Am 15.12.21, 20:07, schrieb Norbert Kwizera:
Hey All,
We run a kannel instances with multiple connections and to increase the
throughput for each we found that we can set multiple instances for each
connection
We have no issue when we set the instances to 5 however
we have an issue when we set
exit 0
```
Regards,
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 11:01 AM Vangelis Typaldos
wrote:
> You need first to start bearerbox before starting smsbox.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Αποκτήστε το Outlook για Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> --
> *From:* users
You need first to start bearerbox before starting smsbox.
Best Regards,
Αποκτήστε το Outlook για Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
From: users on behalf of Norbert Kwizera
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 9:07:33 PM
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: SMSB
Hey All,
We run a kannel instances with multiple connections and to increase the
throughput for each we found that we can set multiple instances for each
connection
We have no issue when we set the instances to 5 however
we have an issue when we set that to 10, starting kannel service fails with
^C2016-04-06 11:29:46 [31378] [0] ERROR: SIGINT received, aborting program...
you turn it on themselves
From: christopher kamutumwa [mailto:chriskamutu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 2:33 PM
To: Беляев Владимир Николаевич
Cc: users
Subject: Re: SMSBox not starting
ehalf Of *christopher
> kamutumwa
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 06, 2016 2:08 PM
> *To:* users
> *Subject:* SMSBox not starting
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: *christopher kamutumwa*
> Date: Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:07 AM
> Subject
First run bearerbox
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of christopher kamutumwa
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 2:08 PM
To: users
Subject: SMSBox not starting
-- Forwarded message --
From: christopher kamutumwa mailto:chriskamutu
-- Forwarded message --
From: christopher kamutumwa
Date: Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:07 AM
Subject:
To: users
hi am failing to start smsbox error below as well as conf file;
root@ctlgate:~# smsbox -v 0 /etc/kannel/kannel.conf
2016-04-06 11:04:00 [30724] [0] INFO: Debug_lvl = 0, log
make it start smsbox, too...
>>>>
>>>> BR,
>>>> Nikos
>>>> - Original Message - From: santosh bhabal
>>>> To: users@kannel.org
>>>> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 4:43 PM
>>>> Subject: smsbox not starting automat
s already available in the /etc/init.d/kannel script.
>>
>> 2011/6/27 Nikos Balkanas
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Edit the /etc/init.d/kannel script and make it start smsbox, too...
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Nikos
>>> - Original Mess
d/kannel script.
>
> 2011/6/27 Nikos Balkanas
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Edit the /etc/init.d/kannel script and make it start smsbox, too...
>>
>> BR,
>> Nikos
>> - Original Message - From: santosh bhabal
>> To: users@kannel.org
>&
nt: Monday, June 27, 2011 4:43 PM
> Subject: smsbox not starting automatically
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
> I have installed kannel using yum.
> When i run "service kannel start", bearerbox is started properly, but
> smsbox is not starting.
> I have googled a lot
Hi,
Edit the /etc/init.d/kannel script and make it start smsbox, too...
BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: santosh bhabal
To: users@kannel.org
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 4:43 PM
Subject: smsbox not starting automatically
Hi All,
I have installed kannel using yum.
When i run
Hi All,
I have installed kannel using yum.
When i run "service kannel start", bearerbox is started properly, but smsbox
is not starting.
I have googled a lot & found that we need to start smsbox manually.
I just wanted to know how to fix this or is there any other way to start
smsbox automatically
e run having all its smpp connection in their respective conf files,
> being bind without problem. Maybe "SMSBOX not starting" topic was not
> appropriate because the reason was something else.
> But, be sure that I executed 4 instances of bearerbox having the same
> admin-port,
files,
being bind without problem. Maybe "SMSBOX not starting" topic was not
appropriate because the reason was something else.
But, be sure that I executed 4 instances of bearerbox having the same
admin-port, and each kannel and access logs were separately written, so the
traffic was spli
Subject: Re: smsbox not starting
I think there is a misunderstanding. I was refering to the port that SMS-BOX
is listening and we got confused with the admin-port. Of course all my
instances have different sms-box ports. I was just claiming that, having the
admin-port 13000 for all instances
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 02:02, Elton Hoxha wrote:
> I think there is a misunderstanding. I was refering to the port that SMS-BOX
> is listening and we got confused with the admin-port. Of course all my
> instances have different sms-box ports. I was just claiming that, having the
> admin-port 13000 f
> > college...Assuming of course that all bearerbox instances live on the
> same
> > server...
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Elton Hoxha
> > To: Nikos Balkanas
> > Cc: users@kannel.org
> > Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 1:10 AM
>
e...Assuming of course that all bearerbox instances live on the same
> server...
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Elton Hoxha
> To: Nikos Balkanas
> Cc: users@kannel.org
> Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 1:10 AM
> Subject: Re: smsbox not starting
> Its totally possib
: Re: smsbox not starting
Its totally possibleall 4 conf files used by 4 bearerboxes have the same
admin-port 13000 and the routing of SMS through different SMPP connections is
done without problems. My problem consisted only at sms-box error message that
I couldnt understand but I
ou cannot disable it.
>
> Nikos
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* Elton Hoxha
> *To:* users@kannel.org
> *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 4:51 PM
> *Subject:* Re: smsbox not starting
>
> In theory it can be right what you said Milan, but practically I have
>
users@kannel.org
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: smsbox not starting
In theory it can be right what you said Milan, but practically I have started
multiple bearerbox instances running on the admin-port 13000 without having
problems for weeks :)
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 15:51, Elton Hoxha wrote:
> In theory it can be right what you said Milan, but practically I have
> started multiple bearerbox instances running on the admin-port 13000 without
> having problems for weeks :)
Well, you can setup kannel however you want but as I wrote in previo
i understand the idea,
but in reality, all modern smsc will keep the MO traffic in the queue till your
esme bind again ...
so its safe to add new smsc and restart the bearerbox ...
and i dont think you add new smsc very often :)
Elton Hoxha wrote:
I use multiple instances because when I add ot
just add one more smsc that's it no need to add more cores and add use diff
ports
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Elton Hoxha wrote:
> In theory it can be right what you said Milan, but practically I have
> started multiple bearerbox instances running on the admin-port 13000 without
> having pr
In theory it can be right what you said Milan, but practically I have
started multiple bearerbox instances running on the admin-port 13000 without
having problems for weeks :)
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 15:00, Elton Hoxha wrote:
> > Actually I
I use multiple instances because when I add other connections I dont want to
affect the actual ones. So I dont need to stop and start all the
connections, but just one bearerbox instance that holds some specific
connections.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:12 PM, seikath wrote:
> Hi,
> whats the use
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 15:00, Elton Hoxha wrote:
> Actually I use 4 bearerbox instances separating my connections. I never had
> this type of error even using this configuration below.
Interesting idea :). But it is useless (at least) and can lead to
problems.
Actually, that can be cause of your p
Hi,
whats the use of four instances ?
use one bearerbox to handle all the smsc connections ..
Elton Hoxha wrote:
Hi,
Actually I use 4 bearerbox instances separating my connections. I never
had this type of error even using this configuration below.
group = core
admin-port = 13000
smsbox-por
Hi,
Actually I use 4 bearerbox instances separating my connections. I never had
this type of error even using this configuration below.
group = core
admin-port = 13000
smsbox-port = 13010
sendsms-port = 13015
group = core
admin-port = 13000
smsbox-port = 13020
sendsms-port = 13016
group = core
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 14:32, Elton Hoxha wrote:
> I was running kannel for 2 weeks with no problems. Today I had to change the
> conf file adding one other SMPP connection. After I started bearerbox
> binding all the clients, I started the smsbox but I noticed the failure
> hours later
>
> 2009-04
Hi guys,
I was running kannel for 2 weeks with no problems. Today I had to change the
conf file adding one other SMPP connection. After I started bearerbox
binding all the clients, I started the smsbox but I noticed the failure
hours later
2009-04-17 08:23:46 [27278] [0] INFO: Added logfile
`/tmp
e!
Thanks,
NGC
- Original Message -
From: "Alejandro Ramírez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 9:52 PM
Subject: smsbox not starting services!
Hello everyone!
I just did a fresh install from CVS, gateway&sqlbox. Im running Fedora
Core 4
One more question... could this have anything to do with the patch:
Leaks and segfaults in smsbox by Peter Christensen
published in the DEVEL list?
Cheers!
Alejandro
Alejandro Ramírez wrote:
Hello everyone!
I just did a fresh install from CVS, gateway&sqlbox. Im running Fedora
Core 4. I c
Hello everyone!
I just did a fresh install from CVS, gateway&sqlbox. Im running Fedora
Core 4. I can start bearerbox,sqlbox and smsbox just fine. For about 30
mins or so smsbox works just fine, posting http requests to my webserver
and the response is correctly sent thru my smpp connection, n
36 matches
Mail list logo
