On 10/19/2014 10:34 PM, jarmo wrote:
Sun, 19 Oct 2014 19:58:51 -0600
jd1008 kirjoitti:
Hi Jon,
I actually did run yum localinstall
/./x86_64/skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc20.x86_64.rpm
and yum downloaded and installed all the i686 libs, so I did not have
An how come you get that 4.2.xxx version wo
On Sun, 2014-10-19 at 16:09 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 12:46 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> > I have been trying to locate a fully 64bit skype client to no avail;
> > a client that will not require 32 bit dependencies.
> >
> > Any info on that?
> >
> > MS is not supporting lin
Sun, 19 Oct 2014 19:58:51 -0600
jd1008 kirjoitti:
> Hi Jon,
> I actually did run yum localinstall
> /./x86_64/skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc20.x86_64.rpm
> and yum downloaded and installed all the i686 libs, so I did not have
An how come you get that 4.2.xxx version work... I had to take 4.3.x
ver
On 10/19/2014 08:14 PM, Roger wrote:
On 20/10/14 12:58, jd1008 wrote:
Hi Jon,
I actually did run yum localinstall
/./x86_64/skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc20.x86_64.rpm
and yum downloaded and installed all the i686 libs, so I did not have
to do any guess
work as to what packages skype needed.
I was
On 20/10/14 12:58, jd1008 wrote:
Hi Jon,
I actually did run yum localinstall
/./x86_64/skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc20.x86_64.rpm
and yum downloaded and installed all the i686 libs, so I did not have
to do any guess
work as to what packages skype needed.
I was only interested in avoiding having to d
On 10/19/2014 05:09 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 12:46 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
I have been trying to locate a fully 64bit skype client to no avail;
a client that will not require 32 bit dependencies.
Any info on that?
MS is not supporting linux x86_64 and who can blame them
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 12:46 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> I have been trying to locate a fully 64bit skype client to no avail;
> a client that will not require 32 bit dependencies.
>
> Any info on that?
>
> MS is not supporting linux x86_64 and who can blame them?
> They do not like Linux. They might e
On 09/18/2014 11:11 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/17/2014 11:26 PM, Marcel J.E. Mol issued this missive:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 02:14:21PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
On 09/17/2014 01:54 PM, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
OK, I have the rpm pf skype which was built for fc18:
skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc18.x86_64.
On 09/17/2014 11:26 PM, Marcel J.E. Mol issued this missive:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 02:14:21PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
On 09/17/2014 01:54 PM, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
OK, I have the rpm pf skype which was built for fc18:
skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc18.x86_64.rpm
but it still depends on i686 libs and othe
On 09/18/2014 12:26 AM, Marcel J.E. Mol wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 02:14:21PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
On 09/17/2014 01:54 PM, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
OK, I have the rpm pf skype which was built for fc18:
skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc18.x86_64.rpm
but it still depends on i686 libs and other components.
On 09/17/2014 07:22 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
On 09/17/2014 02:45 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/17/2014 01:25 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
On 09/17/2014 01:54 PM, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
OK, I have the rpm pf skype which was built for fc18:
skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc18.x86_64.rpm
but it st
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 02:14:21PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>
> On 09/17/2014 01:54 PM, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
> >>OK, I have the rpm pf skype which was built for fc18:
> >>skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc18.x86_64.rpm
> >>but it still depends on i686 libs and other components.
> >>
> >>I was wondering if there i
On 09/17/2014 08:30 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 09/17/2014 07:22 PM, jd1008 wrote:
I really AM trying to avoid the 32 bit libs. I just dont want them on my
system.
Why? Do you have an objective reason to avoid them, or is it just a
personal preference?
Of course it is preference.
I've never ha
On 09/17/2014 07:22 PM, jd1008 wrote:
I really AM trying to avoid the 32 bit libs. I just dont want them on my
system.
Why? Do you have an objective reason to avoid them, or is it just a
personal preference? I've never had to deal with this myself, not
having a 64 bit system, but if I ever
On 09/17/2014 02:45 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/17/2014 01:25 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
On 09/17/2014 01:54 PM, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
OK, I have the rpm pf skype which was built for fc18:
skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc18.x86_64.rpm
but it still depends on i686 libs and other components.
I was
On 09/17/2014 05:50 PM, Tim issued this missive:
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 17:10 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
I will look into those. Thank you, Michael! I'm still rather p*ssed at
these apps. I really don't like anyone looking up my skirt as it were.
Google is getting to be really annoying that way.
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 17:10 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> I will look into those. Thank you, Michael! I'm still rather p*ssed at
> these apps. I really don't like anyone looking up my skirt as it were.
> Google is getting to be really annoying that way.
LOL, I think you've just come up with the pe
On 09/17/2014 02:32 PM, Michael Cronenworth issued this missive:
On 09/17/2014 03:45 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
You should be more concerned with having a closed-source, non-peer-
reviewed binary on your machine. Who knows what data it is mining on
your system and sending off to M$ and their evil m
On 09/17/2014 03:45 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
You should be more concerned with having a closed-source, non-peer-
reviewed binary on your machine. Who knows what data it is mining on
your system and sending off to M$ and their evil minions. Half of the
apps I've downloaded for my Android phone neve
On 09/17/2014 01:25 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
On 09/17/2014 01:54 PM, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
OK, I have the rpm pf skype which was built for fc18:
skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc18.x86_64.rpm
but it still depends on i686 libs and other components.
I was wondering if there is a way to extract the sp
On 09/17/2014 01:14 PM, jd1008 issued this missive:
On 09/17/2014 01:54 PM, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
OK, I have the rpm pf skype which was built for fc18:
skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc18.x86_64.rpm
but it still depends on i686 libs and other components.
I was wondering if there is a way to extract the sp
On 09/17/2014 01:54 PM, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
OK, I have the rpm pf skype which was built for fc18:
skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc18.x86_64.rpm
but it still depends on i686 libs and other components.
I was wondering if there is a way to extract the spec file
from it and rebuild it (i.e. relink it) with
On 09/17/2014 01:54 PM, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote:
OK, I have the rpm pf skype which was built for fc18:
skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc18.x86_64.rpm
but it still depends on i686 libs and other components.
I was wondering if there is a way to extract the spec file
from it and rebuild it (i.e. relink it) with
>
> OK, I have the rpm pf skype which was built for fc18:
> skype-4.2.0.11-3.fc18.x86_64.rpm
> but it still depends on i686 libs and other components.
>
> I was wondering if there is a way to extract the spec file
> from it and rebuild it (i.e. relink it) with 64bit libs, by
> editing the spec file
On 09/17/2014 01:01 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/17/2014 11:46 AM, jd1008 issued this missive:
I have been trying to locate a fully 64bit skype client to no avail;
a client that will not require 32 bit dependencies.
Any info on that?
MS is not supporting linux x86_64 and who can blame them?
On 09/17/2014 11:46 AM, jd1008 issued this missive:
I have been trying to locate a fully 64bit skype client to no avail;
a client that will not require 32 bit dependencies.
Any info on that?
MS is not supporting linux x86_64 and who can blame them?
They do not like Linux. They might even wish
I have been trying to locate a fully 64bit skype client to no avail;
a client that will not require 32 bit dependencies.
Any info on that?
MS is not supporting linux x86_64 and who can blame them?
They do not like Linux. They might even wish it would disappear.
--
users mailing list
users@list
27 matches
Mail list logo
