Hi, I'm hoping that you can help me with an issue we have come across regarding
some new development we're doing around the use of CGI Apache web services.
I work in the Systems department for Premier Farnell (Leeds), we had an
in-house course a while back that was presented by Paul Tuohy.. thi
> However, the problem we have stumbled onto is the maximum size of the query
> string that we can use... this is limited to 8190 bytes... I believe this is
> a "Directive" constraint in Apache called: LimitRequestLine
>
> We understand that there isn't such a limit using a "post" request but
> bef
Hi Phil
Alas that isn't possible... there is a constraint in Apache that limits this to
8190... see following help text from Apache:
Maximum request line: allows you to reduce the limit on the allowed size of a
client's HTTP request-line below the normal input buffer size compiled with the
ser
> Alas that isn't possible... there is a constraint in Apache that limits this
> to 8190... see following help text from Apache:
> Default: places 8190 in the edit field and "Bytes" in the first drop-down
> menu.
> Maximum: places 8190 in the edit field and "Bytes" in the first drop-down
> menu
Sorry, yes that snippet was taken from the Server... Directive.
OK then I can certainly look into what you have said, I had thought we were on
the latest version but maybe we aren't.
When I've spoken to our Ops team I'll get back to you.
Many thanks for taking the time to respond, very much app
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Chapman [mailto:schap...@mischko.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 12:28 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [us...@httpd] proxy 502 problem uploading a large file
>
> I have Apache 2.2.11 and a web server behind it (CherryPy).
> When I up
I've been reliably informed that 8190 bytes is the maximum size available for
the get method and anything over this should be done using the post method.
Thanks to all that took the time to look at this for me.
Regards, Andy.
-Original Message-
From: Philip Wigg [mailto:p...@philipwigg
On 25 Nov 2009, at 10:18, Martucci, Andy wrote:
> I've been reliably informed that 8190 bytes is the maximum size available for
> the get method and anything over this should be done using the post method.
IIRC the HTTP spec limits it to 2kb, so you can't rely on any agent (server,
browser
or
Hi List,
I'm new to mod_proxy and I think my problem is really a newbie problem
but I didn't find the answer in the doc or Google.
I set up a forward proxy but I can reach only web pages located on this
server (any vhost of this server), I can't reach web servers on the
local network or the
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Bastien Semene [mailto:bsem...@cyanide-studio.com]
> Envoyé : mercredi 25 novembre 2009 12:12
> À : users@httpd.apache.org
> Objet : [us...@httpd] mod_proxy configuration issue
>
> Hi List,
>
> I'm new to mod_proxy and I think my problem is really a newbie pro
Hi,
I have compiled and installed apache httpd sources on solaris 10.
My configure statement was:
I am trying to test load balancing...
./configure -prefix=/export/home0/xxx/httpserver --enable-proxy
--enable-proxy-connect --enable-proxy-http
I get this error when I start apache:
Invalid command
Hi Scott, I recently posted a message to the group about a 502 error I was
getting:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-users/200911.mbox/%3c9a7d6213f32e30428d8c94e8441c8ac85c8a8...@edxmb25.jdnet.deere.com%3e
Given the description of your environment, it's not clear if my situation
r
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Onur Ağın wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have compiled and installed apache httpd sources on solaris 10.
> My configure statement was:
>
> I am trying to test load balancing...
> ./configure -prefix=/export/home0/xxx/httpserver --enable-proxy
> --enable-proxy-connect --enable
Hi Guys
Is it possible somehow to use httpd for replicate files between servers ?
We have a use case where a user will place a file on one of the apache
servers and then it should get replicated towards the other servers..
regards Nino
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:09 PM, nino martinez wael <
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> Is it possible somehow to use httpd for replicate files between servers ?
>
> We have a use case where a user will place a file on one of the apache
> servers and then it should get replicated
hmm yeah I know, but it's on windows :/ Just wanted to know if we could stay
withing httpd for this one...
2009/11/25 Tom Evans
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:09 PM, nino martinez wael <
> nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys
>>
>> Is it possible somehow to use httpd for replicate file
nino martinez wael wrote:
hmm yeah I know, but it's on windows :/ Just wanted to know if we could
stay withing httpd for this one...
