a silly question, how do you understand that a package is signed in any repo?? apart from the warning of dnf, of course....
Antonio Montagnani Linux Fedora 24 (Workstation) inviato da Gmail 2016-06-22 6:31 GMT+02:00 Ed Greshko <ed.gres...@greshko.com>: > > > On 06/22/16 12:27, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 06/21/2016 09:12 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> On 06/22/16 11:59, Gordon Messmer wrote: > >> > >>> I'll admit that the risk is hypothetical, but what does rpmfusion's > flux > >>> have to do with the risk of allowing unsigned packages? > >> > >> It was only one package that was unsigned, and it came from rpmfusion, > and they are in the > >> middle of putting up an new infrastructure. So not unthinkable a > package had slipped thru > >> unsigned. > > > > dnf stops at the first unsigned package. All the rpmfusion F24 packages > are currently > > in the updates-testing repository and are unsigned. > > Right, and that is why I suggested I should have disable just the > rpmfusion check. > > In any event.... If you are worried, don't upgrade. If you're not > worried, upgrade. > Your choice. > > -- > You're Welcome Zachary Quinto > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org >
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
