On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 07:33:27 +0200,
Ahmad Samir wrote:
Personally, I am not with or against this change, but here's their
rationale http://limi.net/checkboxes-that-kill
They really downplay the extra security risk of enabling javascript.
And they really are placing the blame in the wro
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 16:45:02 -0700,
"T.C. Hollingsworth" wrote:
Yeah, just use NoScript. They probably killed it because that's what
anyone who used that checkbox really wants. Makes sense to me.
NoScript isn't as safe in at least some regards. There are some places
that javascript i
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 01:44:45 +0200,
Andras Simon wrote:
2013/8/10, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার :
Yes, I'd just use noscript. It gives you much finer grained control
than a simple manual on/off option any way.
Last time I tried it, I concluded that manual on/off was much better
for me. But th
On 10 August 2013 01:34, Andras Simon wrote:
> "... and user-set values will be reset to the default" according to
> http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/
>
> Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable.
>
> What do people suggest? The NoScript addon? A d
On 07/23/2013 11:03 PM, Roger wrote:
> After that I tried to upgrade from nouveau to NVIDIA drivers.
>
> Why?
vdpau and XvMC
When nouveau support them, I'll reconsider. Buts its been years now,
and still no support for them in nouveau.
--
Kevin J. Cummings
kjch...@verizon.net
cummi...@kjcho
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> but more frustrating is the general attitude all over the software
> wold to hide any options because the developers thinking all their
> users are idiots and finally the next generation of users *will* be
> idiots because they never had a c
Am 10.08.2013 01:34, schrieb Andras Simon:
> "... and user-set values will be reset to the default" according to
> http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/
>
> Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable.
>
> What do people suggest? The NoScript addon? A
On 10/08/2013 06:03, Anthony Messina wrote:
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 05:47:57 AM Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming
wrote:
It's no longer in /etc/sysconfig/iptables.
Fedora 19 used FirewallD by default. If you prefer to use the iptables
initscripts, you need to install iptables-services and
2013/8/10, Fernando Cassia :
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
>> What do people suggest? The NoScript addon? A different browser? I
>> don't believe I'm the only one who hates JS and only switches it on
>> for websites that absolutely require it.
>
> Prefbar
> http://prefbar.m
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
> What do people suggest? The NoScript addon? A different browser? I
> don't believe I'm the only one who hates JS and only switches it on
> for websites that absolutely require it.
Prefbar
http://prefbar.mozdev.org
F8 to show/hide, there's a ch
2013/8/10, T.C. Hollingsworth :
> On Friday, August 9, 2013, Andras Simon wrote:
>> 2013/8/10, T.C. Hollingsworth :
>>
>>> Yeah, just use NoScript. They probably killed it because that's what
>>> anyone who used that checkbox really wants.
>>
>> I'm not sure I do. But thanks for the suggestion an
On Friday, August 9, 2013, Andras Simon wrote:
> 2013/8/10, T.C. Hollingsworth :
>
>> Yeah, just use NoScript. They probably killed it because that's what
>> anyone who used that checkbox really wants.
>
> I'm not sure I do. But thanks for the suggestion anyway!
Well, in addition to the per-site
On Sat 10 August 2013 01:44:45 Andras Simon wrote:
> 2013/8/10, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার :
> > Yes, I'd just use noscript. It gives you much finer grained control
> > than a simple manual on/off option any way.
>
> Last time I tried it, I concluded that manual on/off was much better
> for me. But tha
2013/8/10, T.C. Hollingsworth :
> Yeah, just use NoScript. They probably killed it because that's what
> anyone who used that checkbox really wants.
I'm not sure I do. But thanks for the suggestion anyway!
Andras
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subs
2013/8/10, Andre Robatino :
> Andras Simon gmail.com> writes:
>
>> "... and user-set values will be reset to the default" according to
>> http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/
>>
>> Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable.
>
> Under about:config , set
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 07:21:32 AM Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming
wrote:
> On 10/08/2013 06:03, Anthony Messina wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 10, 2013 05:47:57 AM Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming
> >
> > wrote:
> >> It's no longer in /etc/sysconfig/iptables.
> >
> > Fedora 19 used Fir
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Andras Simon wrote:
> "... and user-set values will be reset to the default" according to
> http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/
>
> Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable.
>
> What do people suggest? The NoScript add
2013/8/10, আনন্দ কুমার সমাদ্দার :
> Yes, I'd just use noscript. It gives you much finer grained control
> than a simple manual on/off option any way.
