On Fri Jan24'25 04:54:36PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> From: Patrick O'Callaghan
> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 16:54:36 +
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: OT: How to select a new port number for ssh
>
> On Fri, 2025-01-24 at 11:40
On Sun Jan12'25 08:25:18PM, Mike Wright wrote:
> From: Mike Wright
> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 20:25:18 -0800
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: rclone on F41: mounting proton drive
>
> On 1/12/25 19:5
On Sun Jan12'25 09:09:06PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> From: Todd Zullinger
> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 21:09:06 -0500
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: rclone on F41: mounting proton drive
>
> Ranjan Maitra v
On Sun Jan12'25 01:24:04PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> From: Todd Zullinger
> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 13:24:04 -0500
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: rclone on F41: mounting proton drive
>
> Ranjan Maitra v
On Sun Jan12'25 01:08:52PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> From: Todd Zullinger
> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 13:08:52 -0500
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: rclone on F41: mounting proton drive
>
> Ranjan Maitra via
Dear friends,
According to the manpage for Rclone, it seems to me that I an option with a
number for mounting Proton drive using rclone on F41 (when we get to Storage).
However, I tried both v1.67.0 and v1.68.2 (that is on updates-testing) but I
can not find this option. Is there something spec
On Wed Dec25'24 01:00:51AM, Community Support for Fedora Users wrote:
> From: ToddAndMargo via users
> Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 01:00:51 -0800
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: ToddAndMargo
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: betterbird in the repos?
>
> On 12/25/
>
> On 12/9/24 6:01 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > On Mon Dec09'24 05:22:12PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > From: Samuel Sieb
> > > Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 17:22:12 -0800
> > > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Reply-To: Community
>
> On 12/8/24 5:57 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > I have not installed Fedora on a laptop for a while, and I am pretty
> > confused with how to partition the disk: I do custom partition because I
> > want a very big /home, and a reasonable /
> >
> >
;
> On 12/09/2024 03:33 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
>
> > Thanks! I use systemctl hibernate from the commandline though after it
> > becomes stable, my plan is to bind a key doing this.
>
> You might want to think that over because all it takes is one typo and
>
longer needed for
> hibernate?
>
> On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 11:10 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > I do not have anything other than Fedora installed. It seems to me to be
> > strange that it reliably comes back the first time, but not in future
> > times. Something
longer needed for
> hibernate?
>
> On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 07:29 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > On Mon Dec09'24 12:38:54PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > From: Patrick O'Callaghan
> > > Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:38:54 +
> > &g
longer needed for
> hibernate?
>
> On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 06:31 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > I don't understand what this could be, and wonder what the issue could be?
>
> Check the journal, e.g. 'journalctl -g hibernate'. Maybe also:
Thank you! Here is the
On Mon Dec09'24 05:07:31AM, Community Support for Fedora Users wrote:
> From: Ranjan Maitra via users
> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 05:07:31 -0600
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Cc: Ranjan Maitra
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: n
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 10:36:52 +
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no longer needed for
> hibernate?
>
> On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 20:54 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
>
ude 7450
>
> On 2024-12-08 18.58, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > On Sun Dec08'24 03:05:05PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > From: Patrick O'Callaghan
> > > Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 15:05:05 +
> > > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> &
ew F41 install: is swap partition no longer needed for
> hibernate?
>
> On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 19:57 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > I have not installed Fedora on a laptop for a while, and I am pretty
> > confused with how to partition the disk: I do custom partition
> >
de 7450
>
> On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 08:09 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > On Sun Dec08'24 10:47:04AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > From: Patrick O'Callaghan
> > > Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 10:47:04 +
> > > To: users@lists.fedoraproj
Hi,
I have not installed Fedora on a laptop for a while, and I am pretty confused
with how to partition the disk: I do custom partition because I want a very big
/home, and a reasonable /
In the old past, several iterations ago, I used to create a separate swap
partition (twice the size of RAM
On Sun Dec08'24 02:14:21PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> From: Jonathan Billings
> Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2024 14:14:21 -0500
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: starting udev on F41
>
> On Dec 8, 2024, at 12:4
Hi,
I have been trying to follow these instructions to flash an android tool.
https://gist.github.com/smac89/251368c8df2ccd645baedc3e1238fdb4
However, I get the following:
$ sudo systemctl start udev
Failed to start udev.service: Unit udev.service not found.
What does this mean? How do I get
de 7450
>
> On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 08:09 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > On Sun Dec08'24 10:47:04AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > From: Patrick O'Callaghan
> > > Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2024 10:47:04 +
> > > To: users@lists.fedoraproj
de 7450
>
> On Sat, 2024-12-07 at 21:56 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > Secure Boot: should this be disabled? I guess so, because it is su[[[osed
> > to ensure that the system only uses validated software (which I guess would
> > be to Windoze).
