Re: How do I fix my EUFI boot from USB stick?

On 1/17/25 4:39 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, I am officially confused.  Search.brave.com give tons of stuff I either can't use or can't figure out. I AM NOT DUAL BOOTING WITH WINDOWS!!!  (That is dumb to do.  Use qemu-kvm) I have a USB flash drive I have installed Fedro

Re: How do I fix my EUFI boot from USB stick?

On 1/20/25 2:11 PM, George N. White III wrote: On Sat, Jan 18, 2025 at 4:16 AM Tim via users wrote: How do I fix my EUFI boot on the USB drive from my main fc41 computer? The flash drive is completely readable from my main computer including the flash drive's boot folder With my last Fedor

Re: mate terminal -e halt?

On 1/20/25 1:17 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 1/19/25 7:53 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: In the following command, how do I put a press any key command at the end of it /usr/bin/mate-terminal -e "your_application_command" https://www.tweaking4all.com/software/linux-software/bash

mate terminal -e halt?

Hi All, In the following command, how do I put a press any key command at the end of it /usr/bin/mate-terminal -e "your_application_command" Many thanks, -T -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to us

Re: Unable to Access Samba Shared Folder from Windows 10 Guest in virt-manager/QEMU Setup

On 1/19/25 7:05 AM, Earl Ramirez wrote: And got nowhere trying SMB. I had similar headache with a windows VM on Fedora host and permitting SMB on firewalld libvirt zone resolved the issue Hi Earl, I have Windows qemu-kvm virtual machines with my Fedora 41 host Samba (cifs) sharing wi

Re: Unable to Access Samba Shared Folder from Windows 10 Guest in virt-manager/QEMU Setup

On 1/19/25 2:03 AM, Tim via users wrote: And is this consistent in describing when you share a resource, and how networking is described? Superficially, yes. But all kind of stuff pop up to annoy you. And it is not always straight forward. But far easier than Samba initially. Certainly very

Re: Unable to Access Samba Shared Folder from Windows 10 Guest in virt-manager/QEMU Setup

On 1/18/25 11:02 PM, Tim via users wrote: Which versions of Windows have you discovered have that backwards? All of them. The problem is the user only see the words "public" and "private". They do not read the description of either as they do not understand such "geek" speak. M$ does adequa

Re: Does Red Hat have any plans for Win 10 EOL ?

On 1/18/25 11:16 PM, Tim via users wrote: From my point of view, the OS should*never* fail. Everything depends on it. It should do proper error handling. And OS creators should spend much more effort on getting it right. They should, also, spend far less time re-inventing the wheel, keeping

Re: Unable to Access Samba Shared Folder from Windows 10 Guest in virt-manager/QEMU Setup

On 1/18/25 8:00 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: In the registry, first identiry the {} from   [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\NetworkList\Profiles\ Then switch "catagory" to the type of network you want.  For example: if {} was

Re: Unable to Access Samba Shared Folder from Windows 10 Guest in virt-manager/QEMU Setup

On 1/17/25 5:33 AM, Paul Smith wrote: Dear Fedora Users, I’m encountering an issue where I cannot access a Samba shared folder from a Windows 10 guest running on a host configured with virt-manager + QEMU/KVM. Here are the details of the situation: --> Host Configuration and Status The Samba s

Re: Does Red Hat have any plans for Win 10 EOL ?

On 1/14/25 3:31 AM, Tim via users wrote: -- Can I still run my Windows software on it? -- You do realise it was mostly*that* software that did the crashing? "That" software is no more buggy with their Linux offerings than it is on Windows offering. The problem is the unstable platform (Win) t

Re: How do I fix my EUFI boot from USB stick?

On 1/18/25 12:15 AM, Tim wrote: On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 16:39 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: I have a USB flash drive I have installed Fedroa 41 on. I somehow goofed my EUFI boot. Yes it was definitely my doing. Do you mean you've installed Fedora so it can run from the drive (liv

Re: How do I fix my EUFI boot from USB stick?

On 1/17/25 11:15 PM, Felix Miata wrote: ToddAndMargo via users composed on 2025-01-17 22:55 (UTC-0800): Device Start End Sectors Size Type /dev/sdc1 2048 4095 20481M BIOS boot /dev/sdc2 4096 2101247 20971521G Linux extended boot /dev/sdc3 2101248

Re: How do I fix my EUFI boot from USB stick?

