Re: Throughput drop with NIO transport as compared to TCP transport

2015-04-15 Thread Tim Bain
are only examples. Other contributions > will be considered as well. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Throughput-drop-with-NIO-transport-as-compared-to-TCP-transport-tp4694494p4694620.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Throughput drop with NIO transport as compared to TCP transport

2015-04-09 Thread artnaseef
Sorry - JMeter or custom Java code are only examples. Other contributions will be considered as well. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Throughput-drop-with-NIO-transport-as-compared-to-TCP-transport-tp4694494p4694620.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User

Re: Throughput drop with NIO transport as compared to TCP transport

2015-04-09 Thread artnaseef
ation details and O/S level metrics captured as well). Anyway, if you can contribute to the same, that would be awesome. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Throughput-drop-with-NIO-transport-as-compared-to-TCP-transport-tp4694494p4694618.html Sent from the Act

Re: Throughput drop with NIO transport as compared to TCP transport

2015-04-09 Thread oliverd
e) I would expect a slight overhead for NIO as the thread handling adds some overhead (but this is the price for scaling) - given that the JVM NIO throughput is comparable to blocking IO -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Throughput-drop-with-NIO-transpo

Re: Throughput drop with NIO transport as compared to TCP transport

2015-04-09 Thread Tim Bain
Kevin. > > As I already mentioned, I did those tests with 1 consumer, 1 producer and 1 > consumer, 20 producers. > > How many consumers and producers do you suggest I repeat the tests with? > > Thanks, > Sam > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://act

Re: Throughput drop with NIO transport as compared to TCP transport

2015-04-09 Thread samdowning
.nabble.com/Throughput-drop-with-NIO-transport-as-compared-to-TCP-transport-tp4694494p4694595.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Throughput drop with NIO transport as compared to TCP transport

2015-04-08 Thread Kevin Burton
; I tried the same thing 20 producers and 1 subscriber but similar results - >> throughput with NIO was much less than TCP. >> >> Is throughput expected to drop with NIO transport connector? >> >> Thanks, >> Sam >> >> >> >> >> >&g

Re: Throughput drop with NIO transport as compared to TCP transport

2015-04-08 Thread Kevin Burton
thing 20 producers and 1 subscriber but similar results >>> - >>> throughput with NIO was much less than TCP. >>> >>> Is throughput expected to drop with NIO transport connector? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sam >>&g

Re: Throughput drop with NIO transport as compared to TCP transport

2015-04-08 Thread Kevin Burton
ge in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Throughput-drop-with-NIO-transport-as-compared-to-TCP-transport-tp4694494.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com Location: *San Francisco, CA* blog: http:/

Throughput drop with NIO transport as compared to TCP transport

2015-04-08 Thread samdowning
transport connector? Thanks, Sam -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Throughput-drop-with-NIO-transport-as-compared-to-TCP-transport-tp4694494.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.