On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 08:08:04AM +0100, Niels Weber wrote:
> Is there any way that I missed so far? Or is it simply not possible?
Please try:
$ loginctl list-sessions
$ loginctl lock-session $ID
$ loginctl unlock-session $ID
--
Regards,
Olav
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.or
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 01:15:53PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2014 12:43:57 -0400
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> > This isn't the case. systemd isn't monolithic. it is a collection of
> > tools with a shared codebase where most of the tools are optional.
>
> Its a collection of tool
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 02:23:44PM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
> Olav Vitters writes:
>
> >On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 01:34:24PM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
> >>Poettering reminds me of a teenager who thinks the world would be
> >>perfect if everybody just did thin
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 01:34:24PM -0700, David Benfell wrote:
> Poettering reminds me of a teenager who thinks the world would be
> perfect if everybody just did things his (gender-biased language
> *might* be appropriate here) way. The difference is that
> distributions are giving Poettering his
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 04:34:35PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jul 2014 13:22:56 -0700
> Joe Zeff wrote:
>
> > One
> > wonders what would happen if somebody would open a bugzilla on the man
> > page claiming that it's impossible to understand, especially if there
> > were a number of
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:02:54PM -0700, Mike Wright wrote:
> Appears to be a bug in dconf-editor-0.18.0-2.fc20.
>
> Drilling down:
>
> org->gnome->desktop->wm->preferences: *auto-raise* has no effect.
>
> Targeted window receives focus but doesn't raise to the top when
> mouse or sloppy is sel
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 04:48:32PM +1030, Tim wrote:
> Tim:
> >> And if logs are in a format that you cannot read, you cannot safely
> >> submit them to an outside server. You don't know what they contain.
> >> Logon credentials, confidential data that you're working on, etc.
>
> Patrick Lists:
>
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 10:44:21PM +0100, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> I agree, all systemd stuff seems very crude for me.
> And 'enough time' to debug or help to fix systemd monster I really not
> have, I even don't have time to report all bugs which happens to me.
> Thus I must only wish to systemd
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 12:46:40PM -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 11/17/2013 12:32 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> >I'm convinced it is as similar things on eg. ms windows (binary logs,
> >registry,...) - when is all working fine, then it look fine too.
>
> Yes. When there's a major crash, you may no
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 05:51:53PM +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> The bug was just closed as NOTABUG with the comment "Get the gnome devs to
> blacklist it." Since you obviously understand this stuff much better than
> me, does that sound like a reasonable response?
To explain this in a bit more d
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 03:09:32PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> Please file a bug. Note: the bug is in Cinnamon, because I see the same
> in Mageia.
Checking more, it seems that almost all of the Cinnamon 2.0 packages
have similar bugs. Causing Cinnamon bits to start under GNOME. Plus
Ci
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:25:13AM +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Thanks for this, I'll try it next time it happens, and file a bug if it
> works. (BTW, I don't always have the problem - the last time I was locked
> out, I was able to enter password.) I currently have
> cinnamon-screensaver-2.0.0-1
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:36:38PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> Only until the Gnome devs change something that breaks them. What I
> don't understand is why they removed that functionality in the first
> place?
Why discuss this for the 50th time on the same mailing list? I already
provide everything
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 01:13:13PM -0600, Eric Smith wrote:
> Is there some way to create launchers on the Gnome 3 Classic Mode
> panel, as was easily done in Gnome 2?
>
> I'm trying really hard to like Gnome 3 Classic Mode, but having a very
> difficult time of it, because it seems to only provid
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 05:28:25PM +0200, lee wrote:
> It won't run to begin with but say it cannot find this or that library,
> and something that doesn't run can't crash.
Seems unimportant to discuss the difference between not starting up and
crashing if you're on about removing avahi and expect
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 07:33:39AM +0200, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:
> What is it supposed to look like?
