antonio montagnani ha scritto il 10/11/19 alle 07:57:
stan via users ha scritto il 10/11/19 alle 01:42:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 22:20:36 +0100
antonio montagnani wrote:
after upgrading to F31, when I use the Noscript add-on for Firefox, I
note that I cannot set different options (Trusted, untruste
stan via users ha scritto il 10/11/19 alle 01:42:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 22:20:36 +0100
antonio montagnani wrote:
after upgrading to F31, when I use the Noscript add-on for Firefox, I
note that I cannot set different options (Trusted, untrusted and so
on) because mouse must be shifted left compar
stan via users ha scritto il 10/11/19 alle 01:42:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 22:20:36 +0100
antonio montagnani wrote:
after upgrading to F31, when I use the Noscript add-on for Firefox, I
note that I cannot set different options (Trusted, untrusted and so
on) because mouse must be shifted left compar
On 11/10/19 12:56 PM, sixpack13 wrote:
okay, so we are both liars !
fine by me, "endowed" with that "competence" let's fix the OP pain !
:-)
the priciest questions are (just to put AND remove in one step a topic on my
list):
- OP, do have multi-card readers in your box ?
- do you or does fedora
okay, so we are both liars !
fine by me, "endowed" with that "competence" let's fix the OP pain !
:-)
the priciest questions are (just to put AND remove in one step a topic on my
list):
- OP, do have multi-card readers in your box ?
- do you or does fedora do "magic" mapping with them ?
- are th
On 11/10/19 12:22 PM, sixpack13 wrote:
I have read more then once in the howto's regarding upgrade that one task is to
do an relabeling.
I have never seen such recommendation. I'd rather defer to what Dan Walsh has
written on the subject:
Full relabelling of an SELinux machine should almos
On 11/10/19 10:45 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I'm not going to spend any time to determine when they do and when they don't.
They appear here on multiple systems, with no lvm,
OK, I lied.
I was curious as to why some the systems here had entries like
Nov 07 12:27:42 meimei.greshko.com lvm[43966]:
> On 11/10/19 10:25 AM, sixpack13 wrote:
>
> Nope
>
> But the point is,
the point is that I don't run lvm (esp. lvm2-monitor.service) since month/years.
so I was unable to see the OP message like "lvm[14772]: /dev/sdX: open
failed: No medium found" on my box.
therefore it appeared to m
On 11/8/19 4:40 PM, Temlakos wrote:
Then I ran this command:
sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=31 --best
--allowerasing
It took many hours, but I got 2.8 gigabytes of downloads. I also
imported three GPG keys. It did successful transaction check and test.
Before anyone
On 11/10/19 10:25 AM, sixpack13 wrote:
okay,
journalctl | grep -i lvm
=>
Nov 08 03:07:27 obelix.fritz.box systemd[1]: lvm2-lvmpolld.socket: Succeeded.
Nov 08 03:07:27 obelix.fritz.box systemd[1]: Closed LVM2 poll daemon socket.
Nov 08 07:58:17 obelix.fritz.box systemd[1]: lvm2-lvmpolld.socket: Su
okay,
journalctl | grep -i lvm
=>
Nov 08 03:07:27 obelix.fritz.box systemd[1]: lvm2-lvmpolld.socket: Succeeded.
Nov 08 03:07:27 obelix.fritz.box systemd[1]: Closed LVM2 poll daemon socket.
Nov 08 07:58:17 obelix.fritz.box systemd[1]: lvm2-lvmpolld.socket: Succeeded.
Nov 08 07:58:17 obelix.fritz.box
On 11/10/19 9:59 AM, sixpack13 wrote:
On 11/10/19 3:17 AM, sixpack13 wrote:
Those are "normal". If you check your own logs you will see the same thing.
there is no need to check my log's regarding lvm entries.
here is no lvm running !
so I can't know what is "normal" on lvm boxes.
and therefo
> On 11/10/19 3:17 AM, sixpack13 wrote:
>
> Those are "normal". If you check your own logs you will see the same thing.
