Kannel queue growing though TPS not exceeded

Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.3'. Build `Mar 27 2013 08:45:56', compiler `4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-3)'. System Linux, release 2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64, version #1 SMP Tue Nov 6 23:43:09 UTC 2012, machine x86_64. Hostname mobilise.kannel01, IP 192.168.2.140. Libxml version 2.7.6. Compiled

Re: Kannel queue growing though TPS not exceeded

Please see my responses inline highlighted in yellow. Would appreciate your feedback. Thanks for your help. On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 9:33 AM, spameden wrote: > Hi > > 2013/7/30 Oladeji Oladeji > >> Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.3'. Build `Mar 27 2013 08:45:56', comp

Consistently large SMSbox queue

Hello folks, I have the following setup using kannel 1.5.0 services <--> 1 smsbox <---> bearerbox <> 2 smsc connections (mo and mt) I believe I have set throughput, max-pending submits appropriately on the two smscs given the provider allocated 60TPS for each account. throughput = 40

Re: Consistently large SMSbox queue

Following up: any insights on this is appreciated. Thanks. On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 10:09 AM, wrote: > Hello folks, > > I have the following setup using kannel 1.5.0 > > services <--> 1 smsbox <---> bearerbox <> 2 smsc connections (mo > and mt) > > I believe I have set throughput, max-

Re: Consistently large SMSbox queue

No throttling in the logs - set to debug mode already. How can I add more connections with same SMPP account? On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:40 AM, spameden wrote: > check your operator log, it might be throttling problem, try playing with > throughput and max-pending-submits parameters and adding

Re: Consistently large SMSbox queue

I asked operator and it appears they allow more than 1 connection. So below is what I came up with: I want to send messages via &smsc=msmc-mo and have bearerbox load balance between the connections. Does the config look right? Also I assume the throughput number now needs to be divided across t

Re: Consistently large SMSbox queue

I just confirmed operator allows 65 total. I will set each connection to 32. Is it worth it to also have multiple SMSboxes instead of 1. Is their any performance improvement to be gained doing that? On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Alvaro Cornejo wrote: > Hi > > - as per the load balancing, is

Re: Consistently large SMSbox queue

Hi Alvaro, appreciate your inputs.. I did turn on debug for smsbox and see the following snippet.. let know if any interesting observations from this.. 2014-02-18 21:29:02 [17275] [2] DEBUG: HTTP: Creating HTTPClient for `127.0.0.1'. 2014-02-18 21:29:02 [17275] [2] DEBUG: HTTP: Created HTTPClien

Re: Consistently large SMSbox queue

Update: I increased # of connections to 4 and it appears bearerbox is load balancing across the 4 ok, per status page below. But the SMSbox queue has grown again and persists. Please what can I look for in SMSbox.log to get indication of what is causing the queue? Thanks Box connections: sms