On 07/02/14 12:24, JD wrote:
I have a 2.5" drive, 7200RPM and eSATA 3 (6gbps) drive.
If I put it in an enclosure that is eSATA 2 (3gbps),
how much impact does it have on the drive's performance
using the various i/o throughput benchmarking apps,
compared with if the enclosure supported 6gbps?
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 9:38 PM, 王超 wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:09 AM, JD wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 8:54 PM, 王超 wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> After installing Fedora 20, I switched to tty2 and did a yum update
>>> there. The charging splash screen took over the screen at
Actually, I unplugged the ethernet when yum started to rebuild delta. I
don't think it could be the downloading progress since the first warning
message shows that the update/installation had already begun.
Regards,
Wang Chao
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:09 AM, JD wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 8:54 PM, 王超 wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> After installing Fedora 20, I switched to tty2 and did a yum update there.
> The charging splash screen took over the screen at some point and I cannot
> switch to any other tty. So I waited until I believe the transcaction is
> done an
Hi everyone,
After installing Fedora 20, I switched to tty2 and did a yum update there.
The charging splash screen took over the screen at some point and I cannot
switch to any other tty. So I waited until I believe the transcaction is
done and did a forced shutdown.
I rebooted and everything see
On 03.07.2014 03:53, Bill Oliver wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul 2014, poma wrote:
Yeah, it would be good to hear from the service provider that everything is
OK on their side, so you're 120% sure.
It is always good practice.
poma,
Actually, cotse.net is one of the more responsive companies I've dea
Tim writes:
Sounds like a good idea to have something by default (i.e. as part the
system, not just a user kludge) that looks out for failed services post
boot, and tries to get them working after a small delay.
I'm about half-way to figuring out how to kludge this with:
systemctl --failed |
On Thu, 3 Jul 2014, poma wrote:
Yeah, it would be good to hear from the service provider that everything is
OK on their side, so you're 120% sure.
It is always good practice.
poma,
Actually, cotse.net is one of the more responsive companies I've dealt
with. They don't do much hand-holdi
07/02/2014 06:10 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 07/02/2014 03:22 PM, Stephen Morris issued this missive:
On 07/02/2014 08:29 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/02/14 05:45, Stephen Morris wrote:
I'm using Thunderbird which like Ed's is configured to send both
text and html. Like Ed said there is po
On 03.07.2014 03:01, JD wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:40 PM, poma wrote:
On 03.07.2014 02:08, JD wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:46 PM, poma wrote:
On 02.07.2014 19:24, JD wrote:
I have a 2.5" drive, 7200RPM and eSATA 3 (6gbps) drive.
If I put it in an enclosure that is eSATA 2 (
On 07/02/2014 03:22 PM, Stephen Morris issued this missive:
On 07/02/2014 08:29 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/02/14 05:45, Stephen Morris wrote:
I'm using Thunderbird which like Ed's is configured to send both
text and html. Like Ed said there is potentially an issue at your end
or Rahul's
On 03.07.2014 02:28, Bill Oliver wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, poma wrote:
No joy. I have a support call into my virtual machine vendor. I'll see
if they have any words of wisdom.
billo
Which virtual machine vendor?
poma
Cotse.net
billo
Yeah, it would be good to hear from the
On 03.07.2014 02:51, Bill Oliver wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Bill Oliver wrote:
No joy. I have a support call into my virtual machine vendor. I'll see
if they have any words of wisdom.
billo
Well, for what it's worth, I still don't know why this happens but:
1) My vendor hasn't changed
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:40 PM, poma wrote:
> On 03.07.2014 02:08, JD wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:46 PM, poma wrote:
>>
>> On 02.07.2014 19:24, JD wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a 2.5" drive, 7200RPM and eSATA 3 (6gbps) drive.
If I put it in an enclosure that is eSATA 2 (3gbps),
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Bill Oliver wrote:
No joy. I have a support call into my virtual machine vendor. I'll see
if they have any words of wisdom.
billo
Well, for what it's worth, I still don't know why this happens but:
1) My vendor hasn't changed anything recently.
2) On the target mach
On 03.07.2014 02:08, JD wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:46 PM, poma wrote:
On 02.07.2014 19:24, JD wrote:
I have a 2.5" drive, 7200RPM and eSATA 3 (6gbps) drive.