>
there is no need to check my log's regarding lvm entries.
here is no lvm running !
so I can't know what is "normal" on lvm boxes.
and therefore I underwrote my prev. comment
Hi All,
Apologies if I've missed something obvious.
I have 5 local fedora installations (mainly the xfce spin) on various
computers, i'd like to manage centrally.
Looking upstream at RHEL it seems that Satellite 5 was based on spacewalk,
the new version is based on foreman.
I'm not particularly fon
On 11/10/19 12:00 AM, john.mel...@gmail.com wrote:
Git it. However, it is not showing any problems that I can see.
Excerpt from the log showing a shutdown and subsequent powerup:
=== excerpt start ===
ov 08 19:14:18 localhost.localdomain audit[1]: SERVICE_START pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295
ses=
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 22:20:36 +0100
antonio montagnani wrote:
> after upgrading to F31, when I use the Noscript add-on for Firefox, I
> note that I cannot set different options (Trusted, untrusted and so
> on) because mouse must be shifted left compared to the right
> position, I apologize if I a
On 11/10/19 3:17 AM, sixpack13 wrote:
It hangs with a frozen window showing a stalled rotating
action indicator in Gnome, leaving the power on.
Wasn't hitting - I believe - ESC-Key a task to see what's going on on the
console.
what are sdb - sdf are ?
and what does the error "/dev/sdf: ope
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 19:18, sixpack13 wrote:
> It hangs with a frozen window showing a stalled rotating
> > action indicator in Gnome, leaving the power on.
> >
>
> Wasn't hitting - I believe - ESC-Key a task to see what's going on on the
> console.
>
> what are sdb - sdf are ?
> and what does
On 11/9/19 12:42 PM, Frank Elsner wrote:
the firefox of the Fedora Live system doesn't play videos which require a H.264
handler.
How to enable playing of H.264 videos? Without that I can't install.
I saw some mention that the openh264 codec was being improved to handle
playing all h264 vide
after upgrading to F31, when I use the Noscript add-on for Firefox, I
note that I cannot set different options (Trusted, untrusted and so on)
because mouse must be shifted left compared to the right position, I
apologize if I am not clear
Is anybody using Noscript add-on??
Antonio Montagnani
Hello,
the firefox of the Fedora Live system doesn't play videos which require a H.264
handler.
How to enable playing of H.264 videos? Without that I can't install.
And is the Fedora Workstation release better?
Kind regards,
Frank Elsner
___
users
On 11/7/19 1:11 AM, Jouk Jansen wrote:
When performing an upgrade from F30 to F31 on one of my machines the upgrade
process tries to install (yes an install not an upgrade) the packages
hdf.x86-64 and hdf.i686. This fails due to a mismatch in these packages of
/usr/bin/h4cc and /usr/bin/h4fc.
Do
It hangs with a frozen window showing a stalled rotating
> action indicator in Gnome, leaving the power on.
>
Wasn't hitting - I believe - ESC-Key a task to see what's going on on the
console.
what are sdb - sdf are ?
and what does the error "/dev/sdf: open failed: No medium
found" mean ?
wer
On 11/9/19 4:34 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 11/8/19 2:28 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/7/19 1:11 AM, Jouk Jansen wrote:
When performing an upgrade from F30 to F31 on one of my machines the
upgrade
process tries to install (yes an install not an upgrade) the packages
hdf.x86-64 and hdf.i686. This f
On 11/09/2019 09:56 AM, Anthony F McInerney wrote:
Yes i was also wondering when it's hanging, does the escape key work to
show the console?
Try it and find out.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 16:56:28 +
Anthony F McInerney wrote:
> > Yes i was also wondering when it's hanging, does the escape key
> > work to
> show the console?
I run a daemon that is usually sleeping at shutdown. If I don't
kill it manually, I get this error. Nothing I've tried does anythin
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 00:36:04 +0200
Kad Zayar via users wrote:
> Does that mean that the install media should appear in my uefi boot
> menu as (at least) two entries? Or are we talking about the grub menu
> that appears *after* booting from the flash drive?