It is not a new UI. You can add a sidebar, taken from IBM Symphony. It
is not working perfectly so it is still under experimental. For me I can
enable it under Tools→Options→Advanced. After ena
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 02:37:05PM +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> In fact I had already tried installing gconf-editor, however as the rest
> of the Gnome environment isn't there the options it offers are limited
> and desktop/gnome/applications/browser is not one of them
You want "Preferred a
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 08:26:26AM +0200, lee wrote:
> I don't know what the point is in moderating his posts. He does things
Then you haven't seen his messages that haven't made it through the
moderation queue. I know not all make it through (CC to inbox). No clue
what is in those, I only read t
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:09:50PM +0100, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Someone have suggest?
Requires work in GNOME shell:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665548
Please only cc.
--
Regards,
Olav
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription option
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 07:34:39PM +, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > $HOME/.cache/gdm/session.log
>
> Window manager warning: Failed to load theme "Nodoka": Failed to
> find a valid file for theme Nodoka
>
> Which makes sense, insofar as I did not have Nodaka installed, but does
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:33:12PM +0300, Aleksandar Kostadinov wrote:
> From some time my fedora stopped suspending when lid is closed. I
> see in system log that lid event is detected. So I'm wondering what
> can be the cause.
> Suspend works when I choose to suspend clicking on the XFCE power ap
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:32:11PM -0500, Matthew J. Roth wrote:
> Harald may be a little rough around the edges, but he consistently makes
> helpful
> and informative posts. In balance, this mailing list would be much worse off
> without his presence.
Thanks for the hint. I make various helpful
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:59:54PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 19.03.2013 23:55, schrieb Olav Vitters:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:43:11PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 19.03.2013 23:38, schrieb Olav Vitters:
> >>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:43:11PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 19.03.2013 23:38, schrieb Olav Vitters:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 09:58:36PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> have a good reason to do so - i am living in a IT based
> >> BUSINESS wo
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 09:58:36PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> have a good reason to do so - i am living in a IT based
> BUSINESS world, and no serious business will outsource
> all it's IT "to the cloud", not now and not in the future
I know one Fortune 500 company that has no problems with tha
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 07:22:47PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> By golly that works (since I hadn't put anything on the disk yet,
> I wiped it so I could try again). It is unfortunate that it uses
> the same gear icon as the one below the picture in the middle of the
> screen yet does complete diffe
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:13:01PM -0400, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
wrote:
> process = subprocess.Popen(['gnome-desktop-item-edit',
> file_path], env=os.environ)
Install whatever provides gnome-desktop-item-edit and please file a bug
for the missing requires.
--
Regards,
Olav
--
us
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 10:40:19PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> you simply have no opinion because you are lacking the experience most
> grown up people have to realize that this time libreoffice and openoffice
> are the same application
Attack the argument, not the person?
> you could have a op
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:43:05PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 2:29 AM, doug wrote:
>
> > You'll
> > most likely have to download it and install it yourself from
> > an rpm or dev archive, since most of the devs of the Linux
> > distros hate it
> >
>
> Oh really? an e
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:58:40AM +0100, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno mer, 30/01/2013 alle 21.04 -0500, Rahul Sundaram ha scritto:
> > Note that the entire GNOME Shell UI is a plugin to Mutter which is the
> > window manager for GNOME 3.
>
> Ok, now is NOT obsolete. (as the subject suggests)
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 06:44:29AM -0500, John Aldrich wrote:
> I was looking to download Fedup, but I see that there is one for F17 and one
> for F18. I am currently running F17, so I'm guessing I should download that
> one
I used the one for F17 and worked fine.
--
Regards,
Olav
--
use
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 10:00:41PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> GNOME is not interested in their userbase and was never really
In your view.
> so use KDE which is after the 4.0 disaster now really fine again
> sad that the ignorant GNOME developers did not learn from what
> happened with KDE 4.0
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 09:13:01AM +1100, Nick Urbanik wrote:
> On my son's machine, however, gdm presents a fuzzy rectangular patch
> instead of the Fedora logo. This is also the case with the icons at
> the top right of the gdm screen, until you move the mouse over them.
