How to get updated Fedora 31 Cloud Image?

The Fedora 31 qcow2 cloud image e.g. http://mirrors.rit.edu/fedora/fedora/linux/releases/31/Cloud/x86_64/images/ was built with a buggy grub bootloader which causes problems like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1669252 How do I request a new Fedora 31 cloud image to be built and pu

Re: GRUB prompt after F29 to F30 upgrade

This morning I got the dreaded grub prompt on boot. Took me 3 hours to understand what https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F30_bugs#GRUB_boot_menu_is_not_populated_after_an_upgrade was talking about. I did a bunch of searching and trying things out before I hit upon the configfile grub command.

[389-users] Re: Replication + SSLCLIENTAUTH failure: setup_ol_tls_conn - failed: unable to create new TLS context

On 03/30/2016 06:45 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: On 31 Mar 2016, at 12:25 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: [30/Mar/2016:17:19:19 +] setup_ol_tls_conn - failed: unable to create new TLS context [30/Mar/2016:17:19:19 +] slapi_ldap_bind - Error: could not configure the server for cert auth - erro

Re: Can not install mariadb Error: Transaction check error: ....

Thanks, that worked On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Jon Ingason wrote: > Den 2015-09-26 kl. 16:42, skrev Rich Emberson: > > # dnf install mariadb mariadb-server > > Last metadata expiration check performed 0:19:25 ago on Sat Sep 26 > > 07:14:08 2015. >

Can not install mariadb Error: Transaction check error: ....

Seems like a rather fundmental problem: $ uname -a Linux medusa 4.1.7-200.fc22.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Sep 14 20:19:24 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ rpm -qa --qf '%{NAME} %{VERSION}-%{RELEASE} %{ARCH}\n' | grep -i mariadb # dnf install mariadb mariadb-server Last metadata expiration ch

Re: F22: KDE to Gnome?

Well, after decades of KDE my solution was: dnf groupinstall Xfce Xfce works On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Rich Emberson wrote: > Upgraded from F20 KDE environment using > fedup --network 22 --product=nonproduct > > and X/KDE has rendering/refresh/redraw issues. > Applicat

F22: KDE to Gnome?

Upgraded from F20 KDE environment using fedup --network 22 --product=nonproduct and X/KDE has rendering/refresh/redraw issues. Application widgets and KDE pop menus are not draw, or, at best some edge or corner is drawn. In an xterm, the line being entered is drawn, but nothing else - move the w

Re: fedup 20 -> 22 -> improper X rendering

te machine. So, somehow Fedora 22's nouveau-based rendering seems to have an issue .. or something On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Rich Emberson wrote: > I used to update: > > fedup --network 22 --product=nonproduct > > Coming up in graphical target as default.target, KD

Re: fedup 20 -> 22 -> improper X rendering

I might add that logging in remotely to this machine and then launching an X-application that displays on the remote machine works. So, it seems to be purely a X rendering issue on the machine, the X protocol works fine. Richard On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Rich Emberson wrote: > I used

Re: fedup 20 -> 22 -> improper X rendering

3.3.7-1.fc22 x86_64 kmod-libs 21-1.fc22 x86_64 kmod 21-1.fc22 x86_64 On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:34 AM, fedora2015 wrote: > On 08/08/2015 09:42 PM, Rich Emberson wrote: > >> I used to update: >> > fedup --network 22 --product=nonproduct >> >> Coming up in graphic

fedup 20 -> 22 -> improper X rendering

I used to update: > fedup --network 22 --product=nonproduct Coming up in graphical target as default.target, KDE X does not render properly. With right click I a small box appears under the cursor, navigating to what I guess is the first menu item, I can start a console. A box appears. I click int

Closure: fedup 20 -> 21 -> No Mouse or Keyboard

Review my post from previous week or so for background First Laptop: Having failed to upgrade Fedora 22 using fedup on my KDE-base Fedora 20, I reinstalled Fedora 20. I downloaded the Workstation Live dvd twice, each time it passed the 256sha and both time the burned dvd passed the media test ..

