Re: Can I know which fedora is stable?

On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 00:43:28 +0100, Sam Sharpe wrote: > On 1 October 2010 00:40, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 09/30/2010 08:56 AM, James Mckenzie wrote: > >> However, be aware that Fedora tries to be on a six month or shorter > >> release cycle.  Fedora is basically a 'wide beta' for RedHat

Re: Fedora user base

On 09/30/2010 11:04 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: > >> Ok. Maybe I shouldn't really ask this, but I think honesty is important >> even if it is a bit unpleasant. How big is the Fedora user base and >> how was that measured? > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Statistics >

Re: Fedora user base (was: Can I know which fedora is stable?)

Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: > Ok. Maybe I shouldn't really ask this, but I think honesty is important > even if it is a bit unpleasant. How big is the Fedora user base and > how was that measured? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Statistics -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org T

Fedora user base (was: Can I know which fedora is stable?)

Gordon Messmer writes: > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/interviews-28/interview-with-greg-dekoenigsberg-red-hat-community-architect-725426/ > > Interview with Greg Dekoenigsberg - Red Hat Community Architect > > * What do you think is the biggest misconception about Fedora? * > > That

RE: Can I know which fedora is stable?

I would like to add my vote to this discussion. I am running Fedora Core 12 and 13 x 64 under Virtualbox on Windows 7/64bit, not a problem. I had Fedora Core 9/10, the only issue was with the evolution of the video cards, windows had some of the same issues. Scott Ford Senior Systems Engineer

Re: Can I know which fedora is stable?

On 1 October 2010 00:40, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 09/30/2010 08:56 AM, James Mckenzie wrote: >> However, be aware that Fedora tries to be on a six month or shorter >> release cycle.  Fedora is basically a 'wide beta' for RedHat and that >> is also stated on the Project's web page. > > Where is t

Re: Can I know which fedora is stable?

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/interviews-28/interview-with-greg-dekoenigsberg-red-hat-community-architect-725426/ Interview with Greg Dekoenigsberg - Red Hat Community Architect * What do you think is the biggest misconception about Fedora? * That it's just a beta for Red Hat Enterpr

Re: Can I know which fedora is stable?

On 09/30/2010 08:56 AM, James Mckenzie wrote: > However, be aware that Fedora tries to be on a six month or shorter > release cycle. Fedora is basically a 'wide beta' for RedHat and that > is also stated on the Project's web page. Where is that stated? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedorapro

Re: generating PDF's via code - looking for ideas

Depends on the languages you can work with and what level of control you need Jasperreports - jasperforge.org is an appropriate solution in the Java world BIRT - http://www.eclipse.org/birt/phoenix/ - also provides reporting tools in the Java world PHP offers bindings for PDFlib (not really ch

Re: Can I know which fedora is stable?

On 09/30/2010 08:41:19 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On 30/09/10 16:33, adrian kok wrote: > > Hi > > > > Can I know which fedora is stable? > > Fedora 13 is the most recent release. The correct answer is that Fedora is _never_ stable. If you want stability, you need to go with Red Hat Enterprise Lin

Re: Plugins for Totem

2010/9/30 AnneMarie Robinson > > Movie Player using GStreamer 0.10.20 and GNOME > Totem cannot play this type of media (DVD) because it does not have the > appropriate plugins to be able to read from the disc. > I don't want to know about them, I just want to get them and play my DVD. > Thank you

Re: [Fedora] generating PDF's via code - looking for ideas

On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, list user wrote: I'm looking for a way to generate a PDF report based on a set of data in a database and a set of pre-generated graphs via some sort of procedural method based on a template. We tried to do this via open office & it's templating features but this process r

Re: [389-users] Multi-Master setup

Reinhard Nappert wrote: > Rick, > > I have seem this again: > [23/Sep/2010:11:23:00 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - > multimaster_be_state_change: replica o=umc is going offline; disabling > replication > [23/Sep/2010:11:23:00 -0300] - somehow, there are still 13 entries in the > entry cache. :/

