On Jul 9, 2014, at 8:20 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> would suggest that the misunderstanding is on your part instead as noted in
> another reply. However even if it weren't true, we all get bug reports
> closed from time to time with a resolution different from what we want. The
> right app
Poma said:
>OK that's it!
>I sincerely recommend the moderators to close this shameful thread where
certain creatures are capable of spitting on >the systemd and its
developers without any remorse!
I think Greg had the right idea. *plonk*.
To be frank, as I mentioned on another thread on anothe
On Jul 6, 2014, at 9:01 PM, Doug wrote:
> Just because you have a hammer doesn't mean everything is a nail.
> You should always select the proper tool for the job, and this time, it's
> not the computer.
I agree. I'm a musician myself, and I invested in the right tools for the job.
Audiobox
On Jul 6, 2014, at 5:33 PM, David Benfell wrote:
> Rolf Turner writes:
>>
>> The difference is that Olav is polite and you are abusive.
>
> If you regard what I say as abusive, then you should, perhaps, be challenging
> this entire thread, which impugns the motivations, not only of Mr.
> Poe
On Jun 6, 2014, at 10:44 AM, bruce wrote:
>
> My question, is how the heck can I implement something within the test
> foo.php to have it die/be removed from the procTBL when it dies..
If it's "stopped" that means it's not running, it's probably got an fd to the
tty open
and is listening for i
On May 13, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> You could learn to love the default udev nomenclature
>
> Of course the major problem with the new "consistent" names
> is they keep changing the software and making the names
> consistently different :-).
>
> The original biosdevname changed
On May 13, 2014, at 5:33 PM, CLOSE Dave wrote:
>
> I want to run the same software on all of these machines and having
> inconsistent names /between/ the machines makes that next to impossible.
> Using the new names means that my software has to learn all those
> different names and can't eas
On Apr 21, 2014, at 10:14 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 04/22/2014 07:00 AM, Russell Miller wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 21, 2014, at 9:52 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>>
>>> IMO, this is *the cause*, why Fedora has lost against its competitors.
>>>
On Apr 21, 2014, at 9:52 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> IMO, this is *the cause*, why Fedora has lost against its competitors.
>
I don't agree. Fedora doesn't have competitors. It fills a niche which I am
not sure that
any other distribution truly meets. Sure, some have bleeding edge forks,
On Apr 19, 2014, at 7:51 PM, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> I am having a really terrible experience with Fedora 20 KDE on Thinkpad 420i.
>
> I installed Fedora 20 KDE on Thinkpad 420i, upgraded it to the latest and
> system freezes at the login screen. System temperature goes over limit either
> bu
On Apr 19, 2014, at 11:52 AM, Robin Laing wrote:
>
> Fedora will work for servers but the upgrade cycle does cause problems. I
> have seen enough of them in my job.
>
Well, yes. Any linux distribution will work for servers as long as it will run
the binaries required. Even *shudder* Gentoo
On Apr 19, 2014, at 6:21 AM, Dave Ihnat wrote:
>
> I'm not currently running Fedora, either--it's just not in the mix for
> the five frankenstations and the server that I use for home and business
> right now. But I've been in the field since I got my degree in '76--that's
> almost 40 years now
On Apr 18, 2014, at 9:40 PM, David wrote:
>
> If you do not 'like Fedora' I would suggest that you find some other
> distro of Linux that you do. And leave this list. And? Join the list(s)
> of your latest Linux darling and sing your love there.
>
Thank you for your suggestion.
> It seems a wa
On Apr 18, 2014, at 9:15 PM, David wrote:
>
>
> And yet you are still 'here'?
>
Not that it's any of your business, but the story behind that: I subscribed
using my gmail a long time ago, and never
forwarded my gmail, and filtered it to a special folder that I never saw. A
few weeks ago
On Apr 18, 2014, at 8:43 PM, Thomas Cameron
wrote:
>
> That is neither the charter of the project, nor my personal experience.
> I use Fedora for my daily driver at home, I use it for dev work at work,
> my 7 & 11 year old daughters use it for daily driving on their laptops
> (https://fedorapro
On Apr 13, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Richard England wrote:
>
> Curious, since the -w command-line option is suppose to cause warning
> messages to be displayed indicating questionable Perl code
Yes, quite curious, and were it me I would not consider that a solution. I
would run strace on it to fin
On Saturday 13 March 2010 03:47:52 pm Craig White wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 15:26 -0800, Russell Miller wrote:
> > We are *not* irrelevant. I'm not, and neither is the OP, and the
> > attitude
> > that says we are is the *problem*.
>
>
> #1 - mention
On Saturday 13 March 2010 03:24:09 pm David wrote:
> Perhaps you should search for a distribution that works for your needs
> if you are so dissatisfied with Fedora?
It's like capitalism. it's the worst distro out there, except for all the
others.
I didn't say I was dissatisfied with Fedora.
On Saturday 13 March 2010 02:58:48 pm Craig White wrote:
> you are completely irrelevant... not that I have any ability to change
> that and I surely respect your right, as a Fedora user to post on the
> list.
>
> In the future, would you please mark your irrelevant rantings as OT (off
> topic)?
On Saturday 13 March 2010 02:21:35 pm Marcel Rieux wrote:
> In thread starting with
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-March/367987.html
>
> I stated a skewer of bugs. Geeks answered it was normal to have bugs
> like, for at least 2 years now, "New Files" entering the clipboa
On Saturday 06 March 2010 05:59:14 pm Antonio Olivares wrote:
> On another note, due to the inability of Fedora to release a 2.6.32 kernel,
> I was on the impression that IT was going to be SKIPPED to make way for
> 2.6.33 and its many IMPROVEMENTS. Like John I will compile the new kernel
> as so
On Monday 01 March 2010 08:33:20 pm Jeffrey Metcalf wrote:
> > If you put the filesystem of interest on its own partition, then
> > ISTM you can mount -o remount,ro that one file system, and it should
> > remain static during the backup. All data will still be available,
> > though unmodifiable. Cl
On Saturday 27 February 2010 09:12:06 Vadkan Jozsef wrote:
> How can I do that in bash or perl, that I have a txt file, e.g.:
>
something like
sed -ie s/(.*)/\1/ filename
Not sure of the EXACT syntax but that should be close.
(apologies if this gets sent twice, I sent the first from the wrong a
23 matches
Mail list logo