FAIL: Thunderbird: Replying to thread

I use gmail. When I reply to a thread using Thunderbird, the response never shows up, but, if I include the email of the person who wrote the thread I am responding to, that person gets the email. On the other hand, if I log in to my gmail account, the I can post a response, that that response ap

fedup 20 -> 21 -> xinit -> KDE -> No mouse/keyboard input

Thanks for the suggestion. Contents of /var/cache/akmods/akmods.log START 2015/07/25 16:06:18 akmods: Checking kmods exist for 4.0.8-200.fc21.x86_64 2015/07/25 16:06:18 akmods: Building and installing nvidia-340xx-kmod 2015/07/25 16:06:18 akmods: Building RPM using the command '/bin/akmodsbuild --

fedup 20 -> 21 -> xinit -> KDE -> open /dev/fb0: No such file or directory

Still no mouse or keyboard. Don't know if this is the problem. from /var/log/Xorg.0.log START [96.019] (II) Loading sub module "fb" [96.019] (II) LoadModule: "fb" [96.020] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libfb.so [96.030] (II) Module fb: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [96.030]

fedup 20 -> 21 -> xinit -> KDE -> No mouse/keyboard input

So, I am now at the point where xinit (calling startkde) has the KDE screen appearing, but ... The pointer-cursor appears but can not be moved by the mouse, and (after some timeout and the login screen appears) keyboard entry fails. What does one do to enable both the mouse and keyboard. Thanks

fedup 20 -> 21 -> xinit -> error setting MTRR

What is causing the MTRR error in the xinit output? cat /proc/mtrr reg00: base=0x0 (0MB), size= 4096MB, count=1: write-back reg01: base=0x1 ( 4096MB), size= 1024MB, count=1: write-back reg02: base=0x0c000 ( 3072MB), size= 1024MB, count=1: uncachable Part of xinit output

fedup 20 -> 21 -> 22 -> Plasma closed unexpectedly

Also see MTRR issue below. On 07/25/2015 07:01 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: You're a KDE user and quite a bit has changed. One question and one suggestion Q. Just for information... Are you using kdm or sddm as your display manager? How does one find which display manager is being used? Sugg

fedup 20 -> 21 -> 22 -> Plasma closed unexpectedly

Again, fedora upgrades using fedup ... Starting with Fedora 20, did ... stuff ... > fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct ... stuff ... > fedup --network 22 --product=nonproduct So, now rebooted and it started. I have all my machines in multi-user mode just in case there is an issue wit

fedup 20 -> 21 -> No X

Ah, fedora upgrades using fedup ... Starting with Fedora 20, did > yum update and then > fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct Took a while but there were no issues but remember, as root > export PATH=$PATH:$HOME/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin or use > su - to become root otherwise fedup has an iss

Re: [389-users] Review 389-ds install/upgrade procedures and requisites on http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.html

ts to the latest 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-50.el6? If you were using the old rmeggins repo or a copr repo, see http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/releases/end-1-2-11.html Thanks. Is compiling from source our only option? Because, I can do that. I'd just rather not have to. On Mar

Re: SOLVED mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md127

Thanks for the help! cryptsetup luksClose luks-ab8911f9-b3a4-4f33-8b10-7e52c7217ae9 did the trick. Steps Remove entry from /etc/fstab # vi /etc/fstab then following sequence of commands: # lsof +d /raid1/ # lsof +D /raid1/ # df # mount # cryptsetup luksClose luks-ab8911f9-b3a4-4f33

Re: mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md127

Tried: # wipefs -a /dev/md127 which did not word, so I next tried: # wipefs -f -a /dev/md127 /dev/md127: 6 bytes were erased at offset 0x (crypto_LUKS): 4c 55 4b 53 ba be and then # mdadm -S /dev/md127 mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md127:Perhaps a running process, mounte

Re: mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md127

Thanks - wipefs fails see below # dmsetup ls luks-ab8911f9-b3a4-4f33-8b10-7e52c7217ae9 (253:9) luks-35719a97-5898-4420-9a56-1576ffdc6db3 (253:1) luks-c80d9988-30f6-42cf-a9b7-89ee3408eccb (253:6) luks-03c06df8-f9b9-4f0d-847e-79a7ed527888 (253:0) luks-a2ebb2b0-527d-47f3-83ef-

mdadm: Cannot get exclusive access to /dev/md127

I've got a two disk raid and I want to it and convert the disks to some non-raid usage. The raid was never used and has no data. Also, the raid disks are encrypted along with the rest of the disk in the machine. When I try to stop raid I get the following: # mdadm --stop /dev/md127 mdadm: Cannot