Re: missing command

Dave Cross wrote: > $ rpm -q --whatprovides `which GET` > perl-libwww-perl-5.834-1.fc13.noarch Or, for something that works even if you don't have the proper package installed already: $ sudo repoquery --whatprovides '*/GET' perl-libwww-perl-0:5.834-1.fc13.noarch or $ yum provides '*/GET' Loade

Re: generating PDF's via code - looking for ideas

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:54 AM, list user wrote: > Hi All; > > I'm looking for a way to generate a PDF report based on a set of data in a > database and a set of pre-generated graphs via some sort of procedural > method based on a template. > > We tried to do this via open office & it's templati

Re: generating PDF's via code - looking for ideas

On 09/30/10 11:54, list user wrote: > Hi All; > > I'm looking for a way to generate a PDF report based on a set of data in > a database and a set of pre-generated graphs via some sort of procedural > method based on a template. > > We tried to do this via open office & it's templating features bu

Re: System time running fast

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:42 AM, suvayu ali wrote: > Hi Tanmoy, > > On 29 September 2010 11:35, Tanmoy Chatterjee wrote: >>> To achieve this in Fedora (and probably will work for Ubuntu too) is to >>> open up system-config-date and under the "Time" tab check the box saying >>> "System clock uses

Re: System time running fast

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Tim wrote: > Tanmoy Chatterjee: >>> I have not done this though. Is it necessary? > > suvayu ali: >> As I mentioned, its recommended but not necessary. With ntpd turned on >> your clock will be kept synchronised with other time servers on the >> internet. This is a

Re: Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's

On 09/30/2010 10:12 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:59:38 -0700 > JD wrote: > >> What I would like to know is the degree of granularity >> of the SMP implementation in Linux. > Don't know what granularity means :-), but we have run kernel.org > kernels on up to 64 core machines he

Re: generating PDF's via code - looking for ideas

On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, list user wrote: > I'm looking for a way to generate a PDF report based on a set of data in a > database and a set of pre-generated graphs via some sort of procedural > method based on a template. One can generate postscript with printf. In the pre-pdf days, that was how I ma

Re: Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's

On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:59:38 -0700 JD wrote: > What I would like to know is the degree of granularity > of the SMP implementation in Linux. Don't know what granularity means :-), but we have run kernel.org kernels on up to 64 core machines here at work. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedorapr

Re: Intel GMA 3100 Card in fedora 13

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/30/2010 10:28 AM, Manuel Escudero wrote: > The /xorg-x11-drv-psb/ package do not exist in my Fedora's repositories, > do I have to add something? > Oh! and today is the Graphics test day for F14 And someone just tested > an Intel GMA x3100 card

Fedora SMP and 12 core cpu's

I was browsing for info on 12 core cpu's and found that AMD released them or announced back in March. The price is steep of course. What I would like to know is the degree of granularity of the SMP implementation in Linux. Does anyone have an inside track on that? Or point to some internal docume

Re: generating PDF's via code - looking for ideas

On 09/30/2010 11:54 AM, list user wrote: > I'm looking for a way to generate a PDF report based on a set of data in > a database and a set of pre-generated graphs via some sort of procedural > method based on a template. ... > method. So, I'm looking for a way to generate PDF's straight away as > d

Re: generating PDF's via code - looking for ideas

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:54:17 -0600, list user wrote: > Hi All; > > I'm looking for a way to generate a PDF report based on a set of data in a > database and a set of pre-generated graphs via some sort of procedural > method based on a template. > > We tried to do this via open office & it'

Re: [389-users] Segfault

Edward Z. Yang wrote: > Excerpts from Rich Megginson's message of Mon Sep 20 11:37:32 -0400 2010: > >> What platform? What version of 389-ds-base? Can you install the >> 389-ds-base-debuginfo package? >> You will have to enable the directory server to produce a core dump. >> 1) edit /etc/sys

