I installed by Yum Extender (Dnf) i.e. the graphical interface, and the
list that I am referring to is the list in the graphical interface, not in
the terminal, that I used a short ago
$ dnf info vlc
Ultima verifica della scadenza dei metadati: 0:22:02 fa il Wed Jun 22
08:00:25 2016.
Pacchetti ins
On Jun 22, 2016 01:45, "Samuel Sieb" wrote:
>
> On 06/21/2016 10:01 PM, Eric Griffith wrote:
>>
>> I was using my system earlier tonight, trying to get a couple games
>> working in wine. Everything was fine.. until I ran PlayOnLinux. It
>> errored out with saying it couldn't find any OpenGL driver
On 06/22/16 14:05, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> msttcorefonts-2.5-1.noarch is no longer available, but have a copy, so
> manually install it.
This has been replaced by msttcore-fonts-installer-2.6-1.noarch
--
You're Welcome Zachary Quinto
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
Question on setup machine after clean install?
This is the process I've been using.
rpm --qf "%{NAME}\n" -qa | sort | grep -v gpg-pubkey | grep -v kmod-V | grep
-v google-earth > installed_pkgs.txt
Copy all *.repo files from /etc/yum.repos.d
Copy files from /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/
After putting copi
After having installed the F24 Beta x86-64 workstation and running it
since some weeks without problems, I tried to burn the recently released
F24 Workstation image
Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-24-1.2.iso
to a DVD using k3b. But k3b crashes immediately after selecting the F24
downloaded im
On 06/21/2016 10:47 PM, Antonio M wrote:
I find amusing that when I check a package in the Dnf list also packages
installed from UnitedRpms are listed as installed from System Is it
right?? I suppose no
How did you install it? And what command are you using to check that?
# dnf info drico
I find amusing that when I check a package in the Dnf list also packages
installed from UnitedRpms are listed as installed from System Is it
right?? I suppose no
Antonio Montagnani
Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation)
inviato da Gmail
2016-06-22 7:43 GMT+02:00 Samuel Sieb :
> On 06/21/2016 10:19 P
On 06/21/2016 10:01 PM, Eric Griffith wrote:
I was using my system earlier tonight, trying to get a couple games
working in wine. Everything was fine.. until I ran PlayOnLinux. It
errored out with saying it couldn't find any OpenGL drivers for my
laptop (Intel Broadwell). Thought it was odd, but
On 06/21/2016 10:19 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/22/16 13:15, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 06/21/2016 10:04 PM, Antonio M wrote:
a silly question, how do you understand that a package is signed in any
repo?? apart from the warning of dnf, of course
That would be the primary way. Otherwise, if y
On 06/22/16 13:15, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 06/21/2016 10:04 PM, Antonio M wrote:
>> a silly question, how do you understand that a package is signed in any
>> repo?? apart from the warning of dnf, of course
>>
> That would be the primary way. Otherwise, if you have rpmdevtools installed,
> y
On 06/21/2016 10:04 PM, Antonio M wrote:
a silly question, how do you understand that a package is signed in any
repo?? apart from the warning of dnf, of course
That would be the primary way. Otherwise, if you have rpmdevtools
installed, you can download the rpm and run rpmdev-checksig on
a silly question, how do you understand that a package is signed in any
repo?? apart from the warning of dnf, of course
Antonio Montagnani
Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation)
inviato da Gmail
2016-06-22 6:31 GMT+02:00 Ed Greshko :
>
>
> On 06/22/16 12:27, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 06/21/2016 09:1
Hey guys and gals. I'm at my wit's end on this one...
I was using my system earlier tonight, trying to get a couple games working
in wine. Everything was fine.. until I ran PlayOnLinux. It errored out with
saying it couldn't find any OpenGL drivers for my laptop (Intel Broadwell).
Thought it was o
On 06/22/16 12:27, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 06/21/2016 09:12 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 06/22/16 11:59, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>>
>>> I'll admit that the risk is hypothetical, but what does rpmfusion's flux
>>> have to do with the risk of allowing unsigned packages?
>>
>> It was only one package t
On 06/21/2016 09:12 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/22/16 11:59, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I'll admit that the risk is hypothetical, but what does rpmfusion's flux
have to do with the risk of allowing unsigned packages?
