Interesting. Would be nice to see if there were any benchmarks for this. On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:16 AM, samdowning <samdowning2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi ActiveMQDevs, > > I was fiddling around with NIO transport connector in ActiveMQ v5.11.1. I > can see the expected thread count reduction when using NIO connector. I did > some quick throughput testing also and found that with NIO transport > connector the throughput drops by more than 1.5 times to what I get with > TCP > transport connector. > > I used 1 subscriber and 1 producer on queue with non-persistent messages to > measure the throughput. > I tried the same thing 20 producers and 1 subscriber but similar results - > throughput with NIO was much less than TCP. > > Is throughput expected to drop with NIO transport connector? > > Thanks, > Sam > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Throughput-drop-with-NIO-transport-as-compared-to-TCP-transport-tp4694494.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com Location: *San Francisco, CA* blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com … or check out my Google+ profile <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> <http://spinn3r.com>
