On 4/25/23 21:00, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/25/23 17:44, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/25/23 09:56, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/25/23 02:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/24/23 17:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't understand why you're having so much trouble.
I do beleive after fixing and u
On 4/25/23 17:44, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/25/23 09:56, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/25/23 02:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/24/23 17:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't understand why you're having so much trouble.
I do beleive after fixing and upgrading to the new
networking method
Mike Wright composed on 2023-04-25 18:43 (UTC-0700):
> I've never been a fanboi when it came to NetworkManager so when I
> installed f38 I used systemd-networkd. I found it straight forward and
> was able to set up my networking very easily.
> Does anybody know which way forward Fedora is goin
On 4/25/23 17:56, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 5:18 PM Todd Zullinger wrote:
A non-upstream patch was removed¹, which had kept the
long-deprecated uname -i and -p options.
¹ https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/coreutils/c/cd953e1
uname (1) says -i and -
On 4/25/23 18:03, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:44:07 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Keyfiles vs. ifcfg
https://fedoramagazine.org/converting-networkmanager-from-ifcfg-to-keyfiles/
I converted when there was no longer default support for ifcfg
files unless I installed Networ
Hi all,
I've never been a fanboi when it came to NetworkManager so when I
installed f38 I used systemd-networkd. I found it straight forward and
was able to set up my networking very easily.
Does anybody know which way forward Fedora is going? That is,
NetworkManager with nmcli or systemd
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:44:07 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Keyfiles vs. ifcfg
>
> https://fedoramagazine.org/converting-networkmanager-from-ifcfg-to-keyfiles/
I converted when there was no longer default support for ifcfg
files unless I installed NetworkManager-initscripts-ifcfg-rh.x86_6
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 5:18 PM Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> A non-upstream patch was removed¹, which had kept the
>> long-deprecated uname -i and -p options.
>>
>> ¹ https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/coreutils/c/cd953e1
>
> uname (1) says -i and -p are valid options:
>
>
On 4/25/23 09:56, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/25/23 02:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/24/23 17:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't understand why you're having so much trouble.
I do beleive after fixing and upgrading to the new
networking method that what has been transpiring
was my preference
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 5:18 PM Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
> Tom Horsley wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189656
> >
> > God knows how many scripts I have that use "uname -p" to get
> > the architecture name, but it now returns "unknown" instead of
> > "x86_64".
> >
> > I guess
On 4/25/23 15:55, Max Pyziur wrote:
Per the subject line, where does the root password get set on an F38
fresh install.
"sudo passwd" after you login to the installed system.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:58:45 -0400
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> One idea for tracking things down which aren't stored in a
> place which is reasonable to grep, is a uname script which
> overrides the default uname command
I was going to do that, but I found the old f37 uname command
runs fine on f38,
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:49:08 -0400
> Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
>> s/uname -p/uname -m/
>>
>> shouldn't be too much of an issue.
>
> Right, just have to locate the 47,321 scripts which have some variation
> of that command in them. No problem at all :-).
I have good news a
I use "GNOME on Xorgs", after upgrade to F38 some apps, like Firefox or
Libreoffice, are show with Minimize/Maximize Buttons on windows
titlebar.
Also F38 Workstation live version, if you set password to liveuser and
logon with "GNOME on Xorgs" (and not with default GNOME on Wayland),
show same ap
Greetings,
Per the subject line, where does the root password get set on an F38 fresh
install.
Thank you.
Max
p...@brama.com
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
OK, thanks. Guess I'll just wait for it to resolve itself.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 5:42 PM Andre Robatino
wrote:
> BTW, this isn't a new problem. It happens at least once every few months,
> it's just by chance that it happened shortly after F38 was released.
> _
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:49:08 -0400
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> s/uname -p/uname -m/
>
> shouldn't be too much of an issue.
Right, just have to locate the 47,321 scripts which have some variation
of that command in them. No problem at all :-).
___
users
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> The man page still has '-p' and '-i', so that's at least a
> documentation bug.
The options are still accepted. They just don't produce the
same output they did with a non-upstream patch.
Changed output across a major release isn't all that
unreasonable -- even if it
BTW, this isn't a new problem. It happens at least once every few months, it's
just by chance that it happened shortly after F38 was released.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedor
The Rpmfusion version of qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld is incompatible with the
latest fedora packages, so if you want to update those, remove
qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld until Rpmfusion has a new build.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 17:18 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Tom Horsley wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189656
> >
> > God knows how many scripts I have that use "uname -p" to get
> > the architecture name, but it now returns "unknown" instead of
> > "x86_64".