Last time I tried it, I concluded that manual on/off was much better
for me. But that was years ago, noscript may have improved, and I
don't seem
Andras Simon gmail.com> writes:
> "... and user-set values will be reset to the default" according to
> http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/
>
> Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable.
Under about:config , set javascript.enabled to "false" .
-
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 01:34:24 +0200
Andras Simon wrote:
> "... and user-set values will be reset to the default" according to
> http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/
>
> Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable.
>
> What do people suggest? The NoScri
"... and user-set values will be reset to the default" according to
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/23.0/releasenotes/
Thank you Mozilla Foundation, you have just made my netbook unusable.
What do people suggest? The NoScript addon? A different browser? I
don't believe I'm the only one who h
On Friday, August 09, 2013 10:56:16 PM Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming
wrote:
> When I installed virt-manager in Ubuntu, it created a network bridge
> called virbr0.
The bridge is created when you configure and start libvirtd. -A
--
Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amess
On Saturday, August 10, 2013 05:47:57 AM Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming
wrote:
> It's no longer in /etc/sysconfig/iptables.
Fedora 19 used FirewallD by default. If you prefer to use the iptables
initscripts, you need to install iptables-services and issue 'systemctl
disable firewalld'.
-A
On 9 August 2013 17:47, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang
Enming) wrote:
> It's no longer in /etc/sysconfig/iptables.
>
Hi:
Mine are there...
[casep@ip36 ~]$ sudo cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables
# Firewall configuration written by system-config-firewall
# Manual customization of this file is
Hi,
When I installed virt-manager in Ubuntu, it created a network bridge
called virbr0.
Now that I have installed virt-manager in Fedora 19, it did not create a
network bridge.
So how do I create a network bridge? Is virt-manager supposed to create
a network bridge?
I installed virt-mana
Am 09.08.2013 16:12, schrieb Zdenek Pytela:
> Georgios Petasis pise:
>> In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl
>> through apache rivet) which implements a "heavy" application,
>> something that takes some minutes to start when apache starts a new
>> process.
>>
>> Is the
It's no longer in /etc/sysconfig/iptables.
--
Yours sincerely,
Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http:
On 08/08/2013 09:53, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:45:27PM +0800, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming
(Zhang Enming) wrote:
Hi,
I have just installed virt-manager in Fedora 19. I have looked into
the /etc/init.d directory but I can't find any init scripts for
libvirt.
Is lib
Am 09.08.2013 10:03, schrieb Georgios Petasis:
> In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl through
> apache rivet) which implements a "heavy"
> application, something that takes some minutes to start when apache starts a
> new process.
>
> Is there a way to "separate" the
Am 08.08.2013 23:41, schrieb David:
> On 8/8/2013 5:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> who cares in context of the official release?
>
>> these are *completly* different binaries with completly different
>> shared libraries and a different compiler, they have *nothing*
>> common with distribution pa
Am 08.08.2013 23:12, schrieb David:
> I can not say anything about "extensions installed with yum". I use
> the official extensions from Mozilla. And they work regardless what
> Fedora does.
well, so don't complainif you can't say anything
>> "long before* is laughable in case of FF23
> I was u
Am 08.08.2013 23:04, schrieb David:
> On 8/8/2013 4:47 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>> On 08/08/2013 01:34 PM, David wrote:
>>> I can certainly agree with not following the Daily/Nightly, Alphas and
>>> Betas but the official(s) IMHO should arrive more quickly.
>>
>> The people doing the packaging and test
Am 08.08.2013 22:56, schrieb David:
> On 8/8/2013 4:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Am 08.08.2013 22:34, schrieb David:
>>> On 8/8/2013 4:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> I was wondering if there was some problem here with Fedora
>>>
mostly bad timing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show
Am 08.08.2013 22:34, schrieb David:
> On 8/8/2013 4:26 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> I was wondering if there was some problem here with Fedora
>
>> mostly bad timing
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977325
>
> Not to insult anyone but... This same situation happens with each
> off
Am 08.08.2013 21:50, schrieb David:
> On 8/8/2013 3:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> * patience * koji * yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update
>> firefox\* xulrunner\* thunderbird\*
>
>> choose one of them :-)
>
>> the 'regular user' implicitly chooses option 1
>
> True. But they are not yet '
Am 08.08.2013 20:48, schrieb David:
> Does anyone have any idea when we can expect Firefox 23 and Thunderbird
> 17.08?