Re: [389-users] Segfault

Excerpts from Rich Megginson's message of Mon Sep 20 11:37:32 -0400 2010: > What platform? What version of 389-ds-base? Can you install the > 389-ds-base-debuginfo package? > You will have to enable the directory server to produce a core dump. > 1) edit /etc/sysconfig/dirsrv-instancename - add

Re: missing command

On 09/30/2010 09:02 AM, theonly.obsid...@gmail.com wrote: > If this comes across as a newbie question...I apologize. i simply > don't know the answer. I recently installed Fedora 13. I'm used to > using "wget" and "GET". When trying to run a few of my old scripts I > found that "wget" and "GET

Re: missing command

On 30 September 2010 17:02, wrote: > If this comes across as a newbie question...I apologize. i simply don't know > the answer. I recently installed Fedora 13. I'm used to using "wget" and > "GET". When trying to run a few of my old scripts I found that "wget" and > "GET" were not installed. I wa

missing command

If this comes across as a newbie question...I apologize. i simply don't know the answer. I recently installed Fedora 13. I'm used to using "wget" and "GET". When trying to run a few of my old scripts I found that "wget" and "GET" were not installed. I was able to install "wget" by using "yum

Re: Can I know which fedora is stable?

Dave Cross wrote: >Sent: Sep 30, 2010 8:44 AM >To: Community support for Fedora users >Subject: Re: Can I know which fedora is stable? > >On 30 September 2010 16:33, adrian kok wrote: >> Hi >> >> Can I know which fedora is stable? > >For future reference, the front page of http://fedoraproject.o

generating PDF's via code - looking for ideas

Hi All; I'm looking for a way to generate a PDF report based on a set of data in a database and a set of pre-generated graphs via some sort of procedural method based on a template. We tried to do this via open office & it's templating features but this process requires us to first generate an od

Re: Can I know which fedora is stable?

On 30 September 2010 16:33, adrian kok wrote: > Hi > > Can I know which fedora is stable? For future reference, the front page of http://fedoraproject.org/ is usually a good clue :-) Dave... -- Dave Cross :: d...@dave.org.uk http://dave.org.uk/ @davorg -- users mailing list users@lists.fedora

Re: Can I know which fedora is stable?

On 30/09/10 16:33, adrian kok wrote: > Hi > > Can I know which fedora is stable? > > Thank you > > Fedora 13 is the most recent release. -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded Friend of Fedora -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: ht

Can I know which fedora is stable?

Hi Can I know which fedora is stable? Thank you -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Re: FC 13 - 64bit and Ruby

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Scott Ford wrote: > All: > > I have a question concerning how to download a workable version of Ruby. > When I YUM INSTALL RUBY i get ruby 1.8.6 which is great no issue but I want > to do some Rails development work and > the Rails requirement is 1.8.7 or 1.9.2

Re: FC 13 - 64bit and Ruby

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Scott Ford wrote: > I tried: 'yum install ruby-devel' and received this: > > ruby-devel.x86-64 0:1.8.6.399-6.fc13 > > So i assume its 1.8.6 am i correct if so , 1.8.7 must be hiding out > > Scott Ford > Senior Systems Engineer > > *[mobile]* 609-346-0399 > *[dir

Re: Plugins for Totem

Hi, Don't worry - install livna repository as rpmfusion.org rpm's and install libdvd, libcss2 and other proprietary tools to decode the DVD. 2010/9/30 AnneMarie Robinson > Movie Player using GStreamer 0.10.20 and GNOME > Totem cannot play this type of media (DVD) because it does not have the >

[389-users] "Target is beyond the scope of the ACL" wasRe: shadowLast Change NOT updating

Wait...my mistake. I was looking in the wrong log. In the error log, I AM seeing errors with one or more of the ACLs (ACIs?) I reated to try to get shadowLastChange attribute to be updated by various client apps (including ldappasswd): [28/Sep/2010:11:18:16 -0400] NSACLPlugin - ACL Invalid T