>
> Can anyone suggest
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 03:03:28PM +0100, Joe Feely wrote:
> The problem seems to have started after I enabled some assistive
> technology, which nearly paralysed the performance of the computer.
The performance impact was only solved quite recently (GNOME 3.6). I
assume the assistive tech is stil
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:40:49PM -0400, Doug wrote:
> On 10/21/2012 01:06 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> >On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:59:26 +0200
> >Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> >
> >>What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
> >Loss of remote display capability? Destruction of compatib
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:18:36AM +1030, Tim wrote:
> Christopher Svanefalk:
> >> What would be some key benefits of replacing X with Wayland?
>
> Tom Horsley:
> > Loss of remote display capability? Destruction of compatibility
> > for tens of thousands of existing applications? But it is
> > shi
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 01:04:09AM +0200, Kernel Guardian wrote:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=651075 (When I read this I had
> the impression that someone is trying to insult my intelligence.)
Not fixed and a lot of discussion why it isn't good.
> https://live.gnome.org/GnomeOS/De
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 03:07:10PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 02:38 PM, Kernel Guardian wrote:
> >As I found in Gnome 3.4 release notes, this is default options for all
> >applications.
>
> Are you serious about this? Who in their right mind thought that
> the average user wanted this
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:16:08AM +0200, sguazt wrote:
> In my case, the effect of unread notifications is the one you can see
> in the following screenshot http://i48.tinypic.com/2qkovpw.png
> In this screenshot there are two unread notifications: one from
> mail-notification and the other one fr
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:51:25PM -0700, Tommy Pham wrote:
> I have a need to test network throughput for SMTP traffic on Fedora
> and I'd like to configure postfix to accept incoming e-mail from
> clients and drop them. How can I go about that?
A postfix mailing list would be more appropriate?
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 09:21:57PM +0200, Łukasz Jagiełło wrote:
> Is it possible to set focus at gnome-terminal window after system bell
> ? Can't find any good solution for that. What I want to achieve is
> working from example Chrome or other terminal and when window gets
> system bell it will b
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 06:09:48PM +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
> Does any body use Fedora 17 with Unity Desktop?
Last I see it was still being worked on. Unity required all kinds of
patches, but seems the most invasive ones (gtk+) are now optional.
Suggest looking back in the various Fedora archi
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:46:48AM +0200, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> To clarify a bit, is there a BETTER way to seed, than to simply let a
> client program (such as Transmission, which I currently use) do the seeding
> for me? I would like to feed as much data as possible.
Transmission also ha
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:53:11AM +0200, sguazt wrote:
> In GNOME, when you have "unread" desktop notifications come from a
> specific source (e.g., empathy, mail-notification), all new
> notifications from that source do not pop-up.
> Instead, they are stacked up in the "unread notifications" pla
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:03:52PM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> On 2012-07-20 21:51, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> >>Any clues on how to debug this further?
> >
> >Press ALT+F2 and type "lg" into the run prompt. Look at the
> >"Errors" tab
> >for more clues.
>
> lg, I do n
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 02:49:19PM +0530, magina antimage wrote:
> it freezes for forever.
> pressing these keys does nothingalso mouse cursor gets vanished...
Ok, then I don't have any idea. Seems like maybe hardware or kernel
problem, and that is a bit too detailed for me.
To really kno
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 11:55:28AM +0530, magina antimage wrote:
>FYI I have ported fedora 15 for my target board (x86 based arch.)
>when i switch any user to gnome-fallback mode,i cant relogin
> once i do switch-user.GDM login screen freezes and i have to restart my
> syste
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 04:03:08PM +0200, Frode Petersen wrote:
> I was about to report a bug towards terminal, as several other
> people have, but after trying to start terminal as a fresh test user
> without problems, I'm uncertain about this being a bug in terminal
> or not.
[..]
> $ gnome-termi
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 12:28:47AM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTEzMjM
Phoronix?
Though, Phoronix doesn't even suggest what you read into it.
> I'd rather see more Gnome projects using OpenJDK and
> http://java-gnome.sourceforge.net/ rather
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 09:48:52AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I could not find any package that supplies either xdg-su or gnomesu
>
> I also just realized that my eyes missed your platform information at the top
> of your
> original email.
So it is a bug in gnome-commander. Relies on something
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 08:20:05AM -0400, Eddie G.O'Connor Jr-I wrote:
> Uhhguys? not to be a pain in the arse or anything, but does it
> matter either way? I have a slew of e-mails of you guys going back
> and forth, let's just leave it as "You have YOUR opinion..and He
[..]
> in any case.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:12:30AM -0700, Daniel wrote:
> On 06/22/2012 08:10 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 06:27:14AM -0700, Daniel wrote:
> >>>On 06/22/2012 05:00 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> >>>>>On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:45:06PM -07
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:14:46AM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/22/2012 07:34 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> >I think it is somewhat normal to ask for more details. And I understand
> >that proving a negative is difficult (XFCE/KDE), but that should still
> >be possible (sampli
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 04:34:34PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> So in short: you have a belief, no basis for it, but cannot be bothered
s/you have/someone has/
--
Regards,
Olav
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
ht
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 06:27:14AM -0700, Daniel wrote:
> On 06/22/2012 05:00 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:45:06PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> >>>On 06/21/2012 09:36 PM, Roger wrote:
>
> >>>>>As I understand it to date the devs say
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 08:18:03AM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> Currently, my desktop's running F16, fully updated. Just a few
> minutes ago, I was reading my morning comics on-line when my box
> froze. Nothing responded. Even the second hand on my desktop clock
> stopped moving. Just as I was about
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:45:06PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/21/2012 09:36 PM, Roger wrote:
> >As I understand it to date the devs say:
> >"Go away", rightly so,
> >and "Put up or shut up", again rightly so.
>
> I've never heard complaints about the KDE devs doing that, and I
> know that the
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 02:00:50PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> You list a number of things you personally dislike, but Fedora 17
> isn't responsible for any of them. All of them are part of Gnome 3,
> just one of the many desktop environments that you can use with
> Fedora. This is not, believe me,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:39:47AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> That however is a matter of ensuring a global disable is a feature of the
> configuration that is easy for an admin to use (easier than firewalling
> gnome.org to stop it)
I think that was planned, but I'll check as development goes on.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 06:20:10PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Probably by arguing that 99.99% of users who don't actually care won't
> be part of the noise. Which I think is a fair point.
Having a good user testing would be very much appreciated. Meaning:
something that Sun did a lot of years ago. A
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:25:44AM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/15/2012 10:20 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
> >Probably by arguing that 99.99% of users who don't actually care won't
> >be part of the noise. Which I think is a fair point.
>
> So, what you're saying is, Gnome 3 is being developed for people
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 05:48:28PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Having every appp implement a version of NoSquint makes so much more
> sense than gdm passing through the right option to Xorg!
Do you honestly expect anyone to respond to you? I mean, anyone who
actually bothers to makes changes?
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 08:27:22AM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Olav Vitters writes:
>
> >You're very demanding and call people "royal highnesses". Sure seems
> >like you seem obliged that people do what you think is right (other
> >idea? wrong!) o
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 06:29:53PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Unfortunately, the royal highnesses that even bothered to reply to
> that years-old bug have waived it off, with vague, occasional
Someone pointed at this lately:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=etiquette.html
It contains
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 04:35:50AM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Or are you saying that extensions.gnome.org has the ability to interface
> with the package manager?. ;)
In GNOME 3.6 the extensions will update automatically. This was not done
before on purpose (fear of bugs, breaking stuff, etc.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 08:09:57PM +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> Now it really goes OT and becomes venting. I'm far from complaining
> every time and for everything and you'll see in previous mails I don't.
Oops.. didn't want to imply that you did.
Just wanted to explain about venting _in
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:50:16PM +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> As you already know it does. This stupidity in GNOME is changed in next
> releases so each voice from frustrated users is important. It is the way
> wrong things can be heard and repaired.
Venting makes it difficult to underst
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 07:31:43AM -0500, Matthew J. Roth wrote:
> From where I'm sitting, that looks like venting *did something*.
Nope, it is totally pointless. I talked to a few designers personally,
explained calmly a better approach. The announced change pretty much
matches with what I said.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 02:35:43PM +0930, Tim wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 00:10 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > Furthermore, updates to extensions are reviewed by GNOME shell
> > developers. If they break stuff, it means additional work for them to
> > review the updated ext
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 05:10:02PM -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> want. Please note that they have made it very clear that they're
> not going to make the slightest effort to avoid breaking third-party
> plugins, even (especially!) those that correct some of Gnome 3's
> most glaring flaws.
There is a b
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:37:53AM -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> It is true that Gnome is product of the Gnome people not the fedora
> people. But since (it seems to me) Fedora is the only major distribution
> that uses Gnome as its default Desktop Environment the Fedora Board
> should be listened
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 03:54:53PM -0400, David Mansfield wrote:
> Implying, of course, that SOME non-gui bits are here now. Which
> bits and how can I find them/evaluate them etc? As I mentioned, I
No idea. I responded to what I knew.
--
Regards,
Olav
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedora
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:06:44AM -0400, David Mansfield wrote:
> 1. There's nothing in the GUI
GUI bit is scheduled for GNOME 3.6.
--
Regards,
Olav
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:36:19AM -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Nope. You have found the problem. As soon as I created the ntfs group,
> everything started to work. Though I found this error message
>
> # mount /mnt/c
> mount: only root can mount UUID=E0649EB1649E8A44 on /mn
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 04:44:22AM -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> Very strange things happen. With the line commented out the device can
> be mounted without problems. But with the line uncommented this happens
> (note that I'm running as root):
> # mount /mnt/c
> mount: only ro
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:29:05AM -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> ~/.gconf/apps/metacity/workspace_names/%gconf.xml
You already have a solution, so just adding some background info...
Up to GNOME 3.2 (inclusive), Mutter and GNOME shell use gconf to store
their settings. As of GNOME 3.4, gsettings is
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:44:16PM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I couldn't find a clear account of the effect of the line
> anywhere in the shorewall documentation.
Add it, apply the changes and run the following as root:
iptables -t nat -L -n
That'll tell you what it does.
--
Regards,
Olav
-
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 08:17:47PM +0200, suvayu ali wrote:
> A quick question out of curiosity, is Gnome 3 using something other
> than nm-applet? I don't use Gnome 3 myself[1]. Since this is a rather
> common question on the list would be good to know.
It uses something different. Meaning: integ
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 09:07:22AM +0200, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> A major defiency is the loss of deleting SSID configurations. There
> is no 'delete' feature anymore in the Network Settings panel.
Not being able to forget wireless networks + not being able to switch of
wifi while it is still t
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:58:05AM -0600, S P Arif Sahari Wibowo wrote:
> For some reason some accessibility features (specifically slow keys
> and sticky keys) in my Gnome3 login screen turn on, and I cannot
> seems to deactivate / disable / turn-off / reset it. I tried turn
> them off from the ac
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 02:04:07AM -0700, Nataraj wrote:
> The original author of mysql has created mariaDB http://mariadb.org/
> which I believe is claimed to maintain compatability with mysql. Some
> linux distros are considering offering alternative packages. PostGreSQL
Adding to above: Magei
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 07:56:41AM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
> Let others know what you find to be better alternative as that can be
> helpful as well.
He already mentioned Pidgin.
--
Regards,
Olav
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription o
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 11:53:17AM +1000, Dan Irwin wrote:
> Over several successive versions (Since Fedora 10), empathy has never
> "just worked" or "worked right" on my laptop. It will crash. Modules
> will crash. People will complain that I am signed in and ignoring
> them, when I don't appear t
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:58:14PM -0800, les wrote:
> I have added gnome-tweak-tool to my system. However I have some
> problems with it. First run from the software install tool went OK.
> Made changes to various fonts, and they took effect.
>
> However on subsequent runs I had t
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 07:44:33AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> So is this a bug with the locked panel NOT using the same format as
> the unlocked panel? Obviously there is an intermitent problem of
> the system loosing track of things. And as I think back, once it
> gets confused, locking th
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 02:42:31PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> AH. After I thought about it, I thought this was the case. Kind of
> an Easter Egg thingee (for those of us not of Easter celebrants).
GNOME 3.4 will have a real easter egg (discovered it only by accident; I
mean while reading g
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 07:16:09AM -0800, Alan Evans wrote:
> A *one* *letter* command to restart the shell?!? That seems like a
> horrible mis-feature, like something I might key in accidentally.
You noticed this before or after my email? Suggest to try it before
becoming emotional.
> Did develo
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:29:42AM -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 01/05/2012 12:34 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> >Quicker than rebooting the entire machine just to see the
> >changes you made to gnome-shell.
>
> Wouldn't logging out and back in be sufficient?
Of course. Ju
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 10:17:55AM -0500, William Case wrote:
> Now, how do you download and install a new extension from here?
> Anything I have read is out of the dark ages involving torture and
> incantations with 'git' and 'make'. There has to be a more modern and
> sophisticated way.
There s
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 11:29:38PM +1030, Tim wrote:
> There's two paragraphs, the first one just says "this," with no
> indication what the hell it's referring to. There's a whole list of
File a bug and attach a patch. Pretty sure improvements are welcome.
Lots of the comments I write in source
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:52:44PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 06:29 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 06:23:30PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >>This line appears twice, so I commented them both out. We will see
> >>what happens o
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 06:23:30PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> This line appears twice, so I commented them both out. We will see
> what happens on the next reboot...
tip: alt+f2, type "r", enter, wait a bit
--
Regards,
Olav
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscri
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:04:16PM -0500, William Case wrote:
> How do I get rid of the Universal Access icon in the upper right hand
> corner/panel? Googled but seems every distribution has a different
> answer. How do I get rid of it in Fedora 16, preferably using the
> icon-manage extension in
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:38:15PM +, JB wrote:
> Olav Vitters vitters.nl> writes:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:27:11AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Most people already left for fedora forum and the like. The list is
> > > basically not managed so its useles
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 11:27:11AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> Most people already left for fedora forum and the like. The list is
> basically not managed so its useless. If you want to fix that you need
> to take it up with the fedora board I believe.
FWIW, I'm willing to moderate (after effect, doe
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 04:48:33PM +1000, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> Gnome3 works fine on some of my systems, but unfortunately my
> classrooms machines with Nvidia Geoforce FX 5200 cards it only
> works about 80%.
Could you link to either a screenshot or a picture of the problem?
Sounds like
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:32:18PM -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
> yes - tho Gnome has a similar thing - it may be called Beagle .. but
> I'm not sure ...
Beagle was used in the past. Currently it uses Tracker. Before the
release of 3.0, Tracker could still negatively impacted performance.
This
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 10:50:40PM +0100, Christopher Svanefalk wrote:
> I switched to Gnome3 just recently, and frankly, I am not sure I would want
> to go back again. Yes, the project has to mature, and I expect we will hit
> F18 before Gnome3 is on par with Gnome2 in terms of raw stability (I
>
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:18:10AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> ah sounds exactly what i searched for, thanks
Did systemd log anything in syslog about forcefully shutting down the
service/unit/... because of the timeout? If not, could you file an
enhancement bug with systemd?
Thanks
--
Regards
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 11:41:51AM -0200, ferna...@lozano.eti.br wrote:
> What can I do to troubleshoot this? Anyone with similar problems?
> []s, Fernando Lozano
Suggest looking into /var/log/messages and ~/.xsession-errors. Look for
anything related to networking, dbus, and gnome-shell.
--
Reg
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