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q thunderbird
thunderbird-17.0.8-1.fc18.x86_64
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q firefox
firefox-23.0-1.fc18.x86_64
[harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q xulrunner
Am 08.08.2013 21:34, schrieb David:
> On 8/8/2013 2:50 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Am 08.08.2013 20:48, schrieb David:
>>> Does anyone have any idea when we can expect Firefox 23 and
>>> Thunderbird 17.08?
>
>> [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ rpm -q thunderbird
>> thunderbird-17.0.8-1.fc18.x86_64
>
>>
Am 08.08.2013 21:52, schrieb Mark Haney:
> I know this is an easy one, but I can't seem to find the current
> correct way to do it. I've got a TB HDD that I need to change the
> LABEL on. Currently it's 'LIVE' (it's an old production drive) and I
> really want to just remove the label altogether
On 08.08.2013 01:37, Ian Malone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Having just changed my phone I've got a lot of backed up messages in
> csv format (without the sender name, so I'm going to have to reconcile
> it with the separate contacts backup). While there are ways to get tem
> onto my new phone I'm not really
On 08.08.2013 22:16, Temlakos wrote:
> Everyone:
>
> It's taken me this long to realize what the problem is. But I cannot use
> Find-and-replace with LibreOffice anymore. It either tries to replace
> everything under the sun with my Replace text, or else it can't find the
> search key (typically a
On 09.08.2013 10:03, Georgios Petasis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl through
> apache rivet) which implements a "heavy" application, something that
> takes some minutes to start when apache starts a new process.
>
> Is there a way to "separat
Στις 9/8/2013 18:31, ο/η Reindl Harald έγραψε:
Am 09.08.2013 16:12, schrieb Zdenek Pytela:
Georgios Petasis pise:
In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl
through apache rivet) which implements a "heavy" application,
something that takes some minutes to start when apach
On 08/09/2013 11:51 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Thank.
Do not worry, I already removed the nvidia driver because it was not
working;
Concerning the F14 installation, after double checking, it had been updated
to fedora 16 and only
nvidia-xconfig-1.0-20.fc16.i686
nvidia-settings-1.0-22.fc16.i686
are
Hello Joe,
Thank.
Do not worry, I already removed the nvidia driver because it was not
working;
Concerning the F14 installation, after double checking, it had been updated
to fedora 16 and only
nvidia-xconfig-1.0-20.fc16.i686
nvidia-settings-1.0-22.fc16.i686
are installed. Thus I guess that it OK.
On 08/09/2013 01:34 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> Your way won't work because bash will expand the wildcards if you don't escape
> them.
Not necessarily, but that is good practice. Bash will pass wildcards along if
there are no matches in the string you type.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproje
On 08/09/2013 11:14 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
yum remove *-nvidia*
Correction: yum remove \*nvidia\*
Your way won't work because bash will expand the wildcards if you don't
escape them.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https:
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:22:10 +0200
"Patrick Dupre" wrote:
> yum install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia works fine and install:
> xorg-x11-drv-nvidia i686 1:319.32-7.fc19
> kmod-nvidia-3.9.9-302.fc19.i686.PAE i686 1:319.32-1.fc19
> xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs i686 1:3
Hello,
2013/8/9 Zdenek Pytela :
> Yes. You just have multiple Listen lines in your config file and
> then you have to restart the httpd.service.
I think the main goal was not just to get Apache to listen to multiple
ports, but to have two entirely separate Apache instances running, to
prev
Hello,
Try:
systemctl status ipsec.service
Rami Rosen
http://ramirose.wix.com/ramirosen
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Hi,
> I have installed libreswan 3.3-1 on fc18 from RPM.
> How do I start the libreswan service on Fedora ?
>
> I tried:
> systemctl status libreswan.ser
Hi,
I have installed libreswan 3.3-1 on fc18 from RPM.
How do I start the libreswan service on Fedora ?
I tried:
systemctl status libreswan.service
libreswan.service
Loaded: error (Reason: No such file or directory)
Active: inactive (dead)
regards,
Kevin
--
users mailing list
users@lists.f
Georgios Petasis pise:
> Hi all,
>
> In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl
> through apache rivet) which implements a "heavy" application,
> something that takes some minutes to start when apache starts a new
> process.
>
> Is there a way to "separate" these "heavy" apa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/08/2013 03:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> What's the best and most current way to do it? I was thinking
>> e2label will do it, but it's been so long since I've done it, I'm
>> playing it safe.
>>
>> Ideas?