Fedora 20 Mate System Sounds

emes available to me. Sound works when testing using the mixer, as well as when using Chrome and netflix. Has anyone else had this problem? Rich-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [389-users] 389-console problem restore backup

On 04/02/2014 08:40 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote: Am 02.04.14 schrieb *Rich Megginson * : On 04/02/2014 07:47 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote: Am 02.04.14 schrieb *Rich Megginson * <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>: On 04/02/2014 02:50 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote: If I try to restore backups

Re: [389-users] 389-console problem restore backup

On 04/02/2014 07:47 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote: Am 02.04.14 schrieb *Rich Megginson * : On 04/02/2014 02:50 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote: If I try to restore backups I get the error: error:could not read config file. In the console log I see: http://testcsw.contac.lan:2389/[1:0] recv> er

Re: Dell U2913WM 2560 x 1080

Asus NVIDIA EN7300GT DVI Max Resolution 2560 x 1600 On 03/20/2014 07:30 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 03/21/14 09:36, Rich Emberson wrote: Thinking about getting a Dell UltraSharp 29 Ultrawide Monitor U2913WM but I've not found anyone on the net saying that they've been able to configure

Dell U2913WM 2560 x 1080

Thinking about getting a Dell UltraSharp 29 Ultrawide Monitor U2913WM but I've not found anyone on the net saying that they've been able to configure X to take advanage of its size and resolution. Dell says they only support MS. Anyone using one with Fedora using one of these and how to register i

Re: [389-users] Kerberized admin server

On 03/04/2014 09:16 AM, Paul Robert Marino wrote: hello I know there use to be a document on doing this because I did it several years ago at a previous job but I cant seem to find it in the documentation now. I'm trying to make the the admin server accept Kerberos authentication. From which a

fedora 20 firewalld multicast DLNA

Setting up a media server on a Fedora 20 box. It must have reception of multicast messages enabled. If I do a 'iptables -F' blowing away the firewall, then the media server sees the smart tv and the smart tv sees the media server. Given the default firewall that comes with Fedora 20 and firewalld,

Re: [389-users] ACL processing

On 02/27/2014 12:49 PM, Russell Beall wrote: Hi Rich, Thanks for the data. I've been continuing to experiment and work on this and especially making sure that everything that might be used in the ACIs is indexed. All the indexes appear to be in order, but I am confused by one thing

Re: [389-users] replication stopped after server restart - problem to reenable

On 02/13/2014 02:05 AM, Jan Kowalsky wrote: On 2014-02-12 23:25, Rich Megginson wrote: On 02/12/2014 02:34 PM, Jan Kowalsky wrote: Hi Rich, thank you for answering, Since this is my first experience with replication I don't know if I do something completely wrong or it's a but. I

Re: [389-users] replication stopped after server restart - problem to reenable

On 02/12/2014 06:29 AM, Jan Kowalsky wrote: Hi all, this is my first post on the list. I'm using 389ds inside a kolab environment. We are going to migrate to the new kolab version which runs now 389ds. At the moment we are testing different scenarios for replication. I don't have much experie

Re: [389-users] Upgraded 389-admin rpms and now I can't start dirsrv-admin

On 01/23/2014 11:47 AM, Groten, Ryan wrote: Just upgraded my packages from: 389-ds-console-1.2.6-1.el5 389-console-1.1.7-1.el5 389-ds-console-doc-1.2.6-1.el5 389-admin-console-1.1.8-1.el5 389-admin-console-doc-1.1.8-1.el5 389-ds-base-1.2.9.9-1.el5 389-dsgw-1.1.7-2.el5 389-adminutil-1.1.1

f19->f20 fedup: reboot freezes at: Mounted /boot.