On 1/17/25 10:29 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 1/17/25 4:39 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: I have a USB flash drive I have installed Fedroa 41 on. I somehow goofed my EUFI boot.  Yes it was definitely my doing. How do I fix my EUFI boot on the USB drive from my main fc41 computer? The flash

Re: How do I fix my EUFI boot from USB stick?

On 1/17/25 4:39 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, I am officially confused.  Search.brave.com give tons of stuff I either can't use or can't figure out. I AM NOT DUAL BOOTING WITH WINDOWS!!!  (That is dumb to do.  Use qemu-kvm) I have a USB flash drive I have installed Fedro

How do I fix my EUFI boot from USB stick?

Hi All, I am officially confused. Search.brave.com give tons of stuff I either can't use or can't figure out. I AM NOT DUAL BOOTING WITH WINDOWS!!! (That is dumb to do. Use qemu-kvm) I have a USB flash drive I have installed Fedroa 41 on. I somehow goofed my EUFI boot. Yes it was definitely

Re: Does Red Hat have any plans for Win 10 EOL ?

On 1/13/25 3:46 AM, Tim via users wrote: Tim via users wrote: I quite like the (old) Gnome menus. ToddAndMargo: Take a look at MATE https://fedoraproject.org/spins/mate Just simple. And gets the job done Yes, it's what I've been using for many years. It's so close to bein

Re: Does Red Hat have any plans for Win 10 EOL ?

On 1/13/25 5:44 PM, Tim via users wrote: !?>!?! They release something that's flawed, seriously flawed, they never get it right, and want you to pay more to receive things that attempt to fix it into the condition that it should have been in the first place!? Well stated. The problem is that

Re: Does Red Hat have any plans for Win 10 EOL ?

On 1/13/25 12:16 AM, Tim via users wrote: I quite like the (old) Gnome menus. Take a look at MATE https://fedoraproject.org/spins/mate Just simple. And gets the job done -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send a

Re: Does Red Hat have any plans for Win 10 EOL ?

On 1/12/25 8:30 PM, Tim via users wrote: Switching to Linux, you do have to "learn something new", which frustrated a lot of my customers to no end. Linux usually has alternate ways around those popular Windows only packages. Usually. The common retort "you have to learn a new way of doing t

Re: Does Red Hat have any plans for Win 10 EOL ?

On 1/12/25 1:41 PM, Lee Thomas Stephen wrote: Hi Todd, The suggestion came from my personal experience. I use RHEL as my personal/work desktop workstation. After moving to RHEL 9, I boot to Windows 10 twice yearly, only to check for updates. I never miss Windows because most of today's apps are

Re: Does Red Hat have any plans for Win 10 EOL ?

On 1/11/25 4:23 AM, Lee Thomas Stephen wrote: Hi All and RedHatters, Windows 10 is going to be End of Life soon. Canonical is promoting Ubuntu Pro. Does IBM have any plans for Red Hat to take advantage of this opportunity? I post this here as I see many people with @redhat.com frequenting here.

Re: bugzilla dying?

On 1/10/25 11:08, Luna Jernberg wrote: ugZilla is an Open Source project:https://www.bugzilla.org/ but yeah there has some been discussion that Fedora will change to Gitlab or Forgejo instead, but not sure if anything was/is decided yet Thank you! -- ___

Re: bugzilla dying?

On 1/10/25 11:08, Slade Watkins wrote: Do you mean redhat's bugzilla instance or bugzilla in general? In general. I am trying to get a vendor to use it. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-

bugzilla dying?

Hi All, Rumor has it that Red Hat is moving to Jira for bug reporting. Is bugzilla dead? Or will we still ave access to it with Fedora? Also, is Bugzilla available for sale to other companies to use as their bug reporting utility? Many thanks, -T -- __

Re: betterbird in the repos?

On 12/27/24 10:56, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 4:34 AM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 12/26/24 11:34, Jeffrey Walton wrote: Butterbird is in the Flathub repos that Flatpak relies upon. See <https://www.google.com/search?q=what+repo+does+fedora+flatpak+use> and

Re: betterbird in the repos?

On 12/26/24 11:34, Jeffrey Walton wrote: Butterbird is in the Flathub repos that Flatpak relies upon. See and. Jeff Not finding it.