It was only one package that was unsigned, and it came from rpmfusion, and they
On 06/22/16 11:59, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> I'll admit that the risk is hypothetical, but what does rpmfusion's flux
> have to do with the risk of allowing unsigned packages?
It was only one package that was unsigned, and it came from rpmfusion, and they
are in the
middle of putting up an new inf
On 06/21/2016 08:43 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Generally speaking, yes. But considering the flux rpmfusion is in these days
and I deemed
the risk rather low.
I'll admit that the risk is hypothetical, but what does rpmfusion's flux
have to do with the risk of allowing unsigned packages?
(Bearin
On 06/22/16 11:36, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/21/2016 07:41 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> Anyway I did try to update a system here and the OP's issue came up for me
>> and I read the
>> error message properly and simply added the --nogpgcheck to the dnf command.
>
>
> That works, but it's terrible
On 06/21/2016 07:41 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Anyway I did try to update a system here and the OP's issue came up for me and
I read the
error message properly and simply added the --nogpgcheck to the dnf command.
That works, but it's terrible practice. Those packages are (probably)
downloaded o
On 06/22/16 10:41, Ed Greshko wrote:
> You're not talking about the same issue as the OP.
I did not mean to leave that in my reply.
--
You're Welcome Zachary Quinto
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproje
On 06/21/16 23:45, Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno mar, 21/06/2016 alle 22.07 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
>> You could try disabling all the rpmfusion repos and try again to
>> upgrade.
> This is not the solution.
>
> If I disable rpmfusion repo the update fails:
You're not talking about the sa
On 06/21/2016 07:14 PM, Dylan Thiedeke wrote:
You could always set up the account as a second email account using IMAP,
download all the messages and then move them across to your POP based account.
Or if it were me I'd restructure my IMAP account to use the folder settings I
was using under
You could always set up the account as a second email account using IMAP,
download all the messages and then move them across to your POP based account.
Or if it were me I'd restructure my IMAP account to use the folder settings I
was using under POP and revert to using that. I use offlineimap a
On 06/21/2016 06:37 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/21/2016 05:31 PM, jd1008 wrote:
How can I force them to be downloaded again?
Use IMAP, and drag-and-drop to copy the messages.
--
But that will wreck my current folders in TB.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
On 06/21/2016 05:31 PM, jd1008 wrote:
How can I force them to be downloaded again?
Use IMAP, and drag-and-drop to copy the messages.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedora
Had a disk corruption and lost inbox messages from Dec 17, 2015 to June
15, 2016
So, I followed the tips online:
1. Exit TB
2. Login to gmail account via browser
3. Click on cogwheel on upper left of browser screen
4. Select Settings
5. Click on Forwarding and POP/IMAP
6. Click on Enable POP for
Ha! I found the /etc/vconsole.conf file with some google searching. I can
define FONT in there to be latarcyrheb-sun32 and now I get characters the size
of 4 gnats instead of just one :-).
Much more readable when booting.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or chan
I'm glad it working. You’re welcome, I was happy to do it. I know you’d do
the same for me and someone else.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Antonio M
wrote:
> very useful indeed!!! tnx to all
>
> Antonio Montagnani
>
> Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation)
> inviato da Gmail
>
> 2016-06-21 19:53 GMT+0
very useful indeed!!! tnx to all
Antonio Montagnani
Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation)
inviato da Gmail
2016-06-21 19:53 GMT+02:00 Paul W. Frields :
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:52:30PM +0200, Antonio M wrote:
> > Alla packages are downloaded, but when I get the following warning:
> > Errore: Il pac
On 06/21/2016 09:26 AM, David Aldrich wrote:
I can't see anything relevant in the journal but it is like looking for a
needle in a haystack.
Try piping the output through grep, looking for I127-V to get rid of all
of that hay.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscrib
Try to disable rpmfusion repo, before upgrading and then..
sudo dnf config-manager –set-disabled rpmfusion-free
> sudo dnf config-manager –set-disabled rpmfusion-nonfree
> sudo dnf config-manager –set-disabled rpmfusion-free-updates
> sudo dnf config-manager –set-disabled rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 03:52:30PM +0200, Antonio M wrote:
> Alla packages are downloaded, but when I get the following warning:
> Errore: Il pacchetto libmpg123-1.22.4-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm non è firmato
> (unsigned)
>
> but it is not installed
> [root@pcdesktop1 antonio]# rpm -qa libmpg123-1.22.4-1.
