On 2/24/2014 13:22, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Feb 24, 2014, at 8:05 AM, Don Levey <mailto:fedora-l...@the-leveys.us>> wrote:
>> I can appreciate that. If this were a mission-critical machine I might
>> be able to justify the setup for a regular, hourly, backup. At
On 2/24/2014 13:14, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> ..
>
> Obviously one of the drives is no longer updated since the raid1 is
> not in effect so it's possible any utility will find the state
> ambiguous and won't know how to sync the disks, does a overwrite c or
> does c overwrite a? Consider that this
On 2/22/2014 21:37, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Feb 22, 2014, at 12:46 PM, Don Levey
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/21/2014 11:38, Chris Murphy wrote:
...
>>
>>> What do you get for:
>>>
>>> mdadm -E /dev/sda mdadm -E /dev/sdc
>>>
>>>
On 2/21/2014 11:38, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2014, at 5:29 AM, Don Levey
> wrote:
>>> No. Hardware raid will show up as a single /dev/sdX device. What
>>> results do you get for lsblk?
>
> It's a nitpick, but for what it's worth it
On 2/20/2014 20:42, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Feb 20, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Don Levey
> wrote:
>>
>> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
>> /dev/sda1 63 10276051151380224+ 7
>> HPFS/NTFS/exFAT
>
> This starting
On 2/20/2014 17:03, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Feb 18, 2014, at 3:46 PM, Don Levey wrote:
>
>> ...
>> After several weeks of schedule hell, I was finally able to work on
>> this. The upshot is that the previously installed kernels weren't
>> avail
On 2/18/2014 17:46, Don Levey wrote:
> On 1/29/2014 13:59, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> ...
>> Anyway, if you're for sure convinced it's corrupt then reformat the
>> partition.
>> Use blkid to get the new volume UUID to insert into /etc/fstab so it gets
On 1/29/2014 13:59, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> ...
> Anyway, if you're for sure convinced it's corrupt then reformat the
> partition.
> Use blkid to get the new volume UUID to insert into /etc/fstab so it gets
> mounted
> when you next boot. And then mount root, boot, (boot/efi if this is a UEFI
On 1/29/2014 14:37, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2014, at 12:07 PM, Don Levey
> wrote:
> ...
>>
>> I was wondering something similar; perhaps there is physical
>> damage?
>
> This should give a quick idea: smartctl -x /dev/sdX
>
> This will take
On 1/29/2014 13:59, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Don Levey
> wrote:
>
>> A short while ago, during a power cut, my desktop machine failed.
>> A power-up displayed symptoms consistent with a missing /boot
>> partition; attempting to boot
A short while ago, during a power cut, my desktop machine failed. A
power-up displayed symptoms consistent with a missing /boot partition;
attempting to boot under the rescue CD seemed to confirm this when it
did not mount the /boot partition.
Booting under the F20 LiveUSB key allowed me to manua
On 1/3/2014 17:12, Don Levey wrote:
> In my research I've not yet seen anything for Fedora about this, and
> certainly not the combination of two errors. I'll try to be as complete
> as possible...
I have managed to create a LiveUSB stick for F20. I can see the /boot
par
In my research I've not yet seen anything for Fedora about this, and
certainly not the combination of two errors. I'll try to be as complete
as possible:
After a power loss, I was unable to reboot my desktop machine (Dell
Dimension E521 running F19). Upon first hitting grub, I received large
num
On 11/13/2013 17:09, Steven Stern wrote:
> On 11/13/2013 02:32 PM, Don Levey wrote:
>> My wife's laptop was running fine on kernel 3.10.11-200:
>>
>> uname -a:
>> Linux croweflies.the-leveys.us 3.10.11-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Sep 9
>> 13:03:01 UTC 2013 x86_
On 11/14/2013 09:23, John W. Linville wrote:
>
> As you intuit, cutting oneself off from future kernel updates is an
> overreaction.
>
> If your device has stopped working, then open a bug.
>
John,
I posted a bug in the kernel Bugzilla, but as they mentioned I should
open in Fedora I will do tha
On 11/13/2013 21:15, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 11/13/2013 01:55 PM, Don Levey wrote:
>> As a (perhaps) related question:
>> It is my understanding that if I were to use akmod (as opposed to kmod)
>> it would dynamically download necessary modules at startup time if an
>>
On 11/13/2013 16:20, Jim wrote:
> On 11/13/2013 03:32 PM, Don Levey wrote:
>> My wife's laptop was running fine on kernel 3.10.11-200:
>> Linux croweflies.the-leveys.us 3.10.11-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Sep 9
>>
>> ...
>
> In doing this yum will never upda
My wife's laptop was running fine on kernel 3.10.11-200:
uname -a:
Linux croweflies.the-leveys.us 3.10.11-200.fc19.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Sep 9
13:03:01 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
lspci -s 03:00.0:
03:00.0 Network controller: Ralink corp. RT5390 Wireless 802.11n 1T/1R PCIe
rfkill list wl
On 8/30/2012 19:55, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:41:26PM -0700, jdow wrote:
>> painful stuff (making sure addons still work.) As a user this is rapidly
>> becoming VERY annoying. I may revisit Evilution (sic) as a substitute.
>
> If I may suggest an extremely versatile alternativ
On 8/30/2012 15:48, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 08/30/2012 12:34 PM, Don Levey wrote:
>> As for the Linux version, I honestly don't know. Perhaps a
>> separate utility to scan the XPIs installed and check the Mozilla
>> database against the new version? I don't know if
On 8/30/2012 15:21, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 08/30/2012 11:56 AM, Don Levey wrote:
>> Knowing that an update would invalidate an extension would in no way
>> prevent you from installing the update if you chose to do so. But not
>> knowing that one's extension will
On 8/30/2012 15:25, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 08/30/2012 12:01 PM, Don Levey wrote:
>> Because they do it*after* installation. Why not do it before
>> installation instead? I'm not talking about random extensions that are
>> created off in some backwater corner of the in
On 8/30/2012 14:58, David wrote:
> On 8/30/2012 2:29 PM, Don Levey wrote:
>> On 8/30/2012 11:10, Nate Pearlstein wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> So thunderbird 15 breaks the Exchange 2007/2010 Calendar and Tasks
>>> Provider 1.8.5 add on. There isn&
On 8/30/2012 14:45, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 08/30/2012 11:29 AM, Don Levey wrote:
>> On 8/30/2012 11:10, Nate Pearlstein wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> So thunderbird 15 breaks the Exchange 2007/2010 Calendar and Tasks
>>> Provider 1.8.5 add on. There isn&
On 8/30/2012 11:10, Nate Pearlstein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So thunderbird 15 breaks the Exchange 2007/2010 Calendar and Tasks
> Provider 1.8.5 add on. There isn't a newer version of the add-on available.
>
Wouldn't it be nice if the installation routine checked for add-on
incompatibilities *before* it
On 8/22/2012 22:22, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>
> A question When I use gimp and go to "create" I see one of my selections
> to be...
>
> Xsane:hpaio:'net'Officejet6500E709n?ip=192.168.0.195
>
> is that what you are seeing or do you see hpaio:/net/ ?
>
> Everything is working fine for me. Ma
I have an HP OfficeJet Pro L7590 all-in-one unit. Until yesterday I was
able to use it to scan via xsane (and using that, in GIMP). As of
yesterday, however, I get the following error:
Failed to open device `hpaio:/net/Officejet_Pro_L7500?ip=192.168.1.128':
End of file reached
That is indeed th
On 8/9/2012 15:08, James Wilkinson wrote:
> Don Levey wrote:
>> I have one machine on my home network that I protect via a squid proxy -
>> my kids' machine. Somehow, something I (or they) did created a
>> situation where I cannot connect externally via Firefox, an
On 8/9/2012 10:23, Don Levey wrote:
>
> I have one machine on my home network that I protect via a squid proxy -
> my kids' machine. Somehow, something I (or they) did created a
> situation where I cannot connect externally via Firefox, and cannot
> connect to any reposito
So I can't wrap my head around what I might have done to create this
situation, or to back out of it.
I have one machine on my home network that I protect via a squid proxy -
my kids' machine. Somehow, something I (or they) did created a
situation where I cannot connect externally via Firefox, an
On 8/8/2012 10:05, Martin Briza wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Aug 2012 16:01:01 +0200 Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Replaced F-16/64 with F-17/64 on "box7" and see a problem I seem to
>> have every time I do this.
>>
>> Presently box7 will ssh into box9 but box9 can not get
On 7/20/2012 12:14, Emmett Culley wrote:
> Mine is a 64bit system and virtually all KDE packages are installed.
> It has been happening since soon after installing (fresh) Fedora 17.
>
> Like Don noted, when this is happening I have no problem switching
> between desktops, so plasma isn't the cul
On 7/20/2012 01:12, Emmett Culley wrote:
...
>
> My system is running KDE and is fully updated (30 minutes ago) via the
> default repositories.
>
> Is any body else seeing this?
>
I have a similar, but perhaps more drastic, problem.
When I run KDE, *everything* will lock up after some undetermi
On 7/19/2012 15:06, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
> You mean like "Beefy Miracle?" Seriously, I always thought that Fedora
> 18's code name should be a celebration of Life. Two brownie points to
> the first person to figure out why.
You mean apart from the "18 = Chai (Hebrew) = Life (English)" thing?
-Don
Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
> Hi;
>
> pulseaudio: no sound, Fedora 12, what debugging/diagnostic info is
> needed to solve this problem?
>
> Thanks,
> Ken Wolcott
Here's what I used to find my problem, in addition to making sure I
found the correct hardware and software versions:
lsmod | grep snd
l
Tony Nelson wrote:
> On 10-02-25 12:45:57, Don Levey wrote:
> ...
>> Would you suggest I file the bug with Fedora, or with PulseAudio?
>
> Fedora, I think.
>
Doing the appropriate bug search before submitting a new one, I ran
across this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
On 02/25/2010 01:41 AM, Tony Nelson wrote:
> On 10-02-24 23:07:41, Don Levey wrote:
>
>> I've been reading with interest the problems with PulseAudio since
>> F12
>>
>> came out, and I find myself in a similar situation (none of the
>> previou
On 02/24/2010 11:07 PM, Don Levey wrote:
> I've been reading with interest the problems with PulseAudio since F12
> came out, and I find myself in a similar situation (none of the
> previously offered solutions seem to have helped).
>
Two more things:
* The "30
ion I
can post that might help to diagnose this? I'm at a loss.
Thanks in advance,
-Don Levey
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraprojec
39 matches
Mail list logo