Re: betterbird in the repos?

On 12/26/24 11:34, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 2:00 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 12/26/24 10:41, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 8:02 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 12/25/24 06:01, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 3:46 AM

Re: betterbird in the repos?

On 12/26/24 10:41, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 8:02 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 12/25/24 06:01, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 3:46 AM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Is betterbird hiding somewhere in the repos? $ dnf provides betterbird ... No

Re: betterbird in the repos?

On 12/25/24 06:01, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 3:46 AM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Is betterbird hiding somewhere in the repos? $ dnf provides betterbird ... No matches found. Let me Google that for you: <https://www.google.com/search?q=fedora+betterbird>.

Re: betterbird in the repos?

On 12/25/24 00:46, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Is betterbird hiding somewhere in the repos? $ dnf provides betterbird ... No matches found. -T I just asked for it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334059 -- ___ users

betterbird in the repos?

Hi All, Is betterbird hiding somewhere in the repos? $ dnf provides betterbird ... No matches found. -T -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Condu

Re: tip: Firefox -> File -> eMail link: Thunderbird is already running

On 12/13/24 16:16, Tim via users wrote: Usually I'd say the worse browser was MSIE (pronounce "misery"). The "ActiveX" that went with misery was responsible for a lot of virus infections. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To u

Re: tip: Firefox -> File -> eMail link: Thunderbird is already running

On 12/13/24 01:07, Bob Marčan via users wrote: On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:02:33 -0800 "ToddAndMargo via users" wrote: oh ya. 1+ on the crap web sites. oh ya. 2+ on the crap web sites AND browsers. The worst browser I have come across

Re: tip: Firefox -> File -> eMail link: Thunderbird is already running

On 12/12/24 16:03, Tim wrote: Tim: I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox ToddAndMargo: It is medical sites were patients look up their medical records and Recreational Vehicles campgrounds. And a few government sites. I'm sure there are sites that fail i

Re: tip: Firefox -> File -> eMail link: Thunderbird is already running

On 11/25/24 16:59, Tim via users wrote: I've yet to find a site that doesn't work on Firefox It is medical sites were patients look up their medical records and Recreational Vehicles campgrounds. And a few government sites. -- ___ users mailing list

Re: LPR print to another network

On 12/10/24 20:21, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, To LPR print to another network (not a subnet), is port 515 TCP the only port I need to open on the target network? Many thanks, -T Just ports 515 and 9100 TCP. Also 80 if the printer has a status page

LPR print to another network

Hi All, To LPR print to another network (not a subnet), is port 515 TCP the only port I need to open on the target network? Many thanks, -T -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fe

Re: Web site issue

On 11/30/24 21:50, Tim via users wrote: On Sat, 2024-11-30 at 16:29 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: I can not get this web site to render properly on my Fedora 41 host computer on any of the five web browsers I tried (cache was cleared). https://www.tiyproducts.com/products/basic-tiy

Re: Web site issue

On 11/30/24 16:40, Stephen Morris wrote: On 1/12/24 11:29, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, I can not get this web site to render properly on my Fedora 41 host computer on any of the five web browsers I tried (cache was cleared). https://www.tiyproducts.com/products/basic-tiy-water But

Web site issue

Hi All, I can not get this web site to render properly on my Fedora 41 host computer on any of the five web browsers I tried (cache was cleared). https://www.tiyproducts.com/products/basic-tiy-water But, I can with qemu-kvm Tiny-11 (Stripped Windows 11) operated through my FC41 host's firewall

Re: winehq.repo baseurl not update revision

On 11/25/24 08:33, Doug H. wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2024, at 8:10 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Fedora 41 (from fc 40) wine-staging 9.21 & 9.17 (WineHQ) I noticed that `dnf upgrade wine-staging` left me on 9.17. On investigation, I found that my /etc/yum.repos.s/winehq.re