If I put it in an enclosure that is eSATA 2 (3gbps),
how much impact does it have on the drive's performance
using the various i/
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, poma wrote:
No joy. I have a support call into my virtual machine vendor. I'll see
if they have any words of wisdom.
billo
Which virtual machine vendor?
poma
Cotse.net
billo
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscript
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:46 PM, poma wrote:
> On 02.07.2014 19:24, JD wrote:
>
>> I have a 2.5" drive, 7200RPM and eSATA 3 (6gbps) drive.
>>
>> If I put it in an enclosure that is eSATA 2 (3gbps),
>> how much impact does it have on the drive's performance
>> using the various i/o throughput bench
On 07/02/2014 11:03 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
Hi all,
Running f20 and firefox 30.0.
Firefox now starts in "Offline" mode. This is very annoying to me.
I've never found a need to use a browser offline.
I've looked at every preference, about:config setting, and I haven't
been able to find a way to
07/02/2014 03:42 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 06:15 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/03/14 05:03, Mike Wright wrote:
Running f20 and firefox 30.0.
Firefox now starts in "Offline" mode. This is very annoying to me. I've never
found a need to use a browser offline.
I've
On 07/02/2014 03:42 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Or actually configure NetworkManager consistently. IOW if NM is running,
you need to check that it is managing the network interface, otherwise
some apps (Evolution being another one) will think the network is down
when it isn't.
Several years
On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 06:15 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/03/14 05:03, Mike Wright wrote:
> > Running f20 and firefox 30.0.
> >
> > Firefox now starts in "Offline" mode. This is very annoying to me. I've
> > never found a need to use a browser offline.
> >
> > I've looked at every preference,
On 07/02/2014 08:29 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/02/14 05:45, Stephen Morris wrote:
I'm using Thunderbird which like Ed's is configured to send both text and
html. Like Ed said there is potentially an issue at your end or Rahul's end, as
further to what you are seeing when I replied to yo
On 07/03/14 05:03, Mike Wright wrote:
> Running f20 and firefox 30.0.
>
> Firefox now starts in "Offline" mode. This is very annoying to me. I've
> never found a need to use a browser offline.
>
> I've looked at every preference, about:config setting, and I haven't been
> able to find a way to s
Hi all,
This is still going awry
[root@munich]/home/benfell# systemctl status postfix
postfix.service - Postfix Mail Transport Agent
Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/postfix.service; enabled)
Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed 2014-07-02 05:00:31 PDT; 9h
ago
Process: 1
Hi all,
Running f20 and firefox 30.0.
Firefox now starts in "Offline" mode. This is very annoying to me.
I've never found a need to use a browser offline.
I've looked at every preference, about:config setting, and I haven't
been able to find a way to start firefox in "Online" mode.
Any he
On 02.07.2014 22:43, Bill Oliver wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Rick Stevens wrote:
I hit a similar thing on my F19 machine. The fix I had was (as root):
echo "0" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_sack
(I did this on the advice of our in-house network guru) I then added
these to the end of my /etc
On 02.07.2014 09:49, George R Goffe wrote:
Hi,
I have a Fedora 19 system with several large 2-4TB drives attached via USB-SATA
docking stations.
I'm seeing a problem whereby a specific filesystem that hasn't been accessed
for some time and is REALLY slow to respond to initial requests. ls -al
On Jun 30, 2014, at 9:44 PM, Roman Kravets wrote:
> [softded@softded ~]$ mount | grep xfs
> /dev/mapper/encrypt-store on /mnt/store type xfs
> (rw,noatime,nodiratime,attr2,inode64,sunit=1024,swidth=2048,noquota)
> [softded@softded ~]$ xfs_info /dev/mapper/encrypt-store
> meta-data=/dev/mapper/
On 02.07.2014 19:24, JD wrote:
I have a 2.5" drive, 7200RPM and eSATA 3 (6gbps) drive.
If I put it in an enclosure that is eSATA 2 (3gbps),
how much impact does it have on the drive's performance
using the various i/o throughput benchmarking apps,
compared with if the enclosure supported 6gbps?
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Rick Stevens wrote:
I hit a similar thing on my F19 machine. The fix I had was (as root):
echo "0" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_sack
(I did this on the advice of our in-house network guru) I then added
these to the end of my /etc/sysctl.conf file so it gets set on the n
On Jul 2, 2014, at 1:49 AM, George R Goffe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Fedora 19 system with several large 2-4TB drives attached via
> USB-SATA docking stations.
