>
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Bertram
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:55 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on
> OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
>
> Looking back through the e
5.16.5
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Bertram
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:55 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on
> OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
>
> Looking back through the
5.16.5
-Original Message-
From: Justin Bertram
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:55 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava
alternative for ActiveMQ
Looking back through the email thread I don't see a
> From: Justin Bertram
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:06 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on
> OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
>
> Are you asking about the logs themselves or the Log4j configurati
Configuration file
-Original Message-
From: Justin Bertram
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2023 8:06 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava
alternative for ActiveMQ
Are you asking about the logs themselves or the
stin Bertram
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 11:24 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on
> OracleJava alternative for ActiveMQ
>
> No. As the website [1] states:
>
> Java compatibility: 11+
>
> The latest
Do old Log4j files need to be deleted after updating to 5.16.6 or 5.17.4?
-Original Message-
From: Justin Bertram
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 11:24 AM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: [URL Verdict: Neutral][Non-DoD Source] Re: Re: Query on OracleJava
alternative for ActiveMQ
No. As the website [1] states:
Java compatibility: 11+
The latest release that is compatible with Java 8 is 5.16.6.
Justin
[1] https://activemq.apache.org/components/classic/download/
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:21 PM ABURTO, BRUNO M CTR USAF ACC 99 RS/MPC
wrote:
> Can I continue to use Jav
Can I continue to use Java 8 with version 5.17.4?
On 2023/02/22 16:08:58 Matt Pavlovich wrote:
> Hello Jana-
>
> As far as I know, there have been no reported issues specific to the recent
> generation of JDK releases by vendor. The most important thing is to use
> latest releases to incorporat
Hello Jana-
Yes, JDK’s from those vendors should work. Please refer to my previous email
for notes on JDK + ActiveMQ version alignment as well as testing.
Let us know what you end up using and how it goes!
Thanks,
-Matt
> On Feb 22, 2023, at 12:08 PM, Jana Manju wrote:
>
> Thanks for your re
Thanks for your reply Matt, I am looking for input if I can use the
following open source third party JDK as an alternative to Licensed Oracle
Java
for my activeMQ to work?
* Amazon Corretto and OpenJDK Adoptium Eclipse Temurin Azul Java*
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 03:09, Matt Pavlovich wrote:
Hello Jana-
As far as I know, there have been no reported issues specific to the recent
generation of JDK releases by vendor. The most important thing is to use latest
releases to incorporate fixes— especially security.
JDK 11 and ActiveMQ v5.17.3 (v5.17.4 should be available in a few days, as
12 matches
Mail list logo