Used: fedup --network 20 Fedup exited without error. (Had to use the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Commo...Upgrade_issues Upgrade fails if /var is a separate partition ) Got GRUB menu titled System Upgrade. began upgrade no plymouth bo

Re: [389-users] Only username as bind dn

On 01/16/2014 12:56 AM, Paolo Barbato wrote: Thanks for replies, I think I need to better describe what I'm testing. As I said I've a central repository for credentials accessible via ldaps. 389dirsvr stores some information, but before get them I need that a user authenticate on the central r

Re: [389-users] Upgraded to RHDS 9.1 but Console is Still Looking for 9.0 JAR

On 01/08/2014 10:52 AM, Paul Whitney wrote: Hi Rich, thank you for the quick response. I ran the script as you suggested and after the interview process (server, credentials, etc) the update stops on error: Error adding entry 'cn=PAM Pass Through Auth,cn=plugins,cn=config'. Erro

Re: [389-users] 389DS UUID with Apple calendarserver

On 01/06/2014 09:38 AM, Oliver Werner wrote: hello guys, I use OpenLDAP and would like to upgrade to 389DS In OpenLDAP a field entryUUID exists what I use on my Apple calendar server. It has the format of the GUID /----/. In 389DS I have only found the nsUniq

Re: [389-users] group issues

On 12/13/2013 10:43 AM, Alberto Viana wrote: Rich, The behavior is a little bit different and I will try to explain: version: 389-Directory/1.2.11.25 <http://1.2.11.25> B2013.347.1221 389DS <--> Windows 2008 R2 Name of group: GSG_TESTE Included a lot of users on this group, in

Re: [389-users] Upgrade failure

On 12/03/2013 03:25 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 12/03/2013 02:19 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 12/03/2013 03:11 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: Now I remember... there's no Windows sync in the RHEL package. Yes, there is. Do you mean POSIX Windows Sync? I'm uncertain. You mention

[389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server versions 1.2.11.25, 1.3.0.9, 1.3.1.15, 1.3.2.5

389 Directory Server versions 1.2.11.25, 1.3.0.9, 1.3.1.15, 1.3.2.5 The 389 Directory Server team is proud to announce new 389-ds-base versions: * 1.2.11.25 for EL5 and EL6 * 1.3.0.9 for F18 * 1.3.1.15 for F19 * 1.3.2.5 for F20 and Rawhide These packages address CVE-2013-4485 https://bugzilla.r

Re: [389-users] Recommended Berkeley DB for compiling 389 DS 1.3.2.3 version

On 11/21/2013 07:48 AM, Balaji P wrote: Hi All, I downloaded 389 directory server source code 1.3.2.3**from link (http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-base-1.3.2.3.tar.bz2) and try to compile in my CentOS release 4.9 (Final) environment. I noticed below error message and suspect with referring i

Re: [389-users] 389 directory server crash

17:05, Rich Megginson wrote: On 11/18/2013 07:01 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 15. 11. 2013 21:46, Rich Megginson wrote: On 11/15/2013 02:58 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 14. 11. 2013 22:08, Rich Megginson wrote: On 11/14/2013 08:50 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: One of the consumers has crashed again

Re: [389-users] setup-ds-admin.pl errors

On 11/21/2013 08:07 AM, Alberto Viana wrote: I'm trying to set up a new instance of 389 DS in my homologation enviroment: 389-ds-base-1.3.2.4 389-adminutil-1.1.18 389-admin-console-1.1.8 After I ran setup-ds-admin.pl , i'm getting the following errors: Are you read

Re: [389-users] 389 directory server crash

On 11/15/2013 02:58 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 14. 11. 2013 22:08, Rich Megginson wrote: On 11/14/2013 08:50 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: One of the consumers has crashed again and I have attached the stacktrace. Four hous later it crashed again. I do hope there is something in the

Re: [389-users] COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN VERSIONS.

On 11/04/2013 09:39 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 11/04/2013 09:06 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: No matter that they are different versions??? Yes. The replication protocol is the same. The only problems you might have are schema and

Re: [389-users] COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN VERSIONS.

ile a ticket and get it fixed asap, because it is supposed to work. Thanks ... On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 11/04/2013 08:16 AM, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote: Hi Rich, Can you be more specific? On Nov 4, 2013 11:49 AM, "Rich Megginson" wrote: On 11/03/2013 05:

Re: [389-users] PAM Pass through authentication only one threaded

On 11/04/2013 09:08 AM, Jan Tomasek wrote: On 11/04/2013 05:04 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: Does the script open a connection to the same server it is being called from? Yes. So this is a case of self-deadlock? I don't understand. What is it exactly that you expect will happen? -

Re: [389-users] PAM Pass through authentication only one threaded

On 11/04/2013 09:00 AM, Jan Tomasek wrote: On 11/04/2013 04:12 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: Looks like you do not have the right debuginfo packages installed. But there may be enough information in the stack trace anyway. Your pam script is waiting: Thread 11 (Thread 0x7f60c97ea700 (LWP 10146

Re: [389-users] MemberOf Plugin - experiences?

