Its totally possible....all 4 conf files used by 4 bearerboxes have the same admin-port 13000 and the routing of SMS through different SMPP connections is done without problems. My problem consisted only at sms-box error message that I couldnt understand but I suspect it was because one old smsbox process was still alive not killed.
2009/4/17 Nikos Balkanas <[email protected]> > Hi, > > That's not possible. It contradicts all socket theory. Besides, when you > access through HTTP tcp 13000, which one of the boxes are you administering? > Just assign different admin port to each one. You cannot disable it. > > Nikos > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Elton Hoxha <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 4:51 PM > *Subject:* Re: smsbox not starting > > In theory it can be right what you said Milan, but practically I have > started multiple bearerbox instances running on the admin-port 13000 without > having problems for weeks :) > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Milan P. Stanic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 15:00, Elton Hoxha wrote: >> > Actually I use 4 bearerbox instances separating my connections. I never >> had >> > this type of error even using this configuration below. >> >> Interesting idea :). But it is useless (at least) and can lead to >> problems. >> >> Actually, that can be cause of your problem. First instance of bearerbox >> binds to port 13000 and other instances cannot bind and "bark" to log >> files. >> >> > group = core >> > admin-port = 13000 >> > smsbox-port = 13010 >> > sendsms-port = 13015 >> > >> > group = core >> > admin-port = 13000 >> > smsbox-port = 13020 >> > sendsms-port = 13016 >> > >> > group = core >> > admin-port = 13000 >> > smsbox-port = 13030 >> > sendsms-port = 13017 >> > >> > group = core >> > admin-port = 13000 >> > smsbox-port = 13040 >> > sendsms-port = 13018 >> > >> > By the way, is logical the above? >> >> -- >> Kind regards, Milan >> >> >