Re: tip: Firefox -> File -> eMail link: Thunderbird is already running

On 11/25/24 07:18, Frank Bures wrote: I do not use Firefox as my default browser I have eight browser installed. Firefox is "currently" the default, but is varies. I use them all for various things. If you have not tried Brave Browser, you should. It uses the "Blink" rendering engine (same as

winehq.repo baseurl not update revision

Hi All, Fedora 41 (from fc 40) wine-staging 9.21 & 9.17 (WineHQ) I noticed that `dnf upgrade wine-staging` left me on 9.17. On investigation, I found that my /etc/yum.repos.s/winehq.repo's baseurl was still on "40". vi'ing (editing) it to "41" solved the issue. Question: when I upgrade Fedora f

Re: tip: Firefox -> File -> eMail link: Thunderbird is already running

On 11/23/24 10:35, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:43:08 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Fedora 41 thunderbird-128.4.3-1.fc41.x86_64 firefox-132.0.1-2.fc41.x86_64 Since upgrading from Fedora 39 to Fedora 41, when I go into --> Firefox -> File -> eMai

Re: tip: Firefox -> File -> eMail link: Thunderbird is already running

On 11/23/24 14:50, Stephen Morris wrote: On 24/11/24 05:35, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:43:08 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Fedora 41 thunderbird-128.4.3-1.fc41.x86_64 firefox-132.0.1-2.fc41.x86_64 Since upgrading from Fedora 39 to Fedora 41, when I go into

tip: Firefox -> File -> eMail link: Thunderbird is already running

Hi All, Fedora 41 thunderbird-128.4.3-1.fc41.x86_64 firefox-132.0.1-2.fc41.x86_64 Since upgrading from Fedora 39 to Fedora 41, when I go into --> Firefox -> File -> eMail link I get told that Thunderbird is already running, which it is. This is a regression bug that I reported over on: Fir

mseal?

Hi All, I just watched a youtube video on mseal, memory corruptions by hacker,s and the Linux kernel. I do not believe much of what I see on youtube. Is mseal real and if so, will we be seeing it soon? -T -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedo

Re: Lost my Gimp Arrows

On 10/21/24 16:46, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, I somehow got updated to gimp 2.99.19 (3.0 on the splash screen). I lost my arrows. Any idea how to get the back? Everything I have found it for gimp 2.0. -T Follow up: The provider of "Arrows" just posted an update an

Re: tip: when dnf thinks you are on the wrong release

On 11/11/24 13:59, Stephen Morris wrote: did one try dnf autoremove and that wanted to remove half my system, so I abandoned that process, and issuing it now wants to remove 299 packages, I did that on one machine. NEVER AGAIN! I had to reinstall 3/4 of my applications. -- __

Re: vsftp problems

On 11/10/24 22:55, Michael D. Setzer II wrote: On 10 Nov 2024 at 16:04, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, is there a way to tell fsftp to handle more handles and traffic at once? Are you using passive mode? Yes If so what ports have you specified in /etc/vsftpd/vsftp.conf vsftpd

Re: vsftp problems

On 11/10/24 21:55, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 11/10/24 4:04 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: is there a way to tell fsftp to handle more handles and traffic at once? What's happening? I am backing up Windows workstations to it with Cobian Backup. If two go off at the same time (I try to

vsftp problems

Hi All, is there a way to tell fsftp to handle more handles and traffic at once? Many thanks, -T -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: h

Re: tip: when dnf thinks you are on the wrong release

On 11/10/24 14:10, home user via users wrote: It uses     /usr/share/licenses/fedora/fedora-release-common* On my stand-alone home workstation, there's no such thing: After I got it all cleaned up, I did not have them either. -- ___ users mailing l

Re: tip: when dnf thinks you are on the wrong release

On 11/10/24 13:46, Stephen Morris wrote: Note: dnf dose not use /etc/redhat-release as it release version.  It uses    /usr/share/licenses/fedora/fedora-release-common* On my F41 system upgraded from F40, it is using /etc/redhat-release to store its release version which for me contains Fedora r

Re: tip: when dnf thinks you are on the wrong release

On 11/10/24 14:47, home user via users wrote: Now hol-ol-ol-d your horses there. I've been doing as suggested above for a few years now. Me as well -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...

tip: stray kernel entries in your grub boot screen

Hi All, I usually do not pay much attention to the kernel entries on my grub boot screen, but after upgrading my shop computer from FC40 to FC41 I looked. Oh Goody, I have kernels on my geub boot screen all the way back to FC32!!! 3/4 of my screen was filled with kernels! Checking "rpm qa kern

tip: when dnf thinks you are on the wrong release

Hi All, This happened to me again when I went to upgrade my shop computer from FC40 to fc41. So I though I'd repeat my fix here: Note: dnf dose not use /etc/redhat-release as it release version. It uses /usr/share/licenses/fedora/fedora-release-common* -T When dnf thinks you are on the wr

Re: OT: Fedora 40 to 41 update - Strange WINEHQ issue.