>
> Not neces
Hi,
I finally was getting around to installing Fedora on my wife's new Dell
Latitude 7450 but am unclear about the security settings in the BIOS Setup and
was wondering what advice anyone could offer.
This machine will only run Fedora and Windoze will be wiped out (the sooner the
better).
So,
Hi,
I upgraded my six-year old 2018 Dell XPS 13 laptop from F40 to F41 last night
using:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/upgrading-fedora-offline/
I followed all the instructions there and did not notice any warnings, much
less errors. Indeed, I was thinking that how smooth thi
40: NetworkManager with CA Certificate
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 10:52 AM Ranjan Maitra via users
> wrote:
> >
> > I have been trying to connect with NetworkManager using eduroam
> >
> > According to the instructions: I am supposed to use the following:
> >
> &
Hi,
I have been trying to connect with NetworkManager using eduroam
According to the instructions: I am supposed to use the following:
Security type: WPA2-Enterprise
Encryption type: AES
EAP method: Protected EAP (PEAP)
Phase 2 authentication: MSCHAPV2
CA Certificate: Use sy
what is the largest amount for which memory chips can currently
fit in a USB? 1-2 TB? Or far less?
(I was not aware of all these complexities.)
Many thanks,
Ranjan
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 12:31 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 11:54 AM Ranjan Maitra
a 16TB USB on Fedora 40
>
> On 11/6/24 9:54 AM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > I recently got a 16TB USB disk and was trying to mount it on Fedora 40
> > using spacefm. I get the following:
> >
> > Mount /dev/sdb:
> >
> > Status: Finished wi
> Subject: Re: mounting a 16TB USB on Fedora 40
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 11:54 AM Ranjan Maitra via users
> wrote:
> >
> > I recently got a 16TB USB disk and was trying to mount it on Fedora 40
> > using spacefm. I get the following:
> >
> > M
Thanks, Michael!
On Wed Nov06'24 11:58:15AM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> From: Michael Hennebry
> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 11:58:15 -0600 (CST)
> To: Ranjan Maitra via users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: mounting a 16TB USB on Fedora 40
&g
users
>
> Subject: Re: mounting a 16TB USB on Fedora 40
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 11:54 AM Ranjan Maitra via users
> wrote:
> >
> > I recently got a 16TB USB disk and was trying to mount it on Fedora 40
> > using spacefm. I get the following:
> >
> >
I recently got a 16TB USB disk and was trying to mount it on Fedora 40 using
spacefm. I get the following:
Mount /dev/sdb:
Status: Finished with error (Exit status 1).
Object /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/block_devices/sdb is not a mountable file
system.
My first instinct was that I got taken for
gt; On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:12 AM Ranjan Maitra via users <
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > Neal,
> >
> > I am aware of the flatpak option, though I have used this alternative repo
> > for the past four years when I started using Signal, an
te: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 19:35:14 -0400
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> CC: Ranjan Maitra
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: Using Signal-Desktop w Fedora 40
>
> signal is supported on Fedora with a flatpak, which I use.
>
> On Wed, Jun 26
Max,
Yes indeed, try the following:
sudo dnf config-manager --add-repo
https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/im:/signal/Fedora_$(rpm -E
%fedora)/network:im:signal.repo
sudo dnf install signal-desktop
# add --nogpgcheck if there is no public key
Works for me: updates are along w
rs@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Message-ID:<088547fa-c5dd-49f3-86a0-a09dba72a...@sieb.net>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> > >
> > > On 5/23/24 3:32 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > >> I have a strange issue a
bject: Re: F40: strange network issue after upgrade of laptop from F39
>
> On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 17:32 -0500, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > I have a strange issue after upgrading a laptop (Dell XPS 13, 2013
> > edition). That is that I am connected (whether through WiFi or
> >
F39
>
> On 5/23/24 3:32 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > I have a strange issue after upgrading a laptop (Dell XPS 13, 2013
> > edition). That is that I am connected (whether through WiFi or ethernet
> > cable) to a university network which claims after the upgrade tha
Subject: Re: F40: strange network issue after upgrade of laptop from F39
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 6:33 PM Ranjan Maitra via users
> wrote:
> > [...]
> > I am connected (whether through WiFi or ethernet cable) to a university
> > network which claims after the upgrade
Hi,
I have a strange issue after upgrading a laptop (Dell XPS 13, 2013 edition).
