Noted!
systemctl status sddm
● sddm.service - Simple Desktop Display Manager
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/sddm.service; enabled; vendor
preset: disabled)
Active: active (running) since Mon 2018-08-13 16:49:27 MST; 50min ago
Docs: man:sddm(1)
man:sddm.conf(5)
Main
On 08/14/18 08:27, Thomas Letherby wrote:
> Sorry, I wasn't entirely clear there, I meant the major components (GFX, CPU
> family
> etc) rather than down to any particular board rev, although It's not really
> been
> out that long, so there's probably not been any revs yet.
>
> My kids decided th
Sorry, I wasn't entirely clear there, I meant the major components (GFX,
CPU family etc) rather than down to any particular board rev, although It's
not really been out that long, so there's probably not been any revs yet.
My kids decided they'd bother my wife at the grocery store, so I dd get a
c
On 08/14/18 07:38, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:54:20 -0400
> Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>> Is this the result of my having made a wrong selection when creating the
>> VM from virt-manager? If so, I could go through the process again and
>> see what the new network[scripts should look li
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:54:20 -0400
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Is this the result of my having made a wrong selection when creating the
> VM from virt-manager? If so, I could go through the process again and
> see what the new network[scripts should look like since if I understand
> what I've read tha
On 08/13/2018 02:54 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 08/13/18 14:00, Tom Horsley wrote:
>>> Can anyone suggest what I might have wrong?
>> Is the VM using NAT networking or a bridge? If it is NAT, the VM probably
>> won't be on the 192.168.1.0 subnet. You could see what the VM thinks its
>> IP address i
On 08/13/2018 04:04 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 08/13/2018 02:54 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>> On 08/13/18 14:00, Tom Horsley wrote:
Can anyone suggest what I might have wrong?
>>> Is the VM using NAT networking or a bridge? If it is NAT, the VM probably
>>> won't be on the 192.168.1.0 subnet. Yo
On 08/13/18 14:00, Tom Horsley wrote:
Can anyone suggest what I might have wrong?
Is the VM using NAT networking or a bridge? If it is NAT, the VM probably
won't be on the 192.168.1.0 subnet. You could see what the VM thinks its
IP address is.
+
"using NAT networking or a bridge?"
Is this the
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 18:35:36 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> I had some problem with vlc after an upgrade to f28.
>
> For *one* user vlc crashed on startup with these messages:
>
> libva info: VA-API version 1.1.0
> libva info: va_getDriverName() returns 0
> libva info: Trying to op
On 08/13/2018 11:26 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 08/13/18 13:53, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 08/13/2018 10:08 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have an Fedora 28 computer with Fedora 27 running in virtual manager.
My NFS server refuses its connection although the Fedora28 computer
itself connects routinely. Pin
On 08/13/2018 11:26 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
> On 08/13/18 13:53, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> On 08/13/2018 10:08 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>>> I have an Fedora 28 computer with Fedora 27 running in virtual manager.
>>> My NFS server refuses its connection although the Fedora28 computer
>>> itself connects r
El 13/8/18 a las 20:26, Bob Goodwin escribió:
> On 08/13/18 13:53, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> On 08/13/2018 10:08 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>>> I have an Fedora 28 computer with Fedora 27 running in virtual manager.
>>> My NFS server refuses its connection although the Fedora28 computer
>>> itself connec
On 08/13/18 13:53, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 08/13/2018 10:08 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I have an Fedora 28 computer with Fedora 27 running in virtual manager.
My NFS server refuses its connection although the Fedora28 computer
itself connects routinely. Ping and ssh can connect to the NFS server
from
On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 13:08:25 -0400
Bob Goodwin wrote:
> Can anyone suggest what I might have wrong?
Is the VM using NAT networking or a bridge? If it is NAT, the VM probably
won't be on the 192.168.1.0 subnet. You could see what the VM thinks its
IP address is.
___
Den 2018-08-13 kl. 19:08, skrev Bob Goodwin:
>
> I have an Fedora 28 computer with Fedora 27 running in virtual manager.
> My NFS server refuses its connection although the Fedora28 computer
> itself connects routinely. Ping and ssh can connect to the NFS server
> from the VM. Stopping Firewalld a
On 08/13/2018 10:08 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> I have an Fedora 28 computer with Fedora 27 running in virtual manager.
> My NFS server refuses its connection although the Fedora28 computer
> itself connects routinely. Ping and ssh can connect to the NFS server
> from the VM. Stopping Firewalld and
I have an Fedora 28 computer with Fedora 27 running in virtual manager.
My NFS server refuses its connection although the Fedora28 computer
itself connects routinely. Ping and ssh can connect to the NFS server
from the VM. Stopping Firewalld and setenforce 0 in the VM make no
difference.
NF
Bonjour,
I had some problem with vlc after an upgrade to f28.
For *one* user vlc crashed on startup with these messages:
libva info: VA-API version 1.1.0
libva info: va_getDriverName() returns 0
libva info: Trying to open /usr/lib64/dri/i965_drv_video.so
libva info: va_openDriver() returns -1
[0
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_gu
Samuel Sieb writes:
> On 08/12/2018 06:20 AM, Jarmo Hurri wrote:
>> So I needed to dig rpmfusion-free key from https://pgp.mit.edu/ and
>> include it in my Ansible playbook.
>
> Why don't you just install the rpmfusion-*-release packages which
> include the keys?
Good question; the reason was th
20 matches
Mail list logo