On 11/3/24 16:12, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: Did an upgrade from Fedora 40 to 41 and everything went well except for WINEHQ? The Fedora 40 had the 9.20 version installed, but after the upgrade the WINEHQ (winehq-devel) was changed to 9.17?? So, not clear why that happened. Believe is

Re: How do I check to see if my xorg display manager is running?

On 11/3/24 00:03, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: you should look at your ~/.xsession-errors file for errors. I did. What do you think I was doing all those hours? I must have gone through 20 articles on how to fix this. That was indeed mentioned -- __

Re: How do I tell dnf5 I want to replace an fc39 package of the same revision?

On 11/1/24 17:39, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Fedora 41 dnf5-5.2.6.2-1.fc41.x86_64 How do I tell dnf5 I want to replace an fc39 package of the same revision? Many thanks, -T Followup. With all the suggestion over on https://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?333513-DNF-how-do

Re: How do I check to see if my xorg display manager is running?

On 11/2/24 06:50, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2024-11-02 at 05:12 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 11/2/24 04:45, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2024-11-02 at 11:24 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Fri, 2024-11-01 at 17:23 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wro

Re: How do I check to see if my xorg display manager is running?

On 11/2/24 04:45, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2024-11-02 at 11:24 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Fri, 2024-11-01 at 17:23 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 11/1/24 06:02, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: Look in your ~/.xsession-errors or test with a brand new

Re: Well, I am back on 39

On 11/1/24 18:42, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 10/25/24 05:35, George N. White III wrote: On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 7:11 AM ToddAndMargo via users https://github.com/Owl-Maintain/brlaser <https://github.com/Owl- Maintain/brlaser> says the "Brother HL-L2300D series" is su

Re: Well, I am back on 39

On 10/25/24 05:35, George N. White III wrote: On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 7:11 AM ToddAndMargo via users https://github.com/Owl-Maintain/brlaser <https://github.com/Owl- Maintain/brlaser> says the "Brother HL-L2300D series" is supported.  Fedora 40 has `printer-driver-brlaser`. 

Re: how to fsck at boot?

On 11/1/24 09:27, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 22:24:43 +1100 fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote: On 25/10/24 9:18 pm, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: What replaced "touch /forcefsck"? Last time I did this I got a message (during boot? I forget) saying to use:

Re: How do I check to see if my xorg display manager is running?

On 11/1/24 06:02, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: At this point you should try to run a "dnf distro-sync" in a protected way. Example with systemd-run: sudo systemd-run -u distro-sync --no-block --service-type=oneshot \ dnf -y distro-sync Wait for this transient distro-sync unit to

Re: How do I check to see if my xorg display manager is running?

On 11/1/24 06:02, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: Look in your ~/.xsession-errors or test with a brand new test user. Neither of my own profile or the two new profiles had an xsession-errors file -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraprojec

How do I tell dnf5 I want to replace an fc39 package of the same revision?

Hi All, Fedora 41 dnf5-5.2.6.2-1.fc41.x86_64 How do I tell dnf5 I want to replace an fc39 package of the same revision? Many thanks, -T # dnf provides unbound-libs --releasever=41 Updating and loading repositories: Repositories loaded. unbound-libs-1.21.1-3.fc39.x86_64 : Libraries used by t

Re: How do I check to see if my xorg display manager is running?

On 11/1/24 12:39, Robert McBroom via users wrote: lightdm works on rawhide f42 From my research, it work in the vast majority of cases. But if you are one of the "unlucky" ones, yo will learn a few new swear words. (Not an admission that I cuss.) -- _

Re: How do I check to see if my xorg display manager is running?