That is that I am connected (whether through WiFi or ethernet cable) to a
university network which claims after the upgrade that the laptop is no longer
registered. I went through the registration process again thr
On Sat May18'24 12:10:31AM, Community Support for Fedora Users wrote:
> From: Ranjan Maitra via users
> Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 00:10:31 -0500
> To: Community Support for Fedora Users
> Cc: Ranjan Maitra
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Any idea h
I have Cisco VPN version cisco-secure-client-linux64-5.0.05040 which is what is
the current version released by our workplace.
The complete upgrade to Fedora 40 from Fedora 39 appears to have resulted in:
You are missing the required libraries for the authentication method you
requested.
when
rsion 40
>
> On 4/22/24 20:57, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > Btw, does all this discussion about F40 dropping support for X11 mean that
> > openbox (the window manager, also behind LXDE) also stop working with F40?
>
> F40 isn't dropping support for X11. The big
On Mon Apr22'24 07:36:16AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> From: Sam Varshavchik
> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 07:36:16 -0400
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: The best way to still use Fedora + Xorg + Gnome ... even after
> ver
On Thu Feb08'24 09:47:29PM, Jerry James wrote:
> From: Jerry James
>
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 9:43 PM Ranjan Maitra via users
> wrote:
> > Thanks, this did not do anything different. Are you sure that this font is
> > in this package?
>
> $ rpm -ql texlive-
;
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 5:10 PM Ranjan Maitra via users
> wrote:
> > Thanks, yes, I do have it installed!
> >
> > $ sudo dnf install texlive-amsfonts
> > Last metadata expiration check: 1:15:21 ago on Thu 08 Feb 2024 04:52:50 PM
> > CST.
> > Pack
On Thu Feb08'24 04:52:13PM, Jerry James wrote:
> From: Jerry James
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 4:48 PM Ranjan Maitra via users
> wrote:
> > On a fully updated F39 system, I get the following font error when I run
> > LaTeX:
> >
> > kpathsea: Running mktex
Hi,
On a fully updated F39 system, I get the following font error when I run LaTeX:
kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode / --bdpi 600 --mag 1+0/600 --dpi 600 eurm10
mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for eurm10.
mktexpk: perhaps eurm10 is missing from the map file.
kpathsea: Appendin
On Wed Dec20'23 02:11:00AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> From: Samuel Sieb
> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 02:11:00 -0800
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: Network problems with f39
>
> On 12/20/23 01:47, Ranjan Maitra
This may be thoroughly unrelated, but my wife has had this problem on a Dell
for years (largely regularly), and me only intermittently over the past few
months (F38 or F39). I think it may be dependent on the service provider
because the same setup has worked without a hitch in some hotel rooms,
On Sun Dec03'23 01:51:24PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> From: Samuel Sieb
> Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 13:51:24 -0800
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: Python code error in F39, but not in F38
>
> On 11/19/23 08:2
>
>
>
> > On 2 Dec 2023, at 15:24, Ranjan Maitra via users
> > wrote:
> >
> > However, the following:
> > /usr/src/debug/python3.12-3.12.0-1.fc39.x86_64/Include/internal/pycore_pystate.h:118
> > file is where the segfault is, and that is in python3-de
e error in F39, but not in F38
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 5:21 PM Ranjan Maitra via users
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed Nov22'23 09:49:49PM, Barry Scott wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > On 22 Nov 2023, at 21:32, Barry Scott wrote:
> > > >
> >
>
>
>
> > On 1 Dec 2023, at 03:44, Ranjan Maitra via users
> > wrote:
> >
> > So, it seems, so is this a bug that needs to be reported?
>
> Start by reporting on fedora bugzilla against the sip package with all the
> info you have collected in this
From: Barry
> > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 08:28:36 +
> > To: Community support for Fedora users
> > CC: Ranjan Maitra
> > Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> > Subject: Re: Python code error in F39, but not in F38
> >
> >
> &g
Alex,
I am not sure it does whatever you want, but for streaming youtube and similar
videos online, I find mpv to be quite sufficient and good for my needs.
HTH!
Best wishes,
Ranjan
On Mon Nov27'23 06:46:04PM, Mario Marietto wrote:
> From: Mario Marietto
> Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 18:46:04 +010
y window
>
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:03:14 -0600
> Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to set this up so that it can work reliably on every window?
>
> I'm pretty sure the answer is "no" unfortunately. How windows operate
> on keystrokes and
Hi,
I know this is OT, but someone here might know the answer to this.
So, I like the ability to highlight with my mouse left button, and paste with
my middle (scroll) button. It works on `xterm` but not necessarily on my
firefox window (some other windows too, but I do not recall now). Is ther
gt;
> > On 22 Nov 2023, at 22:21, Ranjan Maitra via users
> > wrote:
> >
> > #4 sipOMFinalise (om=0x7fff9e5ff9a0 ) at
> > /usr/src/debug/
>
> It is a bug in the sip code is my strong expectation.
