Re: Is DNF5 Working Correctly

Am 03.11.24 um 11:13 PM schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan: On Sun, 2024-11-03 at 17:02 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Sun, Nov 3, 2024 at 4:57 PM Stephen Morris wrote: [...] Does this mean that with the tracer addin no longer working there is no way to get the equivalent functionality with dnf

Re: Is DNF5 Working Correctly

On Tue, 2024-11-05 at 09:24 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > On 5/11/24 09:11, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > That's rather confusing. I had the same experience, but what it > > actually means is "dnf5 needs-restarting" (no '--'). The documentation > > could be better. > Thanks Patrick. I had already

Re: Is DNF5 Working Correctly

On 5/11/24 09:11, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: That's rather confusing. I had the same experience, but what it actually means is "dnf5 needs-restarting" (no '--'). The documentation could be better. Thanks Patrick. I had already tried that command which told me there was nothing that needed restar

Re: Is DNF5 Working Correctly

On Tue, 2024-11-05 at 09:03 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > On 4/11/24 09:48, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > The 'tracer' command does exist in F41, but doesn't work, and there is > > apparently no longer a 'tracer' plugin. The needs-restarting plugin > > doesn't work either. > Is python3-dnf-plugin

Re: Is DNF5 Working Correctly

On 4/11/24 09:48, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: The 'tracer' command does exist in F41, but doesn't work, and there is apparently no longer a 'tracer' plugin. The needs-restarting plugin doesn't work either. Is python3-dnf-plugin-tracer.noarch Version 4.1.2-3.fc41 not the tracer plugin? I also trie

Re: Conflicting NVIDIA Packages from RPM Fusion

Thanks again, Francis. The result was: # dnf --disablerepo=rpmfusion-nonfree --setopt=excludepkgs= update Updating and loading repositories: Repositories loaded. Problem: package cuda-12-6-12.6.2-1.x86_64 from cuda-fedora39 requires cuda-runtime-12-6 >= 12.6.2, but none of the providers can be ins

Re: Problem during upgrade to F41

On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:22:27 +0100 Frank Elsner via users wrote: [ ... ] > Oha, remove-retired-packages nameS "network-scripts-openvswitch" > > I guess this will solve my problem. Will try it tomorrow. Tryed it already, solced the oroblem! Hot thanks, Frank -- _

Re: thunderbird junks new messages when folder is opened

On Mon, 2024-11-04 at 23:03 +1100, fed...@eyal.emu.id.au wrote: > Note the fact that these messages are NOT junked when they arrive, > but rather a significant time later, when the folder is opened. Are the options for filter messages in *all* folders? As opposed to just the inbox. NB: I don't

Re: Problem during upgrade to F41

On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 11:42:24 -0500 Jeffrey Walton wrote: Hey Jeffrey and others, > On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 11:35 AM Frank Elsner via users > wrote: > > > > my "dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=41" gives > > > > Error: > > Problem: package network-scripts-openvswitch-3.2.2-1.fc3

Re: thunderbird junks new messages when folder is opened

I didn't see a bug filed for the broken "Release notes" link so I just filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2323688 . -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject

Re: Problem during upgrade to F41

On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 11:35 AM Frank Elsner via users wrote: > > my "dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=41" gives > > Error: > Problem: package network-scripts-openvswitch-3.2.2-1.fc39.x86_64 from > @System requires network-scripts, but none of the providers can be installed >

Problem during upgrade to F41

Hello, my "dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=41" gives Error: Problem: package network-scripts-openvswitch-3.2.2-1.fc39.x86_64 from @System requires network-scripts, but none of the providers can be installed - network-scripts-10.23-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System does not belon

Re: Conflicting NVIDIA Packages from RPM Fusion

On Mon, 04 Nov 2024 14:20:35 + Paul Smith wrote: > Thanks, Francis. I did as you suggested, but now the conflict are different: > # dnf --disablerepo=rpmfusion-nonfree update ... > Problem: package cuda-12-6-12.6.2-1.x86_64 from cuda-fedora39 requires > cuda-runtime-12-6 >= 12.6.2, but none o

Re: Trustedqsl

Mon, 4 Nov 2024 08:26:47 -0600 Richard Shaw kirjoitti: > I've been fighting other fires but will try to get to upgrading TQSL > here in the next day or two. > > Thanks, > Richard > KF5OIM Thanks Richard I'll wait Jarmo -- ___ users mailing list -- u

[Testdays] Call for Fedora Linux 42 testing events

Hi Fedora users, developers, and friends! It's time to start thinking about Test Days for Fedora 42. For anyone who isn't aware, a Test Day is an event usually focused around IRC for interaction and a Wiki page for instructions and results, with the aim being to get a bunch of interested users an

Re: thunderbird junks new messages when folder is opened

> The following may be unrelated but is unusual. > I then checked the "About" version (for this report) and see > 128.3.2esr (64-bit) > [BTW: clicking the "Release notes" link gives "There's Nothing Here"...] > which surprised me, I do not recall installing the esr package, or is it the >

Re: Trustedqsl

I've been fighting other fires but will try to get to upgrading TQSL here in the next day or two. Thanks, Richard KF5OIM -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedor

Re: Trustedqsl

Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:50:32 + Will McDonald kirjoitti: > > Checking the changelog for the package(s) in question often gives some > useful pointers: > > root@6254479ee06d /]# dnf changelog tqsllib.x86_64 > > >From https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/, > https://package

Re: Conflicting NVIDIA Packages from RPM Fusion

Thanks, Francis. I did as you suggested, but now the conflict are different: # dnf --disablerepo=rpmfusion-nonfree update Updating and loading repositories: Repositories loaded. Problem: package cuda-12-6-12.6.2-1.x86_64 from cuda-fedora39 requires cuda-runtime-12-6 >= 12.6.2, but none of the prov

Re: Conflicting NVIDIA Packages from RPM Fusion

Hi. On Mon, 04 Nov 2024 13:26:55 + Paul Smith wrote: > I am getting the below issues. Could you please help me? > # dnf update > Updating and loading repositories: > Repositories loaded. > Problem: package cuda-runtime-12-6-12.6.2-1.x86_64 from cuda-fedora39 > requires nvidia-open-560 >= 560.

Re: Trustedqsl

On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 13:29, jarmo wrote: > Who maintain TQSL package? > With this new F-41 sending file to ARRL, NO GO. > There is new version available tsqsl-2.7.4. F-41 > has 2.7.2. > I tried compile from source, but have too new LIBEXPAT. > I'm stuck! > Checking the changelog for the package

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:38 PM wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 12:48 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > RPMFusion users may want to wait for the third party repository to > > rebuild its packages for F41. > > RPMfusion repos are already on F41. Conflicting NVIDIA Packages from RPM Fusion,

Conflicting NVIDIA Packages from RPM Fusion

Dear All, I am getting the below issues. Could you please help me? Thanks in advance, Paul -- # dnf update Updating and loading repositories: Repositories loaded. Problem: package cuda-runtime-12-6-12.6.2-1.x86_64 from cuda-fedora39 requires nvidia-open-5

Trustedqsl

Who maintain TQSL package? With this new F-41 sending file to ARRL, NO GO. There is new version available tsqsl-2.7.4. F-41 has 2.7.2. I tried compile from source, but have too new LIBEXPAT. I'm stuck! Jarmo -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedo

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

> On 4 Nov 2024, at 12:58, Barry wrote: > > This is because the database with the repo cannot be migrated from f40/dnf4 > to f41/dnf5. Should say database with the “repo info cannot…”. Barry -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

> On 2 Nov 2024, at 22:04, Stephen Morris wrote: > > Functionality" where that display is new with F41 and for me, for every > update, that 2nd line lists the repository as "". This is because the database with the repo cannot be migrated from f40/dnf4 to f41/dnf5. As you update the repo dat

thunderbird junks new messages when folder is opened

First, for the last few days I noticed this strange effect: - I download new messages (I use pop3) - I wait for the process to complete as just filtering takes a few seconds at times. Then when all is quiet... - I click on a folder that indicates it has a new message - the message is, immediately

Re: Is DNF5 Working Correctly

On Sun, 2024-11-03 at 19:02 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > As I posted in a separate thread on Friday last, I think that both the > > command 'tracer' and the corresponding dnf5 plugin are broken. I've > > been waiting to see if anyone contradicts this but so far no-one has, > > so I may post a B