looks like others see a throughput drop: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NIO-transport-performance-for-ActiveMQ-td4670977.html
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com> wrote: > Interesting. Would be nice to see if there were any benchmarks for this. > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:16 AM, samdowning <samdowning2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi ActiveMQDevs, >> >> I was fiddling around with NIO transport connector in ActiveMQ v5.11.1. I >> can see the expected thread count reduction when using NIO connector. I >> did >> some quick throughput testing also and found that with NIO transport >> connector the throughput drops by more than 1.5 times to what I get with >> TCP >> transport connector. >> >> I used 1 subscriber and 1 producer on queue with non-persistent messages >> to >> measure the throughput. >> I tried the same thing 20 producers and 1 subscriber but similar results - >> throughput with NIO was much less than TCP. >> >> Is throughput expected to drop with NIO transport connector? >> >> Thanks, >> Sam >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Throughput-drop-with-NIO-transport-as-compared-to-TCP-transport-tp4694494.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > > -- > > Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com > Location: *San Francisco, CA* > blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com > … or check out my Google+ profile > <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> > <http://spinn3r.com> > > -- Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com Location: *San Francisco, CA* blog: http://burtonator.wordpress.com … or check out my Google+ profile <https://plus.google.com/102718274791889610666/posts> <http://spinn3r.com>