> I would also guess that tstate is likely 0 and causi
On Wed Nov22'23 02:36:35PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> From: Samuel Sieb
> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 14:36:35 -0800
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: Python code error in F39, but not in F38
>
> On 11/22/23 14:2
On Wed Nov22'23 09:49:49PM, Barry Scott wrote:
> From: Barry Scott
> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 21:49:49 +
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> CC: Ranjan Maitra
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: Python code error in F39, but not in F38
>
>
>
> > On 22 Nov 2023
On Tue Nov21'23 05:25:35PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> From: Samuel Sieb
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 17:25:35 -0800
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: Python code error in F39, but not in F38
>
> On 11/19/23 10:0
n F38
>
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 2:02 PM Ranjan Maitra via users <
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sun Nov19'23 05:35:19PM, Barry wrote:
> > > From: Barry
> > > Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2023 17:35:19 +
> > > To: Community support
On Sun Nov19'23 05:35:19PM, Barry wrote:
> From: Barry
> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2023 17:35:19 +
> To: Community support for Fedora users
>
> >
> >
> > It is possible that there is a bug in the code itself, but nothing above
> > points to my created code.
> >
> > Any suggestions? Or is this a bug?
Hi,
I was running the code here:
https://github.com/maitra/Visual-Information-Fidelity---Python3
However, the code runs in F38 (python 3.11) without error, but not in F39
(python 3.12) where it
ends with a segmentation fault (after doing the calculations).
Both, however, give an answer that ar
ed practice for python 3.11 on F39
>
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:29 PM Ranjan Maitra via users <
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > So, it turns out that there is no tensorflow for Python 3.12, which is
> > what is shipped out with F39.
> >
> >
So, it turns out that there is no tensorflow for Python 3.12, which is
what is shipped out with F39.
I tried to downgrade my python using
sudo dnf downgrade python --releasever=38
that downgrades a huge bunch of things, including important components
like rpm.
However, dnf install/update pretty
On Thu Nov16'23 08:46:17PM, Ben Hancock wrote:
> From: Ben Hancock
> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 20:46:17 -0800
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: f39 emacs strange behavior?
>
> On 11/12/23 08:12, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Right, now, tryi
On Wed Nov15'23 09:58:23AM, Community Support for Fedora Users wrote:
> From: Ranjan Maitra via users
> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 09:58:23 -0600
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Cc: Ranjan Maitra
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: emacs
On Wed Nov15'23 11:21:51AM, George N. White III wrote:
> From: "George N. White III"
> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 11:21:51 -0400
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: emacs is hopeless
>
> On Tue, N
On Tue Nov14'23 06:02:27PM, George N. White III wrote:
> From: "George N. White III"
> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 18:02:27 -0400
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: emacs is hopeless
>
> On Tue, N
e Zeff wrote:
> > On 11/14/2023 12:26 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > > What really irritates me about vi and its friends is that it throws you
> > > out of editing (insert) mode in order to save the file, and needs
> > > another key to come back in.
> >
On Mon Nov13'23 11:41:28AM, George N. White III wrote:
> From: "George N. White III"
> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 11:41:28 -0400
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: emacs is hopeless
>
> On Mon, N
On Mon Nov13'23 07:55:04AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> From: Neal Becker
> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 07:55:04 -0500
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: emacs is hopeless
>
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 12:17 PM Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> > I rep
On Sun Nov12'23 04:12:07PM, George Avrunin wrote:
> From: George Avrunin
> Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 16:12:07 -0500
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: emacs is hopeless
>
> On 11/12/23 13:19, Ranjan Maitra vi
On Sun Nov12'23 11:22:07AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> From: Joe Zeff
> Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:22:07 -0700
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: emacs is hopeless
>
> On 11/12/2023 11:19 AM, Ranjan Maitra via use
On Sun Nov12'23 07:04:36PM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
> From: francis.montag...@inria.fr
> Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 19:04:36 +0100
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: emacs is hopeless
>
> Hi
>
> On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 12:17:04
On Sat Nov11'23 06:21:48PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> From: Tom Horsley
> Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 18:21:48 -0500
> To: Fedora List
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: f39 emacs strange behavior?
>
> I have by no means finished tweaking my fedora 39 boot partition,
> but the last
On Fri Sep29'23 11:44:08PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> From: Samuel Sieb
> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 23:44:08 -0700
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: F38: systemd-resolved.service oddity
>
> On 9/29/23 20:58, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Thanks!
80 matches
Mail list logo