>
> man e2label tune2fs -l /dev/what
On 08/09/13 19:11, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> My card ia an ATI Mobility, Radeon x1400 128 MB
Ahhh. A "Radeon" card is not "nVidia"
--
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription opt
> - Original Message -
> From: Marko Vojinovic
> Sent: 08/09/13 01:10 PM
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: nvidia on inspiron
>
> On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:43:05 +0200
> "Patrick Dupre" wrote:
> > Now
> > yum install kmod-nvidia
> > gives:
> > Packages skipped because of d
Thank John for the suggestion.
I am not sure to answer to your question.
My card ia an ATI Mobility, Radeon x1400 128 MB
I cannot find it in the nvidia list.
Is it too old?
By default, it installs:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia i686 1:319.32-7.fc19
kmod-nvidia-3.9.9-302.fc19.i686.PAE
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:43:05 +0200
"Patrick Dupre" wrote:
> Now
> yum install kmod-nvidia
> gives:
> Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
> 1:kmod-nvidia-319.32-2.fc19.i686 from rpmfusion-nonfree-updates
> 1:kmod-nvidia-3.10.3-300.fc19.i686-319.32-2.fc19.i686 from
> rpmfusion-n
On 09/08/13 11:22, John Pilkington wrote:
On 09/08/13 10:49, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
After:
yum install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
The display fails, here is the file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[ 161.317]
[ 161.396] (II) NVIDIA GLX Module 319.32 Wed Jun 19 14:13:45 PDT 2013
[ 161.398] Lo
On 09/08/13 10:49, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
After:
yum install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
The display fails, here is the file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[ 161.317]
[ 161.396] (II) NVIDIA GLX Module 319.32 Wed Jun 19 14:13:45 PDT 2013
[ 161.398] Loading extension GLX
[ 161.398] (II) LoadM
Hi guys,
What's the status of running apache under chroots these days? For
instance, is this guide relevant or accurate
http://www.linux-faqs.info/apache/running-apache-in-chroot-jail ?
Thanks
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
Hello,
After:
yum install xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
The display fails, here is the file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[ 161.317]
X.Org X Server 1.14.2
Release Date: 2013-06-25
[ 161.317] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[ 161.317] Build Operating System: 2.6.32-358.14.1.el6.x86_64
[ 161.318] Curren
9.8.2013 11.05 "Georgios Petasis" wrote:
>
> In general I think it can be done (i.e.:
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/RunningMultipleApacheInstances),
> but is a way to do this in fedora 19, and keep all this "systemctl *
httpd" stuff?
>
I have not attempted it, but I think it should be possible. You
On 09/08/13 09:43, Patrick Dupre wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Marko Vojinovic
Sent: 08/09/13 10:32 AM
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: nvidia on inspiron
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:20:11 +0200
"Patrick Dupre" wrote:
I reinstall a fedora 19 and I am experiencing troubl
> - Original Message -
> From: Marko Vojinovic
> Sent: 08/09/13 10:32 AM
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: nvidia on inspiron
>
> On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:20:11 +0200
> "Patrick Dupre" wrote:
> > I reinstall a fedora 19 and I am experiencing troubles with the
> > graphics
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:20:11 +0200
"Patrick Dupre" wrote:
> I reinstall a fedora 19 and I am experiencing troubles with the
> graphics apparently.
> With the previous installation fedora 14. I had to install:
> xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
> nvidia-settings
> nvidia-xconfig
> xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs
> and
Hello,
I reinstall a fedora 19 and I am experiencing troubles with the graphics
apparently.
With the previous installation fedora 14. I had to install:
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
nvidia-settings
nvidia-xconfig
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-libs
and run:
nvidia-xconfig
Should I do the same again?
Thank.
Hi all,
In my apache configuration, I am using a scripting language (tcl through
apache rivet) which implements a "heavy" application, something that
takes some minutes to start when apache starts a new process.
Is there a way to "separate" these "heavy" apache processes from the
rest of the
On 09.08.2013, David wrote:
> Joe did you not read where I said that I was asking for the 'regular
> Fedora Community users', sucjh as you, and not for myself? And that I
> was asking because so many other Linux distributions already have them.
> I already have the latest releases.
Updates usual
On 08.08.2013 17:46, Jon Cosby wrote:
> I installed a GeForce 8400 GS graphics card to replace an integrated
> chipset and can't even boot to the live CD (F18) or rescue mode now. It
> stops with the output
>
> Raw EDID
> [rows of hex digits all 0]
> Nouveau EI [ DRM] DDC responded, but no EDID fo
68 matches
Mail list logo
