
I would have thou
On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 19:59 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 14:53 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> > I have to think if I want to facilitate hibernate when battery runs
> > out, like on a long flight with no working AC. Or when I am just not
> > paying attention to my power sit
On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 14:53 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have to think if I want to facilitate hibernate when battery runs
> out, like on a long flight with no working AC. Or when I am just not
> paying attention to my power situation.
I would have thought the ideal way for it to operate is
On 8/5/19 1:49 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 8/5/19 3:07 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I was just looking at that basically all was running in real memory
(with lots of buffer space) with no swap used, and forgot about
suspend/hibernate.
Only hibernate. Suspend doesn't use the swap
On 8/5/19 3:07 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I was just looking at that basically all was running in real memory
(with lots of buffer space) with no swap used, and forgot about
suspend/hibernate.
Only hibernate. Suspend doesn't use the
feature that works by dumping RAM to swap, having more
ensures that it will fit. I doubt you need double, though.
Thanks for reminding me! I need to bump up my swap again and make it
permanent (change fstab). 50% more than real memory should do it...
I was just looking at that basically all was
On Sun, 2019-08-04 at 16:57 -0400, Doug McGarrett wrote:
> Use GParted to shrink your swap and expand your normal space. You
> should probably not need more than 4 GiB swap.
There is an advantage to having more swap than RAM: If you use a
hibernate feature that works by dumping RAM to swap, havin
On 08/04/2019 07:32 PM, Tim via users wrote:
On Sun, 2019-08-04 at 12:16 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
All last week I ran with 4GB real memory and a total of 8GB swap.
I was using all the real memory and pretty much 4GB of swap with
poor performance.
I think I'd consider 4 gig of
On Sun, 2019-08-04 at 12:16 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> All last week I ran with 4GB real memory and a total of 8GB swap.
>
> I was using all the real memory and pretty much 4GB of swap with
> poor performance.
I think I'd consider 4 gig of RAM a bare minimum, these days
your is an ThinkPad X140e ?
according to this
https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/ThinkPad-X-Series-Laptops/Unofficial-Max-RAM-Capacity-for-x120e/m-p/3717347/highlight/true#M77742
and
https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/forums/v3_1/forumtopicpage/board-id/tp02_en/thread-id/37966/page/3
and
https://imgur.com/a/
Just felt I should post a wrap up on my swap increase journey.
All last week I ran with 4GB real memory and a total of 8GB swap.
I was using all the real memory and pretty much 4GB of swap with poor
performance.
What was going on? With Fedora 28 I was running fairly well with 4GB,
or was I
On 7/22/19 11:50 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> When I get back from IETF, I will see about buying more memory for this
> Lenovo x140e, but still, I should not be eating up this much memory. I
> am doing the same thing I did on my x120e and Fedora28 with never any of
> these memor
When I get back from IETF, I will see about buying more memory for this
Lenovo x140e, but still, I should not be eating up this much memory. I
am doing the same thing I did on my x120e and Fedora28 with never any of
these memory challenges.
On 7/22/19 2:44 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
For
For the 2nd time my system locked up.
This time I managed to get into one of the character sessions, logged in
as root and top showed the kswapd was eating up lots of cpu. Then free
showed all real and swap memory used. That is 4Gb + 4GB.
Obviously with all my problems, I am having
Crashed again last night during rsync. Looks like it is time for a bug
report...