On 10/21/2013 06:49 AM, Vesa Alho wrote: On 10/21/2013 01:37 PM, Lars Remes wrote: We are using the memberOf plugin in a global, multi-master-multi-slave setup, and so far we have not encountered any major issues. You can easily change the membership attribute, for example, to memberUid. MMR

Re: [389-users] hung 389 master 389-Directory/1.2.11.15 B2013.238.2155

On 10/09/2013 09:22 AM, Michael R. Gettes wrote: 389-Directory/1.2.11.15 B2013.238.2155 Nothing in errors, nothing in access log files uname -a Linux 2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Aug 2 17:04:38 EDT 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux yum list | grep 389 389-admin.x86_64

Re: [389-users] 389-ds-base-1.2.10.14-3.2.el5: ns-slapd[5907]: segfault at 0000000000000018 rip 00002b5b390c3361 rsp 00002b5cac9ed560 error 4

On 09/10/2013 06:14 AM, Justin Piszcz wrote: Hello, We're running the following version of 389 DS: 389-adminutil-1.1.15-2.2.el5 389-admin-1.1.29-1.4.el5 389-ds-base-1.2.10.14-3.2.el5 389-ds-base-libs-1.2.10.14-3.2.el5 Recently, ns-slapd crashed on an LDAP search host: ns-slapd[5907]: segfault a

Re: [389-users] ACI invalid syntax

On 09/04/2013 08:11 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: Hi! We are moving our Directory server from CentOS 5 Directory Server to CentOS 6 with 389 Directory Server. Our DIT looks like this: dc=example,dc=com |- dc=guests,dc=example,dc=com We would like the users in dc=example,dc=com to have full write

Re: [389-users] Consumer Initialization Failure

ectly initialize consumers from the supplier again, so it’s important that I get them cleaned up on the supplier side. Thanks for your help! -Samson- *From:*Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 03, 2013 10:44 AM *To:* Wick, Samson *Cc:* General discussion list for

Re: [389-users] Consumer Initialization Failure

*From:*Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 03, 2013 10:15 AM *To:* Wick, Samson *Cc:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. *Subject:* Re: [389-users] Consumer Initialization Failure On 09/03/2013 08:47 AM, Wick, Samson wrote: It probably

Re: [389-users] Best way to upgrade DS servers

On 08/21/2013 01:36 PM, Michael Lang wrote: Am 21.08.2013 21:31, schrieb Rich Megginson: On 08/21/2013 01:03 PM, Michael Lang wrote: Am 21.08.2013 19:25, schrieb Chris Taylor: I am looking at replacing our two CentOS DS servers which are 5.9 with some on the 6.4 channel. What is the best

Re: [389-users] Multi-Theading writes to the same 389 Master Server

On 08/21/2013 09:53 AM, David Boreham wrote: Another thing you might try : While the server is under stress, run the "pstack" command a few times and save the output. gdb will give much more detail http://port389.org/wiki/FAQ#Debugging_Hangs If you post the thread stacks here, someone fami

Re: [389-users] Multi-Theading writes to the same 389 Master Server

On 08/21/2013 09:29 AM, David Boreham wrote: On 8/21/2013 9:14 AM, Jeffrey Dunham wrote: The reason I asked about nsslapd-threadnumber is because during the time of the spike, all transactions slow. Meaning that binds, adds, searches, ect. all start increasing in their etime until it hits the

Re: [389-users] Multi-Theading writes to the same 389 Master Server

#x27;re switching over to 1.3.1 on RHEL6 in a few months. Are you planning to build this yourself? On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Rich Megginson <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 08/20/2013 08:39 PM, Jeffrey Dunham wrote: We have a customer that has been multi-threading

