It is possible to skip scriplets using --setopt=tsflags=noscripts but I it
can have some negative effects
Jaroslav
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:04 PM, Frédéric Bron
wrote:
> > -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1753 Mar 23 17:17 /etc/group
>
> that's what I have
>
> > [root@prophead ~]# lsatt
I would recommend to get inspired by article
http://dnf.baseurl.org/2016/12/15/repair-of-broken-system-with-dnf-2-0/
where you can find how to repair broken system. With dnf-2.0 you can use
"dnf check" command, that could reveal problems on your system.
Hope that it will help
Jaroslav
On Fri, Ma
For your case I would recommend to read
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade and article how to repair
broken system here:
http://dnf.baseurl.org/2016/12/15/repair-of-broken-system-with-dnf-2-0/ .
And don't worry even if you are unable to start your system, you can try to
fix the probl
Please, to get man page use ```man reposync```. Dnf 2.1 was just released
into rawhide. It introduce alias for --repo option --repoid. We also have
testing repository (dnf copr enable rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf-nightly) that
provides latest version of dnf-stack packages for Fc24+.
Hope that it will
I just published blog about how to repair broken system:
https://dnf.baseurl.org/2016/12/15/repair-of-broken-system-with-dnf-2-0/. I
think that it will be useful to solve your problem.
Jaroslav
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Wes James wrote:
> I just installed fedora 24 and was doing the ini
Well it looks like that rpm-fusion do not provide a key for fc-25 yet. You
can install package that provides the missing key by command ```dnf
install /etc/pki/rpm-
gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-nonfree-fedora-25```. Of course do not forget to
fully upgrade system before system upgrade.
Also you can w
You are right that F23 package was picked because availability and higher
version. The tag 1.fc23 represent only release. DNF do not exclude packages
according to fedora tag in release tag.
Probably it would be nice to investigate the original repo from f23
packages where upgraded. Look if f23 pac
I have a question to your request:
Do you have in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf following line:
installonly_limit=3
Did you made ``dnf upgrade --fresh`` before system-upgrade attempt?
Do you run the newest kernel on your system?
If some of the answers were no it could be a reason why you have the issue.
Dear Sanne,
I would like to ask you additional question. For nondestructive upgrade did you
use system-upgrade plugin and work-flow described here
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade#How_do_I_use_it.3F)?
If yes it would be interesting to compare installed packages on both machines
have to keep packages with multiple arch, and want to perform
dnf upgrade, you can use --exclude option and list there conflicting files
(--exclude=gtk2,orc).
Jaroslav Mracek
Original Message -
From: "Kalpa Welivitigoda"
To: "Community support for Fedora users"
S
10 matches
Mail list logo