>
> I'm seeing a problem whereby a specific filesystem that hasn't been accessed
> for some time and is REALLY slow to respond to in
On 02.07.2014, Rick Stevens wrote:
> I don't know of a way to control either the size of the cache or its
> retention period. It might be controllable via a sysctl, but I've never
> tried to bugger things like that.
Look at parameters which can control the kernels virtual memory
management, e.g.
On 07/02/2014 11:36 AM, George R Goffe issued this missive:
Rick,
Thanks for your info. I'll check this out as well. I have used hdparm -B
to get and set the APM values... All the drives including the system
drive were set to 128. I have set them to 255 now so we'll see what happens.
Actually,
Rick,
Thanks for your info. I'll check this out as well. I have used hdparm -B to get
and set the APM values... All the drives including the system drive were set to
128. I have set them to 255 now so we'll see what happens.
Actually, the behavior makes me think of a cache that has been emptied
On 07/02/2014 06:49 AM, Bill Oliver issued this missive:
Another update. It only happens when trying to send to my virtual
machine -- I can ftp to at least two other places just fine using vpn.
I hit a similar thing on my F19 machine. The fix I had was (as root):
echo "0" >/proc/sys/
On 07/02/2014 12:49 AM, George R Goffe issued this missive:
Hi,
I have a Fedora 19 system with several large 2-4TB drives attached via USB-SATA
docking stations.
I'm seeing a problem whereby a specific filesystem that hasn't been accessed
for some time and is REALLY slow to respond to initial
I have a 2.5" drive, 7200RPM and eSATA 3 (6gbps) drive.
If I put it in an enclosure that is eSATA 2 (3gbps),
how much impact does it have on the drive's performance
using the various i/o throughput benchmarking apps,
compared with if the enclosure supported 6gbps?
(assume that that controller in
Hi,
Thank you for the response.
hdparm -B showed the APM settings at 128, even the system drive. I have reset
them to 255 and verified that these settings are in place.
I will report on the status of this tomorrow.
Again, thanks for the response.
George...
--
users mailing list
users@lists
Allegedly, on or about 01 July 2014, David Benfell sent:
> For now, I'm modifying the afflicted service files and adding a cron
> job to run systemctl --failed.
Sounds like a good idea to have something by default (i.e. as part the
system, not just a user kludge) that looks out for failed service
Another update. It only happens when trying to send to my virtual machine -- I
can ftp to at least two other places just fine using vpn.
billo
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/us
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/02/14 10:51, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/02/14 09:36, Bill Oliver wrote:
227 Entering Passive Mode (50,7,12,26,124,13)
150 Ok to send data.
Hang!
Works fine if I don't use a vpn. I run a roundcube server on the same machine,
and I can download image
Michael Hannon wrote:
> Thanks, Hugh. I enabled the repo, as per your (untested) suggestion,
> did the yum update, and voila, I got duplex printing. This was
> success with only one document, and if the update is going to break
> other things, it hasn't had time to do that. But things look very
On 02.07.2014, George R Goffe wrote:
> I'm seeing a problem whereby a specific filesystem that hasn't been
> accessed for some time and is REALLY slow to respond to initial
> requests.
Looks like there is some power management which puts the device to
sleep/spin down. Try disabling that. Also h
On 07/02/14 15:49, George R Goffe wrote:
> have a Fedora 19 system with several large 2-4TB drives attached via
> USB-SATA docking stations.
>
> I'm seeing a problem whereby a specific filesystem that hasn't been accessed
> for some time and is REALLY slow to respond to initial requests. ls -alt
Thanks, Hugh. I enabled the repo, as per your (untested) suggestion,
did the yum update, and voila, I got duplex printing. This was
success with only one document, and if the update is going to break
other things, it hasn't had time to do that. But things look very
good so far. Thanks again.
-
Hi,
I have a Fedora 19 system with several large 2-4TB drives attached via USB-SATA
docking stations.
I'm seeing a problem whereby a specific filesystem that hasn't been accessed
for some time and is REALLY slow to respond to initial requests. ls -alt for
example takes a substantial bit of tim
| From: D. Hugh Redelmeier
| Please sign up for bz 1035090 and whine :-)
| That may increase the priority for backporting the already-fixed
| pdftops.
New alternative: try my COPR. I've assembled a version of poppler
that seems to fix the problem. And be compatible with the rest of
F20.
See <
48 matches
Mail list logo