Jun 28 01:13:57 lx140e kernel: Out of memory: Killed process 2545
(firefox) total-vm:3122000kB, anon-rss:412084kB, file-rss:0kB,
shmem-rss:2672kB
Jun 28 15:20:58 lx140e kernel: Out of memory: Killed process 1136
kernel:
oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_NONE,nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0,global_oom,task_memcg=/machine.slice/machine-qemu\x2d3\x2dfedora21.scope,task=qemu-system-x86,pid=13357,uid=107
Jun 30 01:53:35 lx140e kernel: Out of memory: Killed process 13357
(qemu-system-x86) total-vm:3536848kB
kernel:
> oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_NONE,nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0,global_oom,task_memcg=/machine.slice/machine-qemu\x2d3\x2dfedora21.scope,task=qemu-system-x86,pid=13357,uid=107
> Jun 30 01:53:35 lx140e kernel: Out of memory: Killed process 13357
> (qemu-system-x86) total-vm:3536
=/machine.slice/machine-qemu\x2d3\x2dfedora21.scope,task=qemu-system-x86,pid=13357,uid=107
Jun 30 01:53:35 lx140e kernel: Out of memory: Killed process 13357
(qemu-system-x86) total-vm:3536848kB, anon-rss:860128kB, file-rss:0kB,
shmem-rss:0kB
Jun 30 01:53:35 lx140e kernel: oom_reaper: reaped process
Hi.
On Wed, 22 May 2019 15:41:58 +0200 francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
> I add time, from a second textual console as root, to see the "systemd
> --user" process reach more than 40 GB of memory before dying.
I made a bugzilla for this problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
]: Starting User Manager for UID 1005...
May 20 12:37:48 ... systemd[1]: Started Getty on tty2.
May 20 12:38:16 ... systemd[1864]: pam_unix(systemd-user:session): session
opened for user fm by (uid=0)
May 20 12:38:16 ... systemd[1864]: PAM failed: Cannot allocate memory
May 20 12:38:16
On Sun, 2019-03-10 at 08:01 +1100, Earl Ramirez wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the pointers, it turns out that the issue is related to
> webkit
> GIGCAGE, if I disable GIGCAGE 'GIGACAGE_ENABLED=0 evolution' I see better
> utilisation of memory also after a synchronisation memory
g/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
>
> Be sure to state your specific version of Evo (Help->About).
Thanks a lot for the pointers, it turns out that the issue is related to webkit
GIGCAGE, if I disable GIGCAGE 'GIGACAGE_ENABLED=0 evolution' I see better
utilisation of me
On Fri, 2019-03-08 at 19:46 +1100, Earl Ramirez wrote:
> Dear Fedora Community,
>
> I have been using Evolution client for many years now and it seems that after
> each upgrade Evolution is getting more greedy for memory, I was humble when it
> use to consume 2GB of RAM but now
Dear Fedora Community,
I have been using Evolution client for many years now and it seems that after
each upgrade Evolution is getting more greedy for memory, I was humble when it
use to consume 2GB of RAM but now I have seen it consuming up 8GB of RAM which I
believe is not normal.
I restarted
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 06:47:34PM +0200, Frédéric wrote:
> > I've never had to use it, but what about setting
> > the process max memory with "ulimit -m"?
>
> Thanks, it seems to work. I can put it in .bashrc.
>
> F
That will affect every process you run.
On 08/25/2018 09:47 AM, Frédéric wrote:
Thanks, it seems to work. I can put it in .bashrc.
Note: System policies belong in /etc/security/limits.conf. Otherwise,
they're optional. (Users can remove them).
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedor
> I've never had to use it, but what about setting
> the process max memory with "ulimit -m"?
Thanks, it seems to work. I can put it in .bashrc.
F
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 07:19:41AM +0200, Frédéric wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It happens sometimes that someone launches a process that uses too
> much memory. Then the computer starts swapping leaving the computer
> completely out of use. When the swap is full (I guess), the process is
Hi,
It happens sometimes that someone launches a process that uses too
much memory. Then the computer starts swapping leaving the computer
completely out of use. When the swap is full (I guess), the process is
automatically killed and we can work again. But this can last 10-15
minutes.
Would it
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 08:33:58 +0800
Robbi Nespu wrote:
> As we know, memory leak bugs #64 and relevent fixes are available only
> on gjs 1.53.x + gnome 3.29.
>
> On my current Fedora 28 workstation, I have gnome-shell 3.28.3 and gjs
> 1.52.3 from updates repository and I can&#x
1 - 100 of 385 matches
Mail list logo