Re: [389-users] Multi-Theading writes to the same 389 Master Server

On 08/20/2013 08:39 PM, Jeffrey Dunham wrote: We have a customer that has been multi-threading behind multiple servers and writing to our Master server. These writes come in the form of heavy spikes (1k over 5 second intervals) very much burst traffic and all the writes are adding new items t

Re: [389-users] How to keep dnanextvalue in sync when using DNA plugin?

n replicas, but that's quite complicated and best to avoid if possible. On 2013-07-30 12:36, Rich Megginson wrote: On 07/30/2013 10:19 AM, Kyle Johnson wrote: Each server does have the same range, yes, Why? however the first server was configured about a month before the second was

Re: [389-users] Question about lastlogintime

S Software Development AJM-245 (609)485-4218 harry.dev...@faa.gov From: Rich Megginson To: Harry Devine/ACT/FAA@FAA Cc: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project." <389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org> Date: 07/30/2013 11:10 AM Subject:Re: [389-users] Qu

Re: [389-users] How to keep dnanextvalue in sync when using DNA plugin?

value on the other server. How did you configure DNA? Note that configuration under cn=config does not replicate to other servers. Does each server have the same range? On 2013-07-30 10:42, Rich Megginson wrote: On 07/30/2013 08:41 AM, Kyle Johnson wrote: Sorry, I should know better. 3

Re: [389-users] Fwd: Some cipher suites not working

On 07/19/2013 10:43 AM, Darcy Hodgson wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Rich Megginson <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 07/19/2013 08:38 AM, Darcy Hodgson wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Rich Megginson mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> wrote:

Re: [389-users] Fwd: Some cipher suites not working

On 07/19/2013 08:38 AM, Darcy Hodgson wrote: On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Rich Megginson <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 07/19/2013 06:43 AM, Darcy Hodgson wrote: Hello, I have been setting up SSL/TLS with 389 DS on CentOS 6.4. I have been able

Re: [389-users] 389 directory server crash

On 07/17/2013 01:52 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 07/16/2013 04:49 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 07/16/2013 01:23 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 07/15/2013 05:28 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 07/15/2013 02:57 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 07/12/2013 05:55 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 07/12/2013 08

Re: [389-users] 389 directory server crash

On 07/16/2013 01:23 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 07/15/2013 05:28 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 07/15/2013 02:57 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 07/12/2013 05:55 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 07/12/2013 08:22 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 07/09/2013 03:34 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 07/09/2013 06

Re: [389-users] 389 directory server crash

On 07/15/2013 02:57 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 07/12/2013 05:55 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 07/12/2013 08:22 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 07/09/2013 03:34 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 07/09/2013 06:43 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: Hi! We are having problems with some our 389-DS instances. They

Re: [389-users] Accessing TCP options data in 389ds Hello,

On 07/12/2013 03:25 PM, Justin Kinney wrote: Hello, I'm investigating the possibility of logging client IP address where 389ds is deployed behind a load balancer. Today, we lose the true client IP address as the source IP is replaced with the load balancer's before the packet hits the 389 hos

Re: [389-users] 389 directory server crash

On 07/12/2013 08:22 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: On 07/09/2013 03:34 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 07/09/2013 06:43 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: Hi! We are having problems with some our 389-DS instances. They crash after receiving an update from the provider. After looking at the stack trace, I

Re: [389-users] problems with dsgw

On 07/12/2013 08:33 AM, Barton, Joseph B. wrote: Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:55:01 -0600 From: Rich Megginson To: 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: [389-users] problems with dsgw Message-ID: <51df1ba5.5010...@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed On

Re: [389-users] problems with dsgw

On 07/11/2013 02:32 PM, Barton, Joseph B. wrote: Hi, I am just starting to work with 389 on centos 6.3 , and run into a bit of a snag on a test install of 389. Everything seems to work fine with the basic install. I am able to access the /usr/bin/389-console, run commands from a prompt, plus

Re: [389-users] Multi master replication problem (389 DS - AD)

On 07/10/2013 12:16 PM, Alberto Viana wrote: Hi Noriko, DS Base:389-Directory/1.3.1.3 B2013.189.1813 389 DS + Win2008 (I use my windows as CA) The error came out again, so I decide to investigate it. The error: [10/Jul/2013:10:52:23 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - agmt="cn=AD

Re: [389-users] 389 directory server crash

On 07/09/2013 06:43 AM, Mitja Mihelič wrote: Hi! We are having problems with some our 389-DS instances. They crash after receiving an update from the provider. After looking at the stack trace, I think this is https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47391 The crash happened twice after about a

Re: [389-users] Authentication method not supported

On 06/30/2013 12:10 AM, il...@atacom.kz wrote: Good morning! Yes. Accesslog level is *772*: /[30/Jun/2013:12:00:31 +0600] conn=50705 fd=69 slot=69 connection from 127.0.0.1 to 127.0.0.1/ /[30/Jun/2013:12:00:31 +0600] conn=50705 op=0 BIND dn="uid=kolab-service,ou=Special Users,dc=example,dc=kz"

Re: [389-users] ldbm errors when adding/modifying/deleting entries

On 06/12/2013 10:56 AM, Mahadevan, Venkat wrote: inetOrgPerson (structural) 504000/400 = 1410 bytes/entry - pretty small -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users

Re: [389-users] Users and groups

On 05/16/2013 02:28 AM, Aziza Lichir wrote: Hello, It's being a while, I've started with 389 DS and it never occurred me to see if the users I add in the console will be add automatically to server in kind of "ldif" file :p .! I know now that i didn't really get it. so now I would like

Re: [389-users] Posix problem

-testing-389-ds-base to get the most recent stable versions of 389-ds-base if you want something newer than what the OS provides. And for RedHat Directory Server it's not free (do you have any idea about the price ?). No, not sure. Am I right ? Best regards, Alex 2013/4/30 Rich Megg

Re: [389-users] Install 389 1.3.x on CentOS 6.3

On 04/10/2013 04:27 AM, Moisés Barba Pérez wrote: Hello, I would like to upgrade our LDAP to the last stable versión in CentOS 6.3 but I have seen in the epel-389 repository that the last version is 1.2.10.26. Asking at IRC channel somebody said to me there is not support of 1.3.x on el6. I u

Re: [389-users] MemberOf Plugin Question

p, in case someone knows. Does IPA supports that feature at the server side? or using sssd.conf at the host machine? Any pointers to RTFM would also be helpful. :-) Thanks Chandan On Friday, March 22, 2013, Chandan Kumar wrote: Hi Rich, ops! my bad. Thank you so much for pointing that

Re: [389-users] Certificate between 389DS and Active Directory

of the window. On this link: https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/9.0/html/Administration_Guide/Windows_Sync-Configuring_Windows_Sync.html Thanks 2013/3/27 alexandre mailto:axel0fe...@gmail.com>> Thanks for the new Link !

Re: [389-users] Certificate between 389DS and Active Directory

On 03/27/2013 08:46 AM, Grzegorz Dwornicki wrote: I had missunderstood you im this case. No you don't need to create second CA. But you must generate cert for DS on AD CA. Then you need to import this cert with AD CA cert on DS You don't have to use AD CA to generate the 389DS server cert.

Re: [389-users] Distributed Numeric Assignment plugin fails with indexing

Title: Untitled Document On 03/22/2013 03:24 AM, Scott Crooks wrote: Greetings, We're using 389-ds on CentOS 6.4 What  version of 389-ds-base? rpm -q 389-ds-base with 3 master LDAP servers in different locat

Re: [389-users] Possible to block large multivalued updates

On 03/21/2013 02:05 PM, Jeffrey Dunham wrote: I have run into a bug that is still open several times now causing large problems in our LDAP Service. https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/346 We have group updates that are very large in size (20k+ records) and while we're specifically targeting

Re: [389-users] Windows Sync

On 03/21/2013 05:32 AM, s.oreilly wrote: Hi, Am I correct in my understanding that I cannot sync OU's from Active Directory to 389-DS? Correct. I am trying to sync users fro an AD server that I do not control and most of the users are separated in to different OU's Is there any way of making

Re: [389-users] 389-ds-base-devel and rhel6

On 03/20/2013 02:42 PM, Robert Viduya wrote: I'm trying to set up 389 on an RHEL6 server, all our previous installs have been on RHEL5 or earlier. We have a locally developed plugin and we need the include files from package 389-ds-base-devel. I've got both epel and epel-389-ds-base configur