> >
> > I gue
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:18:21 -0400
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> It's not a bug. :)
That's a matter of opinion. :-(.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Con
On 4/25/23 14:03, Max Pyziur wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, Max Pyziur wrote:
You didn't try the main command that was suggested. "dnf distro-sync"
When I try that command, it lists 27 problems, and then closes with
Problem 27: problem with installed package
python3-mistune08-0.8.4-7.fc37.noar
Tom Horsley wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189656
>
> God knows how many scripts I have that use "uname -p" to get
> the architecture name, but it now returns "unknown" instead of
> "x86_64".
>
> I guess I'll replace uname with a script that invokes the real
> uname unless
> Am 25.04.2023 um 23:03 schrieb Max Pyziur :
>
> I've begun using this command. Example:
> dnf distro-sync perl\*
>
> And it removes all f38 installed packages where there is a an f37 package.
>
> Is this the correct way to proceed?
>
> Thank you again.
First you should check, which versio
Lucky you, I'm stuck for last week at
Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package
qt5-qtbase-5.15.9-1.fc37.x86_64
- cannot install both qt5-qtbase-5.15.9-1.fc38.x86_64 and
qt5-qtbase-5.15.8-10.fc38.x86_64
- package libksysguard-5.27.4-1.fc38.x86_64 requires
libQt5WebEngineWid
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, Max Pyziur wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, Max Pyziur wrote:
packages: NetworkManager, dnf, grub2-tools-minimal, sudo, systemd,
systemd-udev
I'm looking at your recommendations and now wondering how to proceed
given that it seems I have probably about 4800+ packages that ar
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, Max Pyziur wrote:
packages: NetworkManager, dnf, grub2-tools-minimal, sudo, systemd,
systemd-udev
I'm looking at your recommendations and now wondering how to proceed given
that it seems I have probably about 4800+ packages that are both fc38 and
fc37.
Any advice here
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/25/23 13:38, Max Pyziur wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, stan via users wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:10:06 -0400 (EDT)
Max Pyziur wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, Max Pyziur wrote:
Greetings,
Upgrading F38 on my Dell XPS 13 laptop of something like 2
On 4/25/23 13:38, Max Pyziur wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, stan via users wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:10:06 -0400 (EDT)
Max Pyziur wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, Max Pyziur wrote:
Greetings,
Upgrading F38 on my Dell XPS 13 laptop of something like 2012
vintage w a 1TB SSD, the scriplet/upgr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189656
God knows how many scripts I have that use "uname -p" to get
the architecture name, but it now returns "unknown" instead of
"x86_64".
I guess I'll replace uname with a script that invokes the real
uname unless it is called with the -p option, th
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, stan via users wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:10:06 -0400 (EDT)
Max Pyziur wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, Max Pyziur wrote:
Greetings,
Upgrading F38 on my Dell XPS 13 laptop of something like 2012
vintage w a 1TB SSD, the scriplet/upgrade to setroubleshoot-server
is hangi
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:10:06 -0400 (EDT)
Max Pyziur wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Upgrading F38 on my Dell XPS 13 laptop of something like 2012
> > vintage w a 1TB SSD, the scriplet/upgrade to setroubleshoot-server
> > is hanging.
> >
> > Seems that
Thanks very much! And thanks also to Stan.
On Tue Apr25'23 01:57:02PM, Jerry James wrote:
> From: Jerry James
> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 13:57:02 -0600
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: bitmap font error on F38
>
> On Tue, Apr
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023, Max Pyziur wrote:
Greetings,
Upgrading F38 on my Dell XPS 13 laptop of something like 2012 vintage w a 1TB
SSD, the scriplet/upgrade to setroubleshoot-server is hanging.
Seems that it's been this way for a least 5-10 minutes while everything
before this has been runnin
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 12:58 PM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Thanks very much again!
>
> I was explicitly able to update to texlive-was-svn64691-65.fc38.
>
> However, my problem with the font error continues on the F38 machine.
>
> What does it mean: !pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file eurm10): Font eurm10
Greetings,
Upgrading F38 on my Dell XPS 13 laptop of something like 2012 vintage w a
1TB SSD, the scriplet/upgrade to setroubleshoot-server is hanging.
Seems that it's been this way for a least 5-10 minutes while everything
before this has been running briskly.
Advice?
Max Pyziur
p...@bra
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 13:57:58 -0500
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> However, my problem with the font error continues on the F38 machine.
>
> What does it mean: !pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file eurm10): Font
> eurm10 at 720 not found
>
> Where does this come from?
I am not a texlive user, so won't be able
Thanks very much again!
I was explicitly able to update to texlive-was-svn64691-65.fc38.
However, my problem with the font error continues on the F38 machine.
What does it mean: !pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file eurm10): Font eurm10 at 720
not found
Where does this come from?
Btw, I created the
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 11:18:11 -0500
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Any more suggestions?
There was another question about this on the devel list. As near as I
can see in koji, there is no texlive-was-9 package.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5402
The rpm that contains upgreek
On 4/25/23 13:24, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/25/23 06:12, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 4/25/23 08:59, Tim Evans wrote:
On 4/25/23 08:21, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Still no fix on this.
How do I notify the proper people about this? For me, it is gthumb
that is triggering the dependency.
As some
On 4/25/23 06:12, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 4/25/23 08:59, Tim Evans wrote:
On 4/25/23 08:21, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Still no fix on this.
How do I notify the proper people about this? For me, it is gthumb
that is triggering the dependency.
As someone else pointed out:
# dnf -y --exclud
On 4/25/23 02:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/24/23 17:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't understand why you're having so much trouble.
I do beleive after fixing and upgrading to the new
networking method that what has been transpiring
was my preference to stay on the old method.
What new
On Tue Apr25'23 09:57:58AM, Jerry James wrote:
> From: Jerry James
> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 09:57:58 -0600
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: bitmap font error on F38
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:34 AM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 13:40 +, Nils Smeds wrote:
> Upgrading to FC38 I could not get a working kernel because akmod
> could not build the necessary tainted kernel modules for my NVidia
> card.
>
> The only available kernel-header RPM is from the initial release
> kernel in the fedora repo.
F3
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:34 AM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Anyone has any suggestions on how to get around this problem? What BZ report,
> if any, should I file?
Where did you get texlive-upgreek? I don't see it in Fedora.
Do you have the texlive-amsfonts package installed? That seems to be
the p
Den 2023-04-25 kl. 15:12, skrev Robert Moskowitz:
On 4/25/23 08:59, Tim Evans wrote:
On 4/25/23 08:21, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Still no fix on this.
How do I notify the proper people about this? For me, it is gthumb
that is triggering the dependency.
As someone else pointed out:
# dnf -
Anyone has any suggestions on how to get around this problem? What BZ report,
if any, should I file?
Many thanks,
Ranjan
On Fri Apr21'23 03:09:49PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> From: Ranjan Maitra
> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 15:09:49 -0500
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Communit
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 10:40 AM Nils Smeds wrote:
> Upgrading to FC38 I could not get a working kernel because akmod could not
> build the necessary tainted kernel modules for my NVidia card.
>
> The only available kernel-header RPM is from the initial release kernel in
> the fedora repo.
>
Her
Upgrading to FC38 I could not get a working kernel because akmod could not
build the necessary tainted kernel modules for my NVidia card.
The only available kernel-header RPM is from the initial release kernel in the
fedora repo.
___
users mailing list
On 4/25/23 08:59, Tim Evans wrote:
On 4/25/23 08:21, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Still no fix on this.
How do I notify the proper people about this? For me, it is gthumb
that is triggering the dependency.
As someone else pointed out:
# dnf -y --exclude='*heif*' update
Sure, that has gotten
On 4/25/23 08:21, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Still no fix on this.
How do I notify the proper people about this? For me, it is gthumb that
is triggering the dependency.
As someone else pointed out:
# dnf -y --exclude='*heif*' update
___
users mailin
Still no fix on this.
How do I notify the proper people about this? For me, it is gthumb that
is triggering the dependency.
On 4/23/23 16:07, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/23/23 13:04, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On a F37 system I have not updated in maybe a month or more, I get
the error:
Runni
On 4/25/23 02:53, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 02:03 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/24/23 17:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't understand why you're having so much trouble.
Hi Sam,
I do beleive after fixing and upgrading to the new
networking method that what has
On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 02:03 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 4/24/23 17:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > I don't understand why you're having so much trouble.
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> I do beleive after fixing and upgrading to the new
> networking method that what has been transpiring
> was my preferen
On 4/24/23 17:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't understand why you're having so much trouble.
Hi Sam,
I do beleive after fixing and upgrading to the new
networking method that what has been transpiring
was my preference to stay on the old method.
I did not see the point in changing things just f
56 matches
Mail list logo