SOLVED - Re: F13 <-> Samsung Galaxy S via USB

On Thursday 30 September 2010 04:23:44 Dennis Gilmore wrote: > I dont have access to windows at all so i have no idea how it works there. > but my captivate ( at&t branded galaxy s) i select storage then i have to > slide down the notification bar select the "USB connected select to copy > files

Plugins for Totem

Movie Player using GStreamer 0.10.20 and GNOME Totem cannot play this type of media (DVD) because it does not have the appropriate plugins to be able to read from the disc. I don't want to know about them, I just want to get them and play my DVD. Thank you, AnneMarie Robinson -- users

RE: FC 13 - 64bit and Ruby

I tried: 'yum install ruby-devel' and received this: ruby-devel.x86-64 0:1.8.6.399-6.fc13 So i assume its 1.8.6 am i correct if so , 1.8.7 must be hiding out Scott Ford Senior Systems Engineer [mobile] 609-346-0399 [direct] 678-266-3399 x304 identityforge.com

Re: Intel GMA 3100 Card in fedora 13

2010/9/29 suvayu ali > > On 29 September 2010 11:43, Joseph L. Casale > wrote: > >>As someone else mentioned in the thread, your chipset is not poulsbo, > >>I don't know whether this is the right solution but nonetheless the > >>non-free drivers are called xorg-x11-drv-psb. So enabling the > >>R

Re: FC 13 - 64bit and Ruby

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Scott Ford wrote: > All: > > I have a question concerning how to download a workable version of Ruby. > When I YUM INSTALL RUBY i get ruby 1.8.6 which is great no issue but I want > to do some Rails development work and > the Rails requirement is 1.8.7 or 1.9.2

FC 13 - 64bit and Ruby

All: I have a question concerning how to download a workable version of Ruby. When I YUM INSTALL RUBY i get ruby 1.8.6 which is great no issue but I want to do some Rails development work and the Rails requirement is 1.8.7 or 1.9.2 so how do i point YUM to the correct Ruby. Thanks in advance

Re: System time running fast

Tanmoy Chatterjee: >> I have not done this though. Is it necessary? suvayu ali: > As I mentioned, its recommended but not necessary. With ntpd turned on > your clock will be kept synchronised with other time servers on the > internet. This is a good way to keep your system clock synchronised > wit

GIMPBox gives enables GIMP single window mode

http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/09/gimpbox-gives-stable-versions-of-the-gimp-single-window-mode/ This works in Fedora 12 and 13 without any issues, hope you like it. Valent. -- pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt blog: http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com linux, anime, spirituality, w

proftpd

Hi everybody, i new to proftpd and linux, but i would like to setup ftp in the following way: user "jack" have access to folder /var/www/html/test1/ user "martin" has access to folders /var/www/html/martin1/ and /var/www/html/martin2/ how can i do that ? i did not find anything such like that and

Re: NFS Buffering

JB gmail.com> writes: > ... Firewall impact. See 'man 5 nfs' - Mounting through a firewall. Because you do not have access to your nfs server, the nfs client remains to be checked for any messages coming from nfs server that may be blocked or perhaps erroneously forwarded by your Fedora 13 cli

Re: NFS Buffering

On 30/09/2010 01:21, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: > > Simon Andrews writes: >> Does anyone know how to either make this buffer smaller, or get rid of >> it all together so the scp can accruately report on its progress? > > Why not cut to the chase and run scp to the remote server. TCP will do > a

Re: NFS Buffering

On 29/09/2010 20:09, JB wrote: >> Thanks. >> Could you please give us (on Fedora 13) an unedited output of: > # cat /etc/mtab > # cat /proc/mounts remote.server.name:/vol/ftp/ftp-1 /mnt/remote nfs rw,relatime,vers=3,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,namlen=255,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mou

Re: NFS Buffering

On 29/09/2010 16:27, Ian Chapman wrote: > On 29/09/10 22:51, Simon Andrews wrote: > >> That sounds like it might be an answer. It's a shame there's no way to >> specify this per-process, but this machine does have quite a bit of RAM >> in it, so having this specified as a percentage of RAM might m