Hi, Actually I use 4 bearerbox instances separating my connections. I never had this type of error even using this configuration below.
group = core admin-port = 13000 smsbox-port = 13010 sendsms-port = 13015 group = core admin-port = 13000 smsbox-port = 13020 sendsms-port = 13016 group = core admin-port = 13000 smsbox-port = 13030 sendsms-port = 13017 group = core admin-port = 13000 smsbox-port = 13040 sendsms-port = 13018 By the way, is logical the above? Elton On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Milan P. Stanic <m...@arvanta.net> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 14:32, Elton Hoxha wrote: > > I was running kannel for 2 weeks with no problems. Today I had to change > the > > conf file adding one other SMPP connection. After I started bearerbox > > binding all the clients, I started the smsbox but I noticed the failure > > hours later > > > > 2009-04-17 08:23:46 [27278] [0] INFO: Added logfile > > `/tmp/internal_kannel.log' with level `0'. > > 2009-04-17 08:23:46 [27278] [0] INFO: Started access logfile > > `/tmp/internal_access.log'. > > 2009-04-17 08:23:46 [27278] [0] INFO: HTTP: Opening server at port 13000. > > 2009-04-17 08:23:46 [27278] [0] ERROR: bind failed > > 2009-04-17 08:23:46 [27278] [0] ERROR: System error 98: Address already > in use > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Something already is bounded to port 13000. Probably you have bearerbox > running and you trying to start another one (or more) instance. > > > 2009-04-17 08:23:46 [27278] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 1 > > (gw/bb_http.c:httpadmin_run) > > 2009-04-17 08:23:46 [27278] [0] DEBUG: starting smsbox connection module > > 2009-04-17 08:23:46 [27278] [0] INFO: BOXC: 'smsbox-max-pending' not set, > > using default (100). > > 2009-04-17 08:23:46 [27278] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 2 > > (gw/bb_boxc.c:sms_to_smsboxes) > > 2009-04-17 08:23:46 [27278] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 3 > > (gw/bb_boxc.c:smsboxc_run) > > > > Which can be this address already in use? After starting bearerbox it was > > normal. > > -- > Kind regards, Milan > >