It's not apache's business. But you could add a CMS that manages
replication. Or store the data in a replicating database.
Or variants on that theme.
Or of cou
Boyle Owen wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Scott Chapman [mailto:schap...@mischko.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 12:28 AM
>> To: users@httpd.apache.org
>> Subject: [us...@httpd] proxy 502 problem uploading a large file
>>
>> I have Apache 2.2.11 and a web server behind it
The default vhost was the problem.
I renamed the vhost file so it is loaded first and it works like a charm
now.
Thanks a lot.
Emmanuel Bailleul a écrit :
-Message d'origine-
De : Bastien Semene [mailto:bsem...@cyanide-studio.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 25 novembre 2009 12:12
À : users@htt
Your post has the same stuff mine does. I'm using SiteMinder for
enterprise single sign on via Apache. I turned it off and the upload
worked.
Thanks!
Prigge Scott wrote:
> Hi Scott, I recently posted a message to the group about a 502 error I was
> getting:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/
True it's not apaches business, but would be stupid if it was possible,
hence me asking. I did a search for replication module but could'nt find
anything, so I figured that I either searched with wrong words or it was not
possible. Asking this list was then my best shot.
Forgot to say thanks to To
:D
I just saved you about a month worth of work...
Try adding this directive to your SM policy:
LegacyStreamingBehavior = YES
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Chapman [mailto:schap...@mischko.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 8:46 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re
Unless you are Amazon or Google, any reason you might find for
choosing one vs. the other will probably have little to do with
performance. Recent Tomcat versions are not notably slow at serving
static content. And remember, with HTTPD/Tomcat, every request
and response has to make an extra trip
Nick Kew schrieb:
On 25 Nov 2009, at 10:18, Martucci, Andy wrote:
I've been reliably informed that 8190 bytes is the maximum size available for
the get method and anything over this should be done using the post method.
IIRC the HTTP spec limits it to 2kb, so you can't rely on any agent (ser
Hendrik Schmieder wrote:
Do you know the rfc number for 'HTTP spec limits it to 2kb' ?.
I said IIRC, and it's a memory from a long time ago - pre-rfc2616.
It may no longer be valid, but it was standard advice in the early
days: don't make GET requests bigger than 2k.
Of course, no standard li
nino martinez wael wrote:
hmm yeah I know, but it's on windows :/ Just wanted to know if we could stay
withing httpd for this one...
Well, exactly /how/ do the users put files on this server ?
You have not even explained if they put these files there using Apache
somehow.
There is nothing tha
Hi,
Configuration below works fine in 2.2 but I have to run it on 2.0
apache 2.0 it says balancer member not found.
What is the equal configuration for 2.0
# Proxy
ProxyRequests Off
Order deny,allow
Allow from all
BalancerMember http://:7102
BalancerMember http://:7106
Proxy
In users Digest 25 Nov 2009, Issue 3715, Peter N. Lewis wrote:
> Clearly, no one has any particularly helpful suggestions on what to do
> differently.
>
> Apache, even under relatively light load, swallowed up 700+MB over two days.
>
> So the only path forward I can see is to restart apache fairly
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 17:19 +0200, Onur Ağın wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Configuration below works fine in 2.2 but I have to run it on 2.0
> apache 2.0 it says balancer member not found.
>
> What is the equal configuration for 2.0
Apache 2.0.x does not include mod_proxy_balancer.
It is a module only av
Hello,
I have changed our main reverse proxy server on our network from an old
debian woody server with apache httpd 1 to a debian lenny with apache
httpd version 2.2.9-10+lenny6.
Before, our customer had no problem with the reverse proxy, but now,
some of them can no longer use our proxied w
It's a bit complicated. So I'll try to explain it in a simple way.
The user are calling(via phone) an IVR application which in turns interprets
vxml. The vxml page then has an option to record and save the recording.
When the vxml page saves the recording it saves towards tomcat which then
places
Hello,
Hopefully someone will be able to help, as I've been working on this
problem for quite a while and have hit a wall. I'm trying to upgrade
Apache 2.0.47 to 2.2.14, and I need SSL support. Everything seems to
build and compile okay, but when I try to access my site running on
2.2.1
I compiled remoteip module and loaded it without problem.
In one of my virtualhost of Apache reverse proxy, I added and tested:
RemoteIPHeader X-Client-IP
Or
RemoteIPHeader X-Forwarded-For
Or both
I don't see the remote client IP is being forwarded to the backend server from
Apache as it suppos
client y is a http server but i dont want to expose client y to client x.
I am new to this Apache httpd server so I dont know whether it should be
configured as a forward proxy or reverse proxy. Right now i am configuring it
as reverse proxy but it doesnt work.
Please help.
Thanks & Regards,
A
"It doesn't work" is useless. If you want help, explain what you tried, what
happens when you try that, and provide your configuration and logs.
Otherwise, the only response anyone can give is "It works just fine for me".
Cheers
Tom
> On 11/24/09, Jack Bates freezone.co.uk> wrote:
> > * /foo/ to deliver /foo/index.html, or whatever it would naturally
> deliver
> > * /foo to deliver /foo.html always
>
> IIUC, your problem boils down to:
>
> /.htaccess has your desired behavior
> /foo/.htaccess has some undesired, incompat
This is what I am doing and an example of my configuration
I am trying to configure mod_proxy. I want Apache to be the proxy server.
There
is a client x which talks to Apache and Apache in turn passes on this
request to other client y. The client y responds to Apache and in turn
should send the re
This sounds like a Solaris bug.
Make sure you have a recent version of Solaris or the latest patches
installed...
What release/patch level are you using?
Danny
From: "John J. Consolati" [mailto:"John J.
Consolati" ]
Sent: 25 November 2009 17:23
To: users@h
Also what compiler are you using?
Sometimes if you use GCC on Solaris APR gets upset.
Try Sun Studio if you're not already using it.
From: "John J. Consolati" [mailto:"John J.
Consolati" ]
Sent: 25 November 2009 17:23
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [us.
On Nov 25, 2009, at 9:23 AM, John J. Consolati wrote:
> Hopefully someone will be able to help, as I've been working on this problem
> for quite a while and have hit a wall. I'm trying to upgrade Apache 2.0.47
> to 2.2.14, and I need SSL support. Everything seems to build and compile
> okay,
On 23-Nov-2009, at 18:10, LuKreme wrote:
> <
> RewriteEngine On
> RewriteBase /
> RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
> RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
> RewriteRule . /index.php [L]
> RewriteRule ^u/([0-9]+)$ wp-content/plugins/short-url-plugin/u.php?$1|$2
>
I modified the htaccess file ho
Thank you for the reply.
Unfortunately, upgrading Solaris isn't an option. Here is the version
I have to work with (quite old..):
bash-2.05# cat /etc/release
Solaris 9 4/04 s9s_u6wos_08a SPARC
Copyright 2004 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
nino martinez wael wrote:
It's a bit complicated. So I'll try to explain it in a simple way.
The user are calling(via phone) an IVR application which in turns interprets
vxml. The vxml page then has an option to record and save the recording.
When the vxml page saves the recording it saves towar
Jack Bates wrote:
...
Hi again.
I am not saying here that you are necessarily wrong, or that there is
not a good justification to what you are trying to do, or to what you
asserted at the end of the previous post.
But one thing you should be aware of, is that when you place
instructions in a .hta
On Nov 25, 2009, at 10:17 AM, John J. Consolati wrote:
> Thank you for the reply.
>
> Unfortunately, upgrading Solaris isn't an option. Here is the version I have
> to work with (quite old..):
>
> bash-2.05# cat /etc/release
>Solaris 9 4/04 s9s_u6wos_08a SPARC
>
Here is the complete command:
openssl s_server -cert /erd/www/erd/server/apache/httpd-2.2.14/
installed/conf/ssl.crt/www-erdc.crt -key /erd/www/erd/server/apache/
httpd-2.2.14/installed/conf/ssl.key/www-erdc.secureprivate.key -
CAfile /erd/www/erd/server/apache/httpd-2.2.14/installed/conf/ssl.
Just checked into it further, and the ldd might not be a problem (I
think?)
The LD_LIBRARY_PATH env variable is being set to a location where the /
wrong/path files are. Is that a good enough solution?
As far as the Apache configuration, it is correct to my knowledge...I
followed the appr
John,
You should not need to upgrade Solaris. I've got apache running on a
solaris 9 box just fine.
Your "wrong path" shouldn't be a problem either. Those are just "the last
place to look" for an .so. Solaris will use what is in the 'crle' command
and the LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variabl
John,
This is a (very) short explanation of the error code at:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/ref/ssl/sslerr.html
and this one has a possible cause:
http://serverfault.com/questions/63167/sslerrorbadmacalert-error-in-firefox
You might want to Google the message for more info.
Hi,
I have a VPS running Debian and Apache 2.2 and I'd like to setup name
based virtual hosts in Apache for several domains and I will have
several subdomains for each domain. Is this possible? For example:
www.site1.org with subdomains blog.site1.org, wiki.site1.org
www.site2.org with subdomain
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Zachary Uram wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a VPS running Debian and Apache 2.2 and I'd like to setup name
> based virtual hosts in Apache for several domains and I will have
> several subdomains for each domain. Is this possible? For example:
>
> www.site1.org with subd
Dan,
The error occurs on both Safari and Firefox on Apache 2.2.14. We
don't have IE in our environment. Both Safari and Firefox work as
they should with 2.0.47.
It looks like mod_ssl.c is compiled in -- it shows up with httpd -l.
I've checked the links you sent me. The description doesn
Hello,
Ive seen that 2.2.14 comes with a patch for the recent SSL
renegotiation vulnerability. Could anybody tell me if there is a patch
available for apache 2.2.13 .. iam not ready to update yet.
Thank you.
David
-
The officia
We are only at Apache 2.2.9, but don't have any problems. The command I
use to build apache with is:
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache-2.2.9 --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl
--with-z=/usr/local/lib --enable-ssl --enable-cache --enable-disk-cache
--enable-mem-cache --enable-autoindex --enable-mod
Here are the build commands I've tried:
./configure --prefix=/home/consolati1/apache/httpd-2.2.14/installed --
enable-static-support --enable-ssl --with-ssl=/home/consolati1/openssl/
openssl-0.9.8l/installed --with-mpm=prefork
./configure --prefix=/home/consolati1/apache/httpd-2.2.14/installe
I would stick with openssl-0.9.8l, the other have a bunch of
vulnerabilities, but that can get taken care of once this other problem is
fixed :)
When you built OpenSSL, did you build it "shared"? My command is:
./config shared zlib-dynamic --prefix=/usr/local/ssl-0.9.8l
--openssldir=/usr/loca
I have a VPS running Debian and Apache 2.2 and I'd like to setup name
based virtual hosts in Apache for several domains and I will have
several subdomains for each domain. Is this possible? For example:
Sure you can. Look at doc on apache.org and look at module vhost_alias
since it's usually
Apache 2.11:
Couple of questions:
1. Is there a way to limit Max Client Connections per virtual host?
2. When Max Connection is reached, is there a way to return custom
error message in the response? For eg: "Please try again in 15mts."
---
I wish to use Apache 2.2 to limit where users may go. I wish to avert
the so-called "fishing" where a user sees:
(note that I will be using name based virtual hosts to host multiple
domains on the same physical server/same ip)
http://www.site.org/whatever/something.html and tries to access
http:/
http://www.site.org/whatever/something.html and tries to access
http://www.site.org/whatever/
I would like it on a directory basis, a file basis may be needed later
but not for now.
Which rule would you set to disable access? Rule based on IP for instance?
If a user tries to access a forbidd
1. Is there a way to limit Max Client Connections per virtual host?
At least 2:
- mod_slotlimit: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mod-slotlimit/
- Vhost Limit Module: http://modules.apache.org/search.php?id=698
iñ
-
The offi
> -Original Message-
> From: David Taveras [mailto:d3taveras3...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 10:56 PM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [us...@httpd] apache 2.2.13 SSL renegotiation vulnerability
>
> Hello,
>
> Ive seen that 2.2.14 comes with a patch for the rec
62 matches
Mail list logo