On 11/1/24 02:16, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: Is it the machine where you did a system-upgrade to F40 ? (with duplicates systemd RPMs ... at least). Tihs is that same system. I cloned it back to fc39. After a dnf update, lightdm stopped working. Funny. I liked the version of Thunderbi

Re: systemd-sysusers problem

On 10/29/24 14:10, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 10/29/24 14:01, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Fedora 39 Which should I have? systemd-standalone-sysusers  or systemd? Just checked my Xfce Live USB.  It is systemd Cancel the request. It is an issue with lightdm. I replace it

Re: How do I check to see if my xorg display manager is running?

On 11/1/24 01:14, Stephen Morris wrote: No problems, glad it's working now. regards, Steve I must have spent 16 hours trying to fix this. About killed me. I am tickled with lxdm. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscr

Re: How do I check to see if my xorg display manager is running?

On 11/1/24 01:15, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: Hi. On Fri, 01 Nov 2024 01:04:01 -0700 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Turns out I have no issues with x running. The problem is lightdm; I am stuck in the "endless loop" problem that is plaguing lightdm users. Elaborate plea

Re: systemd-sysusers start fails

On 10/29/24 17:27, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Fedora 39 systemd-254.19-1.fc39.x86_64 (provides systemd-sysusers) I can not get lightdm to start Xfc or MATE.  After entering my password into the greeter, I get a black screen with a mouse pointer, then back to the greeter. When I

Re: How do I check to see if my xorg display manager is running?

On 11/1/24 00:58, Stephen Morris wrote: On 1/11/24 14:20, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: # systemctl status display-manager.service Unit display-manager.service could not be found. What display-manager are you actually using, is it sddm, gdm or something different. Lets say you are using gdm

How do I check to see if my xorg display manager is running?

Fedora 39 How do I check to see if my xorg display manager is running? # systemctl status display-manager.service Unit display-manager.service could not be found. # dnf provides display-manager ... Error: No matches found. Many thanks, -T -- ___ use

Re: CentOS - what to use now that CentOS 7 is EOL

On 10/31/24 19:08, Go Canes wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 7:39 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: I don't use the server install of Fedora though. I use a Live USB. Then I dnf whatever server programs I want. That keeps me from having a tons of junk I don't use running. WIth

Re: CentOS - what to use now that CentOS 7 is EOL

On 10/31/24 18:51, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 9:37 PM Tom Horsley wrote: On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 18:27:43 -0700 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: And Bugzilla got things fixed Not everything. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451562 Reported 2008, now listed

Re: CentOS - what to use now that CentOS 7 is EOL

On 10/31/24 17:16, Roger Heflin wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 6:39 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: I found RHEL and friends too frustrating to use. They freeze their stuff so as to not have upgrade issues occur. Problem is they freeze the good and the bad. And it is like pulling teeth

Re: CentOS - what to use now that CentOS 7 is EOL

On 10/31/24 06:59, Jeffrey Walton wrote: I use Fedora Server in place of CentOS. I made the switch years ago. It was too frustrating trying to run a modern LAMP stack with a modern Wiki on RHEL or CentOS due to the antique software. I found RHEL and friends too frustrating to use. They freeze

systemd-sysusers start fails

Hi All, Fedora 39 systemd-254.19-1.fc39.x86_64 (provides systemd-sysusers) I can not get lightdm to start Xfc or MATE. After entering my password into the greeter, I get a black screen with a mouse pointer, then back to the greeter. When I start lighdm, it see Failed to start systemd-sysus

Re: How to install new kernels in grub?

On 10/29/24 14:08, Stephen Morris wrote: On 29/10/24 14:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 10/27/24 14:24, Stephen Morris wrote: If you are still on a legacy bios system, from memory, before running grub2-install you need to run grub2-mkconfig to build the grub menu configuration for grub2

Re: How to install new kernels in grub?

On 10/29/24 15:02, Go Canes wrote: On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 4:39 PM ToddAndMargo via users wrote: That is what I did. Did ot work: # grub2-install /dev/nvme0n1 --force If you are using UEFI, grub2-install is essentially a no-op (unless something weird is going on). Here's why T

Re: systemd-sysusers problem

On 10/29/24 14:01, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Fedora 39 Which should I have? systemd-standalone-sysusers  or systemd? Just checked my Xfce Live USB. It is systemd -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To

systemd-sysusers problem

Hi All, Fedora 39 Which should I have? systemd-standalone-sysusers or systemd? # dnf install systemd-standalone-sysusers --allowerasing Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:46 ago on Tue 29 Oct 2024 01:43:41 PM PDT. Dependencies resolved. ==

Re: How to install new kernels in grub?