At long last, my Nvidia Maxwell card worked out of the box on
my 4K monitor using the nouveau drivers that come with fedora 24!
I no longer need the nvidia binaries to get a non-black screen :-).
But speaking of 4K monitors, in tty mode during boot the characters
are about the size of gnats.
Will
On 06/21/2016 09:26 AM, David Aldrich wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
>> Does it show up still in lspci? If not, then check your BIOS settings.
>
> An Intel I217-V Ethernet Controller does show in lspci.
>
>> If yes, then check "journalctl -b" to see there's any clue.
>
> I can't see anythin
Hi, David,
It seems as if somehow, after inserting the HP card and rebooting, the
network driver of
eno1 was not loaded (though it should have).
If this is the case, you can load the driver manually.
What does ethtool -i enpls0f0 and enpls0f1 show ?
And more important: what does ethtool -i eno1
Thanks for your reply.
> Does it show up still in lspci? If not, then check your BIOS settings.
An Intel I217-V Ethernet Controller does show in lspci.
> If yes, then check "journalctl -b" to see there's any clue.
I can't see anything relevant in the journal but it is like looking for a
needl
Hi there, you can refer here too
https://fedoramagazine.org/upgrading-fedora-23-workstation-to-fedora-24/ if
you using RPMfusion repo. I suggest you to wait a while, some package are
not available right now.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
wrote:
> Today it's my birthday and I d
On 06/21/2016 07:33 AM, David Aldrich wrote:
I have a machine running Fedora 22. The motherboard provides an Ethernet
network adaptor, which I connect to our office network. I want to add an HP
Ethernet 10Gb 2-port 560SFP+ adapter to support a local subnet, but retain the
original motherboard
Il giorno mar, 21/06/2016 alle 22.07 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
> You could try disabling all the rpmfusion repos and try again to
> upgrade.
This is not the solution.
If I disable rpmfusion repo the update fails:
> package mencoder-1.2.1-2.fc23.x86_64 requires libavcodec.so.56()(64bit), but
I have a machine running Fedora 22. The motherboard provides an Ethernet
network adaptor, which I connect to our office network. I want to add an HP
Ethernet 10Gb 2-port 560SFP+ adapter to support a local subnet, but retain the
original motherboard adaptor and connection to the office network.
On 06/21/16 21:52, Antonio M wrote:
> [root@pcdesktop1 antonio]# rpm -qa libmpg123-1.22.4-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm
Oh, and since you're on F24-n it wouldn't be installed
rpm -q libmpg123
No a.
--
You're Welcome Zachary Quinto
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
Hi Antonio,
Den 2016-06-21 kl. 15:52, skrev Antonio M:
> Alla packages are downloaded, but when I get the following warning:
> Errore: Il pacchetto libmpg123-1.22.4-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm non è firmato
> (unsigned)
>
> but it is not installed
> [root@pcdesktop1 antonio]# rpm -qa libmpg123-1.22.4-1.fc2
On 06/21/16 21:52, Antonio M wrote:
> Alla packages are downloaded, but when I get the following warning:
> Errore: Il pacchetto libmpg123-1.22.4-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm non è firmato
> (unsigned)
>
> but it is not installed
> [root@pcdesktop1 antonio]# rpm -qa libmpg123-1.22.4-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm
> [ro
Today it's my birthday and I discovered that one of the gifts for me is
Fedora 24...
Thanks to all the developers and contributors ;-)
I'm going to update during the next few days
Keep on!
BTW: is still the link below the right one to upgrade from Fedora 23 to
Fedora 24:
https://fedoraproject.or
Alla packages are downloaded, but when I get the following warning:
Errore: Il pacchetto libmpg123-1.22.4-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm non è firmato
(unsigned)
but it is not installed
[root@pcdesktop1 antonio]# rpm -qa libmpg123-1.22.4-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm
[root@pcdesktop1 antonio]#
then
[root@pcdesktop1 anton
45 matches
Mail list logo
