On 04/12/2013 11:35 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi Rolf,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:43:50PM +1200, Rolf Turner wrote:
I don't, didn't, never have, and never will use hypdestopt!!! Do you
see any reference to hypdestopt in the "demo" code?
I figured that it had to come from somewhere i
Sorry, I did not mean to send my previous message to the list, since
Joe Zeff had asked to email him off-list. I just clicked on "Reply"
thinking
my message would just go to the sender. (I didn't click on "Reply List"
or "Reply All".) And then I didn't notice that the To field was the list
On 04/13/2013 05:16 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/12/2013 03:32 AM, Rolf Turner wrote:
I realized that I should have been doing
ps2pdf demo.ps
not
ps2pdf demo
and *that* was the source of the error that I was getting.
Brain fart. Don't worry about it. Tish happens. If you want to
On 04/12/2013 03:32 AM, Rolf Turner wrote:
I realized that I should have been doing
ps2pdf demo.ps
not
ps2pdf demo
and *that* was the source of the error that I was getting.
Brain fart. Don't worry about it. Tish happens. If you want to know
about one that had me going round i
> I said ***explicitly*** that "powerdot is not compatible with pdftex".
> I did
> "latex demo", ***NOT*** "pdflatex demo" and got the error that I
> reported.
>
You may install kerTeX^{1} and in there latex is latex :)
If you don't have Development Tools/Libraries installed do,
# yum installgr
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 21:37 +1200, Rolf Turner wrote:
> So I need somehow to get an installation of texlive where "latex" really
> means
> ***latex*** and not "pdftex". How the hell do I arrange that?
>
I'm a bit late to this party, but Jindrich Novy's Fedora TeXLive repo
for F17 works well.
Hi Rolf,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:43:50PM +1200, Rolf Turner wrote:
> I don't, didn't, never have, and never will use hypdestopt!!! Do you
> see any reference to hypdestopt in the "demo" code?
>
> I figured that it had to come from somewhere in the bowels of powerdot.
> God know
Please see inline below.
On 04/12/2013 10:29 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hello Rolf,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 09:37:43PM +1200, Rolf Turner wrote:
I said ***explicitly*** that "powerdot is not compatible with pdftex". I
did
"latex demo", ***NOT*** "pdflatex demo" and got the error that I reported.
Further to my previous message: Maybe I *am* a moron and not just
an idiot studying hard to be one. I realized that I should have been doing
ps2pdf demo.ps
not
ps2pdf demo
and *that* was the source of the error that I was getting.
So it all seems to be working now. I guess the pro
Hello Rolf,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 09:37:43PM +1200, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> I said ***explicitly*** that "powerdot is not compatible with pdftex". I
> did
> "latex demo", ***NOT*** "pdflatex demo" and got the error that I reported.
A little patience and being concise helps a lot. If you knew
No. I certainly ***DID NOT*** "expect it to work with pdflatex"!!! Please
read what I wrote. It's very irritating to be taken for a moron when
one is
only an idiot studying hard to be a moron and flunking the course!
I said ***explicitly*** that "powerdot is not compatible with pdftex".
Hi Ed,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 02:46:52PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> First, I am not a Latex user. But decided to try your demo
> file on an F17 system where I installed using yum... I "think" it
> is OK?
>
> [egreshko@f17x ~]$ latex demo.tex
[...]
I think the OP expected it to work w
On 04/12/13 08:09, Rolf Turner wrote:
> On 04/12/2013 01:12 AM, Mike Williams wrote:
>
>
>
>> The texlive that comes with fedora 17 is texlive 2007, the version from the
>> tug link is texlive 2013. On my system I used yum to remove texlive, then
>> downloaded the .iso from tug, mounted the iso
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:09:42PM +1200, Rolf Turner wrote:
> >! Package hypdestopt Error: This package requires pdfTeX in PDF mode.
> >
> >See the hypdestopt package documentation for explanation.
> >Type H for immediate help.
> > ...
> >
> >l.55 }\@ehc
> But powerdot is incompatible with pd
Hi,
I installed texlive from the install.sh script. It worked after installing
some perl modules which are easily to discover.
The texlive package manager worked better for me than the fedora
repositories. Especially if you are going to use xelatex which I recommend.
Thomas
2013/4/12 Rolf Turn
On 04/12/2013 01:12 AM, Mike Williams wrote:
The texlive that comes with fedora 17 is texlive 2007, the version
from the tug link is texlive 2013. On my system I used yum to remove
texlive, then downloaded the .iso from tug, mounted the iso, installed
from that and it works fine.
OK. I h
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:31:17PM +1200, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> I'm not completely sure if I installed texlive using yum, or if texlive came
> with the initial install of Fedora 17. My vague recollection is that there
> was
> a latex facility that came with Fedora 17 but it was incomplete, and t
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:46:15 +0300, Susi Lehtola
wrote:
> Don't install stuff manually when things have already been packages.
> Fedora 18 features a complete TeXLive 2012 distribution; you can also
> get it on Fedora 17 by
Except that I think Fedora installs the versions from the TeX Live s
Quoting Rolf Turner :
Under Fedora 17 I recently had problems with running latex on a file that
previously (under Ubuntu) I had no difficulty with. (A while back I had to
switch from Ubuntu to Fedora for reasons that I won't go into here.)
I thought that perhaps I might be able to get rid of
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:03:23 +1200, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> Under Fedora 17 I recently had problems with running latex on a file that
> previously (under Ubuntu) I had no difficulty with. (A while back I had to
> switch from Ubuntu to Fedora for reasons that I won't go into here.)
>
> I thought
>
> On 04/11/2013 09:20 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>> On 04/11/13 17:03, Rolf Turner wrote:
>>
>>> Under Fedora 17 I recently had problems with running latex on a file that
>>> previously (under Ubuntu) I had no difficulty with. (A while back I had
>>> to
>>> switch from Ubuntu to Fedora for reasons
I'm not completely sure if I installed texlive using yum, or if texlive came
with the initial install of Fedora 17. My vague recollection is that
there was
a latex facility that came with Fedora 17 but it was incomplete, and that
I did indeed do "yum install texlive" to fix things up.
Now whe
On 04/11/13 17:03, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
> Under Fedora 17 I recently had problems with running latex on a file that
> previously (under Ubuntu) I had no difficulty with. (A while back I had to
> switch from Ubuntu to Fedora for reasons that I won't go into here.)
>
> I thought that perhaps I might
Under Fedora 17 I recently had problems with running latex on a file that
previously (under Ubuntu) I had no difficulty with. (A while back I had to
switch from Ubuntu to Fedora for reasons that I won't go into here.)
I thought that perhaps I might be able to get rid of the flakiness
by re-inst
24 matches
Mail list logo