Yes to the first question, an EFI entry
On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 16:35, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:00:42 -0500
> john.mel...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I guess its possible that something is not completing its shutdown
> > step, but it does not appear to be logging that omission. Any idea how
> > to isolate which is the faul
On Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:00:42 -0500
john.mel...@gmail.com wrote:
> I guess its possible that something is not completing its shutdown
> step, but it does not appear to be logging that omission. Any idea how
> to isolate which is the faulty daemon?
If you turn off rhgb and quiet on the kernel boot
On Sat, 2019-11-09 at 23:00 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/9/19 10:42 PM, john.mel...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I've had this problem ever since I moved up to Fedora 31 from
> > Fedora
> > 30. It fails to completely shutdown. It will reboot correctly,
> > but
> > not shutdown. It hangs with a froze
On 11/9/19 10:42 PM, john.mel...@gmail.com wrote:
I've had this problem ever since I moved up to Fedora 31 from Fedora
30. It fails to completely shutdown. It will reboot correctly, but
not shutdown. It hangs with a frozen window showing a stalled rotating
action indicator in Gnome, leaving th
On 11/9/19 10:14 PM, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
this is the error on dmesg
[ 15.063818] systemd[1]: systemd-modules-load.service: Failed with result
'exit-code'.
[ 15.064239] systemd[1]: Failed to start Load Kernel Modules.
I try to restart it but I got this:
[root@desk mythcat]# system
I've had this problem ever since I moved up to Fedora 31 from Fedora
30. It fails to completely shutdown. It will reboot correctly, but
not shutdown. It hangs with a frozen window showing a stalled rotating
action indicator in Gnome, leaving the power on.
The machine is an older Gateway core-i7
this is the error on dmesg
[ 15.063818] systemd[1]: systemd-modules-load.service: Failed with result
'exit-code'.
[ 15.064239] systemd[1]: Failed to start Load Kernel Modules.
I try to restart it but I got this:
[root@desk mythcat]# systemctl restart systemd-modules-load
Job for systemd-modu
On Sat, 09 Nov 2019 04:59:50 -
Not Random wrote:
> The confusing thing is that the output of 'grub2-editenv list' and grubby
> both show that currently the correct (newest) kernel is the saved kernel.
> This kernel isn't what is actually selected at boot though!
That sounds as if grub may
On 11/8/19 2:28 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/7/19 1:11 AM, Jouk Jansen wrote:
When performing an upgrade from F30 to F31 on one of my machines the upgrade
process tries to install (yes an install not an upgrade) the packages
hdf.x86-64 and hdf.i686. This fails due to a mismatch in these packages
On 11/9/19 7:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 11/9/19 2:44 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
A good place to start, but I have found it does not cover
things that go wrong. To me they are rather incomplete
but a good starting point. I reference them in my
full upgrade write up.
I'm with E
On 11/9/19 2:44 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
A good place to start, but I have found it does not cover
things that go wrong. To me they are rather incomplete
but a good starting point. I reference them in my
full upgrade write up.
I'm with Ed on this. Use the official instructions. Only*afte
Tim:
>> Doing a bit of googling, /boot/grub2/grubenv file cannot be manually
>> edited. Use the following command instead:
>>
>> [root@host ~]# grub2-set-default 0
>> [root@host ~]# grub2-editenv list
>> saved_entry=0
>>
>> That 0 should mean the most recently installed kernel.
(I should add tha
On Sat, 2019-11-09 at 00:35 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 11/8/19 10:03 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> > You happen to do things which are pretty much not what most others
> > would do.
>
> What?? Me??? Okay, guilty as charged.
>
>
> > My suggestion is that people use the official upgr
> I think the problem is that just tells Fedora to use the previously
> saved entry as its default, and there's other things (perhaps more than
> one) that determine what will actually be the default.
>
> In the old grub (which was easier to follow the instructions) if you
> wanted a particular bo
On 11/8/19 10:03 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
You happen to do things which are pretty much not what most others
would do.
What?? Me??? Okay, guilty as charged.
My suggestion is that people use the official upgrade instructions.
A good place to start, but I have found it does not cover
things
42 matches
Mail list logo