On 10/29/24 04:47, Jonathan Billings wrote: The solution is to just move that directory aside and reinstlal the `kernel-core` package. Wait a minute. I only removed and reinstall the "kernel". Following what you said fixed the issue. Thank you! My new method: 1) boot using the latest insta

Re: How to install new kernels in grub?

On 10/29/24 04:47, Jonathan Billings wrote: The directory name should match the contents of /etc/machine-id. I feel like this has been mentioned a couple times in the last week, have you seen the posts about this? Most likely part of the package update/downgrades/whatever have either installe

Re: How to install new kernels in grub?

On 10/28/24 23:21, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi Steve, here aer the steps in teh link you sent: 1) boot using the latest installed kernel (in my case: kernel-6.5.10-100.fc37.x86_64) 2) Uninstall the failed kernel packages (kernel-6.5.11-300.fc39.x86_64 et al. for me). 3) cd /boot/efi and

Re: Announcing Fedora Linux 41

On 10/29/24 06:46, Matthew Miller via announce wrote: Fedora Linux 41 is now officially available! Read the details in our Fedora Magazine article at: * https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-linux-41 or download installer images from: * https://fedoraproject.org/ or, of course, simply

Re: /boot filling up

On 10/28/24 21:15, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 10/28/24 9:09 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 10/28/24 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 10/28/24 7:42 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Fedora 39 My /boot is almost full.  56% of it is occupied by rw---.  1 root root 121768072 Aug 29  2023

Re: How to install new kernels in grub?

On 10/27/24 08:24, Steve Forsythe wrote: On 10/27/24 3:23 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 10/25/24 03:31, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 10/23/24 20:56, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, $ rpm -qa kernel kernel-6.5.10-200.fc38.x86_64 kernel-6.11.3-100.fc39.x86_64 kernel-6.11.4-201

Re: /boot filling up

On 10/28/24 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 10/28/24 7:42 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Fedora 39 My /boot is almost full.  56% of it is occupied by rw---.  1 root root 121768072 Aug 29  2023 initramfs-0- rescue-25f870556c344b599c639eb386296fa2.img Is this normal? Yes.  If that'

/boot filling up

Hi All, Fedora 39 My /boot is almost full. 56% of it is occupied by rw---. 1 root root 121768072 Aug 29 2023 initramfs-0-rescue-25f870556c344b599c639eb386296fa2.img Is this normal? Yours in confusion, -T -- ___ users mailing list -- users

Re: How to install new kernels in grub?

On 10/27/24 14:24, Stephen Morris wrote: If you are still on a legacy bios system, from memory, before running grub2-install you need to run grub2-mkconfig to build the grub menu configuration for grub2-install to build those into the mbr. regards, Steve Hi Steve, I tried # grub2-mkconfi

Re: Dnfdragora Provided Info

On 10/28/24 15:17, Stephen Morris wrote: Hi,     I've been noticing for a little while that when looking at the details for repository packages that it only populates the "File List" section for installed packages, for uninstalled packages it just says "Missing Info".     Is this just Dnfdra

Re: dnf disable-repo???

On 10/28/24 14:49, Dave Close wrote: ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Now what am I doing wrong? [WineHQ] name=WineHQ packages type=rpm-md baseurl=https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/fedora/40 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/winehq.key enabled=1 # dnf upgrade --allowerasing

Re: dnf disable-repo???

On 10/28/24 14:36, Will McDonald wrote: On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 at 21:25, ToddAndMargo via users mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: On 10/28/24 13:39, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 10/28/24 12:33 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >> Hi All, >> >

Re: dnf disable-repo???

On 10/28/24 13:39, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 10/28/24 12:33 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, fedora 41 What am I doing wrong here? # cd /etc/yum.repos.d/ # ls brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_.repo fedora-cisco-openh264.repo fedora.repo fedora-updates.repo fedora-updates

dnf disable-repo???

Hi All, fedora 41 What am I doing wrong here? # cd /etc/yum.repos.d/ # ls brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_.repo fedora-cisco-openh264.repo fedora.repo fedora-updates.repo fedora-updates-testing.repo winehq.repo # dnf upgrade --allowerasing --disable-repo=winehq* No matching repos

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >