Tom Horsley wrote: > On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 17:49:08 -0400 > Todd Zullinger wrote: > >> s/uname -p/uname -m/ >> >> shouldn't be too much of an issue. > > Right, just have to locate the 47,321 scripts which have some variation > of that command in them. No problem at all :-).
I have good news and bad news...
This may be an opportunity to notice that the decade's long
deprecation of egrep now causes a warning to stderr too.
$ egrep . /etc/os-release >/dev/null
egrep: warning: egrep is obsolescent; using grep -E
I wasn't sure I'd live to see the day that deprecation moved
forward, but here it is. ;-)
One idea for tracking things down which aren't stored in a
place which is reasonable to grep, is a uname script which
overrides the default uname command, logs the usage of -i/-p
and the calling script, then replaces it with -m and exec's
the real uname. (Which may be just what you were already
planning.)
--
Todd
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