Re: [389-users] 389 hang while upgrading from 1.2.2 to 1.2.10

On 03/18/2013 11:39 AM, Roberto Polli wrote: Hi all, while upgrading with yum from 1.2.2 to 1.2.10, 389 hang while in ns-slapd upgradedb. gdb says it's in ldbm_ancestorid_create_index(), but it's running from 3hrs on an almost-empty database (there are just a few test entries). Can somebo

Re: [389-users] dsadmin python library

On 03/14/2013 10:59 AM, Roberto Polli wrote: On Wednesday 13 March 2013 09:33:05 Rich Megginson wrote: a separate github repo just for dsadmin.py yes. It could become an useful stand-alone library. What about the scripts such as dirsynccrtl.py, winsyncssl.py, etc. that use dsadmin.py? Should

Re: [389-users] almost off-topic: when is it advisable to get a 3rd party signed (vs. a self-signed) cert to use with 389-ds?

On 03/12/2013 09:45 AM, Jon Detert wrote: I managed to get 389-ds working with encryption. Whew. The project should really update http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:SSL to make it simpler to figure out. I'm willing to, but the wiki says "We are not ready to accept contributions at

Re: [389-users] dsadmin python library

On 03/12/2013 10:58 AM, Roberto Polli wrote: Hi Rich, why don't move the useful dsadmin python library in a separate repo? Not sure what you mean - https://github.com/richm/scripts - you mean have a separate github repo just for dsadmin.py, separate from the other scripts? I

Re: [389-users] Replication fails: id2entry.db4 too large?

On 03/05/2013 07:58 AM, Luigi Santangelo wrote: What is the platform for A and B? What are the 389-ds-base versions on A and B? A and B are Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5 (Tikanga); 389-ds-base are 389 Directory Server version 1.2.5 Note that it is going to be very difficult to s

Re: [389-users] 389 and AD group sync

On 02/28/2013 10:36 AM, Vesa Alho wrote: The value should be TRUE Looks like we have a doc bug. https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/9.0/html/Administration_Guide/Using_Windows_Sync-Synchronizing_Groups.html 12.4.4.1. Configuring Group Sync in the Console

Re: [389-users] DS performance settings while multi-mastering

On 02/21/2013 08:27 AM, Patrick Raspante wrote: Is it required (or at least suggested) that multi-mastered directory server instances have the equal values for dbcache and entry cache settings? If so, what adverse effects result from not configuring the caches similarly? There is a tool which

Re: [389-users] questions about client certificate-base authentication

On 02/06/2013 06:55 AM, yp wrote: Hi all, I'm testing the 389 DS on centos 6 and I had a problem with the certmap.conf file. The certmap.conf file exists (and there is no symlink between them) at 2 locations : /etc/dirsrv/config and /etc/dirsrv/slapd-instancename. The documentation https://acce

Re: [389-users] notes=U, unindex search? really

On 01/31/2013 09:33 AM, Picture Book wrote: As a directory server admin, I need to look at access log and find out who is doing expensive unindexed searchs. So that I can work with ldap clients to optimize search filter and DS indexes. The way DSEE reports notes=U make it very simple for DS ad

Re: [389-users] Rolling upgrade of multiple servers

On 01/31/2013 09:14 AM, Bright, Daniel wrote: When you say schema replication is tricky because it is a “single” master, I am using an MMR environment where in effect every member is a master. Is this a setting that is controlled elsewhere, and does this mean that any custom changes to the sc

Re: [389-users] Rolling upgrade of multiple servers

On 01/31/2013 08:19 AM, Bright, Daniel wrote: |schema changes made over LDAP? Yes, schema replication is tricky because it is "single" master. When you say schema replication is tricky because it is a “single” master, I am using an MMR environment where in effect every member is a master.

Re: [389-users] 389 Master - Master Replication

mirez *Sent:* Wednesday, January 30, 2013 1:36 PM *To:* 'Rich Megginson' *Cc:* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. *Subject:* RE: [389-users] 389 Master - Master Replication Excellent I will be in touch soon. Thank you once again. Santos U. Ramirez Linux

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >